Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kajal KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Summary

Kajal Kumari filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. During the proceedings, she sought the court’s permission to withdraw the second anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted the request to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the bail application were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may be permitted to withdraw an anticipatory bail application before the court

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15213 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2022 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL District-
                                                         Begusarai
                  ======================================================
                  Kajal Kumari, Daughter of Ram Balak Tanti R/V-Kailashpur PS-Singhaul
                  Muffasil Dist- Begusarai

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Nakul Kumar Jamuar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Jai Narain Thakur
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    18-03-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset,

                    seeks permission to withdraw the second anticipatory bail

                    application.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.