Patna High Court
Kulanand ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The court permitted the withdrawal of the contempt petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Kulanand Chaudhari, filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a court order by the State of Bihar officials. After filing, the petitioner complied with the order that was the subject of the alleged contempt. Consequently, the petitioner moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the contempt application. The learned counsel for the State opposed the withdrawal, but the court exercised its inherent discretion to allow the petitioner's request. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the contempt petition as withdrawn, without further adjudication on the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether a contempt petition may be withdrawn when the alleged act of contempt has been complied with
Subjects
- contempt of court
- withdrawal of petition
- compliance with order
- court discretion
- civil writ jurisdiction
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2336 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1880 of 2025
======================================================
Kulanand Chaudhari S/o Mod Narayan Chaudhari, VTC Lagma Rambhadar.
P.O.and P.S.-Rambhadrapur. Sub District-Tardih. District-Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Shri. Deepak Kumar Singh. Principal Secretary.
Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar. Patna.
2. Sri Rajiv Roshan, the District Magistrate. Darbhanga.
3. Sri Niraj Kumar Das, the Additional Collector, Darbhanga.
4. Sri Prashant Kumar, the Dy. Collector, Darbhanga.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Akash Chaturvedi
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Government Advocate 11
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
3 03-04-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned AC to GA-11 for the State.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw the present contempt application, as the
order of which willful disobedience was alleged, has been
complied.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, instant contempt petition is dismissed
as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.