Patna High Court
Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
Provisional anticipatory bail is granted subject to bond, sureties, and verification of antecedent, with confirmation contingent on a clean record.
Summary
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 1,071 litres of liquor from a bush in a litchi orchard belonging to Laxman Rai. He was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his possession, and he has a clean criminal record. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the accusation was based on secret information and that the alleged recovery occurred on property not owned by him. The State opposed the bail. The High Court, after considering the clean antecedent and lack of possession, granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs. 500 with two sureties and ordered verification of his antecedent, stipulating that the bail would be confirmed only if he remains antecedent‑free.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
- Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and lack of possession justify granting bail.
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- excise law
- Section 30
- Section 482
- clean antecedent
- liquor seizure
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15949 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1165 Year-2025 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Sonu Kumar S/o Lakhindra Raut R/o Village - Raghopur, P.S - Ahiyapur,
District - Muzaffarpur At present R/o - Sonu Kumar (Aged about 22 Years,
Male) S/o Lakhindra Ray @ Lakhindra Raut, R/o Village - Ali Neura, P.S -
Minapur, District - Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 16-04-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 1071 litres of liquor from a bush concealed in a
litchi orchard of Laxman Rai.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged
recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15949 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
2/3
and he came to be implicated at the instance of local people, but
then the name of the person, who disclosed the name of the
petitioner, is not disclosed in the FIR, which casts an aspersion
on the case of the prosecution, when petitioner has not been
implicated based on secret information, when petitioner
admittedly is a person with clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks
from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in
connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 1165 of 2025 subject to
the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court
shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the
event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case
then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of
seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this
Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15949 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
3/3
confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a
person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional
anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…