Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the contempt application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Ajay Kumar and Kailash Prasad filed a writ and a contempt application against the State of Bihar and several officials, alleging non‑compliance with a prior order. The petitioners later sought the court's permission to withdraw the contempt application, stating that the writ order had been complied with. The High Court examined whether it could allow the withdrawal of a contempt proceeding. The Court held that, since the petitioners had satisfied the conditions for withdrawal and the order was complied with, it could grant permission. Accordingly, the Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the contempt application as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can permit the withdrawal of a contempt of court application after compliance with the underlying order

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • withdrawal of application
  • writ jurisdiction
  • civil procedure
  • compliance with order

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3567 of 2023
                                                     In
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11944 of 2022
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ajay Kumar S/o Late Jaiprakash Sah @ Jaiprakash Gupta @ Jay Prakash
                  Residing at Nakti Devi Road, Dighwara, Ward No. 15, P.O. and P.S.-
                  Dighwara, District-Saran.
           2.    Kailash Prasad S/o Late Nandu Sah @ Nandu Prasad Residing at Nakti Devi
                 Road, Dighwara, Ward No. 15, P.O. and P.S.-Dighwara, District-Saran.

                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through Sri Arunish Chawla, I.A.S. the Principal
                 Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    Sri Aman Samir, I.A.S., the District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.
           3.    Priyanka Rani, I.A.S. the Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief
                 Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Saran at Chapra.
           4.    Sri Amrendra Kumar , the District Engineer, Zila Parishad, Saran at Chapra.
           5.    Sri Dina Nath Dutta, the Assistant Engineer, Zila Parishad, Saran at Chapra.
           6.    Sri Shambhu Nath Singh, the Junior Engineer, Zila Parishad, Saran at
                 Chapra.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Nitesh Kumar, Advocate.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Standing Counsel -9
                 For Respondent Zila Parishad   Mr. Bajrangi Lal, Advocate.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA)

2   17-04-2026                 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned

                   AC to SC-9 and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of

                   respondent Zila Parishad.

                               2.    Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the Contempt
             Patna High Court MJC No.3567 of 2023(2) dt.17-04-2026
                                                         2/2




                       application, as the order passed in the writ application, stands

                       complied.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                    4. The Contempt application is accordingly dismissed

                       as withdrawn.



                                                 (Satyavrat Verma, J)


                                                   ( Harish Kumar, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.