Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Excise Act

2120 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

Jitesh Sahni @ Jitesh Kumar @ Jitesh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitesh Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and Mahua solution. He argued that the alleged contraband was seized from a location not belonging to him and that the complaint was …

Amin Yadav @ Amin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amin Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 235.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and a house belonging to his brother Azad Yadav. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the …

Rahul Sahni @ Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Sahni was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 144 litres of liquor from his house and 102 litres from another's house. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his conscious …

Ravindra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravindra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from a car and a scooty that were seized. He contended that he was not in possession of the vehicles at the time of seizure and that ownership alone …

Prem KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Prem Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 25.92 litres of liquor was allegedly recovered, feared arrest under Sections 30(a), 41 and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his driver misused the vehicle. …

Sultan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sultan Singh, sought anticipatory bail after a police case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleged that 135 litres of liquor were recovered from his vehicle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware that his …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the only evidence against …

Vikash Paswan @ Vikas Paswan @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Paswan was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly concealing 90 litres of liquor under husk. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and arguing that the alleged seizure occurred at a location not belonging to him and that no …

Rohit Kumar Yadav @ Rohit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and that the alleged liquor was recovered from a public area, not from his …

Amit Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 883.08 litres of liquor and seizure of two motorcycles. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and the case against him …

Congresi @ Sanjeet Sahni @ Sanjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Sahni, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 140 litres of liquor from a larger consignment of raw jawa on the banks of the Gandak River. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Vicky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vicky Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 248.10 litres of liquor from a public area near a bamboo orchard in Laxmipur, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He has four prior excise cases and has been in custody since 20‑04‑2026. The petitioner …

Pradeep Sada @ Pradeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pradeep Sada, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor from a joint family house. He argued he had a clean antecedent, that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and that the post‑2018 amendment …

Shiv KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Shiv Kumar and Suraj Rajbanshi, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 8,000 litres of fermented jawa mahua. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the spot, and the …

Manish Mahto @ Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Mahto was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 138 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He had a prior case under the same Act and had been in custody since 24‑04‑2026. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in the …

Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anil Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4,798.08 litres of liquor from four vehicles. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the liquor was not in his conscious possession; he was …

UMESH KUMAR @ NANHKIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(d) and 33 of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 1,000 litres of spirit from a pickup vehicle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the seized vehicle, …

Nandu Rai @ Nandu Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandu Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act, wherein 4,798.08 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from four vehicles. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not …

Priyanshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Priyanshu Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 43.200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and 475.200 litres from bushes, offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not apprehended at the spot, had no conscious …

Md. Khurshid @ Khurshid AalamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Khurshid Aalam, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 43.200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and 475.200 litres from bushes. He has three prior excise cases and has been in custody since 1 June 2026. The petitioner argued that he was …

Pappu Kumar @ Tena KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 110 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and 70 litres from an orchard, and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He has four prior excise cases and has been in custody since 6 June 2026. The petitioner argued …

Md. NaushadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md Naushad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 318(4), 112(2), 61(1) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, Section 11 of the Gambling Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 1.8 litres of liquor, 21 motorcycles, a …

Suresh DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Suresh Das and Rudal Rai, were charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 900 litres of liquor from the bank of Damrahi ghat and for the seizure of a motorcycle. Both have prior criminal antecedents, with Das having nine previous cases (seven under …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Sonu Kumar and Bijali Rai filed an anticipatory bail application in a case involving offences under sections 121, 132, 74, 76, 109, 352, 351(2), 61(2) of the Bihar Penal Code and section 45 of the Bihar Excise Act. During the pendency of the application, Bijali Rai was arrested, and the …

Manager RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Manager Rai, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor and Mahua Pass. He has seven prior excise cases and has been in custody since 29 May 2026. The petitioner argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor …

Sameer @ Sameer AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sameer Alam, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22.320 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was implicated solely on …

Asfak @ Md. AsfakversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Asfak, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 22.320 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of …

Uday Kumar @ Uday Shankar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Uday Kumar and Gautam Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 261 litres of liquor from an orchard belonging to Sakal Rai. They contended they had no possession, the orchard was not theirs, and they were …

Bhola KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhola Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 900 litres of liquor and a seized motorcycle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He has been in custody since 1 June 2026 and claims he was not apprehended at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …

Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Ray @ Manoj Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 816.48 litres of liquor were recovered from a pickup vehicle. The petitioner was not caught in possession, did not own the vehicle, and the case against him relied on a …

Krishna Sharma @ KrishnaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Krishna Sharma, the owner of a motorcycle from which 60 litres of liquor was seized, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his vehicle was misused by others. The State opposed his …

Idrish @ Nanka @ Md. NehalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Idrish, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 379 (theft), 461 (false evidence), 511 (attempt to insult) and Bihar Excise Act sections 37(b)(c) concerning an alleged shop‑break‑in. The FIR alleged that three accused broke the shop lock, …

Md. NurulversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Nurul, was implicated in a case under Sections 30 and 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from a pickup vehicle and a truck he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not found in his immediate …

SAROJ SAHNI @ SAROJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saroj Sahni, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 435 litres of liquor and 15,000 litres of fermented jaggery from the Gandak river. He argued that the seized material was not in his possession, the riverbank is a public …

Ajeet Kumar @ Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, four residents of Malsalami, Patna, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 144 of 2026) involving alleged possession of 154 litres of illicit liquor and 1.610 kg of ganja. They argued that the material was not recovered from their conscious possession and that the …

Vikas Chaudhary @ Vikku Chaudhary @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikas Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor and 400 litres of mahua from the bank of the Sakri river. He contended that he was not arrested at the …

Pratima SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pratima Sinha, owner of a vehicle, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act relating to the seizure of 1987.2 litres of liquor and Rs. 4,700 from an oil tanker and three vehicles. She argued that she was not present at the spot, had no conscious …

Mangni Devi @ Mangani Devi @ Premshila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Mangni Devi and Shambhu Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor. They argued that no arrest was made on the spot, the liquor was not in their conscious possession, and the recovered liquor was …

Rajo DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rajo Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 62.7 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which she owned. She was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in her immediate possession, asserting that she was unaware of any …

Dipak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dipak Kumar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from two motorcycles he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his brother's alleged misuse of the vehicles, and that …

Manish YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Yadav, the owner of a Bolero pickup, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 495 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he was not in possession at the time of …

Khusilal SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Khusilal Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 32 litres of liquor were recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was …

Roushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Roushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an excise case involving the alleged recovery of 518,400 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was …

Uday Kumar Sah @ Uday KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Uday Kumar Sah, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 1.440 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the concept …

Rajesh Kumar KamtiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Kamti, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 118.480 litres of liquor in a Scorpio vehicle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, and …

ChhotelalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhotelal, owner of a Bolero vehicle, was implicated in the recovery of 993.6 litres of liquor alleged to be in his vehicle, leading to a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he was not in possession of the liquor, was …

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 259.2 litres of liquor at his house and 345.6 litres from a corn field, along with the seizure of a motorcycle. He contended that the liquor was stored in a joint‑family …

Bikash SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bikash Sahani, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He contended that no liquor was seized from his conscious possession and that the alleged recovery site did …

Arjun BindversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arjun Bind was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 30 litres of liquor in a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not found in his possession, and he was unaware that the vehicle would be used for …

Rup Narayan Mukhiya @ Rup NarayanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, five residents of Kuwarpur village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 56 litres of liquor from a bush near petitioner No.2's house. They contended that they were not arrested on …

Saraswati Nand Thakur @ S.N. ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Saraswati Nand Thakur, the owner of a vehicle from which 149.280 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle and that the actual offender, Baiju, was apprehended at the spot. The petitioner argued that he had a clean …

Salim AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Salim Ansari, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 459.720 litres of liquor from his Scorpio vehicle, violating Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware that his driver …

Sudist JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sudist Jha, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272 and 273 and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a) and 41 for alleged recovery of liquor from his scooty and a house. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and …

PHUL KUMAR MANDALversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Phul Kumar Mandal, the owner of a Scorpio, was implicated in the seizure of 450 litres of liquor allegedly recovered from his vehicle, attracting charges under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner, claiming a clean …

Anku DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anku Devi, the owner of a Creta car, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 302,400 liters of liquor, leading to a charge under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that she …

Neel Kamal ShahiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Neel Kamal Shahi, feared arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 3,660.24 litres of liquor from a godown at Basoda and the seizure of a vehicle. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, does not own the godown, and …

Ramji MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramji Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 150 litres of liquor from the bank of the Tilawe river. The petitioner argued that he was …

Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 82.89 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no liquor in his possession, and was implicated merely because he owned …

Kamlesh Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kamlesh Kumar Mandal, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4.410 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He has four prior cases under the Excise Act and claims he was not in possession of the liquor and was unaware of his …

MehruddinversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mehruddin, the owner of a motorcycle from which 342 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that his friend, who fled the scene, misused the vehicle …

Vipul Kumar Mishra @ Bipul Kumar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vipul Kumar Mishra, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3 litres of liquor from a motorcycle registered in his mother's name. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was …

NITISH KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was implicated in a case concerning the alleged seizure of 58.12 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned, although the liquor was not found in his immediate possession. He contended that he has a clean antecedent and that the police mechanically implicated him solely …

Shubham Thakur @ Shubham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shubham Thakur, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 1,416.6 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the …

Nitish Kumar @ Nitish Yadav @ Nitesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 810 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, he is not the owner of the …

DIPAK KUMAR @ DIPAK KUMAR YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dipak Kumar Yadav, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 738.36 litres of liquor from a shop owned by Mundrika Kumari. He contended that he was not present at the shop, had no possession of the liquor, and was implicated solely …

Reyajuddin Ansari @ Riyajuddin @ Isteyak AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Reyajuddin Ansari was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 270 litres of liquor from a car, punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that his name was absent from the …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 75 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a public mango orchard. He argued he has a clean antecedent and that the alleged contraband was not found in his …

Navdeep Mandal @ Navdeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Navdeep Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 64.625 litres of liquor from an auto and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, did not own the vehicles, and the …

Tinku ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Tinku Manjhi and Raju Manjhi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 31.5 litres of liquor from Dasai Manjhi's house. They contended they had no possession, the house did not belong to them, and they were …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 6.480 litres of liquor from a public market. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged liquor was recovered from a place not belonging to …

Subodh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subodh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a police case (PS Case No. 81 of 2023) alleged that 309.60 litres of liquor were recovered from his pickup vehicle, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of …

Krishana Kumar @ Bechan @ Krishan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Krishana Kumar sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10.140 litres of liquor from his open bathan. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his immediate possession, and that the …

RAJ KUMAR RAM @ RANJAN RAMversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 31.8 litres of liquor recovered from a blue box concealed near a public hand pump. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Chandan Ray @ Chandan Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Ray, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 27 litres of liquor in his backyard. He argued that the liquor was stored in a joint family house, that he had no conscious possession, and that the …

LALU MUKHIYAversusThe state of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalu Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22 litres of liquor from his house and 23 litres from another's house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found …

Parmeshwar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Parmeshwar Mandal sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of 38.7 litres of liquor near his hotel and 44.4 litres from a roadside sack. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …

Solu Kumar @ Sonu Yadav @ Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Solu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 106.5 litres of liquor from a roadside location that does not belong to him. He was identified by a home guard, but the police did not seize any liquor from his possession at …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Golu Kumar and Putush Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 203.5 liters of liquor. The petitioners argued they had no direct possession of the liquor and were implicated solely on …

Sanjay Yadav @ Prince Prakash @ Sanjay Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 2.160 litres of liquor from a scooty. He argued that he was not the owner of the scooty, nothing was recovered from his possession, and the case was …

Sukhari SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sukhari Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 34.560 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …

Binod Kumar Ray @ Binod RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Binod Kumar Ray, owner of Hotel Surya Inn, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 6.5 litres of liquor from the sixth floor of his hotel, attracting charges under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act and Section 45 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. He applied for …

Sikandar Manjhi @ Sikandar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sikandar Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 40 litres of liquor at his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the house is a joint family …

Amjad Khan @ Ajad KhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amjad Khan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 76.92 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to him. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the recovery site …

Ramesh Ray @ Umesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Ray, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his residence, which is a joint family property. He argued he had no conscious possession of the liquor and possessed a clean antecedent. The State opposed …

Mina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mina Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 62.160 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to her house. She argued that the liquor was not in her possession, the location did not belong to her, and that a …

Rahana KhatunversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahana Khatun, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She contended that she had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that the vehicle would …

Pinki Devi @ Piku DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, six residents of Karamlichak Purbi Bagicha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 147, 149, 341, 342, 353, 504, 506 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 4,400 litres of liquor from a person named …

Ranjan Paswan @ Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ratnesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 738 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle and charged under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He has four prior excise cases and has been …

Manoj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Yadav was implicated in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 280 litres of spirit and 4.68 litres of liquor from a vacant rice‑mill godown. He was not arrested on the spot and no contraband was found in his possession. The petitioner argued that the investigation was …

Guddu Das @ Guddu Kumar @ Guddu Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Das sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 882 litres of liquor. He has five prior excise cases and claims he was not caught in possession, is not the vehicle owner, and was implicated solely on a …

Ravinder Kumar @ Ravindra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravinder Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 2,240.280 litres of liquor recovered from four vehicles, with charges under IPC sections 272, 273, 120B and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, …

Abhay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhay Yadav, owner of a truck from which 2,304 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail alleging he had no knowledge of the alleged illegal use of his vehicle and possessed a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail, contending the seizure implicated the …

Anita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anita Devi, a woman with a clean antecedent, feared arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Non‑Objectionable Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a public pond and a house not belonging to her. She argued that no liquor …

Amar Raj @ Jai Kishun @ Kishan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amar Raj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a), 32(i) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 4,406.6 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not …

Vinod Ram @ Chuha DomversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vinod Ram, was arrested in connection with an alleged recovery of 600 litres of liquor and Rs. 1,155 under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not apprehended at the scene, that the liquor was not found in his possession, and that the case against him …

Rajesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where authorities alleged recovery of liquor and Mahua Jawa solution from his kiln. He contended that …

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjit RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from an auto. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, is not the owner of the vehicle, …

Sujeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sujeet Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 38(1) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 1.5 litres of liquor from a truck. He claimed he was not apprehended on the spot and that the case was based on secret information and the complaint of a …

Kirani RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kirani Rai applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the recovery occurred on public land at the …

Subodh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subodh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 86 litres of liquor from a house not owned by him. He argued that the recovery was from Golu's house, he had no relation to Golu, and the case …

Kishan Yadav @ Kisan YadawversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kishan Yadav was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 17.640 litres of liquor from a sugarcane field adjacent to his house, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, he was not arrested on the spot, and the …

Vijay RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijay Ram was arrested on 16 May 2026 in connection with the alleged recovery of 4,960 litres of spirit from a truck, alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 34 and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, is not the owner of the …

Rocky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rocky Kumar was arrested in connection with the seizure of 275.2 litres of liquor from a Swift car and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and Sections 281 and 125(a) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. He contended that he had a clean record, was not the owner of the vehicle, and …

Indrajeet MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Indrajeet Mukhiya, applied for bail in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 288 litres of liquor from eight kilns and the destruction of 1,500 litres of Mahua Pass. He has a history of twenty prior cases, nineteen of …

Shivchandra MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shivchandra Mishra sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 318(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023 and several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 89.25 litres of liquor, raw materials and four motorcycles from a house belonging to …

Ratnesh Kumar @ Ratnesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ratnesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 738 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle, charged under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not the owner of the …

Dinesh Sahni @ Dinesh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Sahni, was charged under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 270 litres of liquor from a public place in Damovriti. He has six prior cases, four under the Excise Act, and has been in custody since …

Vikash SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Singh and Dilip Kumar Paswan were arrested in connection with the seizure of 1,799 litres of liquor and Rs. 2,200 from a truck, and charged under Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act and Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The …

Phool Babu @ Phool KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Phool Babu, who has five prior excise cases, feared arrest in a case alleging recovery of 882 litres of liquor from a truck, claiming he was not caught in possession and was implicated by an inimical watchman. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing lack of direct evidence and mechanical …

Birendra Ram @ Virendra RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Birendra Ram, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his friend misused the …

Nippu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nippu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 32.280 litres of liquor from a house owned by Vicky Kumar. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no …

Randheer Kumar @ Randhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Randheer Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act after 991.7 litres of liquor were recovered from a tractor and an Ertiga car he owned. He contended that he had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicles and that no liquor was …

Manish Yadav @ Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 882 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the truck, and the case against him relied solely on …

Upendra Kumar @ Upendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Upendra Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 400 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He was not caught in possession and was implicated solely on a confessional statement made by a co-accused in police custody, which the …

Kamru ZammaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kamru Zamma, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 142.2 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, alleged under Sections 414 and 34 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that …

Naresh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Naresh Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 317(5) read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 162 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was merely the owner of one of …

Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Aman Kumar sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from his house and from Vijay Rai's house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was located in joint family property and that he …

Jiyalal Mukhiya @ Jiyalal Kumar @ Jiyalal Kumar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jiyalal Mukhiya, was implicated in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and mahua from a public place. The petitioner argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the …

Prashuram Prasad @ Parsgram PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prashuram Prasad, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 1.440 litres of liquor from a hotel he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, …

Deepak Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the recovery of 750 ml of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 102.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was framed by a watchman with whom he had a …

Arun YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arun Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 83.10 litres of liquor and seizure of a bicycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor or bicycle, and that the …

Vijay Yadav @ Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 317(5) of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22.55 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the …

Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Surendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor and a seized motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, had no ownership of the vehicle, and was …

Kamtalal Ray @ Kamtalal Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 317(5) of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22.55 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the …

Sikandar ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sikandar Chaudhari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …

Nitesh Sahani @ Nitish SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitesh Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 70 litres of liquor were recovered from a public riverbank and not from his possession. He claimed …

Arun Singh @ Babloo Singh @ Arun Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Arun Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 111 of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act (BNSS) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of spirit and 457.92 litres of liquor from his water plant. He …

NafeesversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nafees, was implicated in an alleged seizure of 1,100.1 litres of liquor from a pickup van, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that the vehicle was misused by another …

Ammpu Kumar @ Ampu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ampu Kumar, owner of an Eco Sports car, was implicated in the recovery of 119.280 litres of liquor allegedly seized from his vehicle, leading to charges under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious …

Shankar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shankar Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 54 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not present at the seizure, had no possession of the motorcycles, and was …

Ranjeet RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Ram, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 705.9 litres of liquor from his orchard and 207 litres from a motorcycle parked at a third‑party’s premises, and is charged under Sections 112(2) and 3(5) of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He has …

Rakesh Rai @ Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rakesh Rai was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 295.560 litres of liquor from a mango orchard belonging to a third party, and charged under IPC sections 272, 273, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner, who has three prior excise cases and has been in custody …

Kanchan Kumar @ Kanchan RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kanchan Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 900 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She has a prior case under the Excise Act and has been in custody since 21-04-2026. Counsel argued that she was not …

Bhawani singhversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhawani Singh, applied for bail in a criminal case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 235.875 litres of liquor from a Tata Indica car. He has nine prior cases, seven of which are under the Excise Act, and has been in custody …

Dhananjay Kumar @ TapiyarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhananjay Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 900 litres of liquor and a seized motorcycle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He has been in custody since 21-04-2026 and contends that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was not in his …

Mohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mohit Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 900 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He has four prior cases under the Excise Act and has been in custody since 21-04-2026. The petitioner argued that he was …

Vikash Kumar @ Bhoma @ VikashversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was arrested on 23-03-2026 in connection with alleged recovery of 600 litres of liquor from a car and 15 litres from an e‑rickshaw under Sections 30(a) and 32(2) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in possession of the liquor, was not the owner …

Upendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Upendra Rai, applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 170 litres of liquor and 1000 litres of Mahua pass from a public area near the Ganga river. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged …

Binda NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Binda Nut, was arrested on 3 May 2026 in connection with alleged possession and recovery of large quantities of liquor and semi‑prepared liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not caught in the act, and that the seized …

Amit Kumar @ GoluversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Amit Kumar applied for bail in a case under the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 70,500 liters of liquor were recovered from his Tata Sumo Gold vehicle, while he claimed he was not in possession of the liquor and was unaware of its misuse by others. The petitioner had two prior excise cases and had …

Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, was arrested in connection with alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a bush behind his house and 25 litres from another location, offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He has a clean antecedent and has been in custody since 25 May …

Muntun Sahni @ Mutun SahniversusThe state of bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Muntun Sahni, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 196 litres of liquor from a public place in Bhagwatiya Chawar and charged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He has four prior cases, …

Rakhi KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rakhi Kumari sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging possession of liquor recovered from a person named Arjun and from her thatched restaurant. She contended that she was not arrested, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …

Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava @ Rakesh SrivastavaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, applied for bail in a case under the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 643.98 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle. He has two prior cases, one under the Excise Act, and has been in custody since 10 May 2026. The petitioner argued that he was not …

Binod RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Binod Rai, Manjay Rai and Akhilesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 103.68 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle. They contended they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the spot, …

Rambabu Paswan @ Rambabu PasawanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rambabu Paswan, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 326 of 2025) for alleged recovery of 123 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, under Section 317(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he was unaware that his friend misused the …

Munna SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munna Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 396 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, which he claims he did not own and was not in possession of at the time of seizure. He contended that a watchman (Chowkidar) with whom …

Kishan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kishan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 54 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his house and 14 litres from an open place. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is …

Munna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Kumar was implicated in a case (PS Case No.15 of 2025) for allegedly recovering ten litres of liquor from a motorcycle, attracting charges under Sections 281, 125(a) and 125(b) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner …

Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 43.2 litres of liquor from a public area near Gandak bridge. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the complaint …

Sobha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sobha Devi was implicated in a case under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 6.12 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, …

Anil PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Paswan, feared arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 20 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the …

Naushad AlamversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Naushad Alam, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 0.360 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that he had a clean antecedent, and that …

Shanker KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shanker Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 1.305 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware of his brother's alleged misuse of …

Narayan Manjhi @ Sri Narayan ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Narayan Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 74 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a thatched house, including six litres from his hut. He argued that the house is joint family property, no liquor was …

Badri ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Badri Chaudhary, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case alleging possession of 243 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles, charging him under IPC sections 272, 273, 414 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual …

Dilip RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilip Rai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 99 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard not belonging to him. He argued that the FIR did not name the informant, that the alleged recovery was not from his possession, and that the …

Jitendra Rai @ Jitendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from the Ganga river bank. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location was public, and the complaint …

Vishal Singh @ Vishal Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishal Singh, the owner of a motorcycle from which 15.6 litres of liquor was recovered, sought anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, claiming he had a clean antecedent and was unaware that another person, Dilshad, misused his vehicle. The petitioner argued that he was not in …

Dhharamnath Rai @ Dharmnath Rai @ Dharm Nath YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmnath Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 432 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the seizure was …

Ramkishor SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramkishor Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 17.91 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was unaware that his friend …

Shyam Sunder RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shyam Sunder Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged liquor recovery occurred on land adjacent to his house and was prompted by a hostile watchman. He argued that no liquor was found in his …

Nawal PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nawal Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of 41 litres of liquor from a roadside location and 4 litres from a house belonging to a third party, Raju. Paswan argued that he was not in …

Mahesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mahesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the …

Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mukesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, does not own the seized vehicle, and the …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Kumar, owner of a Toto vehicle, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 59.5 litres of liquor. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware that a person named Ranjan misused his vehicle. The …

Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 5,265 litres of liquor and 10,800 kg of onions from a truck. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the …

Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from his auto. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, that the driver acted independently, and that he possessed a …

Kailu SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kailu Sah, was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 26.650 liters of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, and …

Dhirendra Kumar Singh @ Dhirendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhirendra Kumar Singh, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 2,162.88 litres of liquor from a truck. He claimed he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the …

Binod Nat @ Bonod Singh @ Vinod KhalifaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Binod Nat, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, and the concept of deemed …

Umakant RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umakant Ray, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 21 litres of liquor from a husk house, asserting that no liquor was found in his possession and that the investigation was mechanically driven. He argued that the premises were not …

Raj Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Gupta, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 11.625 liters of liquor recovered from his scooty. He argued that he was not in possession at the time of seizure and that the vehicle was misused by his neighbour, Piyush, …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 2,162.88 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized liquor, was …

Yogendra ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yogendra Thakur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act involving alleged recovery of 889.2 litres of liquor from a truck and a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the seized vehicles, was not the owner, and …

Timal RavidasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Timal Ravidas and Lalit Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 328 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor and 11,000 litres of raw material from a public …

Ramjan Ali @ SahilversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ramjan Ali, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor and a pistol from a vehicle linked to another accused. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no …

Munni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munni Devi, wife of Naresh Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a public area. She argued she had no possession of the liquor, the location was not her property, and she was falsely …

Siyanandan Sharma @ Siyanandan ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Siyanandan Sharma, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 600.75 litres of liquor from three motorcycles, on the basis that he owned one of the seized vehicles. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, had no …

SATISH YADAV @ SATISH KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

Satish Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 317(4) and 111(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in the act, no liquor was recovered from his possession, and he …

Kailash RautversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kailash Raut, was implicated in a case alleging that 57 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle, violating Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the IPC read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. Raut contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …

Arun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arun Kumar, owner of a motorcycle from which 9.375 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that his brother, who was apprehended at the spot, had misused the …

Malkeet SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Malkeet Singh and Randeep Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging they were involved in the recovery of 4,412.22 litres of liquor from a truck, with charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a), 36, 41(1). They …

Anish Singh @ Anish Kumar Singh @ Rajnish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anish Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 960 litres of spirit from a force‑traveller vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the …

Rudal Nut @ Rudal NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rudal Nut, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 210 litres of liquor and destruction of 150 litres of semi‑prepared liquor near his house. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged recovery site …

Divya KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Divya Kumari, a woman with a clean criminal record, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession and …

SharikversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sharik, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 270.525 litres of liquor and two vehicles, alleged to be connected to an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor, …

Rupesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from his possession and that the case was based solely on a …

Tilak Rai @ Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Tilak Rai and Videshi Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 250 litres of liquor from four vehicles. They argued that they were not caught in possession and the case was based solely on a confessional statement made by a …

Ravindra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravindra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 85.5 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he had no direct possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and …

Ikra BegumversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ikra Begum, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the seizure of 430.5 litres of liquor from her XUV-500 vehicle under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no prior …

Nagmani KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nagmani Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a police case (PS Case No. 116 of 2021) alleged that 11.7 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

Subodh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subodh Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a garden behind a school. He claimed a clean criminal record, no arrest, and that the alleged liquor was located in a public area not under his …

Dharmendra Singh @ Dharmendra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging illegal possession of 1,954.08 liters of liquor, punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and Section 188 of the IPC. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the seized …