Patna High Court
Salim AnsariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The court held that provisional anticipatory bail may be granted, subject to verification of the petitioner’s antecedent, under Section 482(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Summary
The petitioner, Salim Ansari, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 459.720 litres of liquor from his Scorpio vehicle, violating Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware that his driver misused the vehicle. The State opposed his prayer for anticipatory bail. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs. 500 and two sureties, directing the trial court to verify the petitioner’s antecedent. The order stipulated that if any prior case is discovered, the bail would not be confirmed; otherwise, it would be confirmed forthwith under Section 482(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in view of the alleged excise offences.
- Whether ownership of the vehicle alone suffices to implicate the petitioner in the alleged contravention of the Bihar Excise Act.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Excise Act — s. 30(a), 32
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- excise offence
- vehicle ownership
- clean antecedent
- Bihar Excise Act
- Section 30(a)
- Section 32
- Section 482
- Criminal Procedure Code
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44510 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2024 Thana- AANDAR District- Siwan
======================================================
Salim Ansari S/o Altaf Alam Reident of Village - Narauli, PS - Khukhundu,
District - Deoria (U.P)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 08-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and
32 of the Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 459.720 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be
implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized
vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use
his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44510 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
2/3
create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated,
it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware
that his driver would misuse the vehicle in the manner as
alleged, who also fled from the spot.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks
from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in
connection with Andar P.S. Case No. 102 of 2024, subject to the
conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court
shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the
event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case
then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of
seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this
Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be
confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a
person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44510 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
3/3
anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.