Patna High Court
Indrajeet MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The Court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs. 5,000 and two sureties.
Summary
The petitioner, Indrajeet Mukhiya, applied for bail in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 288 litres of liquor from eight kilns and the destruction of 1,500 litres of Mahua Pass. He has a history of twenty prior cases, nineteen of which are excise matters, and has been in custody since 13‑04‑2026. Counsel argued that the petitioner was not caught in possession, is not the owner of the kilns, and was implicated merely as a chowkidar, highlighting a pattern of mechanical police investigations. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences and the petitioner’s criminal record. The Court, after considering the submissions and the period of custody, ordered the petitioner’s release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties of equal amount.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the seriousness of the excise offences and his prior criminal record
- Whether the lack of direct possession and ownership of the seized liquor/kilns justifies release on bail
Legislation cited
- Bihar Excise Act — s. 30(a), 32, 41(1)
Subjects
- bail
- excise law
- Bihar Excise Act
- criminal procedure
- prior record
- liquor seizure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43753 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2025 Thana- SANGRAMPUR District- East
Champaran
======================================================
Indrajeet Mukhiya Son of Late Lalbabu Mukhiya @ Lal Bahadur Mukhiya
Resident of village- Koirgawa Ps -Sangrampur District -East Champaran,
Motihari
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kanhiya Kishor
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 03-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the
Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has antecedent of twenty cases out of which nineteen
cases are under the Excise Act and is in custody since
13.04.2026 and allegation is of recovery of 288 liters of liquor
from eight kilns and 1500 liters of Mahua Pass was destroyed at
the spot.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing
was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the
owner of any of the kilns and he came to be implicated at the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43753 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026
2/2
instance of Chowkidar. It is also submitted that once an accused
is implicated in a case relating to excise, the police starts
implicating mechanically either at the instance of Chowkidar,
local person, confessional statement or secret information
without holding a proper investigation. It is further submitted
that petitioner in similar manner earlier also came to be
implicated in cases relating to Excise.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the bail
application of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the
period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be
released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5000/- (Rupees
Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is
pending/successor court in connection with Sangrampur P.S.
Case No. 377 of 2025.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.