Patna High Court
Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The Court granted provisional anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to bond, sureties and verification of antecedent, with confirmation contingent on a clean record.
Summary
The petitioner, Anil Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 43.2 litres of liquor from a public area near Gandak bridge. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the complaint was filed by an inimical chowkidar who had no reason to inform police earlier. The State opposed his request for anticipatory bail. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail on the condition that the petitioner furnish a bail bond of Rs. 500 with two sureties and that the trial court verify his antecedent. If any prior case is found, the bail will not be confirmed; otherwise, it will be confirmed immediately. The order was made under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, emphasizing the court's inherent powers to prevent abuse of process.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act?
- Whether the petitioner’s alleged lack of possession and clean antecedent justify provisional anticipatory bail?
- Whether the conditions imposed under Section 482(2) of the BNSS are proper for confirming or cancelling the bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Criminal Procedure Code — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Excise Act — s. 30(a)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Bihar Excise Act
- Section 30(a)
- public place
- clean antecedent
- Section 482(2)
- bail bond
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41698 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2026 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran
======================================================
Anil Kumar Son of Hiralal Sah R/o Village- Maiki, P.S.- Garkha, District-
Saran at Chapra
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Hemant Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Braj Kishore Pd.(App)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 30-06-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 43.2 litres of liquor from a place near Gandak
bridge.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged
recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner
and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41698 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
2/3
at the instance of Chowkidar with whom he is on an inimical
term. It is next submitted that if Chowkidar was aware about
the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence, then why he
did not inform the police prior to institution of the instant FIR,
which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks
from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in
connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 336 of 2026, subject to
the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court
shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the
event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case
then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of
seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this
Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be
confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41698 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
3/3
person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional
anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.