Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Criminal Procedure Code

130 judgments · newest first · showing 1–130

Sultan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sultan Singh, sought anticipatory bail after a police case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleged that 135 litres of liquor were recovered from his vehicle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware that his …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Sonu Kumar and Bijali Rai filed an anticipatory bail application in a case involving offences under sections 121, 132, 74, 76, 109, 352, 351(2), 61(2) of the Bihar Penal Code and section 45 of the Bihar Excise Act. During the pendency of the application, Bijali Rai was arrested, and the …

Akshay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Akshay Kumar applied for pre‑arrest bail in a robbery case (Section 309(6) BNS) where the FIR named unknown miscreants. His name was implicated solely through a confessional statement of co‑accused Ashif Ali made in police custody, which the petitioner argued lacks evidentiary value. He asserted his …

Vijo YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Vijo Yadav and his son Chandan Yadav, were named in an FIR for allegedly demanding Rs.5 lakh as extortion from a contractor involved in a community hall project and, upon non‑payment, allegedly firing 30‑40 rounds in the air. The FIR charges them under multiple sections of the Bihar …

Saroj Kumar @ Saroj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saroj Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bihar Penal Code, alleging that he possessed a forged arms licence for personal gain. The petitioner argued that no fake licence was recovered and that the allegation …

Jamil AkhtarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners Jamil Akhtar, Samil Akhtar and Issrafil Gaddi were charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family. The petitioners claimed they were falsely implicated and that any injuries caused were incidental and in self‑defence. The …

Rakhi KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rakhi Kumari sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging possession of liquor recovered from a person named Arjun and from her thatched restaurant. She contended that she was not arrested, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar Sinha, was named in an FIR for alleged assault under Section 326(g) of the Bihar Penal Code, stemming from a domestic dispute in which his wife, the informant, claimed he assaulted her, set their house on fire, and attempted to kill her and their children. The petitioner …

Subodh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Subodh Kumar, Raja Kumar and Dukhit Sahni applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Non‑Specific Act (BNS) 2023. They contend that the FIR contains specific allegations against other accused but only vague, omnibus …

Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 43.2 litres of liquor from a public area near Gandak bridge. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the complaint …

Tilak Rai @ Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Tilak Rai and Videshi Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 250 litres of liquor from four vehicles. They argued that they were not caught in possession and the case was based solely on a confessional statement made by a …

Ashutosh Kumar @ GoldiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashutosh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 338, 336(3), 318(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the recovery of liquor from a vehicle did not involve his possession or …

Pramod Das @ LadduversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pramod Das @ Laddu was implicated in a case under Sections 274, 275, 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 111 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50.31 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He was not arrested at the scene …

Sanoj Kumar @ Nirmal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sanoj Kumar and Om Kumar, were named in an FIR for offences under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have participated in a firing incident during a cultural programme. They contended that the allegations against them were general and …

Kishan ram @ Kishan kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Kishan Ram and Ashish Kumar were named in an FIR for assaulting an informant and her son, allegedly using an iron rod with intent to cause death, under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. The petitioners contended that the incident was a mutual free fight, that injuries were …

Paras SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Paras Sahani was named in an FIR for allegedly firing at and assaulting the husband of an informant with the butt of a pistol, causing dislocated teeth. The petitioner claimed the incident stemmed from a property dispute and that the informant was hostile, arguing the alleged assault was a result of …

Manish Kumar @ Manish SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar (alias Manish Singh) was implicated in a robbery of Rs.2 lakh, alleged under Sections 304(2) and 303(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record, that the informant who lodged the FIR had a personal dispute with …

Digamber Nat @ Guddu NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Digamber Nat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, and the 2018 amendment …

Makhan @ Abhay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Makhan @ Abhay Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged assault on an informant using the butt of a pistol and indiscriminate firing, invoking sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that …

Ehsan AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ehsan Alam and Shamser Sah, were named in an FIR (Pipra PS Case No. 331/2025) for offences under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code, including assault and alleged outrage of modesty. They contended that the FIR's allegations of physical assault were vague, that the incident …

Guddu Ram @ Suddu RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Ram, a resident of Patna district, was implicated in an alleged excise offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He was not caught in possession of the liquor and claims he was unaware that another individual, …

Pawan Pandey @ Bhaskar PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Pandey, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60.375 litres of liquor from a pit not belonging to him. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the …

Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He asserted that he has a clean record, is a first‑time offender, and was falsely implicated along with his family members. The State …

Nitish Kumar Singh @ Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar Singh, was named in an FIR for assault allegedly committed with the intention to cause death during a dispute over temple construction, and was charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code. He applied for anticipatory bail, which the trial court denied on the …

Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from a sack near Itawan crossing. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the alleged location did not belong …

Santosh Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Kumar Sharma was named in an FIR for multiple offences under the Bihar Penal Code, alleged to have assaulted an informant with intent to cause death over a parking dispute. The petitioner argued that the injury was simple, there was no intention to cause death, and he had a clean antecedent, …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle involved, and was implicated by a hostile watchman, …

Abhimanyu Paswan @ Manu Paswan @ Abhimanyu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Abhimanyu Paswan and Hiraman Paswan, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, together with Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 105 litres of liquor were recovered from a river bank and …

Sudhir Sah @ Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 97.275 litres of liquor from a cattle shed adjacent to his house. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession, the informant’s name was omitted …

Sanoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanoj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a vehicle, alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and that the …

Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 308(2) of the Bihar Penal Code for allegedly kidnapping a staff member of an informant. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner abducted the victim, Md. Sultan, for monetary gain. The petitioner argued that the …

Sandeep Tiwari @ Sanju Tiwari @ Sandeep Kumar TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Sandeep Tiwari, was charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and robbing Vishwanath Manjhi, during which caste slurs were allegedly used. The Special Judge had refused …

Himashu Yadav @ Himanshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Himashu Yadav, sought bail fearing arrest in connection with Sadar Police Station Case No. 356 of 2025, which alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, assaulted an informant and his family …

Sheshnath MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sheshnath Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 84 litres of liquor and 9,000 litres of …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the Bihar Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of liquor. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the allegations were vague and that the …

Ranjeet SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic (BNS) Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 931.2 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a Xylo car. He contended that he was not caught in …

Rupesh Kumar @ TeniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 126 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the investigation …

Santlal MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santlal Mahto (73) and Munna Mahto (30) were implicated in a FIR alleging assault with intent to kill and related offences under Sections 126(3), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Penal Code. The petitioners claimed they were falsely implicated, stating a case‑and‑counter‑case arose …

Pappu SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Sahani, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 91.25 litres of liquor from a rented house. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, …

Mithlesh Giri @ Mithilesh Kumar Giri @ Mithlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mithlesh Giri and Jogendra Giri, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023 read with Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging kidnapping for marriage. The FIR was lodged on 3 August 2025, more …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, four brothers, applied for pre‑arrest bail in connection with a case alleging assault and attempted murder. Petitioner's No.2 was arrested during the pendency of an anticipatory bail application, leading to the withdrawal of his bail request. The court found that petitioners No.1 …

Raghav RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raghav Rai, owner of Janki Dhaba, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly concealing 4.125 litres of liquor under husk at his premises. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession. He applied for anticipatory …

Guddu Yadav @ Guddu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 112(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that the alleged seizure of 705.9 litres of liquor and two …

Hasan Nadaf @ Md. Hasan NawazversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hasan Nadaf, was implicated in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 99 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was …

Jitendra SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Jitendra Sahani and Sukai Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from the bank of the Tilave river. …

Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a bag and from a person named Ranjan. He argued that he had no clean possession, the alleged recovery occurred at a location not …

Umesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umesh Paswan, was implicated in a case under Sections 47(A) and 47(F) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor and 570 kg of Jawa Mahua from a public place. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no contraband was found in his possession, and …

Sushil SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sushil Sahani and his wife Sarita Devi, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and S... Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from their joint family house. They argued they had no …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 336(3), 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, read with Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act, for the alleged recovery of 1,330.20 litres of liquor from a …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Nitish Kumar and Anil Kumar Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. They argued they had clean antecedents, were not in actual possession, and were not owners of the …

Ram YadavversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Ram Yadav and Gumani Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Sheikhpura P.S. Case No.12 of 2026) alleging kidnapping and assault of the informant's minor son under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. The petitioners claimed innocence, arguing the incident was a "free …

Bunilal Kumar Ram @ Buni Lal Ram @ Chuni Lal RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Bunilal Kumar Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a rape case (sections 115 and 65 of the Bihar Penal Code) arising from a complaint filed seven months after the alleged incident. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner forcibly raped the complainant, who later made a …

Janjali Rai @ Janakdhari KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Janjali Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a pickup vehicle not owned by him and that he was implicated solely on secret …

Manish Patel @ Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Patel sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 129.24 litres of liquor from an auto and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the …

Sampat Sahni @ Sampati SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sampat Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from his conscious possession and that the house involved …

Sandeep Yadav @ Sandeep Kumar @ Sandeep Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sandeep Yadav, was implicated in an FIR alleging assault with intent to kill on an informant and his brother, involving multiple offences under the Bihar Penal Code. The FIR specifically names co‑accused Lal Bihari Yadav and Pradeep Yadav as the principal assailants, while the …

Nawal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Nawal Yadav and Dilkhush Yadav, sought bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Muffasil P.S. Case No.12 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the BNS, including assault and theft. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, on orders of petitioner No.1, assaulted an …

Chalitra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, including Chalitra Yadav and five others, were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code for allegedly assaulting the informant's family with intent to kill, resulting in injuries and the later death of a petitioner's brother. They claimed the incident stemmed from an …

Umesh Kumar @Umesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, including Chalitra Yadav and five others, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 118(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Penal Code, alleging they were falsely implicated in a land‑dispute‑related altercation that …

Pappu Sah @ Pappu Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Sah, was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 40.86 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He contended that he had no conscious possession, possessed a clean antecedent, and that the 2018 amendment to the Excise Act …

Ravikant Kumar @ Mantu Kumar @ MantuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravikant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 220 litres of liquor from a sack thrown from a scooty. He asserted a clean criminal record, lack of possession of the liquor, and that the …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 61(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023, based on allegations by an informant that a relative, Indu Bhushan, misappropriated funds and credited part …

Narendra MandalversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Narendra Mandal, was arrested on 1 July 2025 in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 38 of 2025, based on an FIR dated 30 June 2025 alleging offences under Sections 65(1), 351(2) and 351(3) of the Bihar Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The allegations state that he, …

Shiv Kumar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Kumar Sahni sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that the alleged liquor seizure occurred at a public place, no liquor was found in his possession, and the …

Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 51.84 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was …

Md. Faij Khan @ Faij KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Faij Khan, a 19‑year‑old, was implicated in a FIR alleging that he established a physical relationship with the informant under the pretext of marriage, leading to charges under Sections 69, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bihar Penal Code. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, asserting …

Lalita Karn @ Lalita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered the petition of Lalita Karn, who sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged against her under Sections 448, 341, 323, 354, 379, 427, 504, 506 and 34 of the Bihar Penal Code alleging robbery, assault and related offences. She argued that she has a clean record, …

Rajdev SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rajdev Sharma, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a murder case (Jalalpur P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR named unknown miscreants, but a co‑accused, Pankaj, gave a …

Manju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manju Devi, the wife of Ashish Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. She contended that the alleged liquor and fermented mahua were recovered from a …

Subhash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 69.120 litres of liquor. He contended that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery occurred on public land, and the case against him relied on …

Tapeshwar Chaudhary @ Pateshwar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tapeshwar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10 litres of liquor, which was actually recovered from a bag carried by another individual, Sarju. The petitioner argued that he had no …

Rajeev Kumar @ Raju YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rajeev Kumar (Raju Yadav) and Dharmendra Kumar, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 35 litres of liquor from the river Punpun. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession and the allegation rested solely on a …

Pankaj Kumar @ Panka KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 319.875 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which he claims is joint family property and that he had no conscious possession. He argued that the 2018 amendment to the Excise Act …

Naresh Kumar Sardar @ Naresh SardarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Naresh Kumar Sardar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 318(4) and 303(2) of the Bihar Non‑Excise Statutes (BNS) read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 63 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not …

Sumit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(iii) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from another accused and a motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle owner, …

Shiv Kumar Paswan @ Shiv KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Kumar Paswan and Raja Paswan were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor in their joint family house. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, the house is joint family property, …

Jitan Sah @ Jitan Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, seven residents of Phulwariya village, sought relief from imminent arrest in connection with Chakia Police Station Case No. 239 of 2025, which alleged their involvement in an assault on an informant's family and the theft of a briefcase containing valuables. The prosecution alleged …

Ramnath RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramnath Ram was arrested in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 55 litres of liquor recovered from a public sack. The petitioner pleaded that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in …

Amit Paswan @ Amit Kumar Paswan @ Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 810 litres of liquor from a boat on the Koshi river. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession. The petitioner, who has three prior criminal …

Chandan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Chandan Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from three vehicles. The petitioner argued that he had no clean possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and was linked to …

Amul Miya @ Anul MiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Amul Miya, Md. Zahid Miya and Md. Shane Ali, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 205 of 2025) that alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code, including hurt and assault. They contended that the incident …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a seizure of 34.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned, alleging he had no knowledge of the contravention and a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seizure implicated him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar …

RAJESH PRASADversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Prasad, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 76.075 litres of liquor recovered from his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was located in a joint‑family property and that he had no conscious …

Mahendra Yadav @ Mahendra PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Mahendra Yadav, Rajkumar Yadav, Ramsurup Yadav and Bachu Yadav were named in FIR No. 424 of 2025 for alleged assault under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Penal Code. They sought bail, arguing that the alleged assault was vague, the injury to the …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 33.125 litres of liquor from his house, charging him under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was stored in a joint‑family property and not in his personal possession, …

VIJAY MAHTOversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Mahto sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 122 litres of liquor and 252 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua solution from a brewery. He contended that he was not in possession of …

Vijay PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Paswan, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act relating to the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor and 1,200 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua from a public canal area. He argued that nothing was seized from his conscious possession, the …

Shyamdeo Yadav @ Shyamdev YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Shyamdeo Yadav and his son Pintu Yadav, were named in an FIR for multiple offences arising from an alleged assault during a land dispute in Gaya district. They argued that the incident was a free fight, with injuries being simple or on non‑vital parts, and thus lacked the intention …

Golu Mistry @ Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Golu Mistry, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod. The appellant contended that the allegations were false, arising from a land …

Mithilesh Kumar @ Mithilesh Kumar Ray @ LangariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 42.720 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a bamboo orchard adjacent to his house. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession and that the …

Bholadani Singh @ Bholadani Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bholadani Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 58.3 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that the charge sheet …

Chitranjan Kumar @ Chitranjan Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chitranjan Kumar, was named in an FIR for allegedly cheating Rs. 52 lakhs from an informant, with charges under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. He contended that the dispute stemmed from a partnership disagreement over profit sharing in the …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, five members of the Yadav family, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code for allegedly obstructing the execution of a court decree, during which police officers were injured. They applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence and asserting that the only …

Md. ArmanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 285, 293, 132 and 352 of the Bihar Penal Code for allegedly obstructing a state highway during a bandh. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with a large group of villagers, blocked the …

Bhagwat ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhagwat Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (PS No. 68 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bihar Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted a victim, causing simple injury to the leg. The petitioner …

Balram PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, four members of the Paswan family, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that they, while intoxicated, entered an informant's house, attempted to outrage her modesty and assaulted family …

Raj Kishor Kumar @ Raj Kishor MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of agnate relatives involved in a land dispute, were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code for assaulting an informant and attempting to outrage the modesty of his daughter‑in‑law. Petitioners 1‑4, 6 and 7 applied for pre‑arrest bail, while petitioner 5 …

Laxman Mallik @ Laxman Kumar @ Laxmana kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Laxman Mallik, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 117 litres of liquor from a public bush and a motorcycle not owned by him. He …

Rameshwar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rameshwar Sah, owner of a truck, was implicated in the seizure of 2,356.720 liters of liquor from his vehicle in a case under the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not caught with the liquor, and that the driver acted without his knowledge. The State …

Balram MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Balram Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 2 litres of liquor and 20 litres of jawa mahua from his under‑construction house. The petitioner claimed he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was planted by …

SIKENDAR KUMAR @ GOLU KUMAR @ SIKENDAR @ GOLUversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sikendar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 70 litres of liquor were recovered from a public place and not from his …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from premises adjacent to his house. He argued he had no possession of the liquor and possessed a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail. The …

Rabesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petition filed by Krishnawati Devi, mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic/Criminal Statutes, 2023, alleging dowry‑related torture and death. The informant alleged that the victim was married on 7 …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar through Inspector of Excise Begusarai

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was implicated in an excise case for alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor and 300 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua from a motorcycle he owned, though nothing was found in his conscious possession. He claimed a clean antecedent and asserted that he was unaware of any …

Maheshwar Paswan @ Mahesar Paswan @ Mahesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Maheshwar Paswan, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant and her family. The petitioner claimed innocence, a clean antecedent, and that the allegations were vague and omnibus. The State …

Shanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Shanti Devi and Rajmatiya Devi, were implicated in FIR No.149 of 2025 for alleged assault on an informant and her family over a tree‑cutting dispute. They claimed innocence, asserting that any injury caused was in self‑defence and that they have clean antecedents. The informant’s …

Soman Mukhiya @ Suman MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers, were accused of plucking mangoes from an informant's orchard and assaulting the informant and his brother during a land‑dispute‑related altercation. They claimed the incident was a spontaneous fight in self‑defence and that the injuries inflicted were simple. The …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar Yadav @ Ashish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 78 litres of liquor from a Maruti car. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's …

Bharti Gerai @ Bharati Gorai @ Bharti GorainversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bharti Gerai, a woman with a clean antecedent, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 360 ml of liquor from a car she owned. She argued that the liquor was not found in her conscious possession, she was not arrested at …

Santosh Tiwari @ Santosh Kumar TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Tiwari sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 3324.945 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from two vehicles. He argued that he had no direct possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and was implicated solely on secret …

Vijay Chaudhary @ Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor and 2000 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua, which were destroyed. He argued that he had no prior criminal …

Md. Saddam @ ImamuddinversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Saddam @ Imamuddin, was charged with abduction and attempted rape under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that he, along with others, tried to abduct a 20‑year‑old woman for marriage and attempted to rape her, but the villagers intervened and the …

Ravindra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravindra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 2,880 litres of liquor from his Mahindra Bolero vehicle under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he …

Prince kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Prince Kumar Rai, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 51.84 litres of liquor from a sack. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery occurred at a location not …

Gayatri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Gayatri Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which she owned. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was unaware of any …

Anjali DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anjali Devi, the petitioner, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 21 litres of liquor from a public area adjacent to a railway track and 15 litres from an open field. She contended that she had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was …

Shakti Kushwaha @ Shakti Kumar KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four members of the Kushwaha family, were implicated in a FIR alleging assault on an informant and his brother and the theft of a golden chain worth Rs.70,000, under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. They claimed innocence, asserting a case‑and‑counter‑case scenario and …

Bikki Manjhi @ Bikki KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bikki Manjhi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 14 litres of liquor recovered from a joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the liquor was part of joint family property, and the only evidence was …

Ajeet Kumar @ Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar, sought relief fearing arrest in connection with PS Mirganj Case No.83 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code for assaulting an informant over a straw‑related land dispute and allegedly snatching a gold Hanuman idol. The petitioner …

Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ AkhileshversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the Bihar Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act, including alleged recovery of 652.875 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession, did not own the seized …

Yashodhar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yashodhar Yadav, owner of a Scorpio vehicle, was implicated in a case where 450 litres of liquor were recovered from his vehicle, alleged to violate Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He applied for …

Guddu RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Ram, a resident of Saran district, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 85 litres of liquor and destruction of 400 litres of mahua from a public riverbank. He argued that he had no possession of the contraband, the site was …

Dipak Sahani @ Dipak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dipak Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act (BNS) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He argued that the alleged liquor and Mahua flower were recovered from a location …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pankaj Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 459.5 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued he had no possession, was not the owner, and the case relied on a confessional statement made in police custody, which he …

Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pintu Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 175 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his friend's …

Amarnath PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amarnath Pandey sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 84.48 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not present at the seizure, had no liquor in his possession, and was only the owner of …

Gulzar Ansari @ GulzanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gulzar Ansari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 288 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a vehicle not owned by him. He argued that the police had no …

Daroga RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Daroga Rai and Moti Rai, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor and 5,000 litres of semi‑prepared liquor from a bamboo orchard. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was not in their …