Patna High Court
Manish Kumar @ Manish SinghversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to specified bond and surety conditions.
Summary
Manish Kumar (alias Manish Singh) was implicated in a robbery of Rs.2 lakh, alleged under Sections 304(2) and 303(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record, that the informant who lodged the FIR had a personal dispute with his family, and that he was falsely implicated. The petitioner’s counsel highlighted that the informant knew the accused’s family but omitted the name of the actual perpetrator, and argued that the petitioner would cooperate with the investigation. The State opposed the bail, contending a risk of non‑cooperation. The court, after considering the clean antecedent and the possibility of a land‑dispute motive, granted anticipatory bail on the condition of furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, and stipulated that the bail could be cancelled if the petitioner failed to cooperate. One of the sureties was ordered to be the petitioner’s father.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Sections 304(2) and 303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
- Whether the petitioner is likely to abscond or tamper with evidence.
- Whether the conditions imposed under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. are appropriate.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Criminal Procedure Code — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act — s. 303(2), 304(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- robbery
- false implication
- land dispute
- clean antecedent
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38414 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-426 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran
======================================================
Manish Kumar @ Manish Singh S/o- Nand Kishor Singh @ Kishori Singh
R/v- Loikai Belwa Ward No- 12 Damodarpur Ps- Pipra District- East
Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 24-06-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(2),
303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant
alleges that on 25.09.2025, he along with his mother after
withdrawing amount of Rs.2 lacs from State Bank of India bank
were coming back home, further at Sirisiya crossing two
accused came on a Honda motorcycle and snatched a bag
containing Rs.2 lacs which was kept on the handle of the bike,
further he recognized one accused as son of Kishori Singh and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38414 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026
2/3
the accused who had accompanied him was seen near the bank
who snatched the bag.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the
informant. It is next submitted that Kishori Singh had two sons
and from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would
manifest that informant is knowing Kishori Singh but then for
reasons best known he did not disclose the name of his son. It is
further submitted that a specific pleading has been made in the
anticipatory bail application that a land dispute in between the
parties is brewing. It is also submitted that petitioner is not
alleged to have snatched the bag containing money of the
informant. It is also submitted that informant and petitioner
were known to each other, as such it does not appear probable
that petitioner could have indulged in the occurrence. It is
further submitted that if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted,
the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the
investigation to prove his innocence.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the fact
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38414 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026
3/3
that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, the petitioner
above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a
period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail
on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court
in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No.426 of 2025, subject to
the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S.
7. Further, one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be
his father, namely, Nand Kishor Singh @ Kishori Singh.
8. However, it is made clear that in the event if the
Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the
learned trial court bringing to its notice that the petitioner
despite giving assurance to this court is not co-operating in the
investigation in that event the learned trial court shall be at
liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.