Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Amit Kumar @ GoluversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, directing release upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties.

Summary

Amit Kumar applied for bail in a case under the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 70,500 liters of liquor were recovered from his Tata Sumo Gold vehicle, while he claimed he was not in possession of the liquor and was unaware of its misuse by others. The petitioner had two prior excise cases and had been in custody since 10 April 2026. Counsel argued that ownership of the vehicle alone should not implicate him and that a prudent person would not use his own vehicle to create evidence against himself. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences under Sections 30(a), 41 and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act. The court, after considering the submissions and the period of custody, ordered the petitioner’s release on bail with a bond of Rs. 5,000 and two sureties of the same amount, pending trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite alleged involvement in offences under the Bihar Excise Act
  • Whether ownership of the vehicle used in the alleged liquor seizure is sufficient grounds for continued detention

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise law
  • liquor seizure
  • vehicle ownership
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38116 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-649 Year-2023 Thana- SHEKHPURA District- Sheikhpura
                 ======================================================
                 Amit Kumar @ Golu S/o Bhagwati Choudhary Resident of Village/Mohalla-
                 Kashmir Colony, Near Masjid, Street IX, Bausa Sector, Bokaro, PS- Harla,
                 District- Bokaro, Jharkhand

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Man Mohan Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Pronoti Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 41 and 32 of the

                   Bihar Excise Act.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has antecedent of two cases under the Excise Act and

                   is in custody since 10.04.2026 and allegation is of recovery of

                   70.500 liters of liquor from a Tata Sumo Gold vehicle and a Tata

                   Punch was also seized.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing

                   was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38116 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                        2/2




                      implicated based on the fact that he is owner of Tata Sumo Gold

                      vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use

                      his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would

                      create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated,

                      it is also submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that

                      Raushan would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged who

                      was also apprehended from the spot along with Jitendra and

                      Manjeet.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the bail

                      application of the petitioner.

                                   6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

                      counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the

                      period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be

                      released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5000/- (Rupees

                      Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is

                      pending/successor court in connection with Sheikhpura P.S.

                      Case No. 649 of 2023.



                                                        (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.