Patna High Court
Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The court granted provisional anticipatory bail with conditions, pending verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedent.
Summary
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 102.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was framed by a watchman with whom he had a personal dispute. The petitioner has five prior criminal cases, four of which relate to the Excise Act. The State opposed his prayer for anticipatory bail. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties and directed the trial court to verify his criminal antecedent; if more than five prior cases are found, the bail would not be confirmed.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances of the excise case and his prior criminal antecedent.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Excise Act — s. 30(a)
- Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (BNSS) — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- excise law
- Section 30
- criminal antecedent
- Bihar Excise Act
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42725 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2026 Thana- Bhararhi District- Madhepura
======================================================
Deepak Kumar Son of Lakhi Chandra Sah Resident of Village- Jiwachhpur,
ward no. 06, P.S.- Bharrahi, District- Madhepura
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Dr Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 02-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State, Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has antecedent of five cases out of which four cases
are under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 102.4
liters of liquor from a motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing
was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the
owner of the seized vehicle and he came to be implicated at the
instance of Chowkidar with whom he is on an inimical term. It
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42725 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
2/3
is also submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case
relating to excise, the police starts implicating mechanically
either at the instance of Chowkidar, local person, confessional
statement or secret information without holding a proper
investigation.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court
within a period of six weeks from today, be released on
Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.
20000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where
the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bharrahi
P.S. Case No. 132 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down
under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial
Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and
in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more
than five cases then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the
purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42725 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
3/3
antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional
anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after
verification if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of five
cases only, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order
shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.