Patna High Court
Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The Court granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to verification of the petitioner’s antecedent, to be confirmed if no prior case is found.
Summary
Anil Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4,798.08 litres of liquor from four vehicles. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the liquor was not in his conscious possession; he was only the owner of one of the seized vehicles and claimed ignorance of the driver’s misuse. The State opposed his prayer for anticipatory bail. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs. 500 with two sureties and directed verification of his criminal antecedent. The order stipulated that if any antecedent is found, the bail would not be confirmed; otherwise, the provisional bail would be confirmed forthwith.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the BNSS in a case under the Bihar Excise Act
- Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and lack of conscious possession justify granting anticipatory bail
Legislation cited
- Bihar Excise Act — s. 30(a), 41
- BNSS — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Bihar Excise Act
- liquor seizure
- clean antecedent
- Section 482
- provisional bail
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46178 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-349 Year-2026 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Anil Kumar Son of Virendar Baitha @ Bandeshwar Baitha Resident of
Village- Bangpur Rabbi, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vasant Vikas
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rana Randhir Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 10-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and
41 of the Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 4798.08 litres of liquor from four different vehicles.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be
implicated based on the fact that he is owner of one of the
seized vehicles. It is next submitted that no prudent person
would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46178 of 2026(2) dt.10-07-2026
2/3
thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get
implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely
unaware that his driver would misuse the vehicle in the manner
as alleged, who also fled from the spot.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks
from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in
connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 349 of 2026, subject to
the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court
shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the
event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case
then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of
seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this
Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be
confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a
person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46178 of 2026(2) dt.10-07-2026
3/3
anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.