Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Excise Act

2120 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

Nandlal RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandlal Rai, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4,798.08 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and …

Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 188 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a) and 38(2) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 218.04 litres of liquor from a house not owned by him. He argued that he …

Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 40 litres of liquor on a cycle. He claimed a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that he was implicated by a …

Dharo SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharo Saw, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 25.5 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and …

Pawan Kumar @ Pawan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 12 litres of liquor from a field belonging to Raj Kumar. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his possession, and the complaint was filed by …

Pramod Das @ LadduversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pramod Das @ Laddu was implicated in a case under Sections 274, 275, 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 111 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50.31 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He was not arrested at the scene …

AMAR SAHNIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Amar Sahni and Dharmendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from a jointly owned family house. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested on the spot, and …

Kamal PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kamal Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 909 litres of liquor from his Bolero pickup vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware of …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 150 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that he was merely the vehicle owner, and that a …

Anil PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 45 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, was not caught in possession, and that the alleged liquor was found in a place not …

Uma DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Uma Devi, a woman with no prior criminal record, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 82 litres of liquor from a dilapidated house she does not own. She contended that the accusation was fabricated by a …

Shambhu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shambhu Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 3.105 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle, invoking Sections 274, 275 and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that the …

Rajesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from a Toto e‑rickshaw. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, …

Ajit Kumar @ Ajit Yadav @ Ajit Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 279, 337, 338 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10.125 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor was not in …

Raja Rai @ Rajan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Raja Rai sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under IPC sections 188, 272 and 34 and the Bihar Excise Act sections 30, 38 and 41 for allegedly recovering 28 litres of liquor from an auto. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in …

Mantosh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mantosh Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case against him under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 170 litres of liquor and 1,000 litres of raw Jawa Mahua from a public area. The petitioner claimed he was not caught in …

Santu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santu Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He was not caught in possession of the liquor and claimed he was unaware that his friend misused the vehicle. The petitioner …

Sonu Singh @ Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Singh, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor from a boat. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the boat, and was implicated by a hostile chowkidar without …

Manoj SardarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Sardar, a resident of Hasanpur, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 42 litres of liquor from his joint‑family house. The petitioner argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, that the …

Sanjay Kumar Yadav @ Sanjay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a motorcycle and a scooty. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and was …

Hareram Das @ Hareram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Hareram Das, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 116 litres of liquor at his joint family house. He argued that the alleged defect of a missing Rs. 50 welfare stamp could be remedied and that the typed copy defect should be …

NiranjanaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Niranjana, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 38 and 56(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 133.100 litres of liquor from a car she owned. She argued that she had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle and that …

Seuti Khatun @ Seuti KhauthversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Seuti Khatun, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 0.375 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty she owned. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that her …

Kamlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kamlesh Kumar, was implicated in a case alleging possession of 76.125 litres of liquor recovered from his Maruti car, invoking Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …

Manoj RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Rai, the petitioner, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 21.375 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession and that he was …

Raja Kumar @ Raja Babu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 54.9 litres of liquor from a bush. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the informant …

Sikindra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sikindra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 12.75 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and possessed a …

Digamber Nat @ Guddu NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Digamber Nat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, and the 2018 amendment …

Jai Kishun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jai Kishun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his possession, and he was …

Lalan Yadav @ Lalan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalan Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 495 litres of liquor from his Scorpio vehicle. He contended that he was not present at the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he was unaware of his …

Md. SalmanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Salman, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and that the vehicle was …

Radhe Yadav @ Radhe SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Radhe Yadav, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 25.6 litres of liquor from a public riverbank, with no possession found on him. He argued he has a clean antecedent and the recovery was based solely on a confessional statement …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Kundan Kumar, Rudal Kumar and Suresh Das, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 900 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, although no liquor was seized from them and the informant’s identity was omitted from the FIR. They sought …

Kamlesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Kamlesh Ray, owner of a vehicle from which 459 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail, claiming he had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse and possessed a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail, arguing the vehicle’s ownership implicated the petitioner. The …

Vikas Ram @ Vikash RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikas Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor. He contended that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery occurred on land not his, and the complaint was …

Nepali Kumar @ Subham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nepali Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, asserting he was not the owner and was implicated by a hostile watchman. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing lack of possession and that …

Rubi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rubi Devi, a woman with three prior criminal cases (two under the Bihar Excise Act), feared arrest in a case alleging possession of liquor recovered from her courtyard and a neighbor's house. She argued that no liquor was found in her conscious possession, the property is joint family, and the 2018 …

SANTOSH RAM SAH @ SANTOSH RAMversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Ram Sah, the owner of a Toto vehicle, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 0.065 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the liquor was not found …

Dhanoj ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhanoj Choudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 8 litres of liquor in his motorcycle, which was seized when his son Lav was apprehended at the spot. The petitioner asserted that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …

Nitish Kumar @ Nitish PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from two scooties he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no liquor in his possession, and was unaware that a third …

Pramod Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar Singh, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 34 litres of liquor from a motorcycle that he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the alleged offence, was not arrested at the spot, and had a clean …

Nitish Kumar @ Nitesh Rai @ Nitish RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 281.4 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He contended he was not in possession of the seized vehicles, was not the owner, and was …

Yogendra MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yogendra Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not caught in possession, and was unaware that his friend misused the …

Shankar Mahto @ Shankar Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shankar Mahto sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act read with Sections 111, 125(a), 125(b) and 281 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging recovery of 954 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. He argued that he was not caught in …

Pinki KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Pinki Kumari, a woman with a clean antecedent, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case alleging her involvement in offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the recovery of 945 litres of …

Meena Devi @ Mina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Meena Devi, the wife of Raju Soren, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 4 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession …

Rajesh BaskiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Baski was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 132 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he was not arrested, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the amendment to the …

Nokhlal Mukhiya @ Nakhlal MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nokhlal Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 11 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his possession, and the complaint …

Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 418.8 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicles, …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 14.805 litres of liquor from a garbage site. He argued that he has a clean criminal record, that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Sultan @ Md. SultanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sultan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 564 litres of liquor from a tractor. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, …

Sakuntla DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sakuntla Devi, the owner of a vehicle from which 475 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was unaware of her driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle, and that no liquor …

Sarwan Kumar @ Shravan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sarwan Kumar and Lalan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,647 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle. They contended that they were not in possession of the liquor, did …

Ruby DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ruby Devi, a woman with three prior excise cases, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 8 litres of liquor from her house and 52 litres from a nearby drain. She contended that the liquor was in joint family property, she had no conscious possession, and …

Guddu Ram @ Suddu RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Ram, a resident of Patna district, was implicated in an alleged excise offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He was not caught in possession of the liquor and claims he was unaware that another individual, …

Pawan Pandey @ Bhaskar PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Pandey, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60.375 litres of liquor from a pit not belonging to him. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the …

Ankaj Kumar @ Angad KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ankaj Kumar was implicated in an excise case (PS Case No. 83 of 2026) for allegedly possessing 305.64 litres of liquor recovered from a straw shed. He pleaded that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and that the straw shed is a communal area possibly used to frame him. The …

Raj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Raj Kumar and Kunal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged recovery of 6,912 litres of liquor from a truck, with charges under Sections 317(5), 111, 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. They argued …

Sunil Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Mandal, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his immediate possession, and he was …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 125 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and …

Subhsh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 175.230 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery occurred on …

Boby DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Boby Devi, the owner of a Scorpio vehicle, was implicated in a case where 675 litres of liquor were seized from her vehicle, alleged to be offences under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act. She contended that she had no knowledge of the driver’s misuse of the vehicle and that no liquor …

Bablu KeshriversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bablu Keshri, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22.320 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a public place, not from his possession, and that the investigation was based …

Munna ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Munna Manjhi and Jully Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from a location south of Sonachak Musahari. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor was …

Santosh Kumar GuptaversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Gupta, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 711 litres of liquor from his Scorpio vehicle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that the actual offender, Mahesh, was …

Sanjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 34 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 5.7 litres of liquor from a public road. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the location did …

Vinay Kumar VishwakarmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vinay Kumar Vishwakarma was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 132.75 litres of liquor from his Swift Dzire vehicle. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and …

Puja DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Puja Devi, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 11.250 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to her. She asserted that she has a clean criminal antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the …

Nishant Kumar @ Nishu RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nishant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 77.265 litres of liquor from a godown owned by Ranjeet. He argued that he was not caught in possession, had no relation to the premises or the …

LAVKUSH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lavkush Kumar and Raju Kumar, sons of the late Kedar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a field. They contended they were not in possession of the liquor, the location did not belong …

Shree Ram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shree Ram Kumar Dhanjay Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 41 and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 1,737 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of …

Prakash Kumar @ Prakash DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prakash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 106.570 litres of liquor from a Toto vehicle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the vehicle, and was …

Rina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rina Devi, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to her house. She contended that the liquor was not in her possession, that the recovery site did not belong to her, and …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 87.480 liters of liquor from under a bridge. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 1,517.25 litres of liquor from a school, with a Hyundai Santro car and a scooter seized. He pleaded not guilty, asserting that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession and that he was unaware of any …

Manoj Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Kumar Ram was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 260.7 litres of liquor from a bag on a motorcycle, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession of the liquor, and was implicated merely because …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rohit Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged recovery of 206.28 litres of liquor from several vehicles and was charged under IPC sections 414, 420 and 120B as well as sections 30(a), 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was not the owner …

Umesh Ray @ Lakadi Rai @ Umesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Umesh Ray, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 315 litres of liquor from a location behind Rita Devi's house and 19.5 litres from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the …

Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a Toto vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and …

Vijendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijendra Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 636 litres of liquor from a boat on the Ganga. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the boat, and the sole …

Suryadeo Kumar @ Surya Dev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suryadeo Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend …

Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rakesh Singh and Nilesh Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 410.040 litres of liquor from a public place near a dam. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly storing 216.36 litres of liquor in a toilet tank at his joint‑family house. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not in his …

Santosh ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Manjhi and Madan Manjhi were implicated in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a joint family house. The petitioners, claiming clean antecedents, …

Dinesh Kumar Singh @ Bhuar Kumar @ BhuarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle's owner, and …

Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ranjan Kumar and Niraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 411 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. They argued that they were not caught in possession of the alleged liquor, were not owners of the seized vehicle, and …

Ramratan Prasad SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramratan Prasad Singh, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 292.320 litres of liquor from a Bolero pickup that he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious …

Hari ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hari Chaudhari, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 220 litres of liquor from an auto and 200 litres from two motorcycles. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Jitendra Sah @ Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32, 36 and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 882 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the seized …

Balmiki yadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Balmiki Yadav and Ankit Yadav, were implicated in a case involving alleged recovery of two litres of liquor from land belonging to a third party, with charges under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Bihar Excise Act. They applied for anticipatory …

SawoodaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sawooda, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 33 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She asserted that she had no knowledge of the contraband, possessed a clean antecedent, and that ownership of the vehicle alone should not constitute evidence of …

Raj Kumar Rai @ Raj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a kiln near the Ganga River. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession, the site was public, and he …

Fantush Yadav @ Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Fantush Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a vehicle he owned was seized containing 765.88 liters of liquor, alleged to be a violation of Sections 30(a), 32(1) and 32(2) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not apprehended at the spot, and had no …

Kunti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kunti Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 26 litres of liquor at her residence and 18 litres at another house. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was stored in joint family property, she had no …

Aman Kumar @ Aman JeeversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 186 litres of liquor in a mini pickup. He argued that the liquor was not recovered from his possession, he was not the vehicle's owner, and his …

Bobby Kumar @ Babi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bobby Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37(c) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 12 litres of liquor were recovered from another person, Ravi Shankar Kumar. The petitioner argued that he had no possession of the liquor, no direct involvement, and …

Jitu Yadav @ Ravi RajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Jitu Yadav and Pankaj Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272, 273, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from their vehicles. They argued that the first petitioner …

Rinku Devi @ Rinki Devi @ Rinki KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rinku Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 20 litres of liquor recovered from her joint family house. She argued she has a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession, and that the 2018 amendment to the …

Shubham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shubham Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 51.84 litres of liquor from his Alto car. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and he was only linked to the offence …

Motilal Manjhi @ Motilal MajhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Motilal Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after a complaint under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleged that six litres of liquor were recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, …

Rinku DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rinku Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was unaware of the misuse of her vehicle by …

Piyush ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Piyush Thakur, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from Sanjay Yadav. He claimed he had no possession of the liquor and was implicated solely on Sanjay's confessional statement made in police …

Sanjay KumarversusThe state of bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was only the owner of one of the seized …

Lal Babu Mahto @ Lal Babu Kumar @ Lalbabu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lal Babu Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,010.88 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, no liquor was found in his …

Manjay PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manjay Paswan was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 345.6 litres of liquor from a truck and 43.2 litres from a toto vehicle he owned. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing he had a clean antecedent and that the liquor was not found in …

Birendra MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Birendra Mahato, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not its owner, and was implicated by a …

Brijesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Brijesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 31.98 litres of liquor from a motorcycle registered in his wife's name. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no liquor in his …

Banshi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Banshi Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 108 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, though he claimed he had no conscious possession of the liquor or ownership of the vehicle. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing he has …

Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 21.600 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that his friend Sanjeet had misused the …

Nurul Israr @ Noorul AsrarversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Nurul Israr, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1.950 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that others used …

Santosh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Mandal sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 379.98 litres of liquor from an orchard not owned by him. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in his possession, and …

Pappu RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 12.75 litres of liquor from a hut not belonging to him. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested on the spot, and the allegation was based on …

Vishandev Rai @ Visho RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishandev Rai sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged recovery of 610.20 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle, with charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 427 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, had no …

Mukesh Khatik @ Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Khatik sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 54 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean criminal record, was not arrested on the spot, did not have possession of the liquor, and …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kundan Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 210 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that he has a clean criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and …

Shivam Kumar @ Shivjanma KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shivam Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that liquor and spirits were recovered from an uncultivated field and two motorcycles owned by him. The petitioner argued that the seized liquor was not in his …

Sanju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sanju Devi, a woman with no prior criminal record, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 2.99 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle she owned. …

Dhanvarti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhanvarti Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly storing 10 litres of liquor on the roof of her joint family house. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession, and that the 2018 amendment to the Excise …

Abhiman Kumar @ Abhimnan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhiman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his house‑cum‑shop, which is a joint family property. He contended that no liquor was seized from his personal …

Sunil Rai @ JattiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Bhagwanpur, sought anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 200 litres of liquor near the Punpun river. They contended that they were not apprehended in possession, the alleged recovery …

Ranjit RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ranjit Rai and Awdhesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 150 litres of liquor near a railway line. They argued that they were not caught in possession, the liquor was recovered from …

Prakash Manjhi @ Prakash Ranjan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prakash Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 228 litres of liquor from a public pond. He argued that the liquor was not in his …

Mohan Manjhi @ Sohan ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mohan Manjhi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard that did not belong to him. The petitioner argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Krishna RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Krishna Ram, the owner of a motorcycle from which 20 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he was not caught in possession, emphasizing his clean …

Mintu @ Mintu BaithaversusThe State of Bihr

DISPOSED

Mintu Baitha sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 750 ml of liquor from a person named Meghnath. The petitioner claimed he had no possession of the liquor and no direct involvement, and the only evidence was a confessional …

Tamanna ParweenversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Tamanna Parween, a woman with no prior criminal record, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of two litres of codeine cough syrup from a scooter she owned. She argued that the seized contraband was not in her …

Mittal Mandal @ Mital Kumar @ Mital MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mittal Mandal, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 3.9 liters of liquor from a public place near his residence. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the alleged recovery …

Manohar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manohar Sharma applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 19.89 litres of liquor from a wheat field adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the …

Shyam Kumar Gupta @ Shyam PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shyam Kumar Gupta sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 68.5 litres of liquor and a motorcycle from a sugarcane field. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the seized items, and that the vehicle …

Vikash SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Sharma, the owner of a truck from which 4,276.8 litres of liquor was seized, was charged under Sections 30(a), 41 and 56 of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that the consignee would misuse his …

Sattar NatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sattar Nat, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act after 90 litres of country-made liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and highlighted his lack of prior criminal …

Awadh Bihari PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Awadh Bihari Prasad applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 10 litres of illicit liquor in a motorcycle. He contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle, was not named in the FIR, and had no criminal …

Bijendra Singh @ Bijendra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bijendra Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 459.240 litres of liquor from a premises not owned by him. He contended that he was not present at the scene, had no possession …

Uday KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Uday Kumar and Mukesh Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case under the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 260 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. Mukesh Kumar was arrested while the application was pending, and his counsel sought to withdraw his anticipatory …

Mithun Mahto @ Mithun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithun Mahto petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was …

Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from a sack near Itawan crossing. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the alleged location did not belong …

Gore Choudhary @ Gorelal ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gore Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 47(A) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, that the concept of deemed …

Vijay RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor from an auto. He …

Lakshman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lakshman Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 48 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw that he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

Chundu Manjhi @ Chintu ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, six individuals from Nonfarawa Dhangar Toli, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Non‑Compulsory Statutes (BNS) and the Bihar Excise Act. They contended that they have clean antecedents, were not caught in possession of …

Lakhindra RishiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Lakhindra Rishi and Suryaram Murmu, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 16.5 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. They argued they had clean antecedents, were not arrested on the spot, had …

Tuntun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tuntun Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging he was involved in the recovery of 14.145 litres of liquor from a thatched hut that does not belong to him. The petitioner argued that he was not apprehended …

Mohan PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mohan Prasad, father of Vishwajeet, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 105.330 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle from Vishwajeet's house. The petitioner argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the …

Mohit Kumar @ BhondaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged offence involved recovery of 1.5 litres of liquor from a cowshed and that no liquor was seized from his possession. He argued that the cowshed was …

Lalbabu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalbabu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 342 litres of liquor from seized vehicles. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of …

Kailash SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kailash Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering three litres of liquor from a bathroom adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to him, and the FIR …

Lalbabu Yadav @ Abhishek Yadav @ Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalbabu Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 400 litres of liquor from two motorcycles and a scooty. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the seized vehicles, and was framed by a …

Jitendra RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Ram, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware that another individual would misuse his …

Viccky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Viccky Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 32.280 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that no liquor was found …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle involved, and was implicated by a hostile watchman, …

Rina KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rina Kumari, sought anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and was not in …

Kamlesh Mallik @ Kamlesh DomversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Kamlesh Mallik sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor near his house and 10.5 litres from a motorcycle. He contended he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, did not own …

Ravi Kishan @ Ravi Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kishan, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 31.7 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the informant’s name …

Ramayodhya YadavversusThe state of bihar

DISPOSED

Ramayodhya Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 25,800 litres of liquor from a motorcycle linked to persons named Prince and Himanshu. He contended that he was not caught in possession, did …

Kjan Kumar @ Kajan MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kjan Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging possession of liquor recovered from another individual and a flat not owned by him. He contended that he had no direct possession of the liquor, the flat was unrelated to him, and the case was …

Pappu Singh @ Sanjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pappu Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 2000 ml of illicit beer under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that the liquor was recovered from a refrigerator in a house jointly occupied by others, not from his constructive …

Shiv Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Kumar Ray, owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from his vehicle. The petitioner argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his …

Vishwanth KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vishwanth Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 320 litres of liquor from a location near the Sone River and 40 litres from a motorcycle. He contended that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession and that …

Vikash Yadav @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vikash Yadav (in two separate petitions), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in cases under Sections 111(i)/111(ii) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(2) of the Bihar Excise Act relating to the alleged recovery of 1,075.68 litres of liquor. They …

Vikash Yadav @ Vikash Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Yadav (in two petitions) applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in excise cases alleging recovery of 1,075.68 litres of liquor. He contended he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and the case was based solely on a confessional statement of …

Pankaj Chaudhary @ Pankaj Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from public places. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery sites did not belong to him, and the police …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 229.320 litres of liquor from a poultry farm owned by Md. Aslam. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, had no possession of the …

Chunchun Sahani @ Chuchun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chunchun Sahani, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 112.14 litres of liquor from a location not owned by him. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, no prior criminal record, and that the …

Nitesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 360.84 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and was implicated solely on …

Sikendra Nut @ Sikandar NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sikendra Nut, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was seized from a location not belonging to him and that he was implicated at the behest of a hostile …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 160 litres of liquor from a scooty. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the seized liquor was not in his possession, and he was not the …

Subodh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Subodh Kumar, fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, filed a second anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner argued that his liberty was at risk and sought pre‑emptive protection. The State, represented by an Assistant Public …

Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Sahni @ Pappu Kumar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 97.5 litres of liquor from a Hyundai car. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, he was not the vehicle's owner, and the …

Bharat RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bharat Ray, applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No.852 of 2025) for alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 315 litres of liquor from a location near his house and 19.5 litres from a motorcycle. The petitioner has 14 …

Bharat RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bharat Ray, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 900 litres of liquor from a Bolero pickup. He has 14 prior cases, six under the Excise Act, but claims he was falsely implicated and was not the owner of the …

Nilu singh @ Nilkamal singh @ Nil kamalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nilu Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case under the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from a rice mill not owned by him. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his possession, and the case was based on secret information without proper …

Surendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Surendra Paswan was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a location behind Sanjay Manjhi's house, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he had a clean record and was falsely implicated because the seized liquor did not belong to …

Indrajeet Mukhiya @ Indrajit Mukhiya @ IndrajitversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Indrajeet Mukhiya was charged under Section 414 of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 35 and 38 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 9 litres of liquor recovered from a joint family house and the seizure of three motorcycles. The petitioner, who has 19 prior excise cases, argued that he was …

Mukesh SahaniversusThe State of BIhar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Sahani, who has fifteen prior cases under the Bihar Excise Act, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) for allegedly recovering 315 litres of liquor and 400 litres of semi‑prepared liquor from a river bank. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the …

Lalan Roy @ Lalan RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lalan Roy, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 70 litres of liquor and 5,000 litres of jawa mahua from the banks of the Ganga River. He had three prior excise cases and had been in custody since 20‑02‑2026. The petitioner argued that he …

Anil Sah @ Anil Kumar SoniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 123.75 litres of liquor from a vehicle, though he was not in immediate possession and was not the owner of the vehicle. The prosecution’s case relied on a confessional statement …

Jawedan Khan @ Jawed AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jawedan Khan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 519.840 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the vehicle, and was …

Rupesh Kumar @ PauwaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rupesh Kumar was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 250.56 litres of liquor from a vehicle, despite having five prior excise cases. The petitioner argued he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and was …

Bhim MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhim Mahto, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from an auto. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated by local residents, who had not …

Rupesh Mehta @ Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rupesh Mehta, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 621 litres of liquor from the bank of the Koshi River. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location was public, and the …

Devendra SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devendra Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 380 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. He argued that he has a clean …

Ganesh Kumar Sah @ Ganesh sahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ganesh Kumar Sah, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 316.6 litres of liquor from a Tata Indigo. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was …

Rishikesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rishikesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 110.7 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious …

Desh Bandhu KunduversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Desh Bandhu Kundu, the owner of a vehicle from which 0.750 litre of liquor was recovered, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He pleaded that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a co‑accused named Amit would misuse his …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sonu Kumar, a resident of Vaishali, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the seized …

Navin Ray @ Navin Kumar @ Naveen KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Navin Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 29.83 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no conscious possession, that the 2018 amendment abolished the concept of …

Tajim HussainversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tajim Hussain, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 203.76 litres of liquor from his Mahindra XUV vehicle. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and that his driver, who …

Chandrabhusan Prasad @ Mitu Prasad @ Mithu PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandrabhusan Prasad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of nine litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued he had a clean criminal record, that the liquor was not in his possession, and …

Mantu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Mantu Kumar and Sanjay Rai, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor. They argued that the liquor was not found in their possession, the recovery site did not belong to …

Arjun DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arjun Das sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, he was not the vehicle's owner, and the case was based solely on a confessional …

Tribhuwan yadav @ Tribhuwan Ray @ Gibhuwan RoyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tribhuwan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 40.60 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued he had no conscious possession, a clean antecedent, and …

Ganesh Sahni @ KutumaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ganesh Sahni, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 7 litres of liquor from a house and 70 litres from a bush. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession, the premises did not belong to him, and he had no relationship …

Arun Sah @ Arun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Arun Sah, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 43.590 litres of liquor from a shop not owned by him. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, and was implicated solely on a …

Vivek Kumar @ Vivek Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vivek Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 4.5 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and was implicated by a watchman …

Santosh Dhangar @ Santosh DhagadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Dhangar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 18 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which he claims is joint family property and that he had no conscious possession. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the 2018 …

Akshay DomversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akshay Dom, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 166 litres of liquor, of which 70 litres were found on a road in front of his house, not in his possession. He has two prior criminal cases, one also under the Excise Act. He …

Prabhu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Prabhu Mahto feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 125 litres of liquor near his farm. He argued he had a clean antecedent, the alleged liquor was not in his possession, and the case was based solely on a confessional statement made by …