Patna High Court
Panchdev Kumar @ Panch @ Panchu Manjhi @ Panchdev ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
Provisional anticipatory bail is granted subject to bail bond, sureties, and verification of criminal antecedent.
Summary
Petitioner Panchdev Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 30 litres of liquor concealed near his house and 12 litres from a neighbour's premises. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the complaint was motivated by an inimical relationship with the complainant. The State opposed his request for anticipatory bail. The Court, after considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail conditioned on a bail bond of Rs. 500 with two sureties and directed verification of the petitioner's criminal antecedent. If any prior case is found, the bail would be revoked; otherwise, it would be confirmed.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act
- Whether the petitioner’s alleged lack of possession and clean antecedent justify anticipatory bail
Legislation cited
- Bihar Excise Act — s. 30(a)
- Bihar Negotiable and Security Act (BNSS) — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- excise law
- Section 30
- Section 482
- criminal antecedent
- liquor seizure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32961 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2025 Thana- BHELDI District- Saran
======================================================
Panchdev Kumar @ Panch @ Panchu Manjhi @ Panchdev Manjhi S/o Late
Badri Manjhi R/o Village- Bheldi Tola, P.S.- Bheldi, District- Saran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashad
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Iftekhar Mahmood
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 14-05-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 30 litres of liquor concealed under husk near house
of the petitioner and 12 litres of liquor from a sack near the
house of Devnath Manjhi.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged
recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32961 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
2/3
but then is adjacent to his house and he came to be implicated
at the instance of Chowkidar with whom he is on an inimical
term. It is next submitted that if Chowkidar was aware about
the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence, then why he
did not inform the police prior to institution of the instant FIR,
which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks
from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in
connection with Bheldi P.S. Case No. 306 of 2025, subject to
the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court
shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the
event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case
then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of
seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this
Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32961 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
3/3
confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a
person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional
anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.