Patna High Court
Devendra SahniversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
Provisional anticipatory bail is granted subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act.
Summary
The petitioner, Devendra Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 380 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery occurred at a place open to the public based on secret information. The State opposed the bail. The Court, after considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs. 500 with two sureties and conditioned the order on verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedent by the trial court under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. If any prior case is found, the bail will not be confirmed; otherwise, it will be confirmed forthwith.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under the circumstances described
- Whether the lack of possession and the public nature of the alleged site justify granting bail
Legislation cited
- Bihar Excise Act — s. 30(a)
- Bihar Narcotic Substances Act (BNSS) — s. 274, 275, 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 274
- Section 275
- Section 30(a)
- clean antecedent
- public place
- liquor seizure
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33201 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2026 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Devendra Sahni S/o Baiju Sahni @ Biju Sahni R/o Village- Dardha Chausaj,
PS- Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Ranjan
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 15-05-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274 and
275 of BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 380 litres of liquor from a place near bank of
Dardha ghat at Budhi Gandak river.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged
recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner
and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33201 of 2026(2) dt.15-05-2026
2/3
based on secret information which is the easiest way to
implicate someone without holding a proper investigation, when
petitioner admittedly is a person with clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks
from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in
connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 113 of 2025 subject to the
conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial
Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and
in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even
one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the
purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his
antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional
anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after
verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with clean
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33201 of 2026(2) dt.15-05-2026
3/3
antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order
shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.