Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Awadh Bihari PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S 2023.

Summary

Awadh Bihari Prasad applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 10 litres of illicit liquor in a motorcycle. He contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle, was not named in the FIR, and had no criminal antecedents, asserting that the case was based solely on suspicion. The State opposed the bail application. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S 2023, including cancellation of bail if antecedents or false statements are discovered. The order directed the petitioner to surrender within eight weeks if arrested.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
  • Whether the petitioner’s claim of innocence, lack of ownership of the vehicle, and absence of prior criminal record justify bail.
  • Whether the court may impose conditions for bail under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S 2023.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482(2)
  • B.N.S.S 2023
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39225 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2021 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Awadh Bihari Prasad, S/O Late Ganga Sah, Resident of Village- Pareo, P.S.-
                 Bihta, District- Patna.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate.
                 For the State           :        Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-06-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest,

                   in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 245 of 2021 dated

                   03.03.2021 registered for the offence punishable under Section

                   30(a) of Bihar Excise Act.

                                 3. As per allegation, Motorcycle bearing registration

                   No. BR-01AT-2296 was carrying 10 litres illicit liquor and on

                   seeing the Police the Motorcyclist fled away leaving behind the

                   Motorcycle. After search, 10 litres illicit liquor was recovered

                   from the bag tied up with the Motorcycle.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

                   case. He further submits that petitioner is neither owner of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39225 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                            2/3




          vehicle nor he was driving the same. He has nothing to do with

          the alleged offence. He also submits that the petitioner is not

          named in the First Information Report. The whole case is based

          only on suspicion.

                       5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail

          petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier

          either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

                       6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the

          bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

                       7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently

          opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

                       8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named,

          to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender

          before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the

          date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his

          furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned concerned court below in connection with

          Ara Town P.S. Case No. 245 of 2021, subject to the conditions

          as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S 2023, and

          on the following conditions:
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39225 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                                          3/3




                                     (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                        below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent, learned

                        court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after

                        hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has

                        concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the

                        same.

                                     (ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                        below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong,

                        learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                      (Jitendra Kumar, J)
S.Ali/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.