Created by Fuzzy Cloud

B.N.S.S., 2023

336 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

AKASH ALIAS AKSHAY ALIAS ROCKY ASHOK BHALEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Rejected

The appellant, Akash alias Akshay alias Rocky Ashok Bhalekar, was convicted along with co-accused for the murder of Laxmibai under Sections 302, 201 and 120(b) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous life imprisonment and other terms. He filed an interim application …

KULDEEPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Kuldeep appealed against the order of the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) dated 23.02.2026, seeking bail and setting aside the conviction under multiple IPC and SC/ST Act provisions. The FIR alleged that the victim's son was attacked by unknown persons, with the appellant’s name appearing …

NEM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Nem Singh appealed against the order of the Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act that denied him bail in a case alleging rape, assault and other offences. The FIR alleged that the appellant had a consensual relationship with the victim, later threatened her, and was accused …

SANGEETAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sangeeta, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing police officials to conduct a fair investigation and arrest accused persons in a criminal case under various sections of the B.N.S. and D.P. Act. She relied on the Supreme Court’s observations in Sakiri Vasu v. State of …

CHANDANI YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Chandani Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing police officials (respondents No.2 and 3) to conduct a prompt, proper and fair investigation in Crime No.120 of 2026 under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. and to complete it within the period prescribed by law. The …

DR PIYUSHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

Dr. Piyush filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a proper investigation in Crime No. 284 of 2026 under sections of the B.N.S. that correspond to IPC sections 420 and 120‑B. The Court examined the scope of Section 156(3) of the Criminal …

SHAKTI SINGH PATHRAURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking to quash criminal proceedings in complaint case No. 3185 of 2018, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial court verified that the …

SANJAY SHUKLA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No. 5548 of 2019, which alleged offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The parties had entered into a compromise on 15 May 2026, which was …

SMT. SEEMA ANJUMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Seema Anjum, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.03, Muzaffarnagar to decide a pending family law case (Case No.1468/11 of 2024) within a stipulated time, alleging that delay would cause irreparable injury. …

POLAVARAPU KRISHNA MOHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Polavarapu Krishna Mohan filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of an FIR dated 17/04/2026 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him under sections 308(2), 319(2), 318(4) of the B.N.S.S. 2023 and section 66D of the IT (Amendment) Act. While the State opposed the merits of …

MAHENDRA SINGH TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

Mahendra Singh Tyagi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police officers (Respondents No. 2 and 3) to conduct a fair investigation into Crime No. 307 of 2023 under various IPC sections. The petitioner argued that the investigation was unsatisfactory and that the High Court could …

VINDHYACHALversusSTATE OF UP AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vindhyachal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to investigate Crime No. 176 of 2026 without collusion and to conduct a fair, impartial investigation under several sections of the B.N.S. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s observations in Sakiri Vasu …

DR. PRABHAT KUMAR SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

Dr. Prabhat Kumar Srivastava filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the investigating officer to conclude the investigation of crime No. 172 of 2026 under sections 352, 351(3), 318(4) of the BNSS. The petition relied on Supreme Court observations …

RAM BHAJAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief in a criminal matter. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the application, although counsel for the State was present. The court dismissed the …

SACHIN CHAURASIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Sachin Chaurasiya filed a criminal revision challenging an order of the Prayagraj Family Court that directed him to pay interim maintenance of Rs.7,000 and Rs.3,000 per month to two opposite parties from the date of the maintenance application (12.01.2026). He expressed willingness to comply but …

RAM KEWAL TRIPATHIversusNEELIMA PANDEY

The petitioner, Ram Kewal Tripathi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Allahabad, to decide pending applications filed under Sections 379 and 94 of the B.N.S.S. 2023 before hearing an application under Section 24 of the …

KUNAL @ KUNAL GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Kunal Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside an order dated 31.01.2026 that had issued both a recovery warrant and an arrest warrant for the enforcement of arrears of maintenance. The maintenance was originally granted to his wife under Section 125 of the …

AJUGYA NARAIN TIWARI AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF U.P AND ANR.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief, but no applicant appeared before the court. The State's counsel was present. The High Court dismissed the application on the ground of want of prosecution, …

VINOD KUMAR MISHRA @ VIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicant, Vinod Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief against the State. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the State’s counsel was present. The High Court observed that the …

UMA KANTversusTHE STATE OF U.P. and ANR.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicant, Uma Kant, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023, seeking relief from the trial court. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while counsel for the State was present. The High …

AKEEL AHMAD AND ORS.versusSTATE OF UP AND ORS.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief. No applicant appeared before the court to pursue the application, although counsel for the State was present. The court dismissed the application for want of …

Bajrangi Kumar @ Bajarangi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Bajrangi Kumar appealed against the refusal of regular bail in a case registered under Sections 70(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.S., 2023, Section 3(1)(w) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and Section 14(A)(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The appellant …

Rajesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in connection with an excise case alleging possession of illicit liquor seized from three motorcycles. The prosecution alleged that the motorcycles, owned by the petitioner, were used to transport 63 litres of illicit liquor, but the liquor was …

Arjun Kumar @ BaheliyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arjun Kumar was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 for allegedly transporting 72.020 litres of foreign wine in a van. He contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle and that his name was recorded only on the basis of …

Rajesh Kumar ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Chaudhari applied for anticipatory bail in a case (Tikapatti P.S. Case No.92 of 2025) where the police recovered 12.5 litres of illicit country-made liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he had sold the motorcycle to another person in 2022, had no connection …

Sudha Devi @ Sugiya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sudha Devi was arrested on 18 March 2026 in connection with a case alleging possession of 10 litres of illicit country‑made liquor, part of a total seizure of 60 litres under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The petitioner claimed she has a clean antecedent and that the …

Pappu Paswan @ ChhotuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pappu Paswan, was arrested on 14 March 2026 in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Prohibition Act for the alleged possession of 324 litres of illegal Nepalese liquor seized from the house of a co‑accused. He filed a bail petition, contending that the …

Brajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Brajesh Kumar and Sumiran Kumar were arrested on 23 February 2026 in connection with an excise case involving the seizure of 100.200 litres of illicit foreign liquor, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The petitioners contended that the liquor was …

Chandan kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested on 26 March 2026 in connection with an FIR dated 25 March 2026 for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act (Amended‑2022), involving the recovery of 15 litres of illicit country‑made liquor from the Chapra Railway …

Sanjiv Kumar Singh @ Sanjiv SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjiv Kumar Singh, feared arrest in a criminal complaint (Case No.1380/2023) alleging fraud, forgery and other offences under several IPC sections relating to a disputed mutation of ancestral land. He claimed he was falsely implicated as the dispute stemmed from a family partition …

SAMEER SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants, Sameer Singh and another, appealed under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act challenging a summoning order dated 27‑02‑2025 issued by the Special Judge, Varanasi, in case Pappu Sonkar v. Sameer Singh & Ors. The order had summoned them to face trial under IPC …

Harinarayan GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Harinarayan Gupta applied for anticipatory bail after a looting incident in which co‑accused Bablu Yadav was caught and, through a captured accomplice Pappu Yadav, identified the petitioner as having facilitated the escape. The FIR records only the co‑accused’s statement linking the petitioner, with …

Gaurav Kumar @ Monu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., where the prosecution alleged his involvement in the killing of an informant's daughter over a dowry demand. The petitioner contended he was merely the brother‑in‑law …

Lalan KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lalan Kumar, a land broker, was named in an FIR alleging his participation in forging a panchnama document in a family land dispute involving co‑accused Navin Kumar and Babita Devi, who are the son and daughter‑in‑law of the informant. The petitioner contended that he was only a …

Sanjay SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the complainant, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 433 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 380, 354, 354A, 406, 498A and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complaint alleged that the petitioners …

Balram SinghversusThe state of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Balram Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being named an accused in a 2017 case involving alleged assault, robbery and firing at an informant under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner argued that the FIR, lodged six days after the …

Rita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS 185/2025) involving alleged ransom‑related conspiracy, shooting, and the death of an informant’s daughter. The FIR named five accused and several unknown persons under sections 103(1), 61(2), 308(2), 352 and 3(5) of the …

Sunil Singh @ Sunil Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunil Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Madhuban Police Station Case No. 322 of 2025, which is registered under several sections of the B.N.S.S, 2023. He contended that the FIR only specifically alleges assault on the informant by co‑accused …

Munarik YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mun​arik Yadav was implicated in an excise case after 15 litres of illicit foreign liquor were recovered from a motorcycle registered in his name, which had been used by his nephew Srikant Kumar. The petitioner argued that he was not present at the seizure, no contraband was found on his person, and …

Mangal DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are the father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and brothers‑in‑law of the deceased Babita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder case (PS Case No. 1055 of 2023) registered under Sections 302, 306, 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that the deceased …

Rita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rita Devi, mother of Shivam Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the B.N.S. 2023 alleging her involvement in the kidnapping of a minor girl. The informant claimed his daughter was abducted by Shivam Kumar, who was allegedly in a romantic …

Raju SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four members of the Sahani family, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a fraudulent land sale. The FIR alleged that …

SANJEEV KUMAR MISHRAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners—Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, his son Abhishek Kumar Mishra, wife Ruby Devi and daughter Khushi Kumari—sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS case No. 474 of 2025, wherein they were alleged to have assaulted an informant, his wife and daughter with iron rods and …

Vijesh Natversusthe state of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Vijesh Nat and Varjesh Nat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 219 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging they assaulted an informant and others during a boundary wall dispute. The FIR alleged that petitioner No.1 stabbed the …

Bittu Sharma @ Bittu Kumar @ Bittu Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bittu Sharma, was implicated in a case registered under IPC sections 363, 365 and 34 for allegedly luring a 17‑year‑old girl and failing to return her. The petitioner claimed innocence, highlighting a two‑day delay in filing the FIR and asserting that the girl voluntarily accompanied …

Dipak Singh @ Deepak Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dipak Singh, was implicated in a case under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 217.560 litres of illicit liquor, based primarily on a co-accused's confessional statement. The petitioner contended that no liquor was found …

Sikandar Sahani @ Sikki SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Sikandar Sahani and Lakhan Jaiswal, sought bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 313.845 litres of illicit liquor was seized from co‑accused Bikhar Mahato. They contended that they were not present at the scene, had no …

Jitendra Kumar @ Prince Kumar @ PrinceversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was implicated in a case (Town P.S. No. 156 of 2026) for alleged possession and recovery of 121 litres of illicit liquor, alleged under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The prosecution’s case rested on a statement by the …

Bimla DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bimla Devi, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR (Case No. 167 of 2023) alleged her involvement in offences under several IPC sections, including assault and theft of jewellery. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges and the existence of a counter‑FIR …

Musharu Yadav @ Musaharu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners Musharu Yadav, Udgar Yadav and Balbir Yadav sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.259/2025 filed under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023, alleging they were part of a ten‑person mob that assaulted an informant and her son. The informant …

SHANI RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Shani Rajbhar, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 91 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 65(1), 69, 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and Sections 5L and 6 of the POCSO Act. The court noted a delay of more than one month in lodging the FIR and that the victim’s …

Nitesh Kumar @ Nitesh SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, was arrested in a case involving alleged dowry demands, assault (IPC §§ 323, 498A) and violations of the Dowry Prohibition Act (ss. 3, 4). The prosecution alleged that after marrying the complainant in 2013, the petitioner and his family demanded dowry, tortured the …

Niraj Kumar @ Niraj yadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged seizure of 418.80 litres of Nepali Saufi liquor from two unregistered motorcycles. The prosecution’s case rests mainly on a disclosure statement by co‑accused Lakhindra …

Babu Sahab PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Babu Sahab Paswan sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for possession of 40 litres of illicit Mahua liquor seized from a motorcycle. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a disclosure statement by co‑accused Rohit …

Nawal Mahto @ Nawal Kishore MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nawal Mahto, was implicated in a case where 30 litres of country‑made liquor were recovered behind his hutment, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He filed an application for anticipatory bail fearing arrest. He asserted that he was not present at …

Chitranjan DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chitranjan Das, was implicated in a case (Kuchaikote PS Case No. 351 of 2025) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, involving the recovery of 405.930 litres of illicit liquor from two vehicles. The petitioner argued that …

Nawal MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nawal Mahto, was implicated in a case (Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 435 of 2025) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 after 57 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from an E‑Rickshaw allegedly owned by him. The petitioner …

Pappu Nat @ Pappu RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pappu Nat and Mukesh Nat, were implicated in a case (Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 41 of 2026) for allegedly possessing 23 litres of illicit liquor, an offence under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming …

Arjun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arjun Kumar was named in an FIR for allegedly possessing 4.020 litres of illicit liquor, an offence punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The petitioner claimed he had no possession of the liquor, that the recovery was made from an open place, and …

Jitendra ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Manjhi, was implicated in a case under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 10 litres of illicit liquor. The FIR was lodged based on information from local residents, and no liquor was recovered from the …

Awadhesh Singh @ Awadhesh kumar singhversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Awadhesh Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a cheating case (Sections 420 and 406 IPC) concerning a purported land sale. He alleged that no written agreement existed, no money was transferred to his account, and that the land did not belong to him or his son. The informant …

Dharmendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, was charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC for issuing three cheques that bounced after receiving a total of Rs. 6,30,000 from the complainant. The petitioner contended that he had only borrowed Rs. 1,00,000 …

Mani Kant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered an application for anticipatory bail filed by Mani Kant Kumar, who was implicated in a complaint case alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 471 and 120B relating to alleged misappropriation of temple advertising revenue. The prosecution alleged that the …

Bairistar Yadav @ Balistar Yadav @ Bairisater YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bairistar Yadav, was implicated in a case (Bairiya P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025) for allegedly assaulting an informant over a monetary dispute, resulting in a simple head injury. He faced charges under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The petitioner …

Abhay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar @ Abhay Kunwar @ Ajay KunwarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhay Kumar, feared arrest in a case (Kesaria P.S. Case No. 299 of 2021) involving alleged illegal liquor possession under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 276.48 litres of illicit liquor was recovered. He contended that he had no possession …

Naresh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, three residents of Vaishali district, were named in an FIR (Case No. 33 of 2026) for allegedly possessing 240 litres of illicit liquor, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence …

Guddu Giri @ Guddu Kumar GiriversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Guddu Giri sought anticipatory bail after a complaint (No. 1791/2020) alleged he committed offences under IPC sections 323, 341, 504, 379, 354, 498A/34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act (sections 3 and 4). The prosecution claimed he subjected his wife to cruelty and ousted her for refusing a dowry …

Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Kumar SoniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ashok Kumar Soni, a jeweller, was implicated in a theft case (PS‑409/2025) for alleged receipt of stolen jewellery, with co‑accused Munna Kumar confessing that the stolen items were found at Ashok Jewellers. The petitioner argued that the recovered jewellery could not be positively linked to the …

Chhotu Kumar @ Anshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, was charged under Sections 329(3), 308(4), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S.S 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly demanding a large sum of money, ordering the killing of an informant's son, and firing a pistol at the informant's house. He claimed he was falsely …

Raju Kumar @ Vijendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raju Kumar, was arrested on 30 July 2025 in connection with a rape allegation under Section 64 of the B.N.S., based on FIR dated 28 July 2025. He contended that he has a clean antecedent and that the accusation is fabricated, pointing out that the victim's medical report, prepared …

Wakar @ WaqarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Wakar, was charged under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 3 of the Domestic Violence Act following a complaint by his wife, Mobina Praveen. He filed an anticipatory bail petition after a summoning order was issued. The parties reached an amicable settlement wherein the petitioner …

Mukesh Kumar @ Bai SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Kumar, also known as Bai Singh, was implicated in a robbery case (Case No.31 of 2022) under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly stealing a motorcycle from an informant. The petitioner asserted his innocence, stating that no incriminating material had been recovered from him and …

Arjun ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Arjun Choudhary was arrested on 21 August 2025 in connection with a rape case (P.S. Case No. 177 of 2025) under Sections 64(i) and 62 of the B.N.S, 2023. He applied for bail, claiming innocence and alleging that the FIR was fabricated. The prosecution, through the Additional Public Prosecutor, …

Md. Samir Alam @ Md. MoshaddilversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Samir Alam, was charged under Sections 323 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code in a complaint alleging dowry harassment and cruelty. He applied for bail, claiming innocence and no prior criminal record, while the State and complainant opposed, alleging a second marriage and refusal …

Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Anil Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for bail in a case (Mahua P.S. Case No. 386 of 2025) involving alleged cyber‑crime, narcotic offences and a tax offence, with charges under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S, Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act and Section 66 of the I.T. …

Balmiki ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Balmiki Chauhan, a driver of a JCB machine, was implicated in an FIR (Mufassil Police Station Case No. 411 of 2025) for alleged illegal sand excavation under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the B.N.S. The JCB, owned by Surendra Kumar, was seized during a raid, and the owner had earlier …

Sunil Kumar Ram @ Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Ram, was named in a complaint (No. 1012/2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 379, 498A and 504, including dowry demand, physical and mental torture, and assault. The petitioner contended that no dowry was demanded, the marriage had broken down, and the …

Md. Shahadat @ Md. SahadatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Shahadat, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint (Case No. 885 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 494, 379 and 498A relating to dowry harassment, assault and other crimes. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner demanded dowry, abused his wife and was …

Viraat BatraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Viraat Batra, sought bail in a case registered under Section 85 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section ¾ of the D.P. Act, alleging that the allegations of dowry harassment and physical/mental torture were false and stemmed from a matrimonial dispute. The informant-wife, Tanya Arora, claimed …

Kailash PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Kailash Paswan sought anticipatory bail after an FIR (Case No. 50/2025) alleged he assaulted a youth with a sharp weapon, invoking several sections of the B.N.S. 2023. He contended that the allegations were false and stemmed from a dowry‑related family dispute, noting a prior FIR (Case …

Suraj kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, was arrested on 31‑08‑2025 in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Chiraiya Case No. 366/2025) under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. He sought bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the FIR was false, delayed, and the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the …

Lucky Kumar Ojha @ Lucky Kumar @ Lucky OjhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Lucky Kumar Ojha was arrested in connection with a police case (No.337 of 2024) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, including a gunshot injury to an informant. The petitioner contended that he was falsely …

Sudhir MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sudhir Mahto applied for anticipatory bail after the police, based on a co‑accused’s confession, linked him to the seizure of 765 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The prosecution argued that the petitioner was involved, while his …

Chikku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chikku Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS No. 704 of 2025) for alleged possession of 5 litres of illicit country-made liquor seized from a scooty he owned. The FIR charges under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 were filed against the …

Dablu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Dablu Kumar sought anticipatory bail in a case (Fatuha P.S. Case No. 958 of 2025) alleging violation of Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for possession of one litre of illicit liquor. The prosecution’s FIR named four accused, including the …

Sandeep Kumar Sharma @ Tinku Sharma @ Suresh SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar Sharma, was implicated in a dowry death case (Complaint No. 660 of 2023) under Sections 498A and 304/34 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he is not the husband of the deceased and therefore not liable, asserted his innocence, and claimed no prior criminal …

Mofijuddin AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mofijuddin Ansari, applied for anticipatory bail after the police seized 214 litres of foreign liquor from an auto‑rickshaw registered in his name in connection with Excise Case No. 417 of 2025 under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016. The …

Munna MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Munna Mandal petitioned the Patna High Court for bail in a case (Dhoraiya P.S. Case No. 252 of 2024) involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. He claimed innocence, lack of criminal antecedents, and pointed to similar co‑accused who had been granted anticipatory bail by the same court. The State …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, applied for bail in connection with a theft case (PS Turkolia Case No. 422 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 331(4), 305 and 317(2) of the B.N.S. He claimed innocence, stating that the FIR was lodged against unknown persons and that his name appeared only in a …

Kariman Chaudhary @ Sanjeevan ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kariman Chaudhary, applied for bail in connection with a case registered under Section 140(3) of the B.N.S., alleging that he was falsely implicated in the disappearance of his brother. The prosecution’s case rests solely on a missing report and a confessional statement of a …

Mahendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mahendra Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after police seized 100 kg of fermented mahua and 10 litres of country-made liquor from his jointly owned house in connection with FIR No. 16 of 2026 under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The prosecution alleged that …

Lakindra Dhangar @ Sohan DhangarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Lakindra Dhangar applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 15 litres of country-made liquor and two gas cylinders from an open area outside his house. The petitioner argued …

Kari DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kari Das, the petitioner, was implicated in a criminal case (PS No.97 of 2025) for offences under several sections of the B.N.S. He claimed innocence, stating that a land dispute led to mutual injuries and that a counter‑case had been filed against the informant. He asserted no prior criminal record …

Chandan Mandal @ Chandan Kumar @ Nishikant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Chandan Mandal and Pawan Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where police, acting on secret information, seized 612 litres of illicit liquor from a tractor that did not belong to them. The prosecution alleged violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition …

Md. Fajil @ Mohammad FajilversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Fajil, was implicated in a 2018 case (PS No. 338) for alleged offences under several IPC sections, including rioting, assault, and causing death. He was accused of keeping a dead body on a public road, obstructing traffic, and attacking police personnel. The petitioner claimed he …

Babulal HansdaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Babulal Hansda and Tallu Hansda sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Dagarua Case No. 416 of 2025) where an FIR alleged they participated in an assault on informant Md. Jamal, who was injured while protecting his crops. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners …

Ranjan Kumar @ Ranjan ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ranjan Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle (Reg. No. BR 02 AM 1622), was implicated in a case where the bike was seized with 40 litres of illicit country‑made mahua liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He claimed the motorcycle was parked due to a …

Bhola Kumar @ Amresh @ Amresh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Bhola Kumar, Jitendra Kumar and Rajeev Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a case where 855 litres of illicit Nepali liquor was seized from a white Scorpio (registration BR 1 AP 1516) near the Indo‑Nepal border. The police identified the …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar, the owner of an e‑rickshaw, applied for anticipatory bail after police seized 750 ml of illicit country‑made liquor from his vehicle in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The petitioner argued that he had no knowledge of or control …

Rajesh UrawversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajesh Uraw, applied for anticipatory bail after a police raid at his joint house recovered 15 litres of illicit country‑made liquor, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016. The prosecution’s case was based on secret …

Mukul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukul Kumar was arrested in May 2025 on charges of kidnapping the sister of an informant and alleged sexual assault, with the charge sheet invoking Sections 137(2), 96, 75, 78, 62 of the B.N.S. and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner pleaded that he has a clean antecedent and that the …

Kasim AnsasriversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Kasim Ansari, aged about 60, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 65(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging that he raped an eight‑year‑old girl. He has been in custody since 1 May 2025. The petitioner’s counsel argued that his …

RAVINDER MEHTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ravinder Mehta, an Assistant Inspector General of Registration/Assistant Commissioner of Stamp in Shamli, was arrested after a trap operation alleged that he demanded and accepted a bribe of Rs.1,00,000 to settle a stamp duty deficiency. The bail application was filed under Section …

MALKEET SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF U.P AND ANR.

Dismissed on merits/Rejected

Malkeet Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the learned Additional Government …

Aakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Aakash Kumar and Aaditya Kumar, were arrested on 02‑02‑2026 after 83.640 litres of liquor was recovered from a car in a Buxar Excise case. They applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of incriminating material in their possession, and that they were merely a driver and passenger …

Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, was arrested on 17 January 2026 after 5.250 liters of liquor were allegedly recovered from a jute bag in his possession during a raid by the Sadar Excise Police Station, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was …

Sanjivan Rai @ Sajivan RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjivan Rai, was implicated in a FIR (Case No. 1120 of 2022) alleging fraud under IPC sections 420 and 406. He argued that the same allegation had earlier been pursued in a complaint (Case No. 972(C) of 2021) which resulted in a compromise and his discharge under Section 245 of the …

Madan NatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Madan Nat was arrested in Bheldi police station case No. 329 of 2025 for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 62 litres of liquor were recovered from a sack at a public place. He claimed he had no knowledge of the liquor, no incriminating material was …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 178 litres of liquor from a co-accused's house and a nearby hut, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no possession of the liquor, that his name was mentioned only …

Tetari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of women and one man from Madanpur Bintoli, were charged in PS Awtarnagar case No. 65 of 2024 for a series of offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, stemming from a police raid that recovered 20 litres of liquor and an alleged assault …

Dewa Mukhiya @ Deba MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dewa Mukhiya, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 350 litres of liquor from a river bank and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no possession of the liquor, that the recovery was made in a public area, and that …

Babul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of women and one man from Madanpur Bintoli, were charged in PS Awtarnagar case No. 65 of 2024 for a series of offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, stemming from a police raid that recovered 20 litres of liquor and an alleged assault …

Md. Kurban @ Md. QurbanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Md. Kurban was arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(1), 32(2) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 423 litres of liquor were recovered from a pick‑up vehicle he owned and drove. He pleaded innocence, claiming he had no knowledge of the contraband and that no incriminating …

ANOOP SRIVASTAVAversusTHE STATE OF U.P AND ANR.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Anoop Srivastava filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023) seeking the High Court's intervention in the criminal proceedings. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while the learned Additional …

Raushan Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Raushan Kumar Singh filed a writ of habeas corpus seeking the production of his wife and minor child before the Patna High Court. The State, represented by counsel, submitted that the alleged victim had been recovered and had voluntarily left her house, with her statement recorded under …

Prem Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are the brother‑in‑laws, father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the deceased, filed an anticipatory bail petition fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case (PS Case No. 243/2022). The offence alleged includes IPC sections 304B, 201, 120B, 302, 498A/34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 …

Shiv Kumari Devi @ Shiv Kumari @ Makhola Devi @ Mashola DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are the mother‑in‑law, father‑in‑law, sister‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of a woman allegedly killed in a dowry‑related murder, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under IPC Section 304B and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that …

Bhagya Narayan Sah @ Bhag Narayan SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhagya Narayan Sah, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case (PS Case No. 72 of 2025) where his daughter-in-law was allegedly killed. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, participated in cruelty and the eventual homicide, charging …

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar and Suraj Kumar filed an anticipatory bail petition. Manoj withdrew his request after being arrested, leading the court to dismiss his bail application. Suraj sought anticipatory bail for alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 103(1) of the B.N.S., 2023, with the only evidence being …

Sachin Kumar @ Sachin SahniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No.190 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S.S. 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused assaulted the informant’s family members, including inflicting …

Md. Lala @ Ashfaq AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Lala (Ashfaq Ali), feared arrest in a murder case (Jagdishpur PS Case No. 115 of 2024) registered under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that four accused killed the informant's husband and that the petitioner had provided a vehicle to the accused for …

Ram Kishor YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Ram Kishor Yadav and Futani Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in connection with PS case No. 82 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S. Act. The informant claimed that the petitioners assaulted her daughter and father‑in‑law, causing severe injury. The …

HARI SHANKAR SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA

The Allahabad High Court heard three bail applications filed by Hari Shankar Sharma, Deepak Jain and Sushant Goyal, all accused in a GST fraud case (Case No.1057/2025) involving alleged creation of fictitious input tax credit under Sections 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c) and 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act, 2017. …

Vivek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vivek Kumar was charged under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 548.805 litres of liquor recovered from a pick‑up vehicle. He had earlier applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied. The petitioner argued that he had no incriminating material …

Prince Kumar @ Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Prince Kumar, was arrested in Athmalgola for alleged possession of 86 litres of liquor recovered from three yellow plastic sacs, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, no incriminating material was found on …

Sonu Kumar Singh @ Amajeet Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Singh, was implicated in a FIR (Dariyapur PS Case No. 664 of 2022) alleging offences under sections 307, 341, 323, 324, 325, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC, involving armed assault and injuries. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that a compromise had been …

Vinod DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vinod Das, was arrested on 27‑12‑2025 after 125 litres of liquor were recovered from an auto‑rickshaw and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, the vehicle did not belong to him, and no incriminating …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Manish Kumar, was arrested on 31-12-2025 after 220 litres of liquor were recovered from an e‑rickshaw, and charged under Sections 30(a), 41 and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating he was neither the owner nor driver of the vehicle and that no …

Subhas YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Subhas Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS Ashtawan case no.112 of 2025, which alleges assault leading to the death of an informant's father. The petitioner was not named in the original FIR; his name appeared later in a restatement by the informant. Two …

Amresh Singh @ Amresh ChandravansiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amresh Singh, was charged under Sections 498‑A, 494, 302 and 34 of the IPC for the alleged murder of his wife. He had been in custody since 3 April 2024 and his earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner claimed an alibi, supported by CCTV footage certified under Section …

Yogendra MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, six residents of Champanagar, Purnia, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged assault on the informant’s husband on 22‑12‑2024. The FIR charges them under several sections of the B.N.S. Act, 2023, including offences of assault and grievous injury. The …

Surendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Surendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bihar Natural Sand Act for alleged illegal sand excavation using his JCB machine. The police had raided the site, recovered the JCB, and the driver was said to have exceeded his …

Rakesh Sah @ Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rakesh Sah and Raju Sah, were implicated in a FIR alleging assault, robbery and other offences under several sections of the B.N.S.S. 2023. They claimed the allegations were false, arising from an old enmity and a retaliatory FIR, and that a counter‑case had also been filed against …

Diwakar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Diwakar Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that a consignment of flour entrusted to a carrier, Zinka Logistics Solution Pvt. Ltd., was not delivered, leading to charges under IPC Sections 406 and 420/34. The petitioner contended that he was merely a local contact for the carrier …

Ashok SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ashok Sah, Abhishek Sah, Birendra Sah and Chhotelal Sah, were implicated in a 2017 case (Kuchaikote PS Case No. 224) for offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have assaulted an informant at her residence. They claim they were falsely implicated due to …

Sanjo DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are family members of co‑accused Shyam Sundar Kumar, were implicated in a 2021 case (Udakishunganj P.S. Case No. 345) for offences under several IPC sections and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. They claim innocence, stating that the police’s final report cleared them, but a Judicial …

Karan Kumar @ Karan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Karan Kumar (Karan Yadav) was charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. 2023 for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family with a sword and knife. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated and that the FIR was a retaliatory counter‑complaint to an earlier case in which his …

Atul Anjan @ PhuloversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Atul Anjan, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated in an assault and theft of a gold chain. He claimed innocence, asserted that the incident was a simple hurt case, and …

Bipin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a student named Bipin Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered in 2017 for offences under Sections 341, 323, 353 and 504/34 of the IPC, alleging that he was falsely implicated in an altercation over BCA results. He claimed innocence, asserted that he had not …

Inzamamul @ AppuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Inzamamul @ Appu, was arrested in a police raid on a house linked to a co‑accused alleged to be running a mini gun factory. The police recovered firearms and related materials, but none were found on the petitioner. He contended that the search violated Section 103(4)(5) of the …

VEER NARAYAN RATHAURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The revisionist, Veer Narayan Rathaur, filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate that dismissed his complaint alleging that his daughter‑in‑law and her relatives had retained jewellery and cash and had assaulted him. He claimed the trial court erred …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a case where an FIR (Supaul PS Case No. 409 of 2025) alleged that they, along with others, assaulted the informant's husband with an iron rod and used lathis against family members. The informant, Rina Kumari, claimed the assault occurred at their veranda, …

Pappu Rai @ Pappu RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are relatives of a woman killed in a dowry‑related incident, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 80 and Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the deceased's husband and co‑accused were responsible for her death, while the …

Biram Mahto @ Biran Mahto @ Birendra MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Biram Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that the co‑accused Jato Mahto assaulted the informant’s brother with a knife, while the petitioner was only …

Ranjan Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ranjan Kumar Mahto was arrested in Forbesganj for allegedly possessing 67.5 litres of liquor recovered from five black bags, alleged violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he had no knowledge of the liquor, the bags did not belong to him, and no …

Malay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Malay Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 606.03 litres of liquor recovered from a truck registered in his name. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, that no incriminating material was …

Rekha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rekha Devi was arrested after 10 litres of liquor and related items were recovered from her residence, a joint family house, and charged under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that no incriminating material was found in her …

Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arvind Kumar was charged under Sections 419, 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly refusing to execute a sale deed after receiving Rs 44.70 lakh from the informant for land in Bihta. The parties had a written agreement to complete the sale within nine months, but the petitioner failed …

Shashibhushan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers from Nalanda district, were implicated in a criminal case (Sare P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025) for alleged assault on an informant, theft of cash and a gold chain, and possession of a rifle, with charges under multiple sections of the B.N.S. 2023 and the Arms Act. They …

Munni Rai @ Munna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Munni Rai (also known as Munna Kumar), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the informant’s daughter, married to co‑accused Neeraj Kumar, was subjected to dowry‑related cruelty and was …

Pushpa DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Pushpa Devi and Surendra Singh were implicated in FIR No. 555/2025 alleging assault on informant Laxman Singh and his son, with charges under several sections of the B.N.S.S. 2023. The petitioners contended that the allegations were false and stemmed from a land dispute between the …

SUNIL KUMAR SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, five employees of a finance company, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Police Station Mansi case No. 315 of 2020, which alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the IPC. The informant, a sales manager of CNHI Capital India Pvt. Ltd, …

Rajan Kumar @ Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petition petitioner, Rajan Kumar, was implicated in a FIR alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 341, 365, 504 and 506/34 of the IPC based on the complainant Sita Devi’s apprehension that her son was missing after a dispute over unpaid wages. The petitioner contended that he had no …

Mahajan SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, members of the Gotia community, were named in an FIR for assaulting an informant and her family on 18 May 2025, allegedly using lathis, iron rods and bricks. They sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 109, 191(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya …

Lal MohammadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Lal Mohammad and Azad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 427, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting the son and brother of an informant. The alleged assault resulted in simple injuries and the petitioners …

Devendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devendra Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to withdraw a pending modification application. He relied on the bar provision contained in Section 403 of the Bihar Negotiable Security Act, 2023, which corresponds to Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. …

Bholesh Singh @ Bholesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bholesh Singh, sought bail in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNS) Act, 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated in an assault on an informant during which a gold chain was stolen. The prosecution alleged that Singh assaulted the informant …

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, feared arrest in an excise case (Case No. 991 of 2025) where police seized 211,500 litres of illicit foreign liquor from three tankers. He was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 based solely on the disclosure of his …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rahul Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police, relying on secret information and local testimony, implicated him in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, for allegedly storing illicit liquor. The FIR alleged that liquor was recovered from a field …

Balkeshiya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Balkeshiya Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for alleged possession of 25 litres of illicit country‑made liquor. The liquor was recovered from a white bag in an open bush behind her house, not from her …

Rajesh Kumar Manjhi @ Rakesh ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Manjhi, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, after 14 litres of illicit country-made wine was recovered from a bamboo clump near his house. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession …

Bhairo SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Bhairo Sahani and Avishek Kumar, sought relief from imminent arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where 40 litres of liquor was recovered from a motorcycle. They contended that the liquor was not in their physical or conscious …

Kamlesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kamlesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with PS Ara Nawada Case No.702 of 2018, an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The police raid on Rinku Chaudhary’s house recovered 528 bottles of wine and …

Raju Kushwaha @ Shyam Mahto@Shyam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raju Kushwaha, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 20.25 litres of illicit liquor was seized from a motorcycle and a co-accused, Sonu Kumar, was arrested. The prosecution’s case against the petitioner rests solely …

Dhani Mahto @ Dhanai MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Dhani Mahto and Brija Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where 69.120 litres of foreign liquor were seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The prosecution’s case linked them to the offence based solely on a …

Sushil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sushil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the seizure of 3,948.48 litres of foreign liquor from a truck. The prosecution’s case was based on the statements of co-accused who named the petitioner, although the liquor and vehicle were not found …

Vikash Mahato @ Vikash MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Mahato applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a 2022 case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 25 litres of illicit liquor were recovered near his house. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but the petitioner contended he was not present at the location and the …

Harendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Harendra Paswan, sought bail in a case alleging possession of 173.20 litres of foreign liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution’s case was based solely on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, with no physical recovery from the …

Raunak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raunak Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where three bottles of illicit liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he had lent to a co‑villager. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was in the …

Birabal Prasad KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Birabal Prasad Kushwaha, is the registered owner of a truck from which 89.280 litres of illicit liquor were seized in an Excise case. He claims he had no knowledge of the liquor being loaded, as the goods were loaded at Gorakhpur and the driver, who has been apprehended, acted …

Md. Faiyaz Ahmad KhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Faiyaz Ahmad Khan, sought bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where 432 litres of Nepali liquor were recovered from a Sumo Gold vehicle. He contended that he was not present at the time of the seizure, had no criminal …

Minku Kumar @ Minku SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Minku Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after the police recovered 750 ml of illicit liquor and Rs 20,000 in counterfeit currency from his house in connection with a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that the seized items were actually in …

Arjun Kumar @ Arjun PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Arjun Kumar, was implicated in an Excise case (No. 1683 of 2025) after a police check seized 20 litres of illicit liquor from a motorcycle registered in his name. The police alleged that the motorcycle was being used by Durga Prasad and co‑accused Kailash Mahto, who were caught with …

Ram Udgar SafiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ram Udgar Safi applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging he was involved in transporting illegal liquor. Police seized 510 bottles of Nepali Desi wine from an e‑rickshaw (Reg. No. BR32ER‑3785) that the petitioner …

Bihar through the District Magistrate, BegusaraiversusSangeeta Kumari

DISMISSED

The State of Bihar appealed the acquittal of Sangeeta Kumari, who was alleged to have been present in a house where a large consignment of foreign liquor was seized. The prosecution relied on the testimony of eight police witnesses and an informant, but many of those witnesses contradicted each …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Kumar was apprehended for alleged possession of 83.625 litres of liquor recovered from an auto, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not the driver or owner, had no criminal record, and that his name was derived solely from a co‑accused’s …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar was implicated in a case (PS No.263/2025) for alleged possession of 439.92 litres of liquor recovered from a tempo, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, the tempo did not belong to him, and his name …

Dipu Saw @ Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dipu Saw, was implicated in an excise case (No. 964 of 2025) for alleged recovery of 330 litres of liquor from a car, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating no criminal record, no possession of liquor, and that the car did not …

Vikas KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vikas Kumar, sought bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 1360 litres of spirit were seized from a Tata Intra vehicle. He asserted that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle and was accused solely on …

Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was arrested as the driver of a vehicle from which 270 litres of liquor was seized, and was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the contraband, had no incriminating material in his possession, and …

Jagdish YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jagdish Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 11 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He claimed innocence, stating no incriminating material was found in his possession and that he was …

KonenversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Konen and Faruk Sah were arrested as driver and co‑driver of a Bolero vehicle from which 719 litres of liquor was seized, and were charged under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioners contended that they had no knowledge of the contraband, no incriminating …

Amarnath Paswan @ Amar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Amarnath Paswan, manager of a poultry farm in Madhubani, was arrested after 697.725 liters of liquor were recovered from his premises and was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner pleaded innocence, arguing that no incriminating material was found in his …

Rajesh RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajesh Ram, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 50 litres of liquor recovered from a drum, charged under Sections 30(a), 30(d) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, no incriminating material was …

SATYENDRA YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Satyendra Yadav, was arrested after 140 litres of liquor was recovered from his straw house in Sirdala, Nawada, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no incriminating material was found in his possession, and …

Suman Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suman Kumar Singh, was charged under Sections 47, 30(a) and 38(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged possession of 617.67 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle, a pick‑up and a tempo. He contended that he was merely the owner of the pick‑up vehicle, had no …

Kuresh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kuresh Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 80(1), 238(a) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. relating to the dowry‑related murder of his sister‑in‑law. The prosecution alleged that the deceased’s husband and co‑accused had harassed and eventually …

Vijay Basfor @ KhesariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vijay Basfor, was arrested in a drunken state and charged under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 4.86 litres of liquor was recovered from the house of a co‑accused. He contended that he had no possession of the liquor, was falsely implicated, and …

Pintu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pintu Singh and Sumit Kumar, were arrested on the spot after 99 litres of liquor were recovered from a tempo, and were charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They applied for bail, contending that they had no knowledge of the contraband, were merely a …

Raghunath SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raghunath Sahni, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 640.2 litres of liquor were recovered from a co‑accused's house. He claimed innocence, stating that no incriminating material was found on his person, he was not …

Jogendra Kumar @ Karu Chaudhary@ Jogendra ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jogendra Kumar Chaudhary was arrested in Nawada district after 220 litres of liquor were recovered from a bush and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he had no possession of the liquor, that the recovery was from an open area accessible …

Vinay Kumar PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vinay Kumar Patel, a driver, was arrested after 171 litres of liquor were recovered from a tempo in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating he had no knowledge of the goods and that no incriminating material was found in his …

Amit Kumar @ Majhi @ ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Amit Kumar was arrested in Dehri (Muffasil) for alleged possession of 65 litres of liquor recovered from bushes near a cremation ground, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he had no incriminating material in his …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was arrested as the driver of a pick‑up vehicle from which 293.44 litres of liquor were seized, leading to charges under Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the contraband, that no incriminating …