Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Fajil @ Mohammad FajilversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court conditionally granted bail to the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Fajil, was implicated in a 2018 case (PS No. 338) for alleged offences under several IPC sections, including rioting, assault, and causing death. He was accused of keeping a dead body on a public road, obstructing traffic, and attacking police personnel. The petitioner claimed he was not present at the scene, was falsely implicated, and highlighted that co‑accused had already been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate bench. He sought bail, noting a single disclosed criminal antecedent and no prior bail applications. The High Court, noting the precedent of bail to co‑accused and applying Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023, granted conditional bail, directing the petitioner to surrender within eight weeks with specified surety and conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the serious nature of the alleged offences.
  • Whether the grant of anticipatory bail to co‑accused warrants similar relief to the petitioner.
  • Whether the petitioner’s disclosed criminal antecedent affects the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • anticipatory bail
  • IPC offences
  • Section 482
  • high court
  • Bihar
  • police assault
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16552 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-338 Year-2018 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Fajil @ Mohammad Fajil Son of Late Bala Miya @ Sheikh Jamuruddin,
                 Resident of Village- Naya Tola, Dhanka, P.S.- Dhaka, District -East
                 Champaran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Jai Prakash Verma, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State

                                 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Dhaka P.S Case No. 338 of 2018 dated 27.08.2018

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149,

                   323, 504, 283, 427, 435, 353, 290 and 291 of the Indian Penal

                   Code.

                                 3. As per allegation, the accused persons including the

                   petitioner are said to have kept the dead body of the deceased,

                   Shobha Devi near Referral Hospital, Dhaka on Dhaka-Chiraiya

                   main road and they have blocked the road and nuisance was

                   being created there by them. It is also alleged that when the

                   police personnel tried to pacify the matter, members of the mob
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16552 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                            2/3




          including the petitioner attacked on the police personnel and

          raised slogans against them.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

          present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner was not

          present at the place of occurrence. He also submits that other co-

          accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail by

          a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.02.2026

          passed in Cr. Misc. No.5100 of 2026.

                       5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail

          petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier

          either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

                       6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the

          bail petition that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent.

                       7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently

          opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

                       8. Considering the fact that similarly situated co-

          accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail,

          this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named,

          to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender

          before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the

          date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16552 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                       3/3




                     furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)

                     with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                     learned concerned Court Below, in connection with Dhaka P.S.

                     Case No. 338 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down

                     under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and on the

                     following conditions:

                                  (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                     below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent other than

                     the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail

                     bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied

                     that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite

                     his knowledge of the same.

                                  (ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                     below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong,

                     learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                (Jitendra Kumar, J.)
ravishankar/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.