Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kari DasversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to bond and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Summary

Kari Das, the petitioner, was implicated in a criminal case (PS No.97 of 2025) for offences under several sections of the B.N.S. He claimed innocence, stating that a land dispute led to mutual injuries and that a counter‑case had been filed against the informant. He asserted no prior criminal record and had not previously applied for anticipatory or regular bail. The State opposed the bail application. The High Court, considering the existence of a counter‑case and injuries on both sides, granted bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023, including cancellation if antecedents are discovered or false statements are made.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the pending criminal case and counter‑case.
  • Whether the petitioner’s claim of no prior criminal antecedent is credible.
  • Whether Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 can be invoked to impose conditions on bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 482
  • counter case
  • land dispute
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16427 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2025 Thana- Mabby District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Kari Das Son of Bilash Das, R/o Village - Shishodih, P.S. - Mabbi(Sadar),
                 Dist. - Darbhanga.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Baidya Nath Prasad, Advocate
                 For the State            :        Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest,

                   in connection with Mabbi (Sadar) P.S. Case No. 97 of 2025,

                   dated 26.07.2025, registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

                                 3. There is allegation of assault by the accused

                   persons against the informant and his family member.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

                   case. He further submits that as a matter of fact, the petitioner

                   and the informant’s side are agnates and on account of land

                   dispute, altercation took place in which both sides got injuries

                   and case and counter case has been filed. The counter case filed
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16427 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                            2/3




          by the petitioner’s side is Mabbi (Sadar) P.S. Case No. 101 of

          2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections

          126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

                       5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail

          petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier

          either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

                       6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the

          bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

                       7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently

          opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

                       8. Considering the case and counter case and injury on

          both sides, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner,

          above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest

          or surrender before the court below within a period of eight

          weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this

          order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-

          (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned concerned Court Below, in connection

          with Mabbi (Sadar) P.S. Case No. 97 of 2025, subject to the

          conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.,

          2023 and on the following conditions:

                       (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16427 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                       3/3




                     below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent, learned

                     court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after

                     hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has

                     concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the

                     same.

                                  (ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                     below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong,

                     learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                              (Jitendra Kumar, J.)
ravishankar/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.