Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lucky Kumar Ojha @ Lucky Kumar @ Lucky OjhaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The petition for bail is allowed, and the petitioner is granted bail subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Lucky Kumar Ojha was arrested in connection with a police case (No.337 of 2024) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, including a gunshot injury to an informant. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the informant had fired first during a dispute over waste dumping and that the petitioner’s side’s retaliatory fire accidentally hit the informant, which he claimed was a counter‑FIR to a case lodged by his side. He further stated that he had no prior criminal record and had not previously applied for anticipatory or regular bail. The State opposed the bail application. The Court, after considering the facts and the counter‑case, granted bail subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. Act, including cancellation of bail if criminal antecedents or false statements were discovered.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in the pending criminal case despite the serious nature of the offences alleged.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Arms Act
  • Section 482
  • counter FIR
  • anticipatory bail
  • B.N.S. Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16367 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2024 Thana- BHAGWANPUR HAT District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Lucky Kumar Ojha @ Lucky Kumar @ Lucky Ojha S/O Satyendra Ojha
                 Resident of village- Mishra ke Mora, P.S.- Morakhas, District- Siwan, Bihar

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr. Amar Alam, Advocate
                 For the State          :        Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest,

                   in connection with Bhagwanpur Hat P.S. Case No. 337 of 2024

                   dated 13.08.2024, registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 126(2), 115(2), 329, 125, 109, 352, 351 and 3(5) of

                   B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                 3. As per allegation, the petitioner has caused gunshot

                   injury in the left arm of the informant.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

                   case. He further submits that as a matter of fact, there was

                   altercation between the informant and the petitioner’s side in

                   regard to dumping of household waste in which it was the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16367 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                            2/3




          informant himself who fired at the petitioner’s side, but in

          course of effort of the petitioner’s side to save themselves, that

          fire hit the informant himself. He further submits that in regard

          to the occurrence, the petitioner’s side has lodged one

          Bhagwanpur Hat P.S. Case No. 336 of 2024. He also submits

          that the present FIR is a counterblast to the FIR lodged by the

          petitioner’s side.

                       5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail

          petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier

          either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

                       6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the

          bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

                       7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently

          opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

                       8. Considering the case and counter case, this petition

          is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named,            to be

          enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before

          the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of

          receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing

          bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

          concerned Court below, in connection with Bhagwanpur Hat
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16367 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                           3/3




                         P.S. Case No. 337 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid

                         down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S 2023, and on the

                         following conditions:

                                      (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                         below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned

                         court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after

                         hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has

                         concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the

                         same.

                                      (ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                         below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong,

                         learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                      (Jitendra Kumar, J)
shoaib/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.