Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhairo SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioners subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, Bhairo Sahani and Avishek Kumar, sought relief from imminent arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where 40 litres of liquor was recovered from a motorcycle. They contended that the liquor was not in their physical or conscious possession and that the motorcycle did not belong to them, arguing that their involvement was based merely on suspicion. The prosecution opposed the bail, but the court noted the absence of a seizure memo witnessed by two independent persons and the lack of direct possession by the petitioners. Considering the petitioners’ criminal antecedents and the procedural deficiencies, the court ordered that they be released on bail if they surrendered within four weeks, subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 each with two sureties. The bail was conditioned on their cooperation with the investigation, verification of their criminal records, and the possibility of cancellation if antecedents were concealed.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners despite the absence of physical possession of the contraband
  • Whether the procedural deficiencies in the search and seizure memo justify bail
  • Whether the petitioners’ criminal antecedents preclude bail under Section 438 CrPC

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • suspicion
  • search and seizure
  • liquor
  • excise law
  • criminal antecedent
  • Section 30
  • Section 438
  • Section 482

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10940 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2025 Thana- DEWARIA District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Bhairo Sahani Son of Late Bhikhari Sahani Resident of Hussepur, Naya Tola
                  Police Station - Sahebganj.
           2.    Avishek Kumar Son of Rajendra Sahani Resident of Hussepur, Naya Tola,
                 Police Station - Sahebganj.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioners
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Ms. Sweety Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Akbar Ali, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-02-2026                           Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                   2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, the recovery is of 40

                   liters of liquor from a motorcycle.

                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   the name of the petitioners have surfaced in the case on account

                   of suspicion. It is next submitted that no recovery has been

                   made from the physical and conscious possession of the

                   petitioners. It is further submitted that no recovery has been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10940 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                            2/3




          made from the said motorcycle. It is next submitted by the

          learned counsel for the petitioners that the motorcycle does not

          belong to the petitioners.

                           5. The application is opposed by the learned APP

          for the State.

                       6. Considering the fact that no recovery has been

          made from physical conscious possession of the petitioners and

          also that the motorcycle in question did not belong to the

          petitioners, the possibility of petitioners being implicated on the

          basis of suspicion cannot be ruled out and further given the fact

          that the search and seizure memo is not witnessed by two

          independent witnesses and also taking into account the fact that

          petitioner no. 1 has two criminal antecedents and petitioner no.

          2 has one only criminal antecedent, let the petitioners, above

          named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court

          below within four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special

          Judge, Excise Court No.-II, Muzaffarpur in connection with

          Dewaria P.S. Case No. 141 of 2025, subject to the condition laid

          down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal

          Procedure/Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and subject to
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10940 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                                      3/3




                    the further condition that:-

                                 (i)   the     petitioners       shall   co-operate   in   the

                    investigation/trial.

                                 (ii) the learned Court would, however, verify the

                    criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case it is found that

                    the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedent, the

                    Court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the

                    petitioners. However, it is expected that the verification process

                    would be done expeditiously without causing any delay.



                                             (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.