Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Surendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner on the condition of a Rs.5,000 bond with two sureties.

Summary

Surendra Paswan was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a location behind Sanjay Manjhi's house, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he had a clean record and was falsely implicated because the seized liquor did not belong to him, merely that he lived nearby. The State opposed bail, but the court considered the petitioner's clean antecedents and the claim of false implication. The court ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.5,000 with two sureties of the same amount. The bail was directed to be given to the trial court where the case is pending.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act
  • Whether the petitioner’s claim of false implication and lack of ownership of the seized liquor warrants bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise law
  • Section 30(a)
  • false implication
  • liquor seizure
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31380 of 2026
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2026 Thana- PARSA District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Surendra Paswan S/o Jagdish Paswan R/o village - Bahlolpur, P.s- Parsa ,
                 District - Saran

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ravi Prakash
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Ms. Indu Kumari Srivastava
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-05-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

                   offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise

                   Act.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of

                   recovery of 40 liters of liquor from a place behind the house of

                   Sanjay Manjhi.

                                4. Learned      counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is

                   next submitted that the recovery was made from a place which

                   does not belong to the petitioner, but since he resides nearby,

                   hence, he came to be apprehended and is in custody since
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31380 of 2026(2) dt.15-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      27.02.2026.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the bail

                      application of the petitioner.

                                   6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

                      counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is

                      directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

                      5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where

                      the case is pending/successor court in connection with Parsa P.S.

                      Case No. 98 of 2026.



                                                    (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.