Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Excise Act

2120 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600

Dhiraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 153 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and that the 2018 …

Abhimanyu Kumar @ Munnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhimanyu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40.38 liters of liquor from a location adjacent to his property. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession and that the informant’s delay …

Sultan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sultan Kumar, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 207 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he was not in possession at the time of seizure, emphasizing his clean antecedent. The …

Bittu SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bittu Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 637.6 litres of liquor from a vehicle he did not own. He claimed the complaint was filed on the basis of a hostile chowkidar’s information and …

Sachin Sahani @ Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sachin Sahani and Ankit Kumar, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 69 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued that they were not in conscious possession, were not owners of the vehicle, and that the case against them …

RAKESH SAH @ RAKESH GOND @ RAKESH KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Sah, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic (BNS) Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 20 litres of liquor was from a public bush and not from his possession. He …

Ram Dayal PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ram Dayal Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that only 13.125 litres of liquor was recovered from a motorcycle and that he had no conscious …

Ram Sajan Kumar @ Ram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ram Sajan Kumar, was implicated in a case under several sections of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 211.5 liters of liquor from a bus. He argued that he had no direct possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the case was based solely on a …

Virendra Mahto @ Virendra Kumar @ Dilli WaliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Virendra Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of Rs. 11,960 from a paasi khana not belonging to him. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no contraband was found in his possession, and the case was …

Vikas Sahni @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikas Sahni, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted a clean criminal record, claimed he was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and alleged that a watchman (Chowkidar) with whom he …

Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 8,863.56 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the seized liquor, and was implicated …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 11 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his conscious …

Rajendra Ray @ Rajendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajendra Ray sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 16.98 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession and that the …

Mithilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithilesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged he was involved in the recovery of 440 litres of liquor from an Alto car, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle owner, and was implicated …

Arjun Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arjun Kumar Sah sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 63.81 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and a bag. He contended that he neither owned the vehicle nor possessed the bag and that the case …

Mungia DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mungia Devi, sought anticipatory bail after the police implicated her in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering three litres of liquor from an abandoned hut that she claimed did not belong to her. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a …

Pardeshi Sahani @ Pardeshi Babu @ Pardesi BabuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pardeshi Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of 73.755 litres of liquor and 800 empty bottles from a mango orchard not owned by him. He argued that the liquor was not in his …

Neeraj Singh @ Neeraj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Neeraj Singh, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 151.44 litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and has a clean …

DEEPAK KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 42 litres of liquor from his residence, which is a joint family property. He was not apprehended on the spot and no liquor was found in his conscious possession. The …

Nagiya Kuer @ Nago KuerversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nagiya Kuer, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 11 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to her house. She argued she had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not in her possession, and the …

Sudis SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sudis Sahni, the owner of a motorcycle from which 20.385 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he had a clean antecedent and was unaware that another person, Santosh, misused his vehicle. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seizure implicated Sahni under Section …

Rupa KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rupa Kumari, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor from her residence, a joint family property. She argued she had no conscious possession, clean antecedent, and that the 2018 amendment …

Munna MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Mahto, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 960 litres of spirit from a vehicle. He contended that he was not the owner, the vehicle was not seized from his possession, and the case was based solely on confessional statements of co-accused, …

Rahul Kumar SafiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Kumar Safi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 36 litres of liquor from a Hyundai car. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicle, …

Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Pappu Kumar and Amit Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 146.885 litres of liquor from a house that does not belong to them. They argued they had no conscious possession, the …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of BIhar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor, 1150 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua, and seizure of a motorcycle from his residence. He argued that the liquor was stored in a joint‑family house, …

Birendra MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Birendra Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 110 litres of liquor were recovered from a river bank and not from his possession. …

Madhuri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Madhuri Devi and Motilal Sah, residents of Gopalganj, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 22.8 litres of liquor from their joint family house. They argued that the liquor was not in their conscious possession and that …

Guddi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddi Devi, the wife of Rakesh Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of liquor, firearms, cartridges and a large sum of cash recovered from her husband's house. She argued that she had no direct possession, the property was jointly owned, she had a clean …

Ranjay Ray @ Ranjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Ranjay Ray and Sanjay Ray sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275, 110, 123 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 26 litres of spirit, a motorcycle, a scooty and Rs. 6,59,485 were seized from their …

Ranjan DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjan Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was unaware of her friend's misuse of the …

Abhimanyu Paswan @ Manu Paswan @ Abhimanyu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Abhimanyu Paswan and Hiraman Paswan, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, together with Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 105 litres of liquor were recovered from a river bank and …

Ajay Kumar @ Swaminath AarybalaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Excise Act involving alleged recovery of 4,924.8 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, …

Sudhir Sah @ Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 97.275 litres of liquor from a cattle shed adjacent to his house. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession, the informant’s name was omitted …

Anita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anita Devi, the wife of Ranjan Singh, sought anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of one litre of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, was not present at …

Sanni KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanni Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing nine litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his conscious …

Gopi SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Gopi Sah, Garib Sah and Pushun Sah, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of large quantities of liquor at their joint family house. They …

Amit Kumar @ KalluversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 131 litres of liquor from a bush near a cattle shed. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and …

Radha KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Radha Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated solely on the basis of a local …

Bhola Paswan @ BholaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three Paswan brothers, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 93.2 litres of liquor from a riverbank location not belonging to them. They argued they were not caught in possession and were implicated …

Anil RavidasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Ravidas, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 46.5 litres of liquor from a Toto vehicle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the …

Dhauli Devi @ Amita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three siblings, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor. The petitioners sought to withdraw the application for the third sibling who had already been arrested. The court granted …

Amit ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act involving alleged recovery of 3,240 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the truck, and the only …

Tileshwar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tileshwar Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the FIR omitted the informant’s name, …

Akshay Kumar Paswan @ Akshay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Akshay Kumar Paswan sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from an under‑construction house and two motorcycles. He contended that he had no direct possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicles, and …

Nikesh SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Amarpura Tola, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and a mustard field. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, had no …

Md. Naushad @ NoshadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Naushad, was implicated in an excise case for allegedly possessing 1.5 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle, under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was …

Vishal Kumar @ Vishal RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vishal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor and semi‑prepared spirits from a public area near the Ganga River. He contended that nothing was seized from his possession, the alleged …

Bajanti KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bajanti Kumari was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 750 ml of liquor from a vehicle she owned. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware that the vehicle would be …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Six individuals were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. The petitioners argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the scene, and the alleged liquor was recovered from land not belonging …

Vinod ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vinod Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after a FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleged that 27 litres of liquor were recovered from a co‑accused’s house and 18 litres from his own residence, which he claims is joint family property and that no liquor was found in his conscious …

Rajesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 810.2 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from the house of Virendra Rai. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and the alleged …

Sanoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanoj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a vehicle, alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and that the …

Shivjee Manjhi @ Shivjee Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shivjee Manjhi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 17.5 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession. …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware of any misuse of his vehicle by a …

Shokat AliversusThe State of BIhar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shokat Ali, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 135 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and that …

Ghanshyam RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ghanshyam Ray and Nageshwar Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 26.64 litres of liquor from a joint family house. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not apprehended at the spot, and …

MITHLESH KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not found in his immediate …

Sushil SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sushil Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in his possession, and the …

Sima Kumari @ Seema KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sima Kumari, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 3.060 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, was unaware of her friend's misuse of the …

Ritalal MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ritalal Mahto and Sonalal Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from Dumra Chewar. They argued that they were not caught in possession and that the complaint was filed …

Umesh Rai @ Umesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Umesh Rai was implicated in a case under Section 414 of the IPC read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He argued that he was not present at the spot, that the seized vehicle belonged to him but was misused by a friend, and …

Vinod Sahni @ Vinod MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vinod Sahni, a resident of Shyampur, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10.5 litres of liquor recovered from a bag that did not belong to him. He claimed he had a clean antecedent and that the complaint was motivated by an …

Md. Javed @ Md. Salim @ JavedversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Javed, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 8.46 litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that no liquor was found in his conscious possession and that the post‑2018 …

Munna Kumar @ Munna ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Munna Kumar and Sarjun Manjhi, were implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a joint family house. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that they were not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not in their conscious …

Tulashi Kumar @ Tulashi RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Tulasi Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a public bush, not in his possession. He argued the allegation was based on secret information and that the location did not belong to …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Nitish Kumar and Mukesh Kumar Rai, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 2,384 litres of liquor from a DCM vehicle. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not in …

Lav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lav Kumar, the petitioner, faced arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 7.44 litres of liquor in a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure and that the vehicle was misused by another person, …

Kamlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kamlesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 300 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he was not caught in possession, asserting …

Anup KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anup Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 126.27 litres of liquor from his residence and nearby premises. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is …

Meena DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Meena Devi applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to her house. She was not arrested and no liquor was found in her possession. The petitioner claimed she has a clean …

Gautam Yadav @ Gautam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gautam Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 317(5) and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances Act (BNS) read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 54 litres of liquor from a Tata Magic …

Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravindra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 42 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious possession of the liquor, claiming …

Manoj RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Chapra, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor from four vehicles. They argued they had no clean possession of the liquor, were not apprehended at the …

Sayad Ejazullah Hafifi @ Sayad Ejazullah HabibiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sayad Ejazullah Hafifi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 232.410 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was …

Lakhan MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lakhan Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail after learning that an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act had been lodged alleging he recovered 36 litres of liquor from a public litchi orchard. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the alleged liquor was not in his possession, …

Rana Rakesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rana Rakesh Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2015 case (Giriyak PS No. 269) involving offences under several IPC sections and Section 47A of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, the seized vehicle did not belong to him, and no direct …

Chotu MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Chotu Mandal, the owner of two autos from which 180.27 litres of liquor were seized, sought anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and was unaware that his driver misused the vehicles. The State opposed …

Sajan Kumar Byadha @ Sajan ByadhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sajan Kumar Byadha, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 139.2 litres of liquor and seizure of two motorcycles from a room behind a hotel. He contended that he had no prior criminal …

Ghuran Yadav @ Ghuran MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ghuran Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Non‑Compulsory Statutes (BNS) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 90 litres of liquor recovered from three sacks. The petitioner argued that …

Sagar Ali @ Saghar AliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sagar Ali, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 26 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in conscious possession of the liquor, and was merely the owner of the vehicle …

Aditya KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aditya Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after liquor amounting to 302,400 liters was recovered from two Mahindra XUV500 vehicles he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had no knowledge of his cousin Arun's alleged misuse of the vehicles, and possessed a clean …

Shambhu SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shambhu Sahni, a resident of Vaishali, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor near Moti Chimney. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the complaint …

Pankaj SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pankaj Sahani feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 110 litres of liquor were recovered from his mother, Tetri Devi. The petitioner claimed he had a clean antecedent and that the only evidence against him was his mother’s confessional statement …

SUDHIR KUMAR KUNWAR @ SUDHIR KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar Kunwar, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in the recovery of 311.34 litres of liquor from a vehicle, invoking Section 281 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was …

Balindra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Balindra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 9.6 litres of liquor from a spot adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the recovery site did not …

Bali MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Bali Mukhiya feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly concealing 12 litres of liquor near his house. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging to him, that the complaint originated from an inimical watchman, …

Anuj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anuj Kumar and Raja Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the liquor recovered was from a hut not belonging to them and that the case was based solely on a confessional statement made by Neeraj in police custody. They …

Kishore Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kishore Kumar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 486 litres of liquor from a Hyundai car. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and …

Naresh Kumar @ Naresh Mahto @ Naresh MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Naresh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 5.4 litres of liquor were recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a …

Sanjeet Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Kumar Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 120 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had no conscious possession, was not the vehicle owner, and the case was based solely on a …

Dharmendra Keshari @ Dharmendra Kumar KeshariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Keshari, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 23.40 litres of liquor from his scooter. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Sajan MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sajan Mahto and Rajan Mahto, were implicated in a case alleging recovery of 125 litres of liquor from a public area, offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the liquor was not in their conscious …

SUKHO DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sukho Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a), (c), (d) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from her motorcycle. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was unaware of her friend's misuse of the …

Ramashish YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramashish Yadav, the owner of a motorcycle from which 32.250 litres of liquor was seized, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused …

Sanjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 292.050 litres of liquor from an auto and a godown. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized items, was not the owner, and was implicated solely …

Jitendra SaperaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Sapera, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a public place near a temple. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, the …

Manju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Manju Devi, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a public place. She argued that she was not arrested at the spot, nothing was recovered from her possession, and the alleged …

Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 72 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the …

Ajay Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Jha, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,800 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his personal possession; the prosecution’s case …

Manjesh Kumar Thakur @ Manjesh ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manjesh Kumar Thakur was implicated in a case under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 28 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and was implicated by a …

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Das @ Rakesh RavidasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in actual possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the case was based solely on a …

Raslal MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raslal Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged liquor recovery occurred at …

Mahendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahendra Singh, the owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 128.16 litres of liquor. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his vehicle was misused by …

Sujeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sujeet Kumar, the owner of an auto bearing No. BR01 AZ‑7185, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He was not arrested at the spot and the liquor was not found in his conscious possession; the driver …

Dharo Chaudhary @ Dharmendra ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dharo Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 47(A) and 47(F) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 90 litres of liquor and 6,000 kg of Jawa Mahua. He contended that he was not apprehended at the spot, nothing was seized from his …

Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sunny Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 9.37 litres of liquor were seized, sought anticipatory bail for alleged offences under Sections 317(4), 317(5), 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the …

Raushan Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 33 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the …

Pankaj Kumar @ Haricharan RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 7.4 litres of liquor from a premises adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession and that the informant, a local resident, …

Purn Mashi Yadav @ Purnwasi YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Purn Mashi Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 34 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a motorcycle he owned but he was not present at the spot. He argued that he had no knowledge of his friend's alleged misuse of the vehicle …

JamaludinversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jamaludin, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 42 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his immediate possession, and he was unaware that …

Mahesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahesh Chaudhary and Priyanka Kumari sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to their house. The petitioners argued that the liquor was not in their conscious …

Chinta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chinta Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 16 litres of liquor from her residence, which is a joint family property. She contended that she has a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was …

Rakesh Mahto @ Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rakesh Mahto and Arjun Mahto, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 102 litres of liquor from banana orchards, including their own. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that they were not arrested, the liquor was not …

Uday Prasad @ Uday KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Uday Prasad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from two sacks. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging to him, he had no conscious possession, and the case …

Jinish Rai @ Jinish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jinish Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 86.4 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the recovery was from property not owned by …

Dileep MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Dileep Mahto and Deelep, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 300 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in their possession, and the case was based …

Muntun Mandal @ Manchun MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Muntun Mandal was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 57.75 litres of liquor from his potato field and faces charges under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and the …

Guddu Ray @ Gudu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guddu Ray, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 600 litres of liquor from the bank of the River Ganga, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He had seven prior cases under the Excise Act and had been in custody since 10 March 2026. The petitioner …

Vipin PanditversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vipin Pandit, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 440.9 liters of liquor from a pickup van, alleged to be a "magic" vehicle, under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not present at the spot, had no liquor in his possession, and was …

Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of large quantities of codeine cough syrup recovered from his poultry farm and vehicles. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Tuntun SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, members of the Sahni family, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging they were involved in the recovery of 410 litres of liquor and 20,000 litres of Jawa Mahua solution from a site near the Gandak river. They argued they …

Virajan Kumar @ ViranjanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Virajan Kumar, a resident of Muzaffarpur, was implicated in a case under Sections 414 and 34 of the IPC read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 136.8 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He claimed he had a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and was …

Amarjeet Yadav @ Amarjit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Amarjeet Yadav, feared arrest in a case under Section 281 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He had earlier obtained anticipatory bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 16396 of 2026, but the trial court found he had concealed an …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar was apprehended in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 92.250 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, he was not the owner of the vehicle, and the case was based solely on an informant’s tip without …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Suraj Kumar was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 27 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, he is not the owner of the vehicle, …

Pankaj Yadav @ Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 37 of the Bihar Excise Act read with Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act after an informant reported that four persons fled from police, one of whom was seized drunk and a pistol was recovered. The petitioner argues he had no …

Sheshnath MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sheshnath Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 84 litres of liquor and 9,000 litres of …

Chandan MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Mukhiya, applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a public ghat. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged incident occurred …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the Bihar Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of liquor. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the allegations were vague and that the …

Rohan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohan Yadav, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he had a clean criminal record. The State opposed his request for anticipatory …

Gaurav Kumar @ Gaurav Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar Jha, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 841.650 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in the act, no liquor was found in his possession, and his implication …

Ranjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 1,017 litres of liquor from four vehicles and charged under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code together with Sections 30(a), 32(ii), 38(ii) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He pleaded that he has a clean …

Vicky chaudhary @ Dhiraj Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vicky Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 35 litres of liquor from a location near a graveyard and pond. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and the alleged liquor was …

Mantu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mantu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 557.5 litres of liquor from a Mahindra tractor. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle's owner, and that …

Madhurendra MadhukarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Madhurendra Madhukar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 2,356.720 litres of liquor from vehicles he owned. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his vehicle was …

Savitri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Savitri Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from two houses. She argued she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and the liquor was found in joint family property, not in her …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 111 and 112 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a field not owned by him. He argued that he was not …

Vidhan Rai @ Vidhan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vidhan Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 94 litres of liquor from a public area near the Ganga River. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and …

Md. Ansarul Nadaf @ Ansarul NadafversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Ansarul Nadaf, was implicated in a case under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 585 litres of liquor from four motorcycles and a sack. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time …

Sohan MarandiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sohan Marandi, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 100 litres of liquor and 6,000 litres of fermented mahua from a forest. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he was not arrested at the spot, that the …

Rakesh Kumar AzadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rakesh Kumar Azad, the owner of an e‑rickshaw, was implicated in a case where 50 litres of liquor were recovered from the vehicle, although he was not arrested at the spot and claims he had no knowledge of the alleged misuse. He sought anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal antecedent and …

Manjay Kumar Ray @ Manjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manjay Kumar Ray sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 112.14 litres of liquor from the premises of Rajendra Chaudhary. The petitioner argued he had no direct involvement, no possession of the liquor, and a …

Gorelal BindversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gorelal Bind, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging possession of liquor recovered from a neighbour and his backyard. He argued that no liquor was found in his immediate possession, the recovery was based on a confessional statement …

Ramesh Mahto @ Bachkun MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 4.350 litres of liquor found in a washroom of his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the property is jointly owned, and …

Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bittu Kumar and Jitendra Kumar sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 313 litres of liquor were recovered from a Scorpio vehicle and a mustard field. The petitioners contended that they have clean antecedents, were not in …

Sidharth KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sidharth Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw that he owned. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a third …

Suresh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Dardha Chausaj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 380 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. They …

Awadh Rai @ Awadh Bihari RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Awadh Rai sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 9.540 litres of liquor from a bush near his house and 49 litres from a government field. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his …

Ranjeet SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic (BNS) Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 931.2 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a Xylo car. He contended that he was not caught in …

Rajesh Paswan @ Raghwendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Rajesh Paswan and Dilip Kumar (also known as Govind Kumar Singh) feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 7.44 litres of liquor from the Balaji Marriage Complex. They contended that no liquor was found in their possession, …

Manager RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Manager Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he was not caught in possession, that the seizure was based solely on confessional …

Nandlal ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandlal Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from locations adjacent to his house but not from his possession. He contended that the police had mechanically implicated him based on …

Virat kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Virat Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 316.6 litres of liquor from a Tata Indigo car. He contended that he was not in possession of the vehicle, was not its owner, and was implicated by a …

Amitab Bachchan Chaudhari @ Amitabha Bachchan ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amitabha Bachchan Chaudhari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where the police alleged recovery of liquor from a neighbour's house and concealed behind his house. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the …

Mithun SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mithun Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Sections 30(a) and 32(1), (2) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong …

Abdul Wahid AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abdul Wahid Ansari, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 3.6 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that the actual offender fled the scene, …

Arvind SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Arvind Sahani, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from his residence, which is a joint family property. He asserted that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and possessed a clean criminal …

Ajay Paswan @Ajay Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ajay Paswan, Shambhu Paswan and Anil Tiwari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 266.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They contended that they were not caught in possession, were not owners of the …

Bhola SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhola Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a sugarcane field and a pond area not belonging to him. He claimed the complaint was motivated by an inimical relationship with a chowkidar and that …

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Mukesh Kumar and Manish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The first petitioner has three prior excise cases, while the second has a clean record and is alleged to …

Anwara BegumversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anwara Begum, the owner of a motorcycle from which 0.650 ml of liquor was recovered, feared arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, had a clean criminal record, and was not in possession of the …

Gyanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Gyanti Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 126 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was unaware of her friend’s alleged misuse of the vehicle, and that the …

Amarjeet Kumar @ Amar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amarjeet Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 40 litres of liquor and 60 litres of raw material recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was …

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 4.68 litres of liquor from a fast‑food shop. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession and the case relied on a confessional …

Sanjay Nut @ Sanjay NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Nut, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor. He sought to correct a pleading error, claiming his criminal antecedent comprises six prior excise cases rather than five as …

Anish Singh @ Anis SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anish Singh sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case alleging offences under Sections 338, 336(3) and 304(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 800 litres of spirit from a Scorpio …

Tabla Nut @ Raghvendra NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tabla Nut @ Raghvendra Nat, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor from a village area not owned by him. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Raghuwar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raghuwar Sah, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 151.68 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the driver of the vehicle …

Shailesh Kumar @ Bhondu Chaudhary @ Shalesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shailesh Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 175 litres of liquor and 200 litres of Jawa Mahua from a kiln near the Ahra river. He contended that he was not caught in possession, the seized material was not on his property, and that …

Dinesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 47(A)(F) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 90 litres of liquor and 600 litres of fermented Jawa Mauha recovered from his house, which is part of a joint family property. He contended that …

Md. AftabversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Md. Aftab and Manish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 6.945 litres of liquor recovered from a house that is joint family property of petitioner No. 2. They argued that no liquor …

Bipin Kumar @ Virendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 872 litres of liquor from government land. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and that the land is public and …

Kunal Singh @ Udhari SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhola Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10.335 litres of liquor in a thatched hut on his agricultural land. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was recovered from his conscious possession, and the …

Pappu Yadav @ Ravindra Kumar Yadav @ Ravindra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Yadav, was implicated in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor near Chalho hill. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery site is a public area, …

Mainejar yadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Mainejar Yadav and his son Jaiprakash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 23.94 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued that they have clean antecedents and were not in possession …

Amar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amar Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 49.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and …

Bhola SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhola Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10.335 litres of liquor in a thatched hut on his agricultural land. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, that the evidence was based on secret information, and that he …

Gayatri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Gayatri Devi sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 26 litres of liquor from a wall of Vikas Bhawan, a public place. The petitioner argued she had no possession of the liquor, the alleged location did …

Rupesh Kumar @ TeniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 126 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the investigation …

Pappu Kumar @ Pappu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 110.125 litres of liquor. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession, the alleged recovery site was public, and the FIR omitted the informant's name, …

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12.75 litres of liquor from the roof of his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house being jointly owned, and …

Ankit Kumar Yadav @ Ankit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ankit Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 172.8 litres of liquor from a truck, although the liquor was not found in his possession and he claims he was unaware that his vehicle was used by another person, …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Guddu Kumar and Sona Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from a location behind Rakesh's house and 325.080 litres from an auto. They argued they have clean …

Raj Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 318(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 2,800.4 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he …

Sanoj ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanoj Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not found in his possession, and he was unaware that …

Raju BhaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Bhai, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 74.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no liquor in his possession, and was unaware that a person named Chhotu …

Manisha Devi @ Manisha KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manisha Devi and Mithun Sahni filed an anticipatory bail application in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 160 litres of liquor from a joint family house. Mithun Sahni was arrested while the application was pending, and his counsel sought to …

Shiva Sahni @ Shiva KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiva Sahni was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 13 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, and the amendment to the Excise Act in 2018 abolished the concepts of …

Rekha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rekha Devi, a resident of Bettiah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a location adjacent to her house. The petitioner argued that no liquor was found in her possession, the FIR was based on …

Rahul Kumar @ SonuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor near a brick kiln. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession, the recovery was based solely on …

Vikram Kumar @ Bikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikram Kumar, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 38 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused his vehicle. The State opposed his request …

Raj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was …

Chinta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chinta Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 125 litres of liquor from a kitchen behind her house. She argued that the liquor was not in her possession, that the location did not belong …

Rajesh ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Manjhi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing two litres of liquor recovered from a field that he does not own. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, and the police …

Sanjay Sahani @ Sanjay SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sanjay Sahani and Rakesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. They contended that the alleged liquor recovery was not from their possession, …