Patna High Court
Mithilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The Court provisionally granted anticipatory bail, subject to verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedent, under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Summary
Mithilesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged he was involved in the recovery of 440 litres of liquor from an Alto car, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle owner, and was implicated solely on secret information without proper investigation. The State opposed the bail, contending the seriousness of the offence. The Court granted provisional anticipatory bail conditioned on a Rs.5,000 bond with two sureties, subject to verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedent under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The order stipulated that if more than one prior case is found, the bail would not be confirmed; otherwise, it would be confirmed upon verification.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the BNSS in a case involving alleged excise offences?
- Whether the petitioner’s alleged lack of possession and ownership of the seized vehicle precludes arrest and justifies bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Excise Act — s. 30(a)
- Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (BNSS) — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- excise law
- seizure of liquor
- police investigation
- criminal antecedent
- Section 30(a) Bihar Excise Act
- Section 482(2) BNSS
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32747 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2023 Thana- ARA MUFFSIL District- Bhojpur
======================================================
Mithilesh Kumar S/o- Kanhaiya Yadav @ Kanhyalal Yadav Resident of
Village- Bara Basantpur PS- Ara Muffasil Dist- Bhojpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sarveshwar Tiwary
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Shaheen Begum
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 13-05-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of
recovery of 440 litres of liquor from an Alto car.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of
the seized vehicle and he came to be implicated based on secret
information which is the easiest way to implicate someone
without holding a proper investigation. It is next submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32747 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
2/3
of late police started implicating accused with criminal
antecedent, in cases relating to excise for obvious reasons.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court
within a period of six weeks from today, be released on
Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.
5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where
the case is pending/successor court in connection with Ara
Muffasil P.S. Case No. 37 of 2023, subject to the conditions as
laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial
Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and
in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more
than one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the
purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his
antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional
anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after
verification if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of one
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32747 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
3/3
case in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be
confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.