Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Excise Act

2120 judgments · newest first · showing 601–800

Dharmendra Yadav @ Bhogendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Dharmendra Yadav was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 585 litres of liquor concealed under straw. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery site did not belong to him. …

Munna Kumar @ Munna ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munna Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 52 litres of liquor and 250 litres of Mahua from his residence, which he claims is a joint family property and that he had no conscious possession or knowledge of the …

Sandeep Sao @ Sandeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Sao, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 24 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner …

Pappu SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Sahani, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 91.25 litres of liquor from a rented house. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, …

Ankit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ankit Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 32.8 litres of liquor from a scooty. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the …

Rahul BhartiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Bharti, was implicated in a case (PS Bihta Case No. 806 of 2025) for alleged possession of 200 litres of liquor seized from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He claimed he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he had a clean criminal record. The …

Dilkhush KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 359 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 19.8 litres of codeine cough syrup from a grocery shop owned by Bihari Kumar. The petitioner argued he has a clean record, …

Raj Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 99 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the alleged recovery site was public, and the FIR was based on …

Arun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Arun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 2,701.8 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not present at the spot of seizure, that the liquor was not found in his conscious …

Beby DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Beby Devi, a widow from Madhubani, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a bush near her house. She claimed she had no possession of the liquor, that the recovery was from land not belonging to her, and that a …

Mani KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mani Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 250 litres of liquor from an auto. He claimed he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated by a hostile …

Suran Yadav @ Surendra Yadav @ Bauka @ Suren YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suran Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …

Upendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Upendra Singh and Ranjeet Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and Sections 217 and 248 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Sections 25(1‑B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The court examined …

Md. AslamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md Aslam, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 229.320 litres of liquor recovered from a poultry farm adjacent to his property. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his immediate possession, …

Manoj Kumar @ Manoj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar Yadav was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 69.120 litres of liquor from his warehouse. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and that the misuse was by an …

Dinanath SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinanath Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that the driver misused his …

Raghav RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raghav Rai, owner of Janki Dhaba, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly concealing 4.125 litres of liquor under husk at his premises. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession. He applied for anticipatory …

Sabita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sabita Devi and Indal Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police recovered 20 litres of liquor from their house and 8 litres from a co‑accused. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor was in a joint family …

Kishori Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kishori Prasad Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 69.120 litres of liquor in his Bolero vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and …

Raushan Sahni @ Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raushan Sahni, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 816.48 litres of liquor from a Mahindra pickup vehicle. He has three prior excise cases and has been in custody since 2 February 2026. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in …

Guddu Yadav @ Guddu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 112(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that the alleged seizure of 705.9 litres of liquor and two …

Baban SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baban Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He alleged that the alleged seizure of 80 litres of liquor and 2000 litres of Mahua was made at a kiln …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 694.2 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the motorcycles, and was …

Bhukhani DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bhukhani Devi, the wife of Satyanarayan Thakur, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against her under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 14.875 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, …

Umesh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Umesh Sahani was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 290 litres of liquor and 8,000 litres of raw material from a kiln near a river, offences punishable under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in …

Vinod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Vinod Yadav was charged under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 90 litres of liquor from the Sone Diyara area. The petitioner, represented by Ms. Rupa Kumari, applied for regular bail, contending that he was not apprehended at the spot and that the liquor was …

Rajesh ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a location behind Raju Manjhi's house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and was …

Anil ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a motorcycle he owned and from a house belonging to another person. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, that the liquor …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in the illegal recovery of 786.660 litres of liquor from a wheat field, invoking Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he …

Mukesh SardarversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Sardar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 30 litres of liquor and 80 litres of semi‑prepared liquor were recovered from a bamboo orchard adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 19.80 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his possession, and the case against him relied on a confessional statement …

Shiva Kumar @ Shiva ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiva Kumar (Shiva Manjhi) sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 44 of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 110 litres of liquor and 1,000 litres of Mahua jaggery solution were recovered from a shed and bush at Ward No. 3, which did not belong to …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Suraj Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 74 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 336(3), 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner has three prior cases, one relating to the alleged …

SAROJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saroj Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 135 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner has 14 prior cases, 12 under the Excise Act, but contends he was not apprehended at the spot, did not have …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Manish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from locations not belonging to him. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, …

Gautam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Gautam Kumar and Pappu Kumar Kewat sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple IPC offences and Section 45 of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from Karu Chaudhary's house. They asserted they have clean antecedents, were not …

Brajesh Yadav @ Barjesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Brajesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 115.72 litres of liquor from five motorcycles. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the seized vehicles, and …

Vipin Kumar Ram @ Bipin Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vipin Kumar Ram, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged seizure of 133.2 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another …

Balinder Ray @ Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Balinder Ray, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized liquor, and was implicated solely on a confessional statement made by another person in police custody. He …

Soni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Soni Devi, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 34 litres of liquor from a joint family house. She argued that she was not apprehended at the scene, no liquor was found in her conscious possession, and the concept …

Arvind Ray @ Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Arvind Ray, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 141.840 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his …

SANJEEV KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 2,203.2 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicles, …

Santosh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) and (b) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 14 litres of liquor recovered from his house and 4 litres from a nearby location. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is joint …

Lalu Kumar @ Lalu PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 10.35 litres of liquor were recovered from a sack he allegedly threw in an open field, with no possession or arrest at the spot. He argued that the recovery was …

Bhuar Ray @ Nirmal RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhuar Ray (Nirmal Ray), was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 240 litres of liquor and 3000 litres of Mahua, which were later destroyed. He argued that nothing was recovered from his conscious possession, the alleged …

Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from premises adjacent to his house and a temple. He argued he had a clean antecedent and that the alleged liquor was not found in his …

Hasan Nadaf @ Md. Hasan NawazversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hasan Nadaf, was implicated in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 99 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was …

Ram Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Kumar Mahto was implicated in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 13,500 litres of liquor in a motorcycle. He was not arrested at the spot and the seized liquor was not found in his immediate …

Vidyanand SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vidyanand Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 28.5 litres of liquor from a bush. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the case was …

Sanjit Mandal @ Sanjit Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Sanjit Mandal sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 15.465 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the house being a joint …

Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prakash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 320.760 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot, and had no …

Janak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Janak Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 270.9 litres of liquor from a room adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to him, and …

RANJAN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Dakaramma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 2,926 litres of spirit and a seized auto. They argued that …

Md. Rahamtullah@ RahamtullaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Rahamtullah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272, 273, 414, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 360 litres of liquor from four motorcycles. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, …

Subhash Mahto @ Suvas MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Mahto, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 288 litres of liquor and 1500 litres of Mahua from a paddy field that does not belong to him. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, that nothing was found …

Pinki KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Pinki Kumari, the wife of Krishna Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 30.48 litres of liquor from a motorcycle registered in her name. She argued that she had no knowledge of the vehicle's misuse, had no liquor in her possession, and …

SACHIN YADAV @ SACHIN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sachin Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 512.460 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle's owner, and that the …

Karan Kumar Sahni @ KaranversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Karan Kumar Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 24.99 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the vehicle, …

Lalbabu RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalbabu Ray was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 600 litres of liquor from the bank of Nurddinganj Ghat, a public place. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and that the alleged liquor was not in his possession …

Ajad MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajad Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from premises not belonging to him. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor and was implicated due to an animosity with a …

Surendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Surendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 62 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the …

Chandeshwar Rai @ Chandeshwar Ray @ Chandrashver RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandeshwar Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 11.25 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He contended that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the house being a joint …

Manju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manju Devi, a resident of Rewan village, was implicated in a case (PS No. 907/2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor concealed near her house. She pleaded that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was not found in her …

Kanhaiya NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Nut, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 30 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was …

Kunal AnandversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kunal Anand, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 99 litres of liquor from his Maruti car. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, that the …

Nandu Yadav @ Nandu Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 1,200 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He argued that he was not caught in possession, did not own the motorcycles, and was implicated by a hostile chowkidar, …

Raju PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 266.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and the case was based solely on a confessional statement …

Vivek SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vivek Singh, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 375 ml of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a person named Kundan misused …

Ajit Lal GaneshversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Lal Ganesh, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 300 ml of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he was not in possession at the time of seizure, emphasizing …

Sanjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from a public place. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the alleged recovery was not from his possession …

Laldas Yadav @ Laldas RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Laldas Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 390 litres of liquor from a public garden. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the complaint was filed by a …

Sumit Mukhiya @ Sumit Kumar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sumit Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 621 litres of liquor from a public area near the Kosi river. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not …

Sudhanshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudhanshu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the case was based solely on a …

Dheeraj VarmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Varma, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 170 litres of liquor from an auto and 180 litres from a scooty. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time …

Dhiraj Kumar ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar Thakur, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 256.575 litres of liquor from a third party's house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession and that the only link to the offence was a …

Manju Yadav @ Manju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners—Manju Yadav, Arun Yadav and Bhim Kumar—sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from a public area. They argued that nothing was seized from their possession, the alleged site was …

Dablu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dablu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7.02 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle. He argued that he was not present at the spot of the alleged offence, that the liquor was recovered from …

Tarabul @ Md. JauwadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tarabul (Md. Jauwad), feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 813.5 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated solely on a …

Jitendra SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Jitendra Sahani and Sukai Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from the bank of the Tilave river. …

Avinash Kumar @ Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Avinash Kumar, the owner of Welcome Hotel, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act after 590 ml of liquor and empty bottles were recovered from two rooms of his hotel. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and that …

Ranjit Sahani @ Ranjit SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ranjit Sahani and Dilip Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor. They argued that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, the location was a public area, …

Jatha BindversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jatha Bind, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 65 litres of liquor. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging to him, and the complaint …

Arvind SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arvind Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 55.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had no possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle owner, and the case was based solely on another accused's …

Manish Kumar SanthaliyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar Santhaliya, a resident of Begusarai, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the …

Rajesh Manjhi @ Jitendra Manjhi @ JitendraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering ten litres of liquor from a sack near his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the …

Harendra Gond @ Harendra Kumar GondversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Harendra Gond sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 19.23 litres of liquor from the Ganga river and seizure of a motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession, was not the owner of …

Pappu Goswami @ Pappu GiriversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Goswami, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25.50 litres of liquor from a drain adjacent to his house. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not found in his possession, and that the …

Sanjay MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 3.5 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the …

Sandhya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sandhya Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from her residence, which is a joint family property. She argued she has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and that the 2018 …

Jai Prakash @ Jai Prakash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jai Prakash Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of nine litres of liquor from an orchard not belonging to him. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, …

Ramu ChaudharyversusThe State of bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramu Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 16 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the orchard did …

John @ Nand Kishore ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, John @ Nand Kishore Manjhi, was implicated in a case under Sections 37 and 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing two litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Dilip Kumar Singh @ Dilip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilip Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 19.650 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that he was merely the …

Chandraket Kumar @ Chandraket RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandraket Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 150 litres of liquor from a scooty. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the scooty, and that the …

Sugriv ChouhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sugriv Chouhan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 46.06 litres of liquor and seizure of three motorcycles. He argued that he had no prior criminal record and that the liquor was found in a …

Sangita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sangita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from her joint family house. She argued she had no conscious possession, the liquor was not recovered from her, and the 2018 …

Md. Aslam Khan @ BholuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Aslam Khan, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 102 litres of liquor from a bus. He argued he had no direct possession, was not the bus owner, and the case was based solely on a confessional statement of another accused made in …

Guddu Rajbhar @ Guddu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Rajbhar, a resident of Siwan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 26 litres of liquor recovered from a public area near a temple. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and arguing that the liquor was not in …

Najara KhatunversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Najara Khatun was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 362.880 litres of liquor from a room she owned but had rented to Suresh, who was apprehended at the scene. The petitioner, a woman with a clean criminal record, sought anticipatory …

Ankush KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ankush Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 52.5 litres of liquor from an orchard behind a poultry farm. He asserted that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not found in his possession, and that the …

Dhirendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhirendra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,800 litres of liquor from the verandah of his Champaran hotel adjacent to a petrol pump. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not in …

Ganesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ganesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 270 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles, invoking Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the IPC read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of …

Laddu Kumar @ Jayram @ Jayram MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Laddu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 121.20 litres of liquor from an auto. He claimed he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicle, …

Kanhai Chaudhary @ Kanhai ChaudhriversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanhai Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging concealment of 30 litres of liquor under straw in a public area. He claimed he was not caught in the act, that the alleged recovery was from a place not belonging to him, and that the …

Umesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Umesh Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 47(A) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged offences from 2014. He filed the application twelve years after the FIR, despite having five prior cases. The court examined whether …

Baban Singh @ Baban Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Baban Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 9.900 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was implicated only …

Rudal Paswan @ Mahaveer Paswan @ Mahavir PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rudal Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from a hut not belonging to him and no conscious possession was established. He argued that the informant’s identity was …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pankaj Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 318(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 2,800.4 litres of liquor and seizure of a vehicle. He contended he has a clean …

Mahesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahesh Kumar, the owner of a truck from which 225 litres of liquor and 440.25 litres of liquor were seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30, 30(a) and 37(b) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was unaware of any misuse of …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused his …

Chanarik Rai @ Chandrika Rai @ Chandrika RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Chanarik Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 56 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was implicated merely as the vehicle …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 294 litres of liquor from the bank of the Ganga River. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged recovery site is a public area, and the informant’s …

Saheb Kumar Yadav @ Saheb Kumar VermaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saheb Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 15.750 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had no knowledge of its misuse, and possessed a clean …

Ankit Verma @ AnkitversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ankit Verma, sought anticipatory bail after liquor amounting to 97.5 litres was seized from his Hyundai vehicle in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not apprehended at the spot, and had no conscious possession of …

Sunil ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Manjhi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 170 litres of liquor and 500 litres of jaggery solution from a public canal area. He argued that he had no possession of the contraband, the site did not belong to …

Harendra NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Harendra Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 40 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a house not belonging to him and 50 litres from sacks. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the recovery was …

Supen SardarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Supen Sardar sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a courier office. He argued that he was not caught with the liquor, was not the owner of the courier agency, and that the case was based …

Sonu Singh @ Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sonu Singh and Vicky Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 35.6 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not caught in …

Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a bag and from a person named Ranjan. He argued that he had no clean possession, the alleged recovery occurred at a location not …

Sonu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Paswan, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 13.5 litres of liquor on a scooty. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that his name was absent from the FIR, …

Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Ranjeet Kumar, owner of a motorcycle from which 47.88 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, claiming he had no knowledge of the liquor and was not in possession of it. He argued that the seizure was based solely on his ownership …

Vilat MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vilat Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 21 litres of liquor from a field adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, he has a clean …

Raja Mahto @ Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Raja Mahto and Saroj Mahto sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not caught in possession, are not owners of the seized …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three villagers from Andhra in Madhubani district, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 21 litres of …

Suresh Pasi @ Saresh PasiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Suresh Pasi, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case involving alleged seizure of 5,440.14 litres of liquor and firearms under the Bihar Excise Act and the Arms Act. He claimed he was implicated because he was purportedly the owner of one of the seized …

Nitish Kumar RajbharversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar Rajbhar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 144 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his friend …

Vinayak Pratap Singh @ TarzanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vinayak Pratap Singh, Suman Kumar and Raftar Singh, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 134.2 litres of liquor from a semi‑constructed room near a school. They argued that the liquor was not seized from their …

Sanjay Kumar Pandey @ Sanjay ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Pandey, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging he concealed 35.28 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging to him, that he was not apprehended on the spot, and …

Umesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umesh Paswan, was implicated in a case under Sections 47(A) and 47(F) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor and 570 kg of Jawa Mahua from a public place. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no contraband was found in his possession, and …

Vidyanand RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vidyanand Ram, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor from his auto. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the driver, who fled the scene, misused the …

DUDHNATH SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dudh Nath Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware …

Guddu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Paswan was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, charged under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the …

Md. AahidversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Aahid, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 4523.04 litres of liquor from a seized vehicle he owned. This was his second anticipatory bail application; a prior petition was mistakenly withdrawn on the ground …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 4,518 litres of liquor and three motorcycles under the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not caught in possession of the liquor, that the motorcycles were owned by him but were misused by another person, and that he …

Angad Kumar @ Angad MahtoversusThe state of bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Angad Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 71.250 liters of illicit liquor recovered from a field belonging to him. He contended that the liquor was found in an open, public area and that he had no conscious possession …

Bali Nut @ Balli NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bali Nut, was arrested in connection with offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 332, 333, 307, 353) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He had been in custody since 11‑11‑2025 and earlier sought regular bail, which was denied …

Rahul SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rahul Sahani was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 240 litres of liquor from a public place near a river, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner, who has six prior excise cases, argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …

Bhola Chaudhary @ Bhola ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhola Chaudhary, applied for bail in a criminal case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a joint family house and that he was not apprehended in possession. He argued that the 2018 amendment to the Excise Act abolished the concept of …

Nandlal Manjhi @ Nandlal MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nandlal Manjhi, applied for bail in a criminal case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 50 litres of liquor were recovered from the house of Suresh Manjhi and another 50 litres from his own residence. He contended that he had no conscious …

Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kumar Kushwaha @ Rajesh KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The Patna High Court heard an anticipatory bail application filed by Rajesh Singh, who feared arrest in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner contended that his name does not appear in the FIR and that the police were unlawfully seeking to …

Sunil SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Sunil Singh was arrested for offences under Sections 272, 273 and 420 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleged to have recovered 89.200 litres of illicit liquor. He has seven prior cases, five under the Excise Act, and has been in custody since 7 March 2026. He previously …

Subhash Kumar Yadav @ Kirkiriya @ Subhash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 324 litres of liquor from an open field behind Pawan's house, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and was implicated …

Ravi Ranjan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 20 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his motorcycle and from a cattle house belonging to a friend, Mintu. He argued that he had no knowledge of the …

Sushil SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sushil Sahani and his wife Sarita Devi, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and S... Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from their joint family house. They argued they had no …

Rahul Kumar @ Raidar @ RiderversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 228.885 liters of liquor from a school and a nearby location, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in possession of the liquor, that the alleged recovery occurred on …

Baudhi Devi @ Shanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baudhi Devi, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from her residence. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was found in a joint family house, …

Dev Ray @ Rajdev RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dev Ray @ Rajdev Rai, was arrested in connection with an alleged seizure of 1,000 litres of liquor and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in the act, that the liquor was recovered from a public riverbank and not from his …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was charged under Section 111 of the BNS read with Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that the liquor was seized from the motorcycles, not from his personal possession, and that …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Suraj Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 750 ml of liquor was from Radhe Shyam Kumar, not from his own possession. The petitioner has a history of eleven prior excise cases, but contends he was not apprehended …

Vikki KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Vikki Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging the recovery of 15 litres of liquor, two country‑made pistols and three live cartridges from his residence. He asserted a clean antecedent and argued that nothing was seized from his conscious possession, …

Rasendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rasendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 190 litres of liquor near a cremation ground. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery site was public, and the case was based …

KRISHNA MANDAL @ KANHAIYA MANDALversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Krishna Mandal, owner of a Scorpio vehicle, was implicated in a case (PS 334/2022) for alleged recovery of 180.36 litres of liquor, violating Sections 30(a), 32(i), 32(ii) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, had no liquor in his conscious …

Sonu Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Sah, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 701.25 litres of liquor from his pickup vehicle, facing charges under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean record, was not apprehended at the …

Santosh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 728/2021) involving serious offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act, including murder, attempt to murder and illegal liquor possession. He contended that the liquor (27 litres) was …

Amarjit Kumar @ MitthuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amarjit Kumar, the petitioner, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, together with several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act. He alleged that the liquor seizure of 2,359.44 liters from multiple vehicles was not …

Dev Kumar Paswan @ Dev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dev Kumar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 133.5 litres of liquor from the house of Harihar Paswan. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, no …

Sujit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sujit Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act after 42.84 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a sack tied to a motorcycle. He contended that he was not present at the scene, had no possession of the liquor or the motorcycle, and was being …

Pappu Kumar @ Pappu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 79.125 litres of liquor from a four‑wheeler. He argued that he was not in possession of the vehicle, had no prior criminal record, and the case was based solely on a confessional …

Raju Kumar @ Raju GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 55.6 litres of liquor from a garbage heap. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and that …

Abhishek Kumar Sahni @ Abhishek Kumar @ AbhishekversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Sahni, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 900 litres of liquor from five vehicles, of which he owned one. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his friend’s misuse of the …

Virendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Virendra Singh, was implicated in an excise case for allegedly transporting 861.6 litres of liquor in a truck he owned, though the liquor was seized from the vehicle and not from his personal possession. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing he had a clean criminal record and was …

Basant PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Basant Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered 100 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and alleged his involvement. Paswan contended he had no possession of the liquor and was falsely implicated, citing his two prior criminal …

Prabhakar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prabhakar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 54 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in actual possession of …

Rahul kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 272, 273, 420, 467, 468 and 120(B) of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 32, 36 and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act. He alleged that he was not caught in possession of the seized liquor (1845 …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 336(3), 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, read with Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act, for the alleged recovery of 1,330.20 litres of liquor from a …

Sakesh Sahiba @ Sakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sakesh Sahiba (also known as Sakesh Kumar), was arrested in connection with offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging the recovery of 3049.98 litres of liquor from a third‑party's house and the seizure of a …

Lalu Kumar @ Lalu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lalu Kumar, was arrested in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a)(e)(4) and 33 of the Bihar Excise Act for the purported recovery of 525 litres of spirits from a van. He has seven prior cases under the Excise Act and has been in custody since 22‑12‑2025. The …

Shankar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shankar Sah was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 457.8 litres of liquor from two vehicles, charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in the act, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the …

Bicky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bicky Kumar, a resident of Saran district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 900 ml of liquor from a shop and the seizure of a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, had no direct …

Mukesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Rai petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 570 litres of liquor and 7,000 litres of raw jawa near the Gandak river. The petitioner argued that no …

Khakhra Yadav @ Indu Bhushan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Khakhra Yadav, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging the recovery of 275 litres of liquor from two cycles. He has nine prior cases, two of which are also under the Excise Act, but was not apprehended at the scene and no …

DEEPAK KUMAR @ DEEPAKversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court heard a bail application filed by Deepak Kumar, who was arrested for the alleged recovery of 118 litres of liquor from a car and two motorcycles under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he has a clean antecedent, is not the owner of the seized …

Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rupesh Kumar was implicated in a case concerning the seizure of 142.875 litres of liquor from two vehicles, a Swift Car and a Tata Tiago, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the vehicles were owned by him but were …

Dippu Yadav @ Deepu Yadav @ Dippu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dippu Yadav, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 6 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and 270 litres from a public area near a river. He was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his possession, and the vehicle involved was not …

Dinesh Nut @ Dineshwar NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Nut, was charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to alleged violent acts and the recovery of 75 litres of liquor. He had been in custody since 30‑01‑2026 and claimed that the liquor was seized from a public …

Rakesh Kumar Tiwari @ Mantun Tiwari @ Mantun BabaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Tiwari, was charged with offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly serving spurious liquor that caused a death and serious illness. He had been in custody since January 2026 and was not originally named in the FIR; …

Arman AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arman Ali applied for bail in a criminal case under Sections 30(a), 38(i) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 3,876.48 litres of liquor were recovered from a truck. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the truck, and was implicated solely on a …

Chhotu Pandit @ Prince RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chhotu Pandit @ Prince Raj, was charged under IPC Sections 414 and 34 read with Bihar Excise Act Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(1) for allegedly recovering 5,727.24 litres of liquor from a truck and a Swift Dzire. He was not seized at the scene, did not possess the seized vehicles, and …

Raju Jha @ Abhishekh Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Jha, feared arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 205.5 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he was not in possession at the time of seizure and was unaware that others would misuse his vehicle, contending that ownership alone should …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 1,071 litres of liquor from a bush in a litchi orchard belonging to Laxman Rai. He was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his possession, and he has a clean …

Chandeshwar RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandeshwar Ray, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 2,053.08 litres of liquor from three vehicles and charged under Sections 30(a), 32(2), 38(2) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was not caught in the act, and …

Manoj Paswan @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Paswan applied for bail in a criminal case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 22 litres of liquor was made from a third person, Sudhir, with whom he has no connection. The petitioner highlighted that he was not apprehended at the scene, has no …

Sunita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sunita Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She contended that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that she was not in possession of it, emphasizing her clean …

Ramesh ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Thakur, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 486 litres of liquor from three motorcycles, one of which he owned. He was not arrested at the spot and claimed he had no knowledge of the misuse of his vehicle by another …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Nitish Kumar and Anil Kumar Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. They argued they had clean antecedents, were not in actual possession, and were not owners of the …

Raju MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 168 litres of liquor. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and the case was based solely on a confessional statement made by another …

Ajay Nut @ Ajay NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 560 litres of liquor from a public pond. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the site did not belong to him, and the complaint …

Sheshnath SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sheshnath Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a), 38(i) and 41(i) for alleged recovery of 2,220.48 litres of liquor from a car and four motorcycles. He contended that he had no …

Asgar Alee @ Asgar AnsaariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Asgar Alee, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from a bus and from a person named Rajesh. He contended he had no possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle …

Shivandra Kumar Ray @ Shivam MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shivandra Kumar Ray (aka Shivam Mishra), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(b) and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a) and 41(1). He argued that he was not caught in possession of the alleged liquor, that the only …

Indrajit Nat @ Amarjeet Nut @ Indrajeet NutversusThe state of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Indrajit Nat, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from a location not owned by him. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the police relied on secret information without proper investigation. The State …

Chandrama Mahto @ Chandrama KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Koirgawa Bin Toli, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of liquor from a distillery not owned by them. They contended that no liquor was found in their …

Rajnish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajnish Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from two locations. He argued that he was not caught in the act, no liquor was seized from his possession, and the FIR did not disclose the informant, …

Dharm KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharm Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 500 litres of Jawa Mahua from a location adjacent to his house, of which 495 litres were destroyed. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, the …

Md. AsrafulversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md Asraful, was implicated in a case concerning the seizure of 648 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle he owned, alleged to be offences under IPC sections 272 and 273 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the …