Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Excise Act

2120 judgments · newest first · showing 801–1000

Sanjiv Kumar @ ModiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjiv Kumar @ Modi, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor, seizure of a motorcycle, and destruction of 1,600 litres of raw material. He contended that he was not present at the spot, had …

Manish Bharti @ Manish Kumar Bharti @ Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Bharti sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 70,500 litres of liquor from a scooty. He argued that he was not in possession of the vehicle, was not the owner, and that the case …

RAHUL KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 70.5 litres of liquor from a scooty. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and …

Janjali Rai @ Janakdhari KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Janjali Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a pickup vehicle not owned by him and that he was implicated solely on secret …

Sitaram yadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sitaram Yadav and Mahendra Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 810 litres of liquor from a boat. They argued they were not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and …

Santosh Ray @ Santosh Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Ray sought anticipatory bail after learning that he was implicated in a case involving offences under Sections 272, 273, 420, 467, 468 and 120B of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 36, 32 and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was recovered …

Bankelal MaliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bankelal Mali, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 414.72 litres of liquor from five bicycles. He claimed he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the bicycles, and was implicated solely on secret information. The …

Dukhan KewatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dukhan Kewat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023 and the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of liquor and the freeing of a seized individual, Shanti Devi, during a ruckus …

ResmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Resma, Asmira and Fida Hussain, feared arrest in a case involving offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Bihar Excise Act. They had earlier filed an anticipatory bail application (Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3442 of 2026) which they later …

Govind RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Govind Ray, sought anticipatory bail after liquor amounting to 18.360 liters was seized from a motorcycle he owned, though he was not present at the spot and had no conscious possession of the liquor. He argued that he had a clean antecedent and that his friend, who fled, misused the …

Shiv Shankar Kumar @ Shiv Shankar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shiv Shankar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 930 ml of liquor from a road near Jaiprakash’s house. He asserted a clean …

Aman KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 612 litres of liquor was from a location not belonging to him and that the investigation relied on secret information. He has four prior …

Sanjay RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor and Mahua were seized. He argued that the seized items were not in his possession, the recovery occurred on property not belonging to him, and that a hostile …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from motorcycles, though he claimed he was not in possession and was unaware of the misuse of his vehicle. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that …

Raj Kishor RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kishor Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 306 litres of liquor from a public area near the Bagmati river. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to …

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak SainiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 115.56 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he had no possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the case was based solely …

Indal Kamat @ Indal Kumar KamatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Indal Kamat, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 252 litres of liquor from a Mahindra Bolero Maxi truck. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, was not arrested at the scene, did not have the seized vehicle …

SAVAN KUMAR @ BITTU KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Savan Kumar, was implicated in a case involving alleged recovery of 930 ml of liquor, facing multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, the alleged liquor was recovered from a location …

Akash Poddar @ Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akash Poddar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 400 litres of liquor from a Tata Sumo Gold vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the …

Hemant @ Hemant Kumar Yadav @ Guddu Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hemant Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 273, 274 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 227.530 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession …

Rupam Anand @ Rocky @ Rup AnandversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rupam Anand, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1), 31(1) and 32(2) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3062.52 litres of liquor from two Scorpio vehicles. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 1,842 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the truck, and was implicated solely on secret information …

Manish Patel @ Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Patel sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 129.24 litres of liquor from an auto and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the …

Shiv Shankar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Shankar Prasad, the petitioner, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 720 ml of liquor in a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his …

Rakesh Kumar @ Ritesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar (alias Ritesh Yadav), was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 300 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and he does not own the …

Rajeev Kumar @ Rajeev Sah @ Rajiv Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajeev Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 90 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the …

Bala Nut @ Bala Kumar Nut @ Bala Kumar Nat @ Bala NatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bala Nut, was charged under multiple serious IPC sections and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from a bush near a canal. He has seven prior excise cases and has been in custody since 9 January 2026, with charges already framed. The …

Guddu Kumar @ Guddu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Guddu Kumar and Pappu Ray were charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 105 litres of liquor near Marine Drive, Patna. The petitioners argued they were not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in their possession, and the case relied solely on a confessional …

Ajim Kumar Singh @ Ajeet Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajim Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 968.76 litres of liquor from two cars and a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had …

Sampat Sahni @ Sampati SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sampat Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from his conscious possession and that the house involved …

Yogendra Bhagat @ YogendraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Yogendra Bhagat and Sadanand Rao, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 466.02 litres of liquor from a pickup van. They contended that they were not in conscious possession, were not owners of the vehicle, and were …

Bigan ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Bigan Manjhi and Basant Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 21 litres of liquor from a spot adjacent to their house. They contended that they have a clean criminal record, that …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kumar was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 54 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused his vehicle. The State opposed his request for anticipatory …

Sunil YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 18 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

Anil Sah @ Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Sah, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 19.260 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not the owner of the vehicle, no liquor was found in his possession, and the case was based solely on a confessional …

Suraj RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Ram, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 5 litres of liquor from a hut not owned by him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the informant’s …

Rakesh Kumar Ray @ Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 32.4 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard behind his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession and the location did not …

Anshu Kumar @ AnshuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anshu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 44 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and jaggery solution. He contended that nothing was seized from his possession, the alleged recovery site was public, and the sole …

Vivek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vivek Kumar, the owner of an e‑rickshaw from which 81 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, alleging that he was not present at the spot of seizure and had no conscious possession of the liquor. The petitioner argued that he has a clean …

Akhilesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a)(d) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 110 litres of liquor and 2000 litres of soaked Mahua occurred at a furnace not belonging to him and that he was implicated by a …

Dilkhush KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly concealing 350.250 litres of liquor behind the house of Ram Balak Yadav. The petitioner argued that no liquor was recovered from his possession, he was …

Srawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Srawan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 23 litres of liquor from a riverbank. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location was public, and the complaint was filed by …

Bala Lakhindra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bala Lakhindra Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …

Sarwan ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sarwan Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a public canal area. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged recovery site did not belong to him, …

Md. SajjadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Sajjad, was implicated in an excise case (Case No. 912 of 2024) for the alleged recovery of 1,300 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and had no knowledge of the vehicle's misuse by …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the Bihar Non-Compulsory Statutes and the Bihar Excise Act, arising from a vehicle stop where a scuffle with police occurred and breathalyzer tests were conducted. The petitioner claimed …

Bhola PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bhola Prasad, the owner of a Brezza car, was implicated in a case where 224.28 litres of liquor were recovered from the vehicle. He was not arrested at the spot and had no conscious possession of the liquor; the driver allegedly misused the car and fled. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, …

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Yadav @ Pramod JadhavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 47(A) and 47(F) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 140 litres of liquor and 460 kg of fermented jawa mahua. He contended that the alleged contraband was seized from a public …

Vikash Kumar @ Vikas KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession …

Ramrati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramrati Devi, a woman with a clean antecedent, feared arrest in a case alleging that 14.5 litres of liquor were recovered from her joint family house under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, the house being joint family property, …

Rakesh Kumar Mahaseth @ Rakesh MahasethversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rakesh Kumar Mahaseth sought relief fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 45 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was …

Sudhir Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sudhir Kumar Yadav was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 144 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, alleged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious …

Soni Kumar @ Soni YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Soni Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor from a public area near the Dhoba river. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering liquor from a bamboo orchard, though the liquor was not found in his possession and the site does not belong to him. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 34.5 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He claimed he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, had a clean criminal record, and that the actual offender, Lakshman, was apprehended at the …

Ramakant SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramakant Sharma was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned, though the liquor was not found in his conscious possession and he was not arrested at the spot. He pleaded that he had a clean antecedent and was unaware that a friend …

Balraj Singh @ Bhuntun SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Balraj Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 324 litres of liquor from a bush. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not in his possession, and the complaint …

Saiyad KamruddinversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saiyad Kamruddin, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 75.24 litres of liquor from his Bolero vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent and that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, asserting that …

Durgavati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Durgavati Devi and Ankit Kumar Yadav, were charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 28.8 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not apprehended at the scene, and that ownership of the vehicle does …

Indal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Indal Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in possession of the alleged liquor, was not the owner of the …

Pramod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Pramod Kumar and Amresh Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor and 1500 kg of jawa mahua. They contended that they were not arrested on the spot, no …

Amit Kumar @ KalluversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amit Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 300 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that nothing was seized from his possession, the site was public, and the complaint was filed by a hostile chowkidar who had not …

Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ankit Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 52.5 litres of liquor from a public area. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession. The petitioner claimed that a chowkidar, with whom he had a …

Kajal KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Kajal Kumari was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from two motorcycles she owned. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was unaware that a friend misused …

Nirsi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Nirsi Devi and Suraj Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering five litres of liquor from a public place near the Collectorate in Patna. They argued that they have clean antecedents, were …

Devkant RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Devkant Ray was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 275.26 litres of liquor from a godown and two vehicles, although no liquor was found in his immediate possession and he was not arrested at the spot. He contended that he was unaware of the misuse of his vehicle by a co‑accused …

Pradeep Yadav @ Pradeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pradeep Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 89.25 litres of liquor from a boring room on his premises. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the room was …

Vikram Kumar @ Vikram RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikram Kumar, feared arrest in a case alleging recovery of 3,681 litres of liquor from three vehicles, with offences under IPC sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 34 and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a), 36, 41(i). He asserted a clean criminal record, claimed he was not arrested on the spot, …

Vishanu Kumar @ Mamu @ MamaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vishanu Kumar and Ashish Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 128 litres of liquor from a joint family house. They contended that they were not arrested on the spot, no liquor was …

Rajiv Saday @ Rajiv SadaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajiv Saday, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing one litre of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …

Fekan Kumar @ Fekan Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Fekan Kumar Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly storing 50.250 litres of liquor on the roof of his jointly owned house. He was not arrested at the scene and argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the …

Jitendra Kumar Das @ Jitendra KurailversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Das, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 40 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he was not in actual possession, that the concept of deemed possession was …

Niraj Sah @ Niraj Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Niraj Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 500 ml of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, was not in actual possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

Daulat DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Daulat Devi, owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act after 212.4 litres of liquor were recovered from her vehicle. She was not present at the scene and the driver fled, leading her to claim she had no knowledge of the offence. …

Shamsher SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shamsher Singh, the owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 184.4 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he was not in possession at the time of seizure, asserting a clean …

Vishal Kumar Verma @ Vishal Kumar @ Vishal VermaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vishal Kumar Verma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act read with Section 317(5) of the BNS, 2023, alleging recovery of 239.4 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not …

Vikram @ Bhutti @ Vikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikram Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 21 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was seized from his possession, and he was not the vehicle's owner, claiming the …

Govinda NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, four individuals from Musepur Nut Toli, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor and semi‑fermented liquor. They argued that they were not caught in possession, the seized liquor …

Sintu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sintu Yadav, was implicated in an excise case (Case No. 366 of 2025) for the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another individual, Vishal, misused …

Ravi Sah @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from his joint family house. He argued that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, the house being a joint family property, and that …

Bipin Ram @ Vipin RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bipin Ram, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 33 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his friend misused the …

GUDDU KUMAR @ GUDDU MANJHIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 54 litres of liquor from a car and 7.5 litres from a motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

Shiv Kumar @ Shiva YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shiv Kumar (Shiva Yadav), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 19.125 litres of liquor from a semi‑constructed house that is part of a joint family property. He contended that he was not arrested on …

Rinku DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rinku Devi, Kundan Nut and Suraj Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 210 litres of liquor from a pond adjacent to their house. They argued that the liquor was not in their conscious …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 164.160 litres of liquor were recovered from a Tata Magic vehicle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was …

Somaru RajwarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Somaru Rajwar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 2.3 litres of liquor from a bush behind his house. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar Bharti @ Chandan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged possession of 11 litres of country-made liquor, a country-made pistol, and cartridges recovered from a cowshed belonging to another person. The prosecution alleged violations of Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 …

Dheeraj SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Singh, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 144 litres of liquor on two motorcycles. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and was implicated solely on the …

Babar AliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Babar Ali, the owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in the seizure of 1,305 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle and possessed a clean criminal record. The State opposed his request for …

Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, the owner of a truck, was implicated in a case (PS Bidupur Case No. 360 of 2021) for alleged possession of 69.12 litres of liquor in a truck and 82.965 litres in a Nano car, offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act read with Section 414 of the …

Munilal SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munilal Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the vehicles were owned by him but were misused by a friend who fled …

Badal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Badal Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 169.74 litres of liquor were seized, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not caught with the liquor, and was unaware that his driver misused the vehicle, who subsequently fled the …

Jagpal @ Jagpal MalikversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jagpal Malik, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 140.25 litres of liquor from a truck he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of the misuse of his …

Afroj Miyan @ Afroj AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Afroj Miyan, was implicated in an FIR alleging that 132.6 litres of liquor were recovered from a straw concealment at Vishunpura village, contravening Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and had no …

Nurul HaqueversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nurul Haque, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 38.5 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and that his friend, who fled …

Dinesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 24.9 litres of liquor recovered from a cowshed. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the cowshed is a …

Dhoni Ram @ Dhoni KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhoni Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 10 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the house is jointly …

BINOD MUKHIYAversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Binod Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor and 100 litres of semi‑prepared liquor from a public riverbank. He claimed the liquor was not in his possession and the recovery site did …

Bithal Saw @ Indrajeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bithal Saw (Indrajeet Kumar), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 47(a) and (f) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor and 690 litres of Jawa Mahua from his residence, which is a joint family property. He argued he has a clean …

Mithilesh Kumar @ Mithilesh ChoupalversusThe state of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithilesh Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …

Onkar NarayanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Onkar Narayan, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 274, 275 and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 25.8 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. …

Neeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Neeraj Kumar and Sanjay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 31.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued that the liquor was not recovered from their conscious possession and that the second …

Lakshmi BabuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lakshmi Babu, the owner of a motorcycle from which 13.875 litres of liquor was recovered, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware that his vehicle would …

Prince KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Prince Kumar, owner of a Scorpio vehicle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 500.625 liters of liquor from his vehicle. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …

Jan Mohammad MianversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jan Mohammad Mian, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 145 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware of his friend's alleged …

Sudhir Kumar BhartiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar Bharti, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged his involvement in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, claiming he had recovered 21.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was neither in possession of the liquor nor the …

Mahesh MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahesh Mishra, the owner of a motorcycle from which 171 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 274 and 275 of the BNS, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being carried, that the vehicle …

Sanjay MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Mahto, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 103.68 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean …

Mukesh Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar Choudhary was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 750 ml of liquor recovered from his co‑accused, Manish, and for being the registered owner of a seized motorcycle. The petitioner, claiming a clean antecedent and no conscious …

Tunni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tunni Devi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 16 litres of liquor from a sack near Chandni crossing. She asserted she had no possession of the liquor, the location did not belong to her, and she was implicated by a …

Ram Awatar SaoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ram Awatar Sao and Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 1.08 litres of liquor. They contended that they were not caught in possession, the alleged recovery was based on a co-accused's confession …

Raja KuraishiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Raja Kuraishi, a resident of Ward No. 26 in Sitamarhi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 69.600 litres of liquor from a field that does not belong to him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at …

Anil ShahiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Shahi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 343.44 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that the actual offender, a friend, fled the scene, …

Sachin Kumar @ Sachin SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 73.2 litres of liquor from a straw house linked to him. He argued that the liquor was not seized from his immediate possession, the straw …

Anil Chaudhary @ Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anil Chaudhary was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 160 litres of liquor from a location not owned by him. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing he has a clean antecedent, the alleged recovery was not from his possession, and the case relied on …

Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after police alleged that 432 litres of liquor were recovered from a poultry farm adjacent to his property and 45 litres from his house, along with the seizure of a motorcycle, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that the …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from his motorcycle and 60 litres from a gallon at Jafrabad. He contended that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, that he was merely the …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, four individuals from Nawada district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 46.5 litres of liquor. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor was recovered from a location not …

Prithvi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Prithvi Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor and two motorcycles were seized but none were found in his possession and he is not the owner. He contended that the case against him relied on a …

Mohan RavidasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mohan Ravidas, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10 litres of liquor in a motorcycle he owned. He argued that the case diary had not been produced despite a court order and that he had a clean …

Dheeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 151.2 litres of liquor from a location not owned by him. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the investigation relied …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from his Maruti Dzire. He was not arrested at the scene and the liquor was not found in his immediate possession; the allegation rests on his …

Mohan SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Mohan Sahani feared arrest in a case under IPC sections 272, 273, 34 and Bihar Excise Act section 30(a) concerning the recovery of liquor from his motorcycle and a shop. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, he had no relation with the shop owner, and he was …

Gopal Chandra Naskar @ Gopal NaskarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gopal Chandra Naskar, the owner of a truck, was implicated in the seizure of 2,617.2 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent and that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, asserting that his driver and …

Tunnu Bhar @ Tunu BharversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tunnu Bhar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 41 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that the …

Mithilesh Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 28 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession and that he was …

Pooja DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pooja Devi, owner of a vehicle from which 240.63 litres of liquor were seized, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, arguing she had no prior criminal record and was unaware of the misuse of her vehicle. The State opposed the bail, contending the seizure implicated …

Subodh Sah @ SubodhversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Subodh Sah, Santosh Sah and Sanjeev Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 240.63 litres of liquor from two autos. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not caught with the liquor, …

Sudhir Pandit @ Sudhir Kumar PanditversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sudhir Pandit and Sudhir Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 240.63 litres of liquor from two autos. They contended they had clean antecedents, were not caught with the liquor, were not owners of the …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly concealing 14.1 litres of liquor under straw. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and the alleged recovery occurred on premises not belonging to him, based on …

Amarjeet RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amarjeet Ray, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor and a seized motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was recovered from premises …

Kaushal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kaushal Kumar, accused under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 100 litres of liquor from a forest area, applied for anticipatory bail. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the case was based …

Om Prakash SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Sahani, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 36 litres of liquor from a Toto vehicle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated by a watchman with whom he …

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5 litres of liquor from a location behind his shop and another shop. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, the alleged recovery site did not …

Vishun Sahni @ Vushun SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishun Sahni sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 31.8 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware that his son had misused …

Upendra Sah @ Satyendra Sah @ Satyondra SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Upendra Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act read with Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging that 5 litres of liquor were recovered from a spot behind his cattle shed and not from his …

Kalawati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kalawati Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 6.375 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in her vehicle and that her son, who was apprehended …

Pappu Sah @ Pappu Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Sah, was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 40.86 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He contended that he had no conscious possession, possessed a clean antecedent, and that the 2018 amendment to the Excise Act …

Shyambabu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shyambabu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act read with Sections 112(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, relating to alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from premises not owned by him. He argued that the …

Ritesh NathversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ritesh Nath, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20.4 litres of liquor in his Hyundai Santro. He argued that the liquor was recovered from the vehicle, not from his personal …

Jai Prakash Paswan @ J. PversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jai Prakash Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor from a bush behind his house. He was not arrested at the scene and the liquor was not found in his possession; the alleged location does not belong to …

Vijay Sahni @ Vijay Kumar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Sahni sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 168.75 litres of liquor from an auto. He claimed he had no prior criminal record, was not caught in possession, and was implicated due to a personal dispute with the …

Kailash Yadav @ Kaila KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kailash Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 500 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He asserted that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was falsely implicated by a watchman …

Ravikant Kumar @ Mantu Kumar @ MantuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravikant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 220 litres of liquor from a sack thrown from a scooty. He asserted a clean criminal record, lack of possession of the liquor, and that the …

Sujeet Kumar @ AfsarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sujeet Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 45 litres of liquor from a vehicle he did not own. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the vehicle belonged to another, and the case relied on a confessional …

Sunil Patel @ Bhaltu PatelversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Patel, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor. He contended that no liquor was found in his possession, the recovery occurred at a location not belonging to him, and he was implicated based on …

Satyam Kumar @ Satyam RamversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyam Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 27 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated by a local chowkidar …

Sarita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sarita Devi, the owner of a Bolero pickup, was implicated in the seizure of 1,710 litres of liquor from her vehicle and feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle and that no liquor was found in her …

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 17.280 litres of liquor concealed near his house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession and the case was based solely on a confessional statement …

Santosh SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh and Rahul, brothers residing in Katihar, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a public area. Fearing arrest, they filed an anticipatory bail application, seeking rectification of pleadings. The petitioners …

Arvind Kr. Sah @ Arvind Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Arvind Kumar Sah, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly supplying spurious liquor that caused the informant's husband to lose an eye and the informant's father‑in‑law to die. The petitioner contended that he was …

Hajara KhatunversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Hajara Khatun, the wife of Md. Gafar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 72 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw she owned. She contended that she had a clean antecedent, was unaware of her husband’s …

Vijay Chauhan @ BijulaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Chauhan sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that 10 litres of liquor were recovered from his house and 10 litres from a neighbour's house, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the property is a …

Amod Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amod Kumar Sharma, the owner of a Maruti Baleno, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 79.98 litres of liquor from his vehicle, violating Sections 30(a), 32(i)(iii) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his immediate possession; …

Sumit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of eight litres of liquor from the house of Devi Lal. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, the alleged recovery occurred at a place …

Mannu @ Abhimanyu @ Abhimanyu Kumar @ Abhimanyu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mannu @ Abhimanyu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 18 litres of liquor from his joint‑family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is a joint …

Rita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rita Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a Bajaj CNG auto. She contended that she was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that …

Shashi Ranjan @ Shashi Ranjan Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shashi Ranjan was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 1,350 litres of liquor from seven motorcycles, charging him under Sections 274, 275 and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in …

Shatranj ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Shatranj Manjhi and Surendra Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a public place. They argued they have no conscious possession of the liquor, the alleged informant is …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a riverbank and his cattle shed. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, …

Ranjeet Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar Mahto, was implicated in an excise case (PS No. 974 of 2025) for the alleged recovery of 225 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he was not in possession at the time of seizure, …

Ramesh Sah @ Ramesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Sah, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 5.79 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle registered in his wife's name. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot …

Rina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three women from Piparahiya village, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor from a bush near the Kataha river. They contended that they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the spot, and were falsely …

Subhankar Prasad SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhankar Prasad Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 82.8 litres of liquor from a Wagon R car he owned, although the liquor was not found in his immediate possession and he was not arrested at the spot. He argued …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 255.120 litres of liquor recovered from his WagonR vehicle. He argued that he was not in actual possession of the …

Md. MustakimversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Mustakim, was implicated in a case under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a) and 47 for alleged recovery of liquor from a motorcycle he owned, while another motorcycle was seized. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not …

Hari Kumar @ Hari Kumar Mahto @ HariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hari Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was seized from his friend who was apprehended at the spot …

Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ankit Kumar, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 277.125 litres of liquor from a Tata Safari vehicle. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicle, asserting that the …

Rafiq Miyan @ Rafik AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rafiq Miyan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 9 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the scooty, and that the only evidence against him was a …

Jelar NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jelar Nut, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 48 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and that the allegation stemmed from a hostile …

Shamsad Alam @ ShamsadversusThe state of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shamsad Alam, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 18 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the case was based solely on a …

Amir Shahni @ Amir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Amir Shahni and Shyambabu Shahni, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 317.100 litres of liquor from a vehicle. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of the …

Dhakelu Bhuiya @ Awadh BhuiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhakelu Bhuiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 34.3 litres of liquor from a poultry farm not owned by him. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, he had no relationship with the farm …

Sumiti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sumiti Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a vehicle registered in her name was seized with 29 litres of liquor, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She contended that she had no knowledge of the driver’s misuse of the vehicle and possessed a clean …

Saroj PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saroj Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 5 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the …

Saroj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Asni village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a public paddy field. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession, the alleged site does not …

Sarvan Yadav @ Sharvan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sarvan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving alleged recovery of 792 litres of liquor from six motorcycles, charged under Sections 274, 275, 317(5) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the …

Ramashankar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ramashankar Sahani, Rambha Devi, and Sajan Sahani, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 35 litres of liquor concealed near their house. They argued that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, the alleged recovery …

Amarnath Manjhi @ Ravinayak @ Ravi Nayak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amarnath Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from a Toto vehicle and a motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of …

Shiv Kumar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Kumar Sahni sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that the alleged liquor seizure occurred at a public place, no liquor was found in his possession, and the …

Athanni Chaudhary @ Birendra ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Athanni Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 75 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated solely on …

Avinash Kumar SrivastavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Avinash Kumar Srivastav, was implicated in an excise case (PS No.1298 of 2025) for the alleged recovery of 54.54 litres of liquor from his Nissan car. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his vehicle was misused …

Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 51.84 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was …

Chandan Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Chandan Kumar Ram was implicated in a case under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34, read with Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a) and 41, for allegedly possessing 1.5 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession at the time of …

GHURAN YADAV @ MANTU KUMAR @ DHURAN YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ghuran Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor and motorcycles. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized items, the orchard did not belong to him, and the case was based …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7.200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the seizure was based on secret …

Vikram MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikram Mukhiya, was implicated in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 70 litres of liquor from a public area near a temple. He argued that he had no clean possession, was not …

Kumar ShubhamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kumar Shubham, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 0.75 litres of liquor recovered from his Maruti Suzuki vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession …

Ramesh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 45 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He …

Mohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 55.210 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not seized from his personal possession, the house being a joint …

Dipu Ray @ Dipu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dipu Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a hut he claims does not belong to him. He argued that the complaint was based on the testimony of a hostile chowkidar and that no …

Nandkishor sahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandkishor Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police recovered 72 litres of liquor from a public canal area and 900 ml from the house of Deep Narayan. The petitioner argued that he had no possession of the liquor, …

Tuntun NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tuntun Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a public orchard. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the site did not belong to him, and the complainant (the …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kumar and Siddu Kumar, brothers from Rupganj village, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging they were involved in the recovery of 60 litres of liquor near a water tank. The petitioners argued they were not caught in the …

Dinesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 756 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle and a motorcycle that he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Salgam @ Naushad SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Salgam @ Naushad Sah, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 432 litres of liquor from three vehicles, charged under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not …

Bipin Kumar Mahto @ Bipin KversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bipin Kumar Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He claimed he was not caught in possession of the alleged liquor, was not the owner of the …

Guddu Chaudhary @ Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 20 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicle, claiming the …

Krishna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Krishna Yadav was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was unaware that another person misused …