Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Excise Act

2120 judgments · newest first · showing 1001–1200

Rakesh DubeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Dubey, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 11.250 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, and …

Mohamad SahilversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohamad Sahil, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 41.415 litres of liquor from three motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Aditya Kumar @ MaheshversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aditya Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 69.8 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, though he claimed no ownership of the vehicles and no possession of the liquor at the time of arrest. He sought anticipatory bail, …

Birju Mukhiya @ Virju MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The Patna High Court considered a petition for anticipatory bail filed by Birju Mukhiya, who feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22 litres of liquor from the house of Madhusudan Ram. The petitioner asserted that he had no possession of the …

Nathu Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nathu Kumar Yadav, owner of a six-wheeler, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 272 of 2025) for the alleged recovery of 1,745.28 litres of liquor seized from his vehicle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the …

Tufani RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tufani Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from other accused. He argued that he was not caught in possession, that the charge was based solely on a confessional …

Ankit Kumar @ Arav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ankit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272 and 273 and several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was recovered from his possession, and the only basis for his …

Manoj PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Pandey, owner of a vehicle from which 1249.56 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that Dinkar had misused his vehicle. The State opposed the …

Anil Nut @ Anil kumar NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Nut, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 90 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, that the liquor was recovered from his mother, and that the case was mechanically filed …

Mushan Devi @ Muskan DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mushan Devi, a woman resident of Saidsarai, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from a public bush. She claimed the allegation was false, made by a chowkidar who had a personal dispute with her husband, and that no liquor …

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5.625 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He asserted a clean criminal record and that no liquor was found in his possession, …

Chandan Safi @ Chandan Kumar SafiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Safi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged liquor recovery was from a bamboo orchard belonging to another person …

Dilip Sada @ Dileep SadaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilip Sada, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3.5 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, and that the …

Rakesh ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the alleged liquor was not found in his possession, …

Bablu Ray @ Bablu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bablu Ray sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner has five prior criminal cases, four of which relate to excise offences, and the …

Shushila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Shushila Devi and Chhotu Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from premises adjacent to their houses. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession, the recovery was from …

Dharmendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Dharmendra Kumar and Vikash Kumar, were implicated in an FIR under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from a public place in Hajaratpur. They contended that they have a clean antecedent, were not arrested at the spot, and …

Pramod SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pramod Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard adjacent to his house. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and …

Jitan Chaudhary @ Jitan ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Jitan Chaudhary and Shatrudhan Chaudhary, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor concealed near their residence. Both have prior excise cases – three for petitioner 1 and one for petitioner 2 – and they …

Surendra Shaw @ Surendra SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Surendra Shaw, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 34 and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 560 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the car, and was implicated …

Subodh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Subodh Singh and his son Santosh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 9 litres of liquor found in their joint family house. They argued they have clean antecedents, that no liquor was recovered from …

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, the alleged recovery occurred on premises not belonging to him, and …

Prince JayswalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Prince Jayswal was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 85 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and that the case was based …

Sandeep Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar Ram, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 83.6 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He was not caught in possession, did not own the motorcycles, and the allegation rests on a confessional statement made by …

Santosh Singh @ Santosh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 54.72 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …

Tunnu Sahni @ Tunni Sahni @ Tunnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Tunnu Sahni and Golu Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 560 litres of liquor from two boats. They argued they were not caught in possession, the FIR did not name the informant, and …

Manibhushan PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manibhushan Pandey sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 54.72 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard not belonging to him. The petitioner argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the informant, a chowkidar, …

Dinesh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Prasad, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15.12 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that …

Manoj Ray @ Manoj RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Ray, the owner of a Bolero vehicle and a truck, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 285 of 2025) for alleged possession of 171.21 litres of liquor and 1,813 cartons of Bajaj Almonds Drops hair oil. He claimed a clean antecedent, argued that the seized items were not in his conscious …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a straw heap on his field and from a house belonging to another accused. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Vikash Kumar @ Rajat Kumar @ TeniyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 147 litres of liquor from three jute bags. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the alleged location did not …

Jangali MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jangali Mahto, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 124.56 litres of liquor from an abandoned house. He contended that he was not arrested …

Dilip Sah @ Dilip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilip Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 126 litres of liquor from a bush near a Hanuman temple. He has six prior cases under the Excise Act and argues that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was not in his …

Vakil SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vakil Sahani, a petitioner with a clean antecedent, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from Vasudeo Ram. He argued that he had no direct possession and was implicated solely on a confessional statement made by …

Munni ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munni Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing nine litres of liquor at his joint family house. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his conscious …

Kunti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kunti Devi, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor from her house and 8 litres from a nearby location. She contended that she had no conscious possession, the property was …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 150 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the seized vehicle, and the case was …

Manish Paswan @ Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Paswan sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly concealing 15.15 litres of liquor under husk at a location not belonging to him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested on the spot, and that the …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 170.490 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was seized from a public area, not from his possession, and that the complainant (a watchman) …

Sunil YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a hut adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to him, …

Parmeshwar Yadav @ Prameshwar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Parmeshwar Yadav, owner of a vehicle from which 88.800 litres of liquor were seized, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 50(b) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the liquor was carried by his son without his knowledge. He …

Manoj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar Yadav was implicated in a case under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 228 litres of liquor in his vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was …

Mithilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar, feared arrest in a case alleging recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, charged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He claimed he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was …

Dilip Sah @ Dilip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilip Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 5.760 litres of liquor recovered from a mustard field that does not belong to him. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, was not caught in possession, and the alleged …

Babul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Babul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not the owner, and the case was based solely …

Ganesh MarandiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ganesh Marandi was apprehended in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the concept of deemed …

Robin Singhla @ Robin SinglaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Robin Singhla, the owner of a vehicle from which 3,051 litres of liquor were seized, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that his driver, who …

Bipin Kumar @ Bipin Ram @ Bipin ChandrbanshiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a garbage site near his house and 30 litres from another individual, Sanjay. He asserted that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, maintained a …

Pramila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pramila Devi, a woman with a clean antecedent, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and several IPC provisions relating to rioting, assault and unlawful assembly. The FIR alleged that 4.4 litres of liquor were recovered from a person named Rahul …

Musaraf @ Musaraf AliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Musaraf Ali, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 13.68 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and his name does not appear in the FIR, asserting a …

Sunil RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that no arrest had been made and no liquor was recovered from his possession. He contended that the recovery of 28 litres of liquor was from a place not belonging to him and …

Doha SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, six residents of Bijalpur village, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 410 litres of liquor and 20,000 litres of Mahua solution. They contended that they have clean antecedents, were not …

Badri Rai @ Badri RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Badri Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from other individuals. He argued he had no possession, a clean antecedent, and that the case relied on a confessional statement made in police …

Pradeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Pradeep Kumar and Laxmi Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. The petitioners argued that they were not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was not in …

Birendra ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Birendra Thakur, owner of a vehicle from which 360 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the IPC. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of …

Laxman YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Laxman Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from his possession and that he is not the owner of the seized …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious …

Brajesh Rai @ Brajesh Kumar @ Brajesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Brajesh Rai sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 17.28 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …

Dheeraj Sahani @ Dheeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Sahani, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was …

Sakal Deep Sahni @ Sakil Dip SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sakal Deep Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of eight litres of liquor and the seizure of his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 16 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the house is a …

Jokhan Yadav @ Jokhan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jokhan Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,049.640 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and that his name was …

Baban SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baban Singh, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,049.640 litres of liquor from his truck. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …

Rakesh Kumar @ GolaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, with a scooty also seized. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and does not own the seized …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 94.5 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …

SURAJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Suraj Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4.125 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware that a person …

Arfa DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arfa Devi, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 14.25 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. She contended that she had no conscious possession of …

KISHAN SAHNI @ KRISHNA SAHNIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kishan Sahni was implicated in an FIR under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 100 litres of liquor and 500 litres of raw material from a hut that does not belong to him. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his …

Raj Kishor SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kishor Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another person, …

Ram Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Kumar Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 159.48 litres of liquor from a banana orchard adjacent to his house. The allegation was based solely on a confessional statement made by Ganesh while in police custody, which …

Ashish Singh Bhadouria @ Ashish BhadouriaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashish Singh Bhadouria, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 750 litres of liquor recovered from a Hyundai car registered in his father's name. He contended he had a clean antecedent and was unaware that his brother had misused the vehicle. The …

Baby DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baby Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 156 litres of beer and 51.75 litres of liquor from two cars and a motorcycle. She contended that she was not present at the spot of seizure, …

Dharmendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 42.225 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the liquor was …

Munazir AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munazir Alam, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 0.750 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

Manju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manju Devi, the wife of Ashish Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. She contended that the alleged liquor and fermented mahua were recovered from a …

Amarjeet Yadav @ Amarjit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amarjeet Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 281 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 3,293.40 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not caught in possession, …

Saheb SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saheb Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the BNS read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 21 litres of liquor in a Bolero vehicle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the …

Bittu Kumar Sah @ Bittu SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering nine litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the FIR did not name him, …

Uday MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Uday Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 57 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to him. He contended that he was not caught in possession, that the complaint was filed by a hostile …

Subhash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 69.120 litres of liquor. He contended that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery occurred on public land, and the case against him relied on …

Satendra Kumar @ Sikindra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Satendra Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 33.810 litres of liquor from three motorcycles, although the liquor was not seized from his immediate possession and he denied ownership of the vehicles. The prosecution’s case relied …

Hema DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hema Devi, owner of a motorcycle from which 50 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued she had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware of her friend's alleged …

Kanhaiya Jaishwal @ Kanhaiya BaranwalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Jaishwal, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 666 litres of liquor from a Mahindra Scorpio, although he was not caught in possession and the vehicle was not owned by him. He argued that the charge was based …

Santosh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Sahni sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 40 litres of spirit and 40 empty bottles was made from a location not belonging to him and that he had no possession or relationship with …

Sunil SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to him. He claimed he was implicated by a watchman with whom he has an inimical relationship and that no …

Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 16.8 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the …

Mantu MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mantu Mahato, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of liquor from a hut owned by a third party and a roadside location. He argued he had no possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the scene, …

Tuntun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Tuntun Kumar and Bhara/Pankaj Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioners sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application for petitioner no. 2, who had already been arrested, and requested anticipatory bail for …

Chandeshwar Mahto @ Mushharu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandeshwar Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, and …

Ritik YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ritik Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged seizure of 538.920 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not …

Sunil PatelversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Patel, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 1,230 litres of raw spirit from a truck. He contended that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not its …

Bhikhari SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhikhari Sahni, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 600.75 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He argued that he was not in actual possession of the liquor and was implicated only because he owned one of the seized vehicles, …

Tapeshwar Chaudhary @ Pateshwar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tapeshwar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10 litres of liquor, which was actually recovered from a bag carried by another individual, Sarju. The petitioner argued that he had no …

Pawan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 717.12 litres of liquor from a boat on the Gandak river. He contended that the liquor was seized from a public boat, not from his possession, …

Rajeev Kumar @ Raju YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rajeev Kumar (Raju Yadav) and Dharmendra Kumar, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 35 litres of liquor from the river Punpun. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession and the allegation rested solely on a …

Kishori KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kishori Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his friend misused the …

Kirani RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Kirani Rai and his son Jitendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Non‑Transportable Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the liquor was recovered from a kiln they did not own and that …

Maina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Maina Devi and Radhika Devi, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from their residence, which is part of a joint family property. They contended that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, that …

Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay PrabhakarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from other individuals and not from him. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the case against …

Shyam Sundar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shyam Sundar Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from other accused and not from his possession. The petitioner argued that the recovery was based solely on a confessional statement …

Krishan Kumar Ray @ Krishan Kumar @ JhanduversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Krishan Kumar Ray, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 4.5 litres of liquor from his house and Rs.112.98 worth from a pickup vehicle. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the …

Ramrati Devi @ Bhagrati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramrati Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to her house. She contended that the liquor was not in her possession, that the complaint was filed on the instigation of a …

Laxman SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Laxman Saw, owner of a vehicle, was implicated in a case (PS 213/2025) for alleged recovery of 1,341 litres of liquor from a truck, alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(2) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no …

Bholu Thakur @ Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bholu Thakur, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of three litres of liquor from a bag not in his possession. He argued that the recovery was linked to another individual, Lalit, whose …

Ramesh Kumar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Kumar Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He claimed a clean criminal record, but the impugned order recorded an antecedent case, …

Mithilesh Kumar @ Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(ii) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 180.360 litres of liquor in a Scorpio vehicle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and the …

Vijay Sah @ Vijay Kumar ShzhversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Sah, was implicated in a case under IPC Sections 274 and 275 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 39.455 litres of liquor seized from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious …

Santosh Sahni @ Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Sahni applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a location behind Md. Sallaudin's house and from a sack in his cowshed. He asserted he had no conscious possession, a clean criminal record, and that the …

Shivmandal Mahto @ Shivmangal MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shivmandal Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of six litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, that the …

Sudeep Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudeep Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 34.925 litres of liquor and 120 kg of Mahua flower from two vehicles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not present at the …

Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ranjeet Yadav and Masudan Kumar, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering five litres of liquor near the Andhera river. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in their possession, and the alleged …

Bablu Shrivastava @ Amitabh SrivastavaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bablu Shrivastava, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, he is not …

Yugal Ray @ Yugal RajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yugal Ray, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 72 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious possession of the liquor, …

Babbu Kumar @ Babbu SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Babbu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 521.25 litres of liquor from a third party's house. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, …

Vishnu Yadav @ Vishnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishnu Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 64.5 litres of liquor from a public bush near the Sone river. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and that …

Golu DhangarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Golu Dhangar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3.75 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was seized from a public place, not from his possession, and that his name was not mentioned in the FIR, …

Harinarayan RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Harinarayan Ram, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 55 litres of liquor from the bank of the Tilave river, invoking Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Non‑Objection Statute (BNS) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, …

Pappu Mandal @ faiza @ Pappu Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Mandal, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 33.9 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of any misuse of his vehicle by a third party, and that …

Sameer RaiversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sameer Rai, was implicated in offences under Sections 30(a)(c) and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3,890.97 litres of liquor from a secret basement belonging to another person. He was not arrested at the time of the raid and no liquor was found in his possession. …

Arun Kumar Bhagat @ Arun Kumar KushwahaversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Arun Kumar Bhagat, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 276.48 litres of liquor from a Bolero pickup. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle’s owner, and was implicated solely on a confessional …

Lal Das Yadav @ Lal Das RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lal Das Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 150 litres of liquor near Mahavir temple. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the site was public, and he was implicated due to a …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a public area near a Mazar. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession; the allegation stemmed from a hostile watchman …

Chunchun Kumar @ Chunchun MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chunchun Kumar, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 582.84 litres of liquor from a seized pickup and motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the seized vehicles, and was implicated only through a …

Bittu Kumar @ Vitu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a public area. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the complaint …

Devee Lal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devee Lal Yadav, filed a petition for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery …

Pankaj Kumar @ Panka KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 319.875 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which he claims is joint family property and that he had no conscious possession. He argued that the 2018 amendment to the Excise Act …

Munsi Paswan @ Munshi Pashwan @ Munshi ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munsi Paswan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 14 litres of liquor from two locations. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery occurred on property not his, and the complaint was filed by a hostile …

Bedami DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bedami Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 50 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware that her friend misused her vehicle. …

RAHUL YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Yadav, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 414.720 litres of liquor from a Tata Magic vehicle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, …

Sitaram Ram @ Sita Ram PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sitaram Ram Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 6.8 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery occurred on premises not belonging to him, and the …

Ramanand YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramanand Yadav, owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in the seizure of 1,465.560 litres of liquor from three vehicles in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his immediate possession; the prosecution’s case rests on his …

Bijen YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bijen Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 8 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession at the time of seizure, and that the vehicle was misused …

Rakesh Sapera @ Rakesh NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rakesh and Rajesh Sapera, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor near Ganeshi Bigha bridge. They contended that the liquor was not found in their possession, the location was a public area, and the …

Guddu ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Chauhan applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to alleged recovery of 72 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the …

Guddu ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guddu Chauhan, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, nothing was seized from his possession, and he is not the owner …

Naresh Kumar Sardar @ Naresh SardarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Naresh Kumar Sardar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 318(4) and 303(2) of the Bihar Non‑Excise Statutes (BNS) read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 63 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not …

Anil SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anil Singh and Naresh Singh applied for anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a public place. They argued that they have clean antecedents, were not in possession of the …

Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Ray @ Satendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 2.88 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a cattle shed adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the recovery site did …

Md. Sarafaraj @ Sarfaraj Ahmad @ Mo SarpharajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Sarafaraj, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 18 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious …

Sujit Kumar Paswan @ Sujit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sujit Kumar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he has a clean criminal record, was not caught with the liquor, and …

Deepak TiwaryversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Deepak Tiwary, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly stealing a mobile phone from a girl’s pocket. The allegation stemmed from a statement made by an apprehended …

Sadhu Choudhary @ Shivnandan ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sadhu Choudhary, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 3(C), 32(iii) and 34 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 60 litres of liquor and 400 litres of jawa mahua at his newly constructed house, which is a joint family property. He was not arrested at the scene …

Lalita Devi @ Lalita KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalita Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 4.875 litres of liquor recovered from her house, which is a joint family property. She contended that she was not arrested, had no conscious possession, and that the amendment to the Excise Act …

Jitendra JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Jha, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 459 litres of liquor from his pickup vehicle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle and that nothing was found in his …

Vinod Sahani @ Binod SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vinod Sahani sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a public bamboo orchard. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the orchard does not belong …

Dilip Kumar PatelversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilip Kumar Patel, was implicated in a 2015 case involving alleged recovery of 3,800 litres of spirit from a truck, with charges under Sections 420, 414, 272, 273, 120B of the IPC and Section 47(A) of the Bihar Excise Act. He claimed to have a clean antecedent, asserted that the …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, faced arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor on a scooty. He contended that the liquor was not recovered from his immediate possession, he was not the owner of the vehicle, and the case was based solely on a …

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 34 and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor concealed under a straw beside a public road. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30.200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that the vehicle was misused by …

Lal Bahadur Chouhan @ Lal Bahadur ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lal Bahadur Chouhan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 40 litres of liquor recovered near a canal. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the recovery site did not belong to him, and …

Vivek Kumar @ TikdhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vivek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a riverbank. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not …

Shailendra Nut @ Shailendra NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of ten litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He argued he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his possession, and that the informant’s …

Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sudhir Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 51.75 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that he was not caught in possession, that the liquor was not on his …

Abodh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abodh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 72.6 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …

Dhauli Devi @ Amita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Dhauli Devi and Chhotu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in their possession, and the …

Baby KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baby Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession, the alleged recovery site did not belong to him, and the FIR …

Momindra SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Momindra Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 145 litres of liquor from a river bank. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …

Saroj DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Saroj Devi, the owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 32 litres of liquor from the vehicle. She contended that she had no knowledge of the liquor, that the vehicle was misused by her brother, and that she possessed a …

Kusum LalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kusum Lal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a bag near a public temple. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location was public, and the …

Sumit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(iii) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from another accused and a motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle owner, …

Madhumala KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Madhumala Kumari, the wife of Ranjit Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail after a Scorpio vehicle registered in her name was seized with 196.56 litres of liquor, implicating her under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse of the …

Kripanand YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kripanand Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …

Ajeet Ray @ Ajeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajeet Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 521.25 litres of liquor from the house of Deepak Sahni. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged recovery occurred at a …

Fekan SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Fekan Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,130.4 litres of liquor from a hut belonging to Basudev Yadav. He contended that he was not caught in possession, that the recovery occurred on premises not owned by him, and …

Rajendra Jaiswal @ Rajendra PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Rajendra Jaiswal and Guddu Jaiswal were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 175.09 litres of liquor from their joint family house. They applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the liquor was not in their conscious …

Gopal Yadav @ Gopal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gopal Yadav, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), (c), (d), 33 and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 64.5 litres of liquor and 89 empty bottles from a bush near the Sone river. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, that the alleged liquor was …

Jagarnath Mahto @ Mangni MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jagarnath Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 13 litres of liquor recovered from a bamboo orchard behind his house. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his immediate possession. The petitioner …

Ashok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ashok Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware …

Ujjawal Kumar @ Amir Choudhary @ AmarnathversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ujjawal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 39 litres of liquor from a bush near Rajendra Sah's house. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession, the recovery site did …

Bechan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bechan Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 90 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the …

Pravesh Kumar @ Ram Pravesh Rai @ Ram Prabesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pravesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a public place near Katra Baradari. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and …

SIKINDAR SAHANIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sikindar S ahani, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house and 15 litres from a motorcycle. He has five prior criminal cases, four of which are also under the Excise Act, …

Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 111 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 103 litres of liquor from a seized motorcycle. He argued that he was …

Muntun BaithaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Muntun Baitha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 9.93 litres of liquor recovered from a hut near his residence. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Navendra Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudarshan Ram, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 23.42 litres of liquor from locations not belonging to him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that the …

Mana Nut @ Munna NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mana Nut, a resident of Dewpura, Saran, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He was not arrested at the spot and the liquor was not found in his possession. The petitioner, …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, was implicated in an excise case (PS Case No. 1581 of 2025) for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, was not in possession, and had a clean criminal antecedent. The State opposed his prayer …

Govinda Mandal @ Gobinda MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Govinda Mandal, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 50.865 litres of liquor from a Toto vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and …

Mukesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Rai was implicated in a case (PS‑513/2025) for allegedly transporting 30 litres of liquor in a motorcycle, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that the liquor was recovered from the vehicle, not from his conscious possession, and that he was unaware of any misuse by a …

Nand Kishore RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nand Kishore Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued he had a clean antecedent, no possession of the liquor, and that the alleged recovery occurred on …

Ravindra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravindra Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 174.765 litres of liquor concealed near a canal, which he claimed was not in his possession and was located on public land. He argued that the informant, a …

Fulchand Sahani @ Fulchand KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Fulchand Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession, …

Sudarshan RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudarshan Ram, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 23.42 litres of liquor from locations not belonging to him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that the …

Sunil SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 50.93 litres of liquor from five locations. He contended that he …

Tinku Kumar SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tinku Kumar Saw, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 55.5 litres of liquor from his auto, although the liquor was not found in his immediate possession and the driver fled the scene. He has one prior case under the Excise …

Dheeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 56(b) and 62 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 28.5 litres of liquor from a house he does not own. He argued that he was not caught in possession, that the …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(2)(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing three litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued he had no prior criminal record, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend …

Deepak KewatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kewat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor from a public drain. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location was public, and the complaint was …

Neelu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Neelu Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from her house and that of a co‑resident. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was not in her conscious …

Nanhak Manjhi @ Nanhaku Manjhi @ Tarkeshwar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Nanhak Manjhi and Dharmendra Manjhi, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a roadside in Mirjapur. They contended that they have no prior criminal record, were not caught in possession, and were …

Pritam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pritam Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of …

Dhananjay PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhananjay Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged liquor recovery was from a public open field and not from his possession. He highlighted his prior three criminal cases, two of which were also …

Rita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rita Devi, a woman from Sitamarhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 315 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to her house and 19.5 litres from a motorcycle. She contended that she was not in possession of the …

Ram Chandra Pandit @ Ramchandra PanditversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Chandra Pandit sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 90 litres of liquor from a Maruti Suzuki. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the watchman (Chowkidar) …

Vinay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vinay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor near the Falgu river. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the alleged recovery occurred on …

Amar Kumar @ Amarjeet SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5.94 litres of liquor near a middle school. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the accusation was …