Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Excise Act

2120 judgments · newest first · showing 1201–1400

Aganidev MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aganidev Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that the police relied on …

Nikesh Ram @ Nikesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nikesh Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor concealed under straw at a public location. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Sanjay ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 6.75 litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the …

Shiv Kumar Paswan @ Shiv KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Kumar Paswan and Raja Paswan were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor in their joint family house. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, the house is joint family property, …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, sought protection from arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 48 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend …

Gore Lal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gore Lal Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his friend misused the …

Vikash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Yadav and Sanjay Yadav were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40.5 litres of liquor from an abandoned house belonging to the second petitioner. The petitioners contended that they have clean antecedents, were not caught in possession …

Amarnath Gupta @ Amar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amarnath Gupta sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 37.18 litres of liquor from a cremation ground, which the petitioner claimed was not in his possession and that the site was public. The petitioner, described as having a …

Mohan SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mohan Sah, a resident of Mira Chowk, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 22.320 litres of liquor from a sack near the Asni river. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 23.265 litres of liquor from his house and 8.64 litres from another house. He argued that the liquor was stored in a joint family property, he had no conscious possession, and …

Sharda Nand JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sharda Nand Jha was implicated in a case (PS Case No.156/2021) for alleged possession of 68.4 litres of liquor in his Maruti car, invoking Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the …

Ramchandra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramchandra Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor and mahua at a public ghat. He argued that nothing was seized from his possession, the location was public, and the FIR did not name the …

Pardeshi Sahani @ Pana Sahani @ Pardeshi BabuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail after an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleged his involvement in the recovery of 47.5 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the premises from which it was allegedly …

Laddu Kumar Mahto @ Laddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Laddu Kumar Mahto and his wife Guriya Kumari, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 26.655 litres of liquor concealed near their house. The petitioners argued that the liquor was not in their conscious …

Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(3), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 7.8 litres of liquor recovered from another person, Vinay. The petitioner argued he had no direct possession, clean …

Dilip Kumar @ Dilip RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilip Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor from premises adjacent to his house and another individual's house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in …

Rajesh NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Ketuka Lachchi, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from locations not belonging to them. They argued they have clean antecedents and were implicated …

Sujeet Kumar @ Sujeet Kumar Singh @ BrajeshversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sujeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5.94 litres of liquor near a middle school. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery …

Sabir AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sabir Ansari sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of six litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the complaint was filed by a hostile …

Raghunath MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raghunath Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 12 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that the seizure was based on secret information, that the vehicle was not his, and …

Geeta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Geeta Devi and Ashok Manjhi were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 21 litres of liquor at their jointly‑owned house. They claimed to have a clean criminal record and argued that the liquor was not found in their conscious possession, nor could …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, asserting he was not caught in possession and was not the vehicle's owner. He claimed the case was initiated solely on the basis of a …

Md. Sonu @ Sonu QuraisiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Sonu Quraisi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor from a third party and a bush, with no evidence of his conscious possession. He argued he has a clean antecedent and that the alleged …

Prabhu RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prabhu Ram, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 54 litres of liquor from the courtyard of his joint‑family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Ajay Bhuian @ Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Bhuian, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(c)(d) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from his house and that of Raja Buniyan. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession …

Akhilesh Sahani @ Akhilesh Kumar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Sahani, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle, which he claims he did not own and was implicated through statements of seizure‑list witnesses. The petitioner …

Dhrup Mahto @ Dhruv MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhrup Mahto, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He asserted that he had no possession of the liquor, that the recovered liquor was not on his …

Kiran DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Kiran Devi and Vicky Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 289.2 litres of liquor from their joint family house. They argued that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, the house is joint family …

Anuj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anuj Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering nine litres of liquor from a bush behind a hut belonging to another person. He argued that he was not apprehended at the scene, no liquor was found in his possession, and the …

Keshav Patel @ Sonu Kumar @ Keshav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 4,698 litres of liquor from two trucks. He contended that no liquor was found in his possession, he was not the owner of the …

Rita Devi @ Sunita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rita Devi, a woman with a clean antecedent, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 19.8 litres of liquor from her joint family house. She argued that she was not arrested, that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, and that the …

Sushil Kumar KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sushil Kumar Kushwaha, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of three litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He was not caught in possession of the liquor and claimed he was unaware that another individual, Amresh, misused …

Sone Lal Yadav @ Sonalal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sone Lal Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 14.04 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the property is jointly owned, and that the …

Mahendra Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahendra Kumar Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that he concealed liquor in a straw house, a scooty and a bush. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, that the seized items were not in his …

Vijay Chauhan @ Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Chauhan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing ten litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Neeraj Mandal @ Neeraj Kumar Chauhan @ Neeraj ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Neeraj Mandal, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from his house and 10 litres from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in actual possession, the house was a joint family …

Mamta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mamta Devi, the owner of two motorcycles, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 141.75 litres of liquor and charged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She contended that she had no knowledge of the liquor …

Ramnath RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramnath Ram was arrested in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 55 litres of liquor recovered from a public sack. The petitioner pleaded that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in …

Shri Singh @ Shri Narayan Singh @ Shreenarayan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shri Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 19.6 litres of liquor from a plastic polythene. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery occurred on premises not …

Sushil Sah @ Sushil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sushil Sah, was implicated in a case (Excise P.S. Case No. 302 of 2025) for the alleged recovery of 319.905 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle he owned. He was not caught in possession of the liquor and claimed ignorance of his driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle. The …

Mithun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithun Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 128 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another person, Ratan, misused his …

Mamta SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mamta Singh was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 171.36 litres of liquor from a car she owned. She contended that she had no prior criminal antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that the vehicle would be used for illegal activity. The State opposed …

Ajay SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Sahni, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 46.24 litres of liquor from a bag that did not belong to him. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and the case relied …

Amit Paswan @ Amit Kumar Paswan @ Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 810 litres of liquor from a boat on the Koshi river. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession. The petitioner, who has three prior criminal …

Ganga Paswan @ GangaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ganga Paswan, owner of a vehicle, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 167 of 2025) for the alleged recovery of 2,531.52 liters of liquor from a truck, alleged offences under Section 111 of the BNS read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He claimed he had no knowledge of …

Chandan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Chandan Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from three vehicles. The petitioner argued that he had no clean possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and was linked to …

Chandan Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 22.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that the liquor was not found in his …

Mohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 28.875 litres of liquor from a third party. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the case was based solely on a confessional …

Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, that the vehicle was misused by a friend who fled …

Birbal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Birbal Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 43.20 litres of liquor from a paddy field not owned by him. He argued that the recovery was made at the behest of a hostile chowkidar and that no liquor …

Maharshi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Maharshi Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 4.5 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …

Dinesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act and Section 414 of the IPC for alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that he was merely …

Rajendra ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajendra Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from his house and adjoining residences. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the house is joint family …

Anshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anshu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor near the Banas River. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location was public, and he had only one prior excise …

Guddu Kumar @ Guddu YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 95 litres of liquor from an auto. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the case …

Muneshwar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Muneshwar Mahto, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 405 litres of liquor from his residence. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and that …

SHASHI KUMAR CHOUDHARYversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shashi Kumar Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 56.670 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was not in his possession, and that the …

Domi Dharikar @ Domi DhanikarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Domi Dharikar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued he had a clean antecedent and that the alleged recovery was not from his possession, relying …

Udal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Udal Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 30 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail alleging he was not in possession of the liquor and was unaware of his friend's alleged misuse of the vehicle. He has four prior cases under the Bihar Excise Act. The State opposed the …

Mukesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar Yadav sought relief fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He argued that he had no prior criminal record and that the liquor was not found in his possession, …

SadakatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sadakat, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 281 and 125(B) of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNS) Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 19.5 litres of liquor from a Wagon R vehicle. He …

Rajkumar Mukhiya @ Raj Kumar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajkumar Mukhiya was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing six litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He contended that he had no conscious possession, the liquor was not seized from him …

Ruksana Khatoon @ RuksanaversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ruksana Khatoon, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw she owned. She contended that she was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that her …

Sikandra SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sikandra Sahni, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 8.4 litres of liquor near Satlakha bridge. He was not apprehended at the spot and no liquor was found in his possession; the complaint was lodged by a chowkidar with whom …

Ashok ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashok Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 2.340 litres of liquor in a worship room of a joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, that the house …

Pradeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pradeep Kumar feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a public spot near the Dhanauti river. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and that he was …

Ravi Ranjan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another individual, …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of Jawa Mahua and 100 litres of raw Jawa. He argued that no contraband was seized from his possession, the alleged recovery occurred on public …

Mathura PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mathura Prasad, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was …

Mukesh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, five residents of Bahilwara Bhual, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from a public bush. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not caught in possession, and …

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act. He has 14 prior criminal cases, 12 of which are excise offences, and the …

Nandu Sahani @ Nandue Sahani @ Nandlal SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandu Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 265 litres of liquor and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized items, was not the owner of the vehicle, …

Devendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devendra Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of large quantities of liquor. He argued that the liquor was located in a joint family house, that he had no conscious possession, and that the 2018 …

Shravan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shravan Paswan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 8.5 litres of liquor. He argued that the alleged liquor was seized from a location not belonging to him and that the case was based solely on a confessional statement of …

Rupesh Kumar @ RupeshversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 745.5 litres of liquor from two cars and four motorcycles. He argued that he had a clean antecedent and that the …

Ritesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ritesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware his friend, …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shivam Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 270.72 litres of illicit liquor from a car. The petitioner argued that he had …

Momindra Paswan @ Momindrar Paswan @ Momindra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Momindra Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 50 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a garden behind a primary school, a location he did not control and from which nothing was seized from his …

Ram Briksha ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ram Briksha Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the alleged …

Dharemandra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharemandra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 36 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty he owned. He argued that he was not in possession at the time, that the vehicle was misused by …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pintu Kumar, who has four prior criminal cases (three under the Excise Act), sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 400 litres of liquor from a Tata Sumo vehicle. He contended that he …

Suman Kamati @ Mangla @ Shiv Nandan ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Suman Kamati and Raj Kumari Devi, were implicated in a case alleging recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, invoking Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a seizure of 34.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned, alleging he had no knowledge of the contravention and a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seizure implicated him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar …

Munna Kewat @ Munna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Kewat was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 40 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession and that the case was based on …

Guddu Yadav @ Guddu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guddu Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 288 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not apprehended on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the motorcycles, …

Vikky Kumar @ vickey KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikky Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from premises adjacent to his house and from a location behind another individual's house. The petitioner argued that no liquor was found in his possession …

Savita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Savita Devi, owner of a vehicle from which 92.73 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued she had no knowledge of the liquor, the driver acted without her consent, and she has a clean criminal record. The State …

Josna Kumari @ Joshna KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Josna Kumari, the owner of a motorcycle from which 10.875 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, had a clean criminal record, and that …

Prince Kumar PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Prince Kumar Pandey was charged under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(iii) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 72.280 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware that …

RAJESH PRASADversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Prasad, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 76.075 litres of liquor recovered from his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was located in a joint‑family property and that he had no conscious …

Sanoj Chaudhary @ Sanoj Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sanoj Chaudhary and Sohan Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 7 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, that no liquor was found …

Anil Bind @ Anil ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Bind, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of 17 litres of liquor from his house and 300 litres of semi‑manufactured liquor from a nearby location. He argued he has a clean antecedent, that …

Rana Pratap Kumar @ Rana Pratap @ RanaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rana Pratap Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 14.58 litres of liquor from a bush near his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the recovery site did …

Suryakant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Suryakant Kumar and Chandan Kumar, were charged under Sections 30(a), 32(3), 41, 62 and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 544.32 litres of liquor from a house rented by them. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was found in an asbestos‑room of Raman Kumar’s …

Mantu Mahato @ Mantu Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mantu Mahato, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, is not the owner of the …

Shambhu SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shambhu Saw, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 55 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that the 2018 …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a public area near the Gandak river. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the location did not …

Nandu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandu Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor recovered from a house that is part of a joint family property. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement made by the petitioner’s …

Dhiraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Dhiraj Kumar and Indal Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor and 3000 litres of raw Jawa Mahua solution near the Gandak river. They argued they have clean …

Binod Choudhary @ Vinod ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Binod Choudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 20 litres of liquor from a bicycle. He was not caught in possession and the prosecution’s case relied on a confessional statement made by Shiv Kumar while in police custody, …

Dharmendra SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Dharmendra Sahni and Brijesh Sahni, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 157.64 litres of liquor from a public bush. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession, and were implicated by …

Vikash Yadav @ Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikash Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that he was implicated solely on the basis of a confessional statement made by Uttam Sarkar while in police custody. The petitioner argued that no liquor was recovered …

Sunarpati Devi @ Sundarapati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunarpati Devi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 160.7 litres of liquor from her house and 22.4 litres from another house. She argued that she was not caught in the act, no liquor was found in her conscious possession, and the …

Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra chaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 26.25 litres of liquor and a motorcycle from Shankar Kumar's house. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, that the vehicle was merely owned by him, …

Abhishek kushwaha @ Abhishek kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kushwaha, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 33.125 litres of liquor from his house, charging him under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was stored in a joint‑family property and not in his personal possession, …

Ramnigah Paswan @ Kurtai @ KurtaliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramnigah Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 198 litres of liquor from a public area near the Bagmati river. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not in his …

Horil Mukhiya @ Hiril MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Horil Mukhiya and Gauri Mukhiya sought relief from arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. They argued they had no possession of the liquor, the alleged informant was not named in the FIR, and they possessed a …

VIJAY MAHTOversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Mahto sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 122 litres of liquor and 252 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua solution from a brewery. He contended that he was not in possession of …

Rajo Ram @ Raju Ram @ Rajba @ RajwaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajo Ram, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 9.75 litres of liquor from a public area near a water tank. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, …

Ranju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ranju Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 54 litres of liquor from her residence, which is a joint family property. She contended that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and that the prosecution’s …

Barun Singh @ Pappal SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Barun Singh, a 65‑year‑old senior citizen with a clean record, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 45 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly obstructing a police raid on Chhotu Singh's house. The petitioner claimed the allegation was false and motivated by an …

Nita Devi @ Neeta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 390 litres of liquor and 1,000 litres of Jawa solution from a hut adjacent to her residence. She asserted that she had no conscious possession …

Sambhu Kumar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sambhu Kumar Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 8 litres of liquor on a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean …

Vijay PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Paswan, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act relating to the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor and 1,200 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua from a public canal area. He argued that nothing was seized from his conscious possession, the …

Vijendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijendra Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was implicated merely as the …

Shri Raushan Kumar @ Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 8.25 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued he had no prior criminal record, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the …

Arjun PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arjun Paswan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 95 litres of liquor from five locations. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the recovery was from premises not belonging to …

SANIA PRIYADARSIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sania Priyadarsi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a scooty she owned. She argued she had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware …

Manoj Kumar Sah @ Manoj SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Manoj Kumar Sah and Suman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not in …

Anguri Bind @ Pradeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anguri Bind, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor from a public area near the Panchayat Bhawan. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, the liquor was …

Rameshwar Dhangad @ Rameshwar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rameshwar Dhangad, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a washroom adjacent to his house. He claimed the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that a watchman, with whom he had an inimical …

Surendra ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Surendra Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of 16 litres of liquor from a mango orchard and 4.4 litres from a location behind his house. He contended that no liquor was found in his …

Khushnandan Chaudhary @ Damru ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Khushnandan Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 954 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. He contended that he was not caught in …

Kavita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Kavita Devi, wife of Biran Rai, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 38.34 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She asserted that she had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware …

Sudhanshu Kumar @ Pintu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudhanshu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 2,070 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was …

Birbal Mehta @ Birbal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Birbal Mehta, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 48 litres of liquor and two motorcycles recovered from his house, which he claims is joint family property and that he had no direct possession or ownership. He …

Om Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 40.310 litres of liquor from a public pond area. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession and the location did not belong to …

Anup Kumar Singh @ Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anup Kumar Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 67.4 litres of liquor from a hut that does not belong to him. He contended that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the FIR …

Vijay ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Manjhi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from a house adjacent to his own. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession. The petitioner, who has a clean criminal record, argued …

Jaleshwar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jaleshwar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40.2 litres of liquor from a field not belonging to him. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the recovery was based on …

Bhola KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhola Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor from the premises of others. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his possession, and the case was based solely on a confessional …

Anil ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Manjhi, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 150 litres of liquor from the bank of the Dhanauti river, a public place where nothing was found in his possession. He contended that the investigation relied solely on …

Rishi Kumar @ Rishikesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rishi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 900 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and was implicated solely on a …

Sabita Kumari @ Sabita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sabita Kumari, a government servant, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 1.5 litres of liquor from her government quarters. She contended that the complaint was filed by her son‑in‑law, an Inspector …

Lalan Sharma @ Lalan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalan Sharma, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 698.235 litres of liquor were recovered from a godown he owned, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the …

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 252 litres of liquor from an auto. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated solely …

KARI YADAV @ AMARJIT YADAVversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kari Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 198.75 litres of liquor occurred at a location not belonging to him and that he was implicated solely on the basis of a chowkidar's …

Vikram Yadav @ Bikram Yadav @ Vikram Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikram Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3,062.52 litres of liquor from two Scorpio vehicles and a varandah. He contended that he was not present at the spot of seizure, that none of the seized items were in …

Bhola Sah @ Sujeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhola Sah, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 53.46 litres of liquor recovered from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the site did not belong to …

Manan Singh @ Manan Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manan Singh sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 800 litres of spirit from a public bush. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the …

Vimlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vimlesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3,602 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated solely on …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar, the owner of a Sumo vehicle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 478 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

Pramod RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pramod Rai feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where authorities recovered liquor and Mahua from a public area not in his possession. He argued that he was implicated solely on secret information without proper investigation and that nothing was seized …

Biplab HalderversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Biplab Halder and Shyamal Biswas were implicated in an excise case involving alleged recovery of 882 litres of liquor, charged under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act. They contended that they were not caught in possession, did not own …

Muniya Devi @ Munni @ Muni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Muniya Devi sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 14 litres of liquor were recovered from her house. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was located in a joint‑family property, so …

Rina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rina Devi, the owner of a Scorpio vehicle and a Bullet motorcycle, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 468 litres of liquor from her vehicles, violating Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicles, had a …

Surendra GoswamiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Surendra Goswami, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 45 litres of liquor and 225 litres of fermented jawa mahua recovered from his house, which were destroyed on the spot. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, that the …

Aman Kumar agrawalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aman Kumar Agrawal, feared arrest in a case (Kanti PS Case No. 524 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 317(4), 317(5), 324(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the recovery of 497.16 litres of liquor from his Scorpio and …

Ramanand SadaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramanand Sada, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 30 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his immediate possession, and he was unaware that …

Shiv Kumari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shiv Kumari Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22 litres of liquor from her house and 15 litres from a neighbour’s straw house. She argued she has a clean antecedent, was not arrested on the …

Mithlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged recovery of 6,000 kg of powdered hemp from a truck. He argued that he has a clean record, was not in possession of the seized goods, and merely hired the …

Anil Sah @ Anil Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a motorcycle and a truck. He has five prior excise cases and contends that no liquor …

Rajesh Ranjan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Ranjan Singh was implicated in an excise case for alleged possession of 375 ml of liquor recovered from a scooty he owned, though the liquor was not found in his immediate possession and his friend Vijay was apprehended at the spot. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing …

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi RajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(2) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an excise case for allegedly transporting 202.5 liters of liquor in a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and he was unaware that his associate …

Ranjeet Sahani @ Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, wherein liquor was allegedly recovered from a motorcycle and a straw house linked to him. He contended that he was not in possession of the seized liquor, did not own the …

Sanoj MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanoj Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from his house and that of another person. He …

Rishu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rishu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 100.68 litres of liquor from a location behind his house. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession and that the alleged recovery site did not …

Sunil Kumar Yadav @ Sunil Kr. YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor and 2000 litres of semi‑manufactured liquor near the Sijua river. He contended that the liquor was not in his …

Amarjeet @ Chhotu @ Chhotu Kumar @ Amarjeet AryanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amarjeet, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 720 ml of liquor from a shop owned by Ravi. He has three prior criminal cases, two of which are also under the Excise Act, and contends that he was not caught in …

Ajit @ Ajit Kumar Rai @ PepaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Kumar Rai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 17.28 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and the case was based solely on a confessional …

Mithilesh Kumar @ Mithilesh Kumar Ray @ LangariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 42.720 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a bamboo orchard adjacent to his house. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession and that the …

Mantu Kumar @ Abhishek Raj @ MantuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mantu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a 2017 excise case involving alleged recovery of 76.5 litres of liquor from a vehicle, for which he was implicated based on a confessional statement made by another person in police custody. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was …

Ravindra NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravindra Nut, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 560 litres of spirit from a public pond. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the spirit at the time of arrest, and that the informant’s …

Santosh Kumar @ KausaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar, a resident of Aurangabad district, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 16 litres of liquor from a location near a water tank that does not belong to him. His counsel argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor …

Ram Lagan ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Lagan Choudhary and his son Pradeep Choudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 294 litres of liquor from a public ghat. They contended that they were not caught in possession, that the recovery was from a place …

Baby DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Baby Devi, a woman with a clean antecedent, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(d) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act relating to the alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from premises adjacent to her house. The prosecution argued that the liquor was …

Radha Yadav @ Arbind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Radha Yadav and Umesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 880 litres of liquor. They argued that no liquor was seized from their possession, the recovery site was public, and the …

Vikky SafiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikky Safi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case involving alleged recovery of 3,062.52 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and was implicated solely on the testimony of a …

Rupam Anand @ RockyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rupam Anand, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 2,496.6 litres of liquor from a DCM truck. He contended that he was not caught in possession, …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guddu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession at the time of seizure, and is not the owner of the …

Kara Ray @ Dinesh Ray @ Kiran Ray @ Dinelsh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kara Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged liquor was recovered from a place not belonging to him, …

Satendra Giri @ Satyendra GiriversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Satendra Giri sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 38(2) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 388.8 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a public heap of hay and not from his possession. He argued that the alleged recovery site did not belong to him and that …

Kajal KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Kajal Kumari, owner of a motorcycle from which 28 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued she had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, had a clean criminal record, and being a woman, should not be implicated …

Sujeet Dom @ Sanjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sujeet Dom, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 5 litres of liquor recovered from a joint family house. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that the allegation …

Rajat Kumar @ KaranversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajat Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act read with Section 318(4) of the BNS, 2023, alleging that 243 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle and a scooty. He asserted that he was not caught in possession, did not own the …

GANESH MUKHIYA @ GANESH BINversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ganesh Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 30(b), 30(c), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of liquor and seizure of breweries. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, nothing was found in his …

Pappu Paswan @ Pappu Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 100 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a sack tied to his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, nothing was found in his conscious …

Rabbu Yadav @ Ravindra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rabbu Yadav, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and that the case rested …

Vinay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vinay Kumar, a resident of Bhagalpur, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly concealing 5.625 litres of liquor beside a Basa. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the alleged recovery occurred on land that did not belong to …

Sadan SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sadan Saw, was implicated in a case where 459 litres of liquor were recovered from his Bolero pickup vehicle, leading to charges under Sections 272 and 273 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean …

Prince KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prince Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and …

Parleji Ray @ Sanjeet Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Parleji Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was implicated merely as the vehicle …

Shrawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shrawan Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 552.960 litres of liquor from a bus. He contended that he was not apprehended at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the bus, arguing …

Dilip SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Dilip and Ashok Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 85 litres of liquor from the Dhanauti river. They argued that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, the recovery site was …

Bugni Chachi @ Sonmati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bugni Chachi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an excise case involving alleged recovery of 175 litres of jawa mahua and 15 litres of liquor. She argued she had no prior criminal record, was a woman, and the alleged contraband was seized from a public area, not from …

Munna Sah @ Munna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the case was based …

Baban SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baban Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to alleged recovery of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was …

Virendra Kunwar @ Virendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Virendra Kunwar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 2.520 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware that a person named …

Ajit Kumar @ Ajeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 98.625 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was unaware of the vehicle's …

Dhanesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhanesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 122.875 litres of liquor from a three‑wheeler. He contended that the liquor was not found in his possession, he was not the vehicle's owner, and the …

Ramu PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramu Prasad, the owner of a bus from which 552.960 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act, claiming he had no knowledge of the liquor and possessed a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, arguing that the …

Ram Chandra Yadav @ Ram Chandra Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Chandra Yadav was implicated in a case under Sections 47(a) and 47(f) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor and 600 kg of fermented jawa‑mahua solution from a public canal bank. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, no arrest, and that the seized material was …

Lal Babu @ Chunnu @ Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lal Babu, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 313.2 litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he has a clean antecedent and that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Vijay NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and is not the owner of the …