Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Excise Act

2120 judgments · newest first · showing 1401–1600

Niranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Niranjan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 2.650 litres of liquor from a car he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean criminal record, and was unaware that the vehicle would …

Ajay RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, for alleged recovery of 6.27 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He …

Talami Soren @ Talamai SorenversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Talami Soren, a woman with no prior criminal record, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from her house and nearby premises. She contended that the liquor was stored in a joint family property, that she had no conscious …

Anita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anita Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 9 litres of liquor were recovered, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that the vehicle would be misused …

Babul Singh @ Babul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Babul Singh and Suresh Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 43.5 litres of liquor from an auto. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not caught in possession, are not owners …

Murari kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Murari Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a police case (PS No.69/2025) alleged that 386.76 litres of liquor were recovered from his Tata Sumo vehicle, implicating him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious …

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 176 litres of liquor from a public ghat. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his possession, and that the allegation arose …

Bholadani Singh @ Bholadani Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bholadani Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 58.3 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that the charge sheet …

Chhotu Kumar @ Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that the case diary had not been produced since the case was taken up on 10-12-2025 and that he was not arrested on the spot nor was any liquor recovered …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Chandan Kumar, the owner of a truck from which 5,200 litres of spirit were allegedly seized, faced charges under IPC sections 372, 373, 420, 120B and several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware that his driver …

Manoj Sahani @ Manoj Kumar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Sahani sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 52 of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that he was involved in the recovery of 70 litres of liquor from the Majhriya river. The petitioner argued that he was never arrested, that nothing was seized …

Shiv Mangal Pandey @ Sheo Mangal PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shiv Mangal Pandey applied for anticipatory bail after the police recovered 8.625 litres of illicit liquor and a motorcycle in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he was not named in the FIR, had no knowledge that his motorcycle was used to transport the …

Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under Section 317(5) of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 430.50 litres of liquor from an XUV 500. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no …

Nabal Sha @ Nawal SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nabal Sha, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of ten litres of liquor from a straw house on his premises. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Sugreev SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sugreev Singh, was implicated in a case concerning the alleged recovery of 724.28 litres of liquor from a seized vehicle, charged under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean criminal …

Sudish SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sudish Sahani was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 245 litres of spirit from an open field and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery was from land not belonging to him, and that the case was …

Subhash Kumar @ Subhash SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a truck and a banana orchard. He contended that he was not caught …

Sanjay RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Ram, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware that …

Amar Yadav @ Amart Nath YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged illegal possession of 720 litres of liquor and seizure of a Bolero vehicle and a motorcycle under Sections 338, 336(3) and 318(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Sections 30(a) and …

Ramayodhya MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Tehti Bin Toli, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor. They argued they have no prior criminal record, the liquor was recovered from a public place not belonging to …

Ramadhar DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramadhar Das, owner of a vehicle seized in a case involving 600 ml of liquor allegedly possessed by his son Raj Kumar Das, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a), 37(b) and 37(c) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued he had a clean antecedent and was unaware of …

Santosh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Yadav, a resident of Ballia, Uttar Pradesh, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,486.56 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a vehicle he owned was seized containing 398.52 litres of liquor, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the misuse of his vehicle and that no liquor was found in his …

Vikash RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Ram sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 108 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle. He argued he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and was implicated by a local informant without …

Rajesh SadaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Sada, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 107.37 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the vehicle at the time of the incident, and that the vehicle had …

Manoj Kumar @ Manoj ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar (Manoj Choudhary) applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor at his poultry farm. He contended that the liquor was planted by an adversary, that he was not in actual possession, and that …

Anuradha KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Anuradha Kumari and Archna Kumari, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 100 litres of liquor and 200 litres of Jawa Mahua, along with seizure of four motorcycles. They contended that …

Saty Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saty Prakash Kumar, owner of a car and a scooty, was implicated in a case (PS Maner Case No. 746 of 2025) for alleged recovery of 129.6 litres of liquor from his car and 21.96 litres from his scooty, offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he …

Mukhtar DhangadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mukhtar Dhangad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from his residence. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that …

Sudin ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudin Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor and 200 litres of jawa mahua from a banana orchard adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Rupesh Kumar @ Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 140 litres of liquor was recovered from a bag near a river and not from their possession. They …

Vicky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vicky Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15.375 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the seized liquor was not in his possession, and the …

Manoj PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Manoj Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 6.375 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time …

Birju YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Birju Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 14.625 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Jagdev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jagdev Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(I)(II) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 2,205 litres of liquor from a DCM truck. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession …

Sultana ParweenversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sultana Parween, sought anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of nine litres of liquor from a scooty she …

Rahul Kumar Jha @ Rahul JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Jha, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 1.5 litres of liquor in his vehicle. He argued that the liquor was hidden by his driver, that he was unaware of the misuse, and that nothing was recovered from his conscious …

Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 7.5 litres of liquor from an abandoned bag, which he claimed was not in his conscious possession. He argued that the investigation relied solely on secret information without proper …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 81 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, alleged under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious …

Dhiraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 9.75 litres of liquor from sacks, which he claims were not in his possession and were located on property not belonging to him. He contended that the police had mechanically …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, owner of a Bolero vehicle, was implicated in the recovery of 358.2 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his driver misused the vehicle. …

Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He alleged that the recovery of 22.5 litres of liquor and a seized motorcycle were linked to other accused, and that his implication rested solely on a confessional statement …

Jiwachh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jiwachh Kumar, the owner of a Hyundai car, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 84 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he was …

Ranjan Nat @ Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjan Nat, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing two litres of liquor and mahua jaggery solution recovered from his house, which was subsequently destroyed. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the …

Mohan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohan Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 21.9 litres of liquor recovered from his house. He argued that the liquor was located in a joint‑family property, that he had …

Bablu Yadav @ Bablu Kumar @ Babalu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bablu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 286 litres of liquor from Gandak bridge. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the alleged location was public, and the chowkidar who …

SITA DEVIversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sita Devi, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 37 litres of liquor were recovered from her residence, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She contended that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was located in a joint family house, …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 612 litres of liquor from a public place near Budhanpur Chaur. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in …

JunglaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Jungla and Mangal Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 43.82 litres of liquor from a co‑accused's residence. They argued that they have clean antecedents, were not caught in …

Pramod Ray @ Pramod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pramod Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 1,000 litres of liquor from a sack near the Ganga river. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and that the location was a public area …

Punit Rai @ Shubham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Punit Rai, was implicated in a case under Section 111 of the BNS read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 43.2 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not apprehended at the spot, did not have possession of …

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sah @ Ajay SaoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 4.5 litres of liquor from a bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the FIR omitted the informant's name, …

Om Prakash Kumar @ Om Prakash Ray @ Om Prakash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 790.56 litres of liquor from an orchard not owned by him, claiming he was implicated solely on the basis of a chowkidar's information without any material seized from his …

SADHU HALWAI @ NISHU HALWAIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sadhu Halwai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 215.460 litres of liquor and a motorcycle from a public riverbank. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the seized items did not …

Shrawan Kumar @ Shrawan kumar Singh @ Shrawan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shrawan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 1,036.080 litres of liquor from a location beside a school. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the site was public, and the informant’s …

Neeraj Ray @ Neeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Neeraj Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 35 litres of liquor from a bush, though no liquor was found in his possession and the alleged site does not belong to him. He claimed a clean criminal record and argued that the …

Rajesh GiriversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Giri sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 36 litres of liquor from his residence, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and that the 2018 amendment to …

Baban Rai @ Baban KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baban Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 900 ml of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in the act, had no conscious possession, and was implicated based on a chowkidar's …

Nirmal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Nirmal Kumar and Harendra Ram, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor from a sack. They contended that they were not apprehended at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and were …

Devendra Bhagat @ Jhagru BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devendra Bhagat, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 116.640 litres of liquor from a public bush near his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location was accessible to the public, and the …

Subham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subham Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 123.12 litres of liquor from his Maruti Suzuki car. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the vehicle was …

Ladan Kumar @ Laddan Kumar @ Rameshwar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ladan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 132.74 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the concept of deemed …

Dharmendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Dharmendra Paswan sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 117.68 litres of liquor from his residence. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that the liquor was located in a joint family …

Praduman ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Praduman Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 29.850 litres of liquor on a motorcycle registered in his wife's name. He contended that he was not apprehended at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, …

Jhagru Mukhiya @ Jhagru BinversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jhagru Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 40 litres of liquor occurred in a public area and that he was not in possession at the time. He argued that the complainant (the …

Shankar Rai @ Shiv Shankar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shankar Rai sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 44.55 litres of liquor were recovered from his cowshed. The petitioner contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the cowshed was accessible to …

Saddam Ansari @ Mir SaddamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saddam Ansari, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 189 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, based primarily on a confessional statement made by Dinesh while in police custody. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in …

Lalbabu Mahto @ Lal Babu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalbabu Mahto was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 2,205 litres of liquor from a truck. He has fifteen prior excise cases and claims he was not caught in possession nor is he the owner of the seized vehicle, asserting that …

Manoj Kumar @ Manoj RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 43.74 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and the case was based solely on a …

Aklu SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aklu Sahani, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle owned by his wife. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was implicated merely …

Ajeet Kumar @ Ghughan @ Sanjeev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor from a forest area near a river. He asserted a clean antecedent, no possession of the liquor, and that the allegation was …

Chunni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chunni Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 10 litres of liquor recovered from the courtyard of her joint family house. She contended that she had no conscious possession, the property is jointly owned, and she has a clean …

Asha SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Asha Singh, sought anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the recovery of 1.875 litres of liquor from a scooter she owned. She argued that she was not present at the scene, the liquor was not in her conscious possession, …

Prakash Mahto @ Pragash MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Prakash Mahto and Harindra Mahto applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 81,600 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. They argued they were not caught in possession, were not owners of the seized …

Ashok YadawversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashok Yadaw, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 30.420 litres of liquor from a sack near his village. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …

Kishor YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kishor Yadav, owner of one of three motorcycles from which 105 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail after fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware …

Dhanji PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhanji Prasad, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from his motorcycle, although the liquor was not found in his possession and he claims he was unaware of any misuse of the vehicle. He asserted a clean …

NANHAK YADAV @ NANK YADAV @ NANHKU YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nanahk Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor, of which 100 litres were said to have been found in his motorcycle. He contended that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of …

Bipin Kumar @ Bipin BihariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and the allegation was based solely on a confessional statement of …

Sanju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanju Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act involving alleged recovery of liquor. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, the location was public, and the complaint was based on the testimony of a …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 52 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 5.94 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and that his …

Govind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Govind Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, that he was unaware his friend misused the vehicle, …

Ravi Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that the actual offender fled the scene, …

Laxman Mallik @ Laxman Kumar @ Laxmana kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Laxman Mallik, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 117 litres of liquor from a public bush and a motorcycle not owned by him. He …

JITENDRA SAHNIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Jitendra Sahni and Arvind Sahni filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. Arvind was arrested while the application was pending, and the petitioners sought to withdraw his anticipatory bail request, which the Court permitted, …

Rameshwar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rameshwar Sah, owner of a truck, was implicated in the seizure of 2,356.720 liters of liquor from his vehicle in a case under the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not caught with the liquor, and that the driver acted without his knowledge. The State …

Banti KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Banti Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the …

Anil SardarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Sardar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 104 litres of liquor from locations adjacent to his house. He argued that no liquor was found in his conscious possession and that the …

Sikandar @ Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sikandar and Rohit, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 78 litres of liquor. They argued that the alleged …

Babita KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Babita Kumari, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 735 ml of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and …

Md Rihan @ Md Rihan AnwarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md Rihan, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 38.88 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware that …

Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 160 litres of liquor from a location not owned by him. He has eight prior criminal cases, seven of which are also under the Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he …

Bindeshwar Mahto @ BinoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bindeshwar Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 922 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which he claims is joint family property and not under his conscious possession. He argued that the concept of deemed …

Gaurav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 7.250 litres of liquor from a scooter he owned. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware of his friend's misuse of the vehicle. …

Munna SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munna Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4.5 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession and that he was unaware of his friend's alleged misuse of the …

Sonu Ray @ Sonu kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 879.525 litres of liquor from a room in front of a government boring. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Aditya KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aditya Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 14.625 litres of liquor from a location in front of a government residence. He contended he had a clean antecedent, was not caught with the liquor, and …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 42 litres of liquor concealed near his relative's house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the recovery site did not …

Surendra Kumar @ Kariya @ Surendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Chakiyaz Tola, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 1,000 litres of liquor. They contended that they were not caught in possession, did not own the seized vehicle, …

Shakil Ahamad Khan @ Shakeel Ahamad KhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shakil Ahamad Khan, the owner of a vehicle from which 987.6 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, claiming he had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse and possessed a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail. The Court, after …

Anil NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Anil Nat and his wife Sugan Devi, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 190 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to their house. The petitioners contended that the liquor …

Birendra Yadav @ Virendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Birendra Yadav, owner of a vehicle from which 40.125 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued he had a clean antecedent and was unaware that the vehicle would be misused by another person, Kundan, who …

Gautam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gautam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 38(1) and 38(2) of the Bihar Excise Act relating to alleged recovery of liquor from another accused, Indrajeet. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the case against him was based …

Kamlesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kamlesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the …

Shani KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shani Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 225.375 litres of liquor from a car and motorcycles. The petitioner argued he was not caught in possession, did not own the seized vehicles, and the case was based solely on …

Vijendra Mukiya @ Vijendra MukhiaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijendra Mukiya, a resident of Samastipur, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from the houses of Ganesh, Santosh, and Pawan Devi. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, …

Nilu Singh @ Nilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nilu Singh, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw, which he claimed he did not own or possess. He argued that the police had implicated him based on information from a spy without …

MITHUN RAI @ MITHUN RAY @ MITHUN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithun Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 164.160 litres of liquor from a Tata Magic vehicle. He contended he was not caught with the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was merely a chowkidar, arguing …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 33.1 litres of liquor from a Toto rickshaw he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,300 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor nor aware that the vehicle would be used for the alleged offence, …

Balram MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Balram Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 2 litres of liquor and 20 litres of jawa mahua from his under‑construction house. The petitioner claimed he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was planted by …

Baleshwar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baleshwar Sahani, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 150 litres of liquor from a sack near the Dhanauti river. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and …

Janki ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Janki Chaudhary, was implicated in an excise case for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from his motorcycle, though the liquor was seized from another individual and not found in his possession. He asserted a clean criminal record and claimed he was unaware that the vehicle …

Md. Sagir @ Sagir AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Sagir Ansari, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware of his friend's misuse of the …

SIKENDAR KUMAR @ GOLU KUMAR @ SIKENDAR @ GOLUversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sikendar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 70 litres of liquor were recovered from a public place and not from his …

Shravan Kumar Yadav @ shravan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shravan Kumar Yadav petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, concerning the alleged recovery of 801.100 litres …

Sanoj Sahani @ Sanoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanoj Sahani, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He asserted that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was …

Gautam Kumar @ Tipinala @ Gautam Kr.versusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gautam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 11 litres of liquor from a bush not belonging to him. He argued that the FIR lacked the informant’s name and that no liquor was found in his …

RAKESH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 21.75 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, that the liquor was not seized from his conscious possession, and that his …

Bulet Yadav @ Bulat YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bulet Yadav was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 291.84 litres of liquor from a modified three‑wheeler, although he was not apprehended on the spot and claimed he was not the vehicle's owner. He has six prior criminal cases, three of which …

Deepak Sah @ Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Sah, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from an open field belonging to Ravindra Sah. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the liquor was not on his property, and the informant’s …

Arvind SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arvind Sahni sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act, where the police alleged recovery of liquor and raw material from a public mango orchard based largely on a confessional statement of a co-accused in custody. The petitioner …

Ajeet Ray @ Ajeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajeet Ray, was implicated in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 30(a), 32(i) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 4,406.4 litres of liquor. He claimed he was not in possession of the seized truck and …

Rahul Singh @ Rahul Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Singh sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case involving alleged seizure of 4,406.4 litres of liquor from a truck, under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic/Excise Act and Sections 30(a), 32(i) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act. He …

Sunny KumarversusThe state of bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 156 litres of liquor from an auto. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated solely on …

Niyaz @ Md. Intezar @ Md. Intezar AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 164.805 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. They argued that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, they were not owners of the vehicles, and …

Dhuran Singh @ Dhurendra Singh @ Dhurandhar Prasad SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Dhuran Singh and Arvind Singh, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,036.80 litres of liquor from a bush near a school. They argued that they were not apprehended on the spot, the liquor was not found in their possession, …

Mohan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mohan Singh sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged seizure of 630 litres of liquor and two motorcycles, with offences under IPC sections 272, 273, 414 and 34 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, that the …

SHASHI KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shashi Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 1,000 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle. He claimed he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated by a hostile …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pintu Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 7.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused his …

Anil RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Ray, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 133,500 litres of liquor from the house of the deceased Harihar Paswan. He contended that he was not present at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, and had no relationship with …

Gulshan Kumar @ Gulshan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Gulshan Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 2,615.760 litres of liquor from two vehicles, under Sections 318(4), 317(5) and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a), 32(ii)(iii), 36 and 41(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner, who has five …

Sikandar Kumar @ Hira Lal @ Sikandra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sikandar Kumar, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 200 litres of liquor and 200 litres of jawa mahua from a forest, which were destroyed at the spot. The petitioner was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession. …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rohit Kumar was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 246 litres of liquor from an auto, charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicle, asserting …

Sanjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 246 litres of liquor from an auto, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was not arrested at the spot, did not have the liquor in his conscious …

Lalan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalan Singh and Rajan Singh were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 12 litres of liquor recovered from their house, which they claim is a joint family property and that they have no conscious possession. They argued that the 2018 amendment to …

Munesh @ Munesh Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munesh Kumar Sharma, owner of a vehicle from which 10,214.4 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail alleging he had no knowledge of the illicit use of his vehicle and maintains a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, contending the petitioner is implicated …

Sahdeo YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sahdeo Yadav, was implicated in a case concerning the seizure of 549 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle he owned, though the liquor was not found in his possession at the time of arrest. He claimed to have a clean antecedent and argued that ownership of the vehicle alone should …

Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 188, 290, 414 and 120B and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the seizure of 587.52 litres of liquor, part of which was recovered from his motorcycle and car. He argued that he …

Parvjit Rai @ Parvjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Parvjit Rai and Srikant Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. They contended that neither was arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in …

SatenderversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satender, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 467 and 468 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from a car and a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he …

Hira Lal Das @ Hira DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Hira Lal Das and Manish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 11.625 litres of liquor from a husk house. They argued that they were not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in their …

Sakesh Yadav @ Saket Yadav @ Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sakesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and his name was omitted …

Jugeshwar Chaudhary @ Jugeshwar ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jugeshwar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 50 litres of liquor and 7,000 litres of Mahua jawa were allegedly recovered from a public area near the Sone river. He argued that he was not arrested …

Ashwani KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ashwani Kumar, owner of a restaurant, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for the recovery of an empty liquor bottle from his premises. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the bottle, and was unaware that a …

Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 100 litres of liquor recovered from his courtyard. He argued that the liquor was stored in a joint‑family house, that he had no …

Pintu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Pintu Singh and Sonu Singh were arrested in connection with the seizure of 147.78 litres of liquor, four cartridges, a car and two motorcycles, and charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, the Arms Act and the Bihar Excise Act. They contended that they were …

Manish Kumar @ Pintu Yadav @ Manish @ PintuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging recovery of 2,660.025 litres of liquor from a truck and charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B, as well as sections 30(a), 30(i)(ii) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the …

Chandan NoniyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Noniya, was arrested in connection with alleged illegal possession of 55.665 litres of liquor recovered from the house of Urmila Devi, invoking Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the recovery …

Gwari Nat @ Buari Khalifa @ Boari NatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gwari Nat, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 20 litres of liquor and 100 litres of Mahua solution, which were destroyed at the spot. He was not apprehended in possession of the liquor and was implicated by a watchman with whom …

Rajdeo Chaudhary @ Rajdev ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajdeo Chaudhary, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 170 litres of liquor, an automobile and a motorcycle from a house that is part of a joint family property. He was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner pleaded that he has a clean …

Chiku Chaudhary @ Amit Chaudhary @ Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chiku Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 5,637.880 litres of liquor from a truck. He was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and he is not the owner of the vehicle; the …

Raman MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raman Mahto, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 417.600 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle, under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the BNS read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not apprehended at the spot, the liquor was not …

Vishal Kumar Chaudhary @ Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar Chaudhary was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle, charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the case against …

Rupesh Kumar @ BideshiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 703.125 litres of liquor from a washroom near Baba Badal Chaudhary Sthan, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not apprehended at the spot, had no conscious possession of …

Srikant Rai @ Umakant Rai @ Kallu Rai @ Srikant YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Srikant Rai, was charged under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 330 litres of illicit liquor and two seized motorcycles at a joint family house. He has eight prior criminal cases, five under the excise …

Rakesh Ram @ Rakesh Kumar Ram @ Rakesh Ram RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rakesh Ram, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 60 litres of liquor from a canal area in Nipaniya village. He has three prior excise cases and has been in custody since 23 October 2025. The petitioner argued that he was not apprehended at …

Pratik Kumar @ Pratik Raj @ PratikversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pratik Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 468, 471, 420, 414 and 34, and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a), 32, 36 and 41 for allegedly recovering 5,951.8 liters of liquor from five vehicles. He contended that he was not apprehended at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, and …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 182.250 liters of liquor from a cattle shed on his premises, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He applied for bail, asserting a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his conscious …

Manish Chaudhary @ Sanjeet Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Chaudhary applied for bail in a criminal case (Criminal Miscellaneous No.1546 of 2026) concerning alleged offences under Sections 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bihar Narcotic/Excise Statute, 2023, read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, for the alleged recovery of 1,528.200 litres of …

Sonu Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Choudhary, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 1528.200 liters of liquor from a truck and charged under Sections 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, together with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he …

Sohan Choudhary @ Jay Shankar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sohan Choudhary, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 1,528.200 liters of liquor from a truck, charged under Sections 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no prior …

Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from his hotel and a toddy shop. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession and that the case was based solely on a …

Sujit Kumar @ Sujit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Sujit Kumar Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 37 and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a house and a motorcycle not owned by him. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, no …

Ajit SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Singh, was implicated in an excise case (PS Case No.1272 of 2025) for alleged possession of 300 ml of liquor in a vehicle he owned, alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession …

Sanjay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the seized vehicle was not his, and the case was based solely on …

Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Pramod Yadav and Ganawa Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 200 litres of liquor and 200 litres of jawa mahua from a forest area. They argued they have no prior criminal …

Chhotak BindversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhotak Bind, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 14 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, …

Kiran DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kiran Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a house that is part of a joint family property. She contended that she had no direct possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and that the FIR did not …

Birendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Birendra Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 104 litres of liquor seized from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and that the vehicle …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and that his name does not appear in the FIR, …

Harendra SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Harendra Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was recovered from a place not belonging to him, and that no liquor was …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from premises adjacent to his house. He argued he had no possession of the liquor and possessed a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail. The …

Md. UjaleversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Ujale, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 35.7 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware that a friend had used the vehicle …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 7.5 litres of liquor near a Durga temple. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged recovery occurred on public land, and the case was based solely on a …

Rajan Mukhiya @ Rajan Kumar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajan Mukhiya sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 129.6 litres of liquor from a sack near a bamboo orchard, which was not in his possession. The petitioner argued that the alleged recovery occurred on …

Satrughan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satrughan Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, concerning the alleged recovery of 10.6 litres of liquor from a public crossing. He …

Jai Narayan ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jai Narayan Thakur, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from three vehicles, alleged to violate Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 33 of the Bihar Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that he has a clean antecedent and that he …

Bulet Yadav @ Bulat YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Bulat Yadav and Ramesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 13.5 litres of liquor from a public place. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, did not have conscious …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 625.86 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he was unaware that his driver …

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Kumar Singh @ Ritik SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 4.5 litres of liquor from a paper‑plate factory. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the alleged recovery occurred on premises not owned by …

Santosh Rai @ Santosh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Rai, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 227.5 litres of liquor from a vehicle, with charges under IPC Sections 272, 273 and 34 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not the …

Suresh Manjhi @ Suresh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suresh Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 100 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He contended that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, that the house is jointly owned, …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, no liquor was found in his possession, and the case was based solely on a confessional …

Shabana KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shabana Khatoon, the owner of a scooter and a motorcycle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20.46 litres of liquor from her vehicles. She contended that she was not in possession of the liquor, had no knowledge of its misuse by others, …

Madho Yadav @ Vikash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Madho Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 46 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. He argued he was not in possession of the vehicle and was implicated solely on a confessional statement of another accused, which he …

Chandan Kumar Singh @ Chhotu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Chandan Kumar Singh and Kundan Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 151.68 litres of liquor. They argued they had no possession of the liquor, the recovery site did not belong to …

Shanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shanti Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a police case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleged that 15 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that she was not in …