Patna High Court
Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
Provisional anticipatory bail is granted subject to conditions, with confirmation pending verification of the petitioner’s antecedent.
Summary
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 11 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his conscious possession. The petitioner, who has a clean antecedent, argued that the amended 2018 Excise Act no longer recognizes deemed possession or presumed offender. The State opposed anticipatory bail. The Court, after considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail on the condition of a Rs.500 bail bond, two sureties of the same amount, and subject to verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedent, with the order to be confirmed if no antecedent is found.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the Bihar Excise Act provisions.
- Whether the absence of conscious possession and the joint family nature of the property negate the presumption of possession.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Excise Act — s. 30(a), 30(c), 30(d)
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Bihar Excise Act
- possession
- joint family property
- clean antecedent
- Section 482
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33621 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2026 Thana- KATRA District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Deepak Kumar Son of Kailash Sahani Resident of Village- Shivdaspur, P.S.-
Katra, District- Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 14-05-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a),
30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 11 liters of liquor from house of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and the house in
question is a joint family property, as such, it cannot be alleged
with certainty that it was petitioner who had kept the liquor in
the house or the liquor kept in the house was within his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33621 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
2/3
knowledge and after amendment in the excise act in the year
2018, the concept of deemed possession and presumed offender
has been done away with and he came to be implicated at the
instance of Chowkidar with whom he is on an inimical term,
when petitioner admittedly is a person with clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks
from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in
connection with Katra P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026, subject to the
conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court
shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the
event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case
then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of
seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this
Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be
confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33621 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
3/3
person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional
anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.