Patna High Court
Lalbabu Yadav @ Abhishek Yadav @ Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
Provisional anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, subject to verification of his antecedent and compliance with the conditions imposed under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Summary
The petitioner, Lalbabu Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 400 litres of liquor from two motorcycles and a scooty. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the seized vehicles, and was framed by a hostile chowkidar. The State opposed his request for anticipatory bail. The Court, after considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail on the condition that the petitioner furnishes a bail bond of Rs. 500 with two sureties and that the trial court verify his antecedent within six weeks. If any prior case is discovered, the bail will not be confirmed; otherwise, the provisional order will be confirmed. The order was made under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under the circumstances.
- Whether the conditions imposed under Section 482(2) of the BNSS are appropriate.
- Whether the petitioner’s alleged lack of possession and clean antecedent justify bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Excise Act — s. 30(a)
- BNSS — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Bihar Excise Act
- Section 30(a)
- Section 482(2)
- clean antecedent
- seizure of liquor
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36930 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2026 Thana- TANKUPPA District- Gaya
======================================================
Lalbabu Yadav @ Abhishek Yadav @ Abhishek Kumar S/o Raja Ram Yadav
R/o vill - Baradiha, P.S.- Tankuppa, Distt.- Gaya ji
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sheo Nandan Prasad
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 16-06-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 400 litres of liquor from two motorcycles and a
scooty was also seized.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of
any of the seized vehicles and he came to be implicated at the
instance of Chowkidar with whom he is on an inimical term. It
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36930 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026
2/3
is next submitted that if Chowkidar was aware about the
involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence, then why he did
not inform the police prior to institution of the instant FIR,
which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks
from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in
connection with Tankuppa P.S. Case No. 41 of 2026, subject to
the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court
shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the
event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case
then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of
seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this
Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be
confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a
person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36930 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026
3/3
anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.