Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Police Act

17 judgments · newest first · showing 1–17

Bale YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, four members of the Yadav family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 285 of 2024 filed under several sections of the Bihar Police Act for alleged assault and related offences. The informant alleged that petitioners 2 and 3, Sunil and Akhilesh Yadav, …

Rekha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Rekha Devi, the wife of Ganesh Sah, was implicated in a case alleging she snatched a gold chain and participated in assault against an informant, alleged to be a caste‑based offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. She appealed the order dated …

Pawan Kumar @ Pawan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar (also known as Pawan Paswan), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 577 of 2025) involving offences under sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 74, 76, 79, 351(2) and 352 of the Bihar statutes. The prosecution …

Vinay kumar singh @ Vinay SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Raju Singh, Lal Babu Singh and Vinay Kumar Singh were arrested in connection with FIR No. 453 of 2025 alleging assault on an informant and her husband, resulting in the husband's death, and offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103, 61(2) of the Bihar Police Act, 2023 and …

Vivek Kumar @ Vivek Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vivek Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail in connection with a police case alleging multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including waging war against the state and assault. The prosecution alleged that Kumar, after being taken to the police station, resisted arrest, …

Hari SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Hari Sah was arrested in connection with a case alleging rape under Sections 498‑A, 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the alleged victim had a consensual relationship with another accused, Bittu Kumar, and that …

Harish Kumar @ Chotu Kumar @ Haresh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Harish Kumar, an 18‑year‑old student, was named in an FIR (Daudpur PS Case No. 189 of 2025) alleging that he abducted a minor girl on a motorcycle, invoking sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The girl later gave a statement under Section 183 of the Bihar Police Act supporting the …

Rahul Kumar @ Chotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was arrested in connection with an alleged kidnapping of a minor girl on 2 March 2025, along with three co‑accused. The prosecution alleged that the girl might have been sexually assaulted, invoking Sections 96, 137(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The defence …

Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Singh @ Dora SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was charged under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 64(2)(f) and 351(3) of the Bihar Penal Code in a POCSO case for alleged rape. The victim initially supported the allegation but later turned hostile, leading the petitioner’s counsel to claim false implication and seek …

Md Altamas Khan @ Altamas KhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md Altamas Khan, was charged under sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act after a pistol and live cartridges were recovered from his jointly‑owned house. He contended that he had no personal possession of the weapons, that the seizure violated the mandatory provisions of section …

Satyanarayan Ram @ Satya Narayan RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Satyanarayan Ram applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, where the prosecution alleged that a country‑made pistol was recovered from his possession. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserted that nothing was seized from him, and contended that the …

Binod Kumar @ Binod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Binod Kumar, was arrested in connection with an alleged illegal sand‑mining operation on the Niranjana river, during which police attempting to seize sand‑laden tractors were attacked with lathis, bricks and stones. The prosecution charged him under sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), …

Ramesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Rai, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Bhelahi PS Case No.48 of 2025) involving alleged participation in a mob that assaulted police while they were trying to arrest another accused. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was among 50‑55 persons who …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Ravi Kumar, a 19‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with an alleged sexual relationship with a 16‑year‑old girl, alleged to have been pursued on the pretext of marriage. He was charged under Section 64 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail after the police registered a case alleging that he, with three unknown persons, attempted to rape a minor girl and assaulted her, causing severe injuries. The prosecution’s case is based on the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Chandan Kumar Jha was arrested in connection with an alleged possession of two country‑made pistols, three live cartridges and a motorcycle, alleged offences under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He filed a petition for regular bail, claiming he was falsely implicated, that …