Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
417 judgments · newest first · showing 401–417
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Shaw, sought anticipatory bail after a police raid recovered 2,997 litres of liquor from a Hyva truck he owned. He argued he had no prior criminal record and was unaware that his brother had misused the vehicle, asserting that the liquor was not in his conscious …
Petitioner Pawan Kumar feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that 27 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. He argued he had no possession, was not the vehicle’s owner, and the case relied on a confessional …
The petitioner, Abhinav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case involving alleged recovery of 455 litres of spirit from a Scorpio vehicle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized liquor, was not the vehicle's owner, and was …
The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 150 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had a clean …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, involving alleged recovery of 2,682.9 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was …
Shravan Kumar was arrested in connection with the recovery of 523.995 litres of illicit liquor and charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He filed an anticipatory bail application, which the petition mistakenly omitted to label as such, and …
The petitioner, Sujit Kumar, feared arrest in an excise case where 801 litres of illicit liquor were seized and he was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He pleaded innocence and applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had not been arrested …
Petitioner Rajesh Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 38(1) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 756.72 litres of liquor from his house, outhouse and a container vehicle. He …
Bharat Singh, the owner of a motorcycle from which 35 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that he was not present at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and he was unaware …
The petitioner, Pramila Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a motorcycle she owned was seized with 98.6 litres of liquor, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not present at the …
The petitioners, Sadanand Kamat and Nitish Kumar Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The court allowed the withdrawal of the application for petitioner No.2 after his arrest, and dismissed that part of …
Budha Singh, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that liquor was recovered from a public place and not from his possession. He argued that the police relied on secret information and had not conducted a …
The petitioner, Chandan Thakur, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 23.700 litres of liquor from his shop. He has two prior cases under the same Act and feared arrest. He argued that the liquor was recovered in his absence and …
The petitioner, Bunty Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 54 litres of liquor recovered from a cowshed on his premises. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his …
Shaida Khatun, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 57,600 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean …
The petitioner, Sanjay Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 128.5 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean …
Birendra Rai, the owner of a vehicle from which 261.54 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being transported, was not in possession at the time of …
