Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018

417 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

Biran ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Biran Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 296 of 2021) under Sections 30(a) and 37(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 10 litres of illicit liquor were recovered. The petitioner claimed he was innocent, not caught in …

Ravi Kumar @ Dharmendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He claimed innocence, stating he was not present at the scene where liquor was recovered from a Maruti …

Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ajit Kumar was arrested in connection with the seizure of 315 litres of illicit foreign liquor from a Scorpio vehicle, alleged to be an offence under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The petitioner contended that he was neither the driver nor the …

Shubham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shubham Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 38 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being transported …

Sabir @ Md. Sabir Siddiqui @ Sahid SiddiqueversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sabir Siddiqui, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 81 litres of liquor from an auto and a motorcycle. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his possession; the …

Vishwaraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishwaraj Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly transporting 7 litres of liquor in a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not arrested at the spot, …

Mithlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 271 of 2022) for alleged conspiracy under Section 120B of the IPC and for offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, involving the seizure of 1,604.475 litres of liquor from …

Arnav Prasad @ Aarav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arnav Prasad was arrested on 11 February 2026 after police recovered 190.380 litres of illicit foreign liquor from a train at Chapra railway station. He was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, that …

Virendra Yadav @ Virendra Singh @ Birendra YdavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Virendra Yadav, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 12.6 litres of liquor from an open space and charged under Section 30 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the place of …

Surendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Surendra Yadav was arrested in connection with the recovery of 638.280 liters of illicit liquor and charged under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He had been in custody since 11 February 2026 and claimed a clean antecedent and innocence, asserting that …

Priya Kumar Singh @ Priya KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Priya Kumar Singh sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, based on the recovery of 620.250 litres of liquor from a hut belonging to a third‑person, Deepak, and on Deepak’s confessional …

Amar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amar Kumar was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 625 of 2022) for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor recovered from his scooty, though he was not arrested at the spot and claims the vehicle was misused by a friend. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that ownership of the vehicle …

Manish YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Yadav was implicated in a case involving 175 litres of illicit liquor alleged to have been recovered from a truck, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The petitioner claimed he was not present at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, and …

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with an excise case (Sadar Excise P.S. Case No. 123 of 2025) alleging possession of 53.005 litres of illicit liquor. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was seized from a vehicle owned by the petitioner, although none was found …

Awadhesh Kumar @ Awdhesh Yadav @ Awadhesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Awadhesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case involving the alleged possession of nine litres of illicit liquor, charged under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The prosecution alleged that the …

Gulshan Kumar @ Gulshan Kumar Mehta @ Gulshan MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Gulshan Kumar Mehta applied for bail in an excise case (Araria Excise P.S. Case No.36 of 2026) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 108 litres of Nepali liquor were seized from a bike. The petitioner contended that the seized liquor was not in his …

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar, the owner of a Tata Mini truck, was implicated in the seizure of 826.3 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and that his …

NomanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Noman, was arrested on 14 February 2026 in connection with the seizure of 868.5 litres of foreign liquor from a pick‑up van, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not the …

Surendra GiriversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Surendra Giri was arrested in Mahuawa police station case No. 14 of 2026 for allegedly possessing 90 litres of illicit liquor, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, a clean antecedent and offering to donate …

Soharab AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Soharab Alam, was arrested on 12 January 2026 in connection with a seizure of 927.720 litres of foreign liquor alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The petitioner contended that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not …

SANTOSH KUMAR SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, a railway employee, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for possession of 5.625 litres of foreign liquor seized from his motorcycle. He argued that the seizure occurred while he was performing official duties, that the informant …

Rajeev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Rajeev Kumar filed a writ petition seeking to quash the confiscation order dated 07.02.2025 that seized his motorcycle, which had been reported stolen on 05.12.2023. The police later recovered the vehicle during an excise raid where 150 litres of illicit liquor were found in sacks, and the driver, …

Saroj Yadav @ Saroj SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saroj Yadav, sought bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, for alleged possession of large quantities of illicit liquor and brewing materials. He contended that the allegations were based on …

Harendra MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Harendra Mukhiya was arrested on 31 January 2026 in connection with a case alleging that he stored and attempted to transport 120 litres of illicit liquor recovered from the bank of the Dudhaura River. The prosecution’s case relied on the testimony of an informant and the recovery of the liquor, but …

Sokhin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sokhin Kumar and Raushan Kumar Singh, were arrested in connection with the seizure of 438 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. They applied for bail, claiming innocence, clean antecedents, and offering to donate Rs. …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar was arrested on 3 January 2026 for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 after 210 litres of Napali liquor were seized from his motorcycle. He filed a bail petition, arguing that the FIR and seizure list showed …

Dinesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Dinesh Chaudhary and his wife Lalita Devi were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from their jointly owned house. They applied for anticipatory bail, contending that …

Raju Kumar @ Raju Kumar Yadav @ Raju YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raju Kumar, was arrested on 2 March 2026 in connection with an excise case involving the alleged seizure of 150 litres of illicit country-made liquor and a motorcycle. He applied for bail, asserting a clean criminal record and arguing that the seizure was not from his conscious …

Ravi HembramversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Hembram, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that 180 litres of liquor and 12 kg of Naushadar tablets were recovered from his house, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that he has a clean …

Prayagadhwaj Yadav @ PrayagversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Prayagadhwaj Yadav, owned a Hyundai Venue that he had rented out via a Zoom Car application. The vehicle was seized by police on 21 June 2024 after 350.250 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from it, and a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate ordered its confiscation and auction on 1 July …

JagpalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jagpal, filed a writ petition seeking the release of a truck seized by the Bihar Excise authorities for alleged possession of 427.320 litres of illicit foreign liquor, contravening several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. …

Ravi YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ravi Yadav sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 alleging that liquor was recovered from two other individuals and not from his conscious possession. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent …

Anish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anish Kumar, owned an e‑rickshaw that was seized after its driver, Guddu Kumar, allegedly drove while intoxicated and struck a motorcyclist. An FIR was lodged under Sections 281, 125(a) and 125(b) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise …

Manoj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Manoj Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking the release of a Tata truck seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged involvement in the recovery of illicit foreign liquor. The High Court granted the petitioner liberty to file …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Jitendra Kumar and Kaju Kumar were arrested on 23 January 2026 in connection with an FIR dated 22 January 2026 alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, for the recovery of 1,682.820 litres of foreign liquor from a …

Bishudev Ram @ Vishudev RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bishudev Ram, was arrested on 31 January 2026 in connection with an excise case involving the seizure of 675 litres of illicit liquor from a tempo. He filed a bail petition, contending that no liquor was recovered from his conscious possession and that the investigation violated …

Ranjay Singh @ Ranjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Ranjay Singh and Sunny Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a truck. They argued they have clean antecedents, are not owners of the truck, and that …

Manoj SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Sinha, the petitioner, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him for alleged offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, involving the recovery of 99 litres of liquor from a car …

Ajeet Kumar @ Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged possession of 3 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor …

Mithun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mithun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 162 litres of liquor from a vehicle he did not own. He argued that the police had implicated him …

Raju Chaudhary @ Raj Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 499.5 litres of liquor from a field adjacent to his residence. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not …

Basant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Basant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with an excise case alleging possession of 53.6 litres of prohibited codeine syrup under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He claimed innocence, stating that the seized syrup was recovered …

Sudhir MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sudhir Mahto applied for anticipatory bail after the police, based on a co‑accused’s confession, linked him to the seizure of 765 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The prosecution argued that the petitioner was involved, while his …

Neeraj Kumar @ Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Neeraj Kumar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged seizure of 40 litres of illicit mahua liquor under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, …

Lakhan RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Lakhan Ram applied for anticipatory bail after the police seized 474.48 litres of foreign liquor from a hut that was open to the public and allegedly linked to him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his …

Rohit Yadav @ Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners Rohit Yadav, Mithalesh Yadav and Bimpu Kumar sought anticipatory bail in a case involving the alleged possession of 50 litres of illicit liquor, charged under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. They claimed they were not present at …

Usha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Usha Devi, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged her involvement in the seizure of 239.4 litres of foreign and country-made liquor from three motorcycles in Buxar. She contended that she was not present at the scene, that only 52.92 litres were recovered from her …

Manjit PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manjit Paswan, the owner of a motorcycle from which 28 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail, claiming a clean criminal record and that he was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seizure implicated him under Section …

Mahendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mahendra Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after police seized 100 kg of fermented mahua and 10 litres of country-made liquor from his jointly owned house in connection with FIR No. 16 of 2026 under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The prosecution alleged that …

Lakindra Dhangar @ Sohan DhangarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Lakindra Dhangar applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 15 litres of country-made liquor and two gas cylinders from an open area outside his house. The petitioner argued …

Vicky ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vicky Manjhi, was implicated in a case (Digha P.S. Case No.672 of 2021) for allegedly possessing eight litres of country‑made liquor, alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 30(b), 30(c) and 32(iii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The petitioner argued that he …

Chandan Mandal @ Chandan Kumar @ Nishikant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Chandan Mandal and Pawan Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where police, acting on secret information, seized 612 litres of illicit liquor from a tractor that did not belong to them. The prosecution alleged violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition …

Birbal Mandal @ Birbal Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Birbal Mandal applied for anticipatory bail after police seized 13.5 litres of foreign liquor from his residence in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The petitioner argued that the liquor was recovered from an open area, that he had …

Saud Alam @ Sawood Alam @ Md Saud AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Saud Alam applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case (Sikti P.S. Case No.175 of 2022) where the police alleged that a motorcycle rider abandoned a sack containing illicit liquor after a chase, and the seized motorcycle (BR38B‑3858) and liquor were linked to the petitioner. The …

Vimal Kumar @ Bhimal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vimal Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 for allegedly transporting Kasturi Nepali liquor from Nepal. The police recovered 160 bottles of liquor and two motorcycles from an open area, but none of the liquor was found on the …

Manish ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Thakur applied for anticipatory bail after the police seized 4.32 litres of foreign liquor from an open area near his house in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The petitioner contended that the seizure was made in a public …

Bechan Paswan @ Bechn PasavanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bechan Paswan, the owner of a motorcycle from which 41.4 litres of liquor were seized, was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that his son‑in‑law had misused …

Subhash RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Ram, filed a writ petition seeking the release of a vehicle seized under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged possession of 20.750 litres of illicit liquor. The High Court granted the petitioner liberty to file an application under Rule 12A(2) of …

Anita GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anita Gupta, filed a writ petition seeking the release of a Mahindra/Bolero vehicle seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged possession of 420 litres of illicit codeine phosphate and triprolidine syrup. The petitioner argued …

Guddu KhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guddu Khan, filed a writ petition seeking the release of a three‑wheeler Toto vehicle seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 18 litres of illicit beer. The High Court, after hearing, granted the petitioner liberty …

KapilversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kapil was arrested after police stopped his vehicle and seized 4006.44 litres of foreign liquor, charging him under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that the liquor and vehicle did not belong to him and that the seizure memo lacked an …

Rajeev Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajeev Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 26.460 litres of liquor from the roof of his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his …

Devnandan SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devnandan Sharma, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing five litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …

Prem Kumar Choudhary @ Langar @ Premnath KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Prem Kumar Choudhary and Vikram Choudhary sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging they were involved in the recovery of 400 litres of liquor from a boat. The petitioners argued they have no …

Jai Prakash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jai Prakash Yadav, was implicated in a case for allegedly transporting 648 litres of liquor in his Bolero vehicle, violating Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his driver’s …

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Shankar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was …

SUNILversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sunil, the owner of a vehicle, was implicated in the recovery of 352.5 litres of liquor from his car under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He asserted that he had a clean criminal record and that the liquor was seized from the vehicle without his knowledge, …

Dhanu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Dhanu Paswan filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the release of his TVS motorcycle, which was seized after two individuals riding it were found with 1.5 litres of illicit liquor. The petitioner was not named in the FIR and claimed no involvement in the offence. The court examined Rule …

Afroj Ansari @ Md. Modi AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Afroj Ansari, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 180 ml of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle from another individual, Alok Kumar. He contended that he was not arrested on …

Anil Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anil Kumar Singh, the owner of a vehicle from which 300 litres of liquor were recovered, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the driver …

Abhishek Kumar @ BalakversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Abhishek Kumar and Krishna Murari, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 954.720 litres of liquor from a secret basement belonging to Rakesh Kumar. They argued that they were not arrested at …

Deepak Sah @ Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Sah, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, after 20 litres of liquor and 30 kilograms of jaggery were seized from an auto‑rickshaw and a motorcycle. He asserted that he neither owned the vehicles nor had the …

Md. Mehebub Alam QuraishiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Md. Mehebub Alam Quraishi filed a writ petition seeking release of his four‑wheel vehicle seized by Buxar Excise Police for allegedly transporting 100 ml of illicit liquor, invoking Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022. The State argued that …

Jagdeo PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jagdeo Prasad filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash three orders that had sealed his premises under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, following the recovery of illicit liquor. The petitioner was not the owner of the premises; ownership belonged to …

Ranjeet ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Ranjeet Chaudhary sought release of his house that had been sealed under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 after 5 litres of illicit country‑made liquor were recovered from his premises. He requested liberty to file an application under Rule 12B of …

Gautam Kumar Paswan @ Gautam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gautam Kumar Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Sections 30(a), 34 and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 40 litres of liquor in a house under construction. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, …

Madhuri KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Madhuri Kumari, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR alleged that 175.8 litres of liquor were recovered from a four‑wheel vehicle she owned, implicating her under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. She argued that she had no prior …

Munna Mushar@Manoj MusharversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munna Mushar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a field not belonging to him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the …

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 258.145 litres of liquor from a vehicle and charged under several IPC sections (341, 323, 353, 427, 504, 506, 34) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that he …

Lala Yadav @ Shambhu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lala Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 23.75 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was seized from a location not belonging to him, that …

Jitendra Bhuiyan @ Jitendra BhuiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Bhuiyan, was arrested on 31‑12‑2025 in connection with an excise case involving the seizure of 210 litres of illicit chulai liquor. He was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The petitioner pleaded that he has a …

Ankit SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ankit Sharma was arrested on 02‑02‑2026 in connection with a case involving the seizure of 135 litres of illicit country‑made liquor from a vehicle (tempu). He was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The petitioner argued that he had no ownership or …

Chaneshwar Musahar @ Chaneshwar RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chaneshwar Musahar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that the alleged seizure of 30 litres of liquor was from a public place and not in his possession. He argued that the police …

Sushil Yadav @ Sushil Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sushil Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 311.46 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a bush near his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the …

Raja Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar Mandal, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 after 159 litres of liquor were recovered from a Tata Magic vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not arrested at the spot, and …

Md. Aslam @ Md. Mohammad AslamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Aslam, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 180 ml of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean criminal …

Radheyshyam Mandal @ Radhey Shyam MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Radheyshyam Mandal applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 153 litres of liquor from a corn field not belonging to him. He asserted a clean criminal record …

Sheikh TaslimversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sheikh Taslim, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 3.705 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no …

Prem Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Prem Prakash Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly transporting 500 ml of liquor in a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was …

Nepali ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nepali Chaudhary, was arrested on 20 January 2026 in connection with an excise case alleging possession of 7 litres of country‑made liquor, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The petitioner argued that the liquor was recovered …

Shashi Kumar @ Shashi MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shashi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Acts of 2018 and 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from a riverbank and a house not belonging to him. He contended that he was not caught in …

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of liquor from a motorcycle and an auto. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in actual possession of …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 after 1,093.875 litres of liquor were recovered from a truck and a motorcycle seized, which he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at …

Jayendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jayendra Singh was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly having 55 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent and was unaware that a person named Vicky misused his vehicle, and …

Pappu Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Mandal, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 60 litres of liquor recovered from a cowshed adjacent to his house. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his …

Ruksana Khatoon @ Rukhsana KhatunversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ruksana Khatoon, was arrested on 24 January 2026 for possession of 8.640 litres of illicit liquor, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. She applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent and highlighting non‑compliance of …

Mohit LatherversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohit Lather, filed a writ petition seeking the release of a seized Swift LXI vehicle (HR 11 R 7103) that had been confiscated in connection with a prohibition case involving 204 litres of illicit liquor. The vehicle had been ordered to be confiscated and auctioned by the …

Shivam Kumar @ Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shivam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 1,049.640 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, …

Junaid KhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Junaid Khan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged recovery of 4,311.72 litres of liquor from a truck, with charges under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 sections 30(a), 32(1)(ii), 36 and 41. He …

Sikandar Mahto @ Sakindra MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sikandar Mahto, was charged under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 in Excise P.S. Case No. 223 of 2025. An earlier order had allowed his bail but the bail bonds were not accepted because of a mistaken submission regarding …

Harendra NoniyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Harendra Noniya petitioned for bail in a criminal case involving alleged possession of 147.78 litres of illicit liquor, four cartridges, and participation in an attack on police personnel. The charges were under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 109, 132 and 324(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, …

Anup Kumar PatelversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anup Kumar Patel, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 297 litres of liquor from his vehicle, violating Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was unaware of his driver’s alleged misuse …

Shila Thakur @ Shilanath ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that 26.64 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle but he was not arrested at the spot and had no conscious possession. He argued he had a clean …

Santosh Kumar @ Sanoth KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, for allegedly possessing 8.3 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual …

Sanjeeet Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeeet Kumar Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 650 ml of liquor was recovered from a vehicle he owned, invoking Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was …

Diwakar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Diwakar Kumar was arrested in a case alleging offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, based on an FIR in which an informant claimed an attempted abduction and the recovery of liquor from a seized vehicle. The petitioner …

BISHNU KUMAR SINGH @ BISHNU KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bishnu Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 concerning alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from the premises of Akhilesh Kumar. He contended that he was not …

Ranjeet Ray @ NariyalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Ranjeet Ray and Abhinay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case (PS‑767/2025) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for possession of illicit country‑made liquor. The prosecution’s case relied on recovery of …

Babita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Babita Devi, applied for anticipatory bail after being named in FIR No. 789 of 2025 for an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, involving the recovery of 5 litres of country-made liquor from a village hut. The prosecution’s …

Manish Kumar @ Anurag SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manish Kumar, a labourer, was implicated in Excise Case No. 118C2 of 2019 for the alleged recovery of 39.6 litres of foreign liquor based on secret information. The petitioner argued that he was not present at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, and that the source of the secret information …

Chandan Sahni @ Chandan SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Chandan Sahni, was named in FIR No.441 of 2025 for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 involving the recovery of 17 litres of illicit country-made liquor. He contended that he was not present at the open place of recovery, …

Umesh Chaudhary @ Rocky Kumar @ RockyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Umesh Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging his involvement in the recovery of 160 litres of illicit country-made liquor, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The prosecution’s case …

NISHANT KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nishant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging possession of illicit foreign liquor under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The prosecution alleged that 116.1 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from the …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Bairgania PS Case No. 257 of 2025) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, involving the seizure of 288 litres of illicit Nepali liquor. The …

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Mishra, sought anticipatory bail in connection with Excise Sadar P.S. Case No. 380 of 2025, wherein the prosecution alleged recovery of 954.720 litres of illicit foreign liquor from his residence, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in an excise case where 2 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from his vehicle and three co‑accused were arrested. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, had lent the motorcycle to Basant Yadav, and had no knowledge of …

Rajnish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, a constable of the Bihar Police, was dismissed following a departmental enquiry into an alleged incident of intoxication and misconduct under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The petitioner contended that the enquiry violated Rule 17(14) of the Bihar Government …

Santosh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Santosh Singh and Sanjay Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 20 litres of illicit Mahua liquor recovered from an open field. They contended that they had no …

Kamlesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kamlesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with PS Ara Nawada Case No.702 of 2018, an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The police raid on Rinku Chaudhary’s house recovered 528 bottles of wine and …

Vikash JayswalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vikash Jayswal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Excise P.S. Case No. 3339 of 2025, which involved the seizure of 1.620 liters of foreign liquor and the apprehension of five individuals. He asserted that he was neither the owner of the godown nor the liquor and had a clean …

Prem Sagar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Prem Sagar Chaudhary, the registered owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case where 5.22 litres of foreign illegal liquor were recovered from a bag on the vehicle. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, lack of knowledge about the liquor, and that the bike was lent to a friend. …

Bablu SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Bablu Sah, the former owner of a car from which 144 litres of foreign liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He contended that he had sold the vehicle before the alleged offence and that no …

Surendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Surendra Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2013 case (Warisaliganj G.O. Case No.41) under Section 47(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 for alleged illegal liquor manufacturing. The police, acting on a tip from an ASI, raided an open area in Bishanpura …

GULESH RAYversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Gulesh Ray, the owner of a motorcycle from which 12 litres of illicit liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail. The prosecution alleged an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, based on the seizure, but no contraband was found …

Birju SahniversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Birju Sahni sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an excise case (PS No. 198 of 2025) for allegedly possessing illegal liquor. The prosecution alleged that a raid recovered 10 litres of illicit chulai liquor and that the petitioner was identified by co-accused. The petitioner …

Birabal Prasad KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Birabal Prasad Kushwaha, is the registered owner of a truck from which 89.280 litres of illicit liquor were seized in an Excise case. He claims he had no knowledge of the liquor being loaded, as the goods were loaded at Gorakhpur and the driver, who has been apprehended, acted …

Samir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Samir Kumar, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 184.620 litres of illicit liquor from a car he was driving, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. His counsel sought to correct the reported quantity of seized liquor in the bail …

Amod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Amod Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after the police recovered 83 litres of country-made liquor and destroyed 150 litres of semi‑prepared liquor from a house that he jointly occupies. The prosecution alleged that Yadav was selling illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and …

Bipin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Bipin Kumar sought anticipatory bail after police seized 20 litres of Mahua liquor from a motorcycle he owned, alleging his involvement in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He contended that the bike was lent to a friend and he had no …

Shiv Chandra RamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shiv Chandra Ram was arrested in connection with a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for possession of foreign liquor. The petitioner argued that the seizure list was prepared in violation of Section 103 of the BNSS because no …

Chandan Kumar@Chandan GopversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Chandan Kumar was arrested in February 2020 for alleged murder under IPC Section 302, illegal possession of arms under the Arms Act Section 27, and a violation of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act 2018 Section 30(a). He has been in judicial custody since his arrest and this is his fifth …

Anil Sahu @ Anil Yadunandan SahuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Sahu, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, for allegedly transporting 30 litres of liquor in his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …

Bhola SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhola Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 25.92 litres of liquor in a dalan, though no arrest was made at the spot and the liquor was not in his immediate possession. He has eight prior …

Ramvinay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramvinay Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 427.140 litres of liquor from a vehicle he did not own. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the seized …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, relating to alleged recovery of liquor from an agricultural field. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the alleged …

Mithlesh ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithlesh Chaudhari applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 alleging that 67 litres of liquor were recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued that …

Dhanji Paswan @ Gudgedi PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhanji Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, alleging that 14 litres of liquor were recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the liquor could …

Chandan Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 43.2 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not found in his possession, …

Baban ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baban Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that 26 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had no knowledge of …

Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 22.6 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, had a clean …

Yaswant Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Yaswant Kumar Mandal applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 5 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …

Raj Kishor RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Raj Kishor Rai sought anticipatory bail after a vehicle he owned was seized containing 888 litres of liquor, alleged to be a violation of Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at …

Gopal PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gopal Prasad, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …

Akshay Lal BindversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akshay Lal Bind, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged possession of 34 litres of liquor recovered from his house and a field. He argued that the liquor was not in his …

Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 35.395 litres of liquor from his sister's house. He argued that he was not arrested on the …

Lav Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lav Kumar Singh, the owner of a house from which 150.230 litres of liquor were recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, claiming he had no conscious possession and a clean antecedent. He argued that the police …

Ranjeet ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Ranjeet Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and (c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his allegedly abandoned joint‑family house. He contended that no liquor was found …

Tunni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tunni Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 420 litres of liquor from two auto-rickshaws. She argued that she was not present at the spot of seizure, …

Md. Adib AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md Adib Alam, a supervisor with Tejas Rajdhani Coach, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 30.75 litres of liquor recovered from Rajendra Nagar Railway Station and related offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, the …

Pappu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 51.12 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a bag and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no …

Amit Kumar @ Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 33, 35, 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that liquor was recovered from premises not belonging to him and that he was not caught in possession. He …

Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 65 litres of liquor from a hut not belonging to him. He asserted a clean criminal record and that the liquor was …

Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that the alleged seizure of 455 litres of spirit was from land not belonging to him and that he had no conscious possession. He …

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 16,500 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of …

Baljit ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Baljit Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 47A and F of the Bihar Excise Act, 1915, read with Section 98(2)(3)(4) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, alleging recovery of liquor from his house. He argued that the liquor …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kundan Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 1.95 litres of liquor was recovered, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his car and that he …

Shailendra Kumar @ Lalan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shailendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 225,540 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a car parked outside his house. He contended that he was not the …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail in connection with a case arising from a land‑dispute‑related assault where he and others allegedly attacked the informant’s family with weapons, causing a non‑vital injury. The petitioner argued that the incident stemmed from a land dispute and …

Saroj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saroj Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that 60.48 litres of liquor were recovered from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not present …

Lalbabu BaithaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalbabu Baitha, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned, under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …

Munna RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munna Rai, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 60 litres of liquor and 4,000 kg of Mahua solution, which were destroyed at the spot. He was not arrested at the scene and the …

Binod ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Binod Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 210 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He contended that …

Sadanand Kumar @ Sadanand YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sadanand Kumar Yadav, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 275 litres of liquor from two cycles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was seized from his possession, …

Raja Yadav @ Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raja Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 275 litres of liquor from two cycles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no liquor in his …

Satyendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of three litres of liquor from a shop not owned by him. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that no liquor …

Deepak Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession …

Tunna Kumar @ Tunna PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Tunna Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail in connection with a 2019 case alleging multiple offences under the IPC and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused demanded extortion and stabbed an informant, and that the petitioner assaulted another …

Bholu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bholu Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 164.100 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned, attracting charges under Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He contended that he had …

Sanchu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanchu Kumar, was implicated in a case (Excise P.S. Case No. 339 of 2025) for alleged possession of 30 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, had a clean criminal record, and was not in possession …

Hridaya ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hridaya Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, concerning the recovery of 9.8 litres of liquor from a public bush, of which only 0.4 litre was linked to two …

Ravikant PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravikant Prasad, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 98.5 litres of liquor from his Alto car. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Anshu Rajak @ AnshuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anshu Rajak, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that liquor was recovered from a location adjacent to his house and that he was not arrested at the spot nor found in possession of the …

Umesh Kumar @ Umesh SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 164.7 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, …

Shashi Kant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shashi Kant Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 475.200 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware that the vehicle was being used by others, Rajiv Kumar and Govinda …

Saligram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saligram Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged possession of liquor and destruction of Jawa Mahua at a property that is part of a joint family. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that no liquor …

Ritesh VishwakarmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ritesh Vishwakarma, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 207 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the time of seizure, and was …

Vijay Singh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Singh Yadav, owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 388.96 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the …

Laljee PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Laljee Prasad, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 after 49.5 litres of liquor was recovered from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the …

Ramlakhan ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramlakhan Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 153 litres of liquor from a public bush near an embankment. He contended that the liquor was not in …

Chunnu Singh @ Monu Singh @ Manu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chunnu Singh, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of liquor and a motorcycle from a public place not owned by him. He argued that he was not in possession of the …

Vijay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 192.75 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers, were implicated in a case involving the seizure of 147.78 litres of foreign liquor and five cartridges, alleged to violate sections of the BNSS Act, 2023, the Arms Act, 1959 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. They argued that the only basis for …

Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Kumar was arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 35.4 litres of liquor at his brother Sanjay Kumar’s house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner, who has a clean antecedent, argued that he was not in …

Ashok MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ashok Mahto and Mukesh Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a joint family house. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor was not in …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 30 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a …

Ashish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ashish Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 6.75 litres of liquor from an Indio car. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the liquor was not found in his …

Shyam Saw @ Ram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shyam Saw alias Ram Kumar, was implicated in an excise case involving the alleged recovery of 275 litres of liquor and two bicycles, though he was not arrested at the scene and claimed the evidence was based on secret information. He has three prior cases under the Excise Act and …

Rustam Yadav @ Rustam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rustam Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 37(c) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of ten litres of liquor from a joint family house. He argued that he has a clean …

Pravesh Bhuian @ Pravesh BhuiyanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pravesh Bhuian, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 24 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle, that the …

Sipi Turha @ Sippi Turha @ Satyendra PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sipi Turha, was apprehended for alleged possession of 97.29 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house, alleged to violate Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not seized from his …

Neero DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Neero Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 7 litres of liquor recovered from a corridor outside her house. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is …

Om PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Om Prakash, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 1.4 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, that the liquor was …

Dinesh Ray @ Dinesh Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 514.5 litres of liquor from a truck he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious …

Pikesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pikesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 180.750 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he was not in possession at the time of seizure, that the …

Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that 190 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not …

Md. Ziauddin AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Ziauddin Ansari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly transporting 201 litres of liquor in his vehicle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 87.390 litres of liquor from a Swift Dzire. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and that the liquor …

Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sanjay Singh, the owner/driver of a tempo, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 355 litres of liquor from his vehicle, attracting charges under Section 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He applied for anticipatory …