Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act

12 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

ANIRUDHA RAMAKRISHNA KARLEKARversusSMT. JANKIBAI R. BEDEKAR

1991 INSC 1829 January 1991Dismissed

The landlord sought eviction of a shop tenant under Section 13(1)(c) of the Bombay Rent, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, alleging that the tenant had been convicted of using the premises for illegal purposes. The tenant, who ran a sweet‑meats and farsan shop, had three convictions under the Prevention

AL CHAMPDANY INDUSTRIES LIMITEDversusTHE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR & ANR.

2009 INSC 22019 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed

Al Champdany Industries Limited purchased the assets of a company in liquidation. After the sale was confirmed, Bhatpara Municipality claimed arrears of property tax for periods before the sale and sought payment from the purchaser. The High Court held that the sale terms "as is where is" imposed a duty on the buyer to

INDIAN HOTEL AND RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION (AHAR) & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2019 INSC 5217 January 2019Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined challenges to the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance Act, 2016 and its Rules, which regulate dance performances in hotels, restaurants and bar rooms. Petitioners argued that provisions defining "obscene dance", licensing restrictions, punitive measures for tips, and various licensing co

PRABHUDAS DAMODAR KOTECHA & ORS.versusMANHABALA JERAM DAMODAR & ANR.

2013 INSC 53413 August 2013Dismissed

The appellants, who were occupying a flat in Bombay as a gratuitous licensee, were evicted by a decree of the Small Causes Court under s.41(1) of the Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882 (as amended by the Maharashtra Act of 1976). They appealed, arguing that the term "licensee" in the statute should be limited to

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ANR.versusKAMLA MILLS LTD.

2003 INSC 31011 July 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai reassessed the rateable value of land belonging to Kamla Mills Ltd. after the company demolished old structures and began constructing a new building. The corporation treated the land as "under construction" and raised its rateable value based on market rates, which the asses

PRATIBHA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1991 INSC 1379 May 1991Dismissed

Pratibha Co‑operative Housing Society Ltd. constructed eight unauthorized floors in a 36‑storey building, exceeding the permissible Floor Space Index (FSI) by about 24,000 sq ft. The Bombay Municipal Corporation issued a show‑cause notice and ordered demolition of the upper eight floors, which the Society challenged th

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search