Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950

33 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

VINODKUMAR M. MALAVIA ETC.versusMAGANLAL MANGALDAS GAMETI & ORS.

2013 INSC 66230 September 2013Dismissed

The case concerned the purported unification of the First District Church of the Brethren (FDCB) with the Church of North India (CNI). The appellants claimed that the unification dissolved FDCB, making CNI its legal successor and entitled to its property, which was held in a public trust regulated by the Bombay Public

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-ILL, PUNEversusSINHGAD TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY

2017 INSC 82029 August 2017Dismissed

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune challenged the assessment of Sinhgad Technical Education Society, a charitable educational institution, which was treated as an Association of Persons after a search under Section 132 revealed alleged capitation fees. The Assessing Officer issued a notice under Section 153C for

REKHABEN H. SHETHversusCHARU K. MEHTA & SONS.

2010 INSC 45329 July 2010Dismissed

The respondent, a permanent trustee of the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, sought the removal of the petitioner and four other trustees alleging misfeasance and misuse of trust funds. The Joint Charity Commissioner ordered that the trustees could not make any policy decisions or financial transactions without hi

VINAYAKA DEV IDAGUNJI AND ORS.versusSHIVARAM AND ORS.

2005 INSC 31928 July 2005Dismissed

The plaintiffs, who claim to be hereditary archaks (priests) of the Vinayaka Dev temple, sued the temple trustees for a declaration of their hereditary right, a share of devotees' offerings, and to set aside a notice terminating their services. The trustees contended that the suit was barred under Section 50 of the Bom

K.R. PATEL (DEAD) THROUGH L.RS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1999 INSC 36027 August 1999Dismissed

The deceased K.R. Patel and B.G. Amin were appointed executors and trustees under a 1962 will that directed payment of debts, conveyance of specific legacies, conversion of remaining assets into cash and donation to charitable purposes. The will created a public trust, which was registered in December 1964 after the es

AMBADEVI SANSTHA & ORS.versusJOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER & ORS.

2018 INSC 87325 September 2018Appeal(s) allowed

Shri Ambadevi Sanstha, a registered public trust under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, applied to the Joint Charity Commissioner (JCC) for permission to sell several trust properties after it had already received earnest money from a purchaser. Two prospective buyers offered higher prices and the newly elected trustees o

SAJJADANASHIN SAYED MD. B.E. EDR. (D) BY LRS.versusMUSA DADABHAI UMMER AND ORS.

2000 INSC 9523 February 2000Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether earlier judgments concerning the status of three wakf rozas could bar a fresh proceeding under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. It clarified that a prior decision is res judicata only when the issue was "directly and substantially" in dispute, not merely "collaterally or incidental

SOPAN SUKHDEO SABLE AND ORS.versusASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER AND ORS.

2004 INSC 5623 January 2004Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs, Sopan Sukhdeo Sable and others, filed a civil suit seeking a declaration that they were tenants of properties owned by the Shaneshwar Deosthan Trust, alleging forcible eviction and claiming injunction, compensation and other reliefs. The trial court dismissed the suit under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code

DINSHAW RUSI MEHTA & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2017 INSC 25722 March 2017Disposed off

The Parsi Lying‑in‑Hospital (PLIH) charitable trust, after transferring its hospital to the Bombay Parsi Punchayet (BPP), entered into a lease with Krimson Health Ventures Private Limited (KHPL) to rebuild the hospital as a super‑specialty facility. The Charity Commissioner approved the scheme under section 36 of the B

SMT. LAXMIRAJ S. PATIL AND ORS.versusBADASHAH SULTAN MUTWALI

1995 INSC 19822 March 1995Dismissed

The Hajlirat Pir, Babujmal, Deosthan Public Trust (the respondent) applied for an exemption certificate under Section 88‑B of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 for certain lands occupied by the appellants as tenants. The Deputy Collector granted the certificate after finding the trust registered under

CYRUS RUSTOM PATELversusTHE CHARITY COMMISSIONER MAHARASHTRA, STATE & ORS.

2017 INSC 97421 September 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a trustee of the B.C. Batliwala Agiary Trust, challenged the sanction granted by the Charity Commissioner of Maharashtra under Section 36 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, for a joint‑venture development‑cum‑sale of a 3,012‑sq‑m fire‑temple property to Astral Enterprises for Rs.2.95 crore. The Supre

RAMCHANDRA GOVERDHAN PANDITversusCHARITY COMMISSIONER OF STATE OF GUJARAT

1987 INSC 11921 April 1987Dismissed

Ramchandra Govardhan Pandit challenged a decision of the Charity Commissioner that his properties were a public trust. After the Commissioner’s order was dismissed by the Commissioner and the City Civil Court under Section 72 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, Pandit appealed to the Gujarat High Court, which dismis

SHEELA BARSEversusSECRETARY, CHILDREN AID SOCIETY & OTHERS

1986 INSC 28620 December 1986Disposed off

Sheela Barse, a freelance journalist, filed a writ petition challenging the operation of observation homes run by the Children’s Aid Society, Bombay, alleging that children were forced to work without pay, faced hazardous conditions, and suffered delays in repatriation. The Bombay High Court issued directions to improv

DAGDU KHOMANE AND ANOTHERversusEKNATH BHIKU YADAV & ORS.

2019 INSC 105218 September 2019Dismissed

The dispute concerned six acres of land belonging to the Maruti Dev Temple, which had been let out to tenants who, on Tillers' Day (1 April 1957), became deemed purchasers under Section 32 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The temple trust was registered as a public trust under the Bombay Public T

BALA SHANKAR MAHA SHANKAR BHATTJEE AND ORS.versusCHARITY COMMISSIONER, GUJARAT STATE

1994 INSC 32517 August 1994

The appellants challenged the registration of the ancient Kalika Mataji temple as a public trust under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, arguing that it was a private family temple based on a historic will and internal restrictions. The respondents contended that the temple, whose origin is lost in antiquity, had bee

MAHATMA GANDHI MISSIONversusCITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.

2005 INSC 42316 September 2005Dismissed

The Mahatma Gandhi Mission, a charitable trust, sought land from CIDCO for a college, hospital, club, stadium and staff quarters. While agreements were executed for the college, hospital, club and stadium, no deed or possession was ever given for the staff quarters. CIDCO cancelled the allotment of the disputed land an

MAROTIversusTULSIRAM AND ANR

1994 INSC 52015 November 1994

The Managing Trustee of Hanuman Deosthan filed a civil suit for possession of a property, alleging that the plaintiff Trust was the owner. The defendant appealed, claiming he had purchased the property from a predecessor and was therefore the owner. During cross‑examination and before municipal authorities, the defenda

SAINATH MANDIR TRUSTversusVIJAYA & ORS.

2010 INSC 87313 December 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The Sainath Mandir Trust, a registered public trust, received a plot of land in 1974 as a gift deed dedicated to the idol of Saibaba, and took possession of it. In 1982 the predecessor of respondents 1‑7 purchased the same plot from the original owner (respondent No.8) by a registered sale deed, but never obtained poss

TRAMBAKESHWAR DEVASTHAN TRUST AND ANR.versusPRESIDENT, PUROHIT SANGH AND ORS.

2011 INSC 76813 October 2011Disposed off

The Trambakeshwar Devasthan Trust, a public trust under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, challenged the High Court's order that the Board of Trustees of the Trimbakeshwar temple should include representatives of the Tungars, Purohits and Pujaris. The appellants argued that these groups have a direct pecuniary intere

SHRI D.M. DESHPANDE AND ORS.versusSHRI JANARDHAN KASHINATH KADAM (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

1998 INSC 42512 November 1998Appeal(s) allowed

The trustees of a public trust filed an execution application to enforce a scheme framed by the Charity Commissioner, seeking possession of Survey No. 14. The respondents claimed that the first respondent was a tenant of the land and therefore entitled to retain possession until an eviction order. The executing court r

PRATAPSINHJI N. DESAIversusDEPUTY CHARITY COMMISSIONER, GUJARAT & ORS.

1987 INSC 20611 August 1987Dismissed

The appellant, a former ruler of Patadi, claimed that two temples he managed were private family property, not public trusts. The Deputy Charity Commissioner, under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, deemed them public temples and public religious trusts, a finding upheld by the Charity Commissioner and the Gujarat Hi

MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF WAKFSversusSHAIKH YUSUF BHAI CHAWLA & ORS.

2012 INSC 22911 May 2012

The Supreme Court examined several Special Leave Petitions challenging the Bombay High Court's interim order that, pending the constitution of a proper Maharashtra State Board of Wakfs under the Wakf Act, 1995, the Charity Commissioner should continue to administer Muslim Wakf properties. The Court held that the Board

CHARITY COMMISSIONER, MAHARASHTRA.versusNIRANJAN & ORS.

1988 INSC 4111 February 1988Disposed off

The Bombay High Court Division Bench criticised the Deputy Charity Commissioner’s conduct and competence while discharging quasi‑judicial functions under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, prompting the Charity Commissioner to seek special leave before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court held that the High Court’s observat

NARANBHAI DAYABHAI PATEL AND ANR.versusSULEMAN ISUBJI DADABHAI

1996 INSC 5411 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Naranbhai Patel and another, became deemed purchasers of agricultural land under Section 32 of the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, effective 1 April 1957. The respondent, the former landowner, executed a trust deed and registered it under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 without giving

JYANTILAL RATANCHAND SHAHversusRESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS

1996 INSC 8599 August 1996Dismissed

The petitioners, a charitable society and a trust, challenged the High Denomination Bank Notes (Demonetisation) Act, 1978, claiming that the Act extinguished their property rights in high‑denomination notes without compensation, violated Articles 19(1)(f), 19(1)(g) and 31(2) of the Constitution, imposed unreasonable ti

SWACCH ASSOCIATION, NAGPURversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2025 INSC 11997 October 2025Dismissed

The Swacch Association filed a public‑interest litigation alleging that Futala Tank in Nagpur was a wetland and that several constructions – a musical fountain, a viewer’s gallery, a parking plaza and an artificial banyan tree – were permanent structures violating the Wetlands (Conservation & Management) Rules, 2017. T

OPERATION ASHAversusSHELLY BATRA & ORS.

2025 INSC 9324 August 2025Dismissed

Operation Asha, a not‑for‑profit society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, provides health services to the under‑privileged. After the society’s CEO terminated co‑founder Dr. Shelly Batra, she and her mother filed a suit under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure alleging financial impropriety

SOPANRAO & ANR.versusSYED MEHMOOD & ORS.

2019 INSC 7193 July 2019Dismissed

The respondents (plaintiffs) filed a suit in 1987 seeking declaration that certain lands were Inam lands of Niyamatullah Shah Dargah and also seeking possession of those lands from the defendants (appellants). The trial court dismissed the suit on the ground of limitation and non‑joinder of parties. The District Judge

CHURCH OF NORTH OF INDIAversusLAVAJIBHAI RATANJIBHAI AND ORS.

2005 INSC 2483 May 2005Dismissed

The Church of North India (CNI) sought a declaration that the earlier Brethren Church had ceased to exist, that CNI was its legal successor with rights over its properties, and a perpetual injunction restraining dissenting members from obstructing its functioning. The plaintiffs filed the suit in a civil court before C

SAIYAD MOHAMMAD BAKER EL-EDROOS (DEAD) BY LRS.versusABDULHABIB HASAN ARAB AND ORS.

1998 INSC 1702 April 1998Dismissed

The case concerned applications under Section 50A of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 for settling the scheme of a public trust. One of the original applicants died and, after a long delay, his son sought substitution; another set of applicants also sought to be joined. The Charity Commissioner allowed both substitut

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search