Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Bombay Rent Act

8 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.versusKAILASH CHANDRA KAPUR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 141929 November 1996Dismissed

The State of West Bengal granted a 999‑year lease of a plot in Salt Lake to Tapan Kumar Mullick, who later bequeathed the leasehold interest to a stranger, K.C. Kapur, by will. After Mullick's death, Kapur obtained probate and applied to have his name entered as lessee, which the High Court ordered despite the Governme

TAYABHAI M. BAGASARWALLA AND ANR.versusHIND RUBBER INDUSTRIES (P.) LTD. ETC.

1997 INSC 15619 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord (appellant) sought a perpetual injunction against the tenant (defendant) to stop any construction on a building that had been destroyed by fire, claiming the tenancy had ended. The City Civil Court granted an interim injunction and later found it had jurisdiction, subsequently punishing the tenant for cont

STATE OF KARNATKAversusKRISHNAJI SRINIVAS KULKARNI AND ORS.

1993 INSC 39216 December 1993Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, owners of agricultural lands in Bijapur district, had leased the lands to M/s Sugarcane Products and Industries Ltd. for 30 years, a lease that expired on 31 March 1973 but the company continued to occupy the land. After the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 was amended in 1974, Section 79‑B prohibited

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ANR.versusKAMLA MILLS LTD.

2003 INSC 31011 July 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai reassessed the rateable value of land belonging to Kamla Mills Ltd. after the company demolished old structures and began constructing a new building. The corporation treated the land as "under construction" and raised its rateable value based on market rates, which the asses

MANGALA WAMAN KARANDIKAR (D) TR. LRSversusPRAKASH DAMODAR RANADE

2021 INSC 2887 May 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, the heirs of Mangala Waman Karandikar, entered into a 1963 agreement with the respondent to transfer the operation of the "Karandikar Brothers" stationery business for a royalty of Rs.90 per month. The dispute arose when the appellant sought possession, alleging the agreement was a business transfer, whi

SMT. SHAKUNTALA S. TIWARIversusHEM CHAND M. SINGHANIA

1987 INSC 1556 May 1987Dismissed

Shakuntala, a monthly tenant of a premises for an ice‑cream business, was alleged by the landlord to have made permanent alterations, caused waste and changed the use of the property, violating sections 12 and 13 of the Bombay Rents, Hotels & Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. The landlord gave a notice to quit in

PRAFUL MANOHAR RELEversusSMT. KRISHNABAI NARAYAN GHOSALKAR & ORS.

2014 INSC 33 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Praful Manohar Rele, sued the heirs of Narayan Keshav Ghosalkar for possession of a house, alleging that they occupied it as gratuitous licensees whose licence had been validly terminated. The defendants counter‑claimed that they were tenants and sought eviction under the Bombay Rent Act. The trial court

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search