Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Bombay Rent Act

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

MANGALA WAMAN KARANDIKAR (D) TR. LRSversusPRAKASH DAMODAR RANADE

2021 INSC 2887 May 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, the heirs of Mangala Waman Karandikar, entered into a 1963 agreement with the respondent to transfer the operation of the "Karandikar Brothers" stationery business for a royalty of Rs.90 per month. The dispute arose when the appellant sought possession, alleging the agreement was a business transfer, whi

PRAFUL MANOHAR RELEversusSMT. KRISHNABAI NARAYAN GHOSALKAR & ORS.

2014 INSC 33 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Praful Manohar Rele, sued the heirs of Narayan Keshav Ghosalkar for possession of a house, alleging that they occupied it as gratuitous licensees whose licence had been validly terminated. The defendants counter‑claimed that they were tenants and sought eviction under the Bombay Rent Act. The trial court

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search