Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Cantonments Act, 1924

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

CANTONMENT BOARD, MEERUT & ANR.versusAFZAL

2019 INSC 55823 April 2019Dismissed

The Cantonment Board, Meerut issued show‑cause notices under Section 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 to respondents including Afzal, alleging unauthorised construction within the cantonment. The respondents objected, but the primary authority neither referred to the objections nor mentioned the earlier show‑cause noti

THE INCOME TAX OFFICERversusURBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST

2018 INSC 97112 October 2018Leave Granted & Allowed

The Urban Improvement Trust (UIT) of Kota, created under the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959, claimed exemption from income tax under Section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, asserting that it qualified as a "local authority" within the meaning of clause (iii) of the explanation – i.e., a Municipal Committee.

CANTONMENT BOARD, JAMMU & ORS.versusJAGAT PAL SINGH CHEEMA

2012 INSC 3289 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed

Jagat Pal Singh Cheema, a Section Officer of the Cantonment Board, Jammu, was removed from service following a departmental inquiry. The Board later reconsidered the decision, and its President referred the matter to the Officer Commanding‑in‑Chief (OCIC) under Section 51 of the Cantonments Act, 1924. The OCIC issued a

OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusCHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ORS.

2018 INSC 5592 July 2018Dismissed

The New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA), created under the U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976, challenged income‑tax notices on the ground that it qualified as a "local authority" and was therefore exempt under section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as amended by the Finance Act, 2002. The ce

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search