Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

UTTARANCHAL ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN. AND ORS.versusMANSARAM NAINWAL

2006 INSC 47728 July 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Mansaram Nainwal, a bus driver of Uttaranchal Road Transport Corporation, was dismissed after a departmental inquiry found him guilty of rash driving that caused a fatal accident. The Labour Court upheld the dismissal, but he was acquitted in the parallel criminal trial. The High Court, relying on Capt. M. Paul Anthony

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL

2013 INSC 77422 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India suspended an Indian Revenue Service officer in 1999 pending two CBI criminal investigations; the Central Administrative Tribunal later quashed the suspension and directed a review, but the government issued fresh suspension orders in 2012 without complying with the Tribunal’s directions, leading the

P.CHANDRAMOULYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1994 INSC 28022 July 1994Dismissed

Four members of the General Reserve Engineers Force (GREF) were tried by a Court‑Martial convened under a warrant of the Chief of the Army Staff authorising the Chief Engineer and were convicted of offences under Sections 63, 39(a) and 41 of the Army Act. They challenged the jurisdiction of the Court‑Martial, the effec

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusP.C. RAMAKRISHNAYYA

2010 INSC 52718 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Group B officer of the Geological Survey of India, was subjected to a departmental inquiry under Rule 14(2) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, where the Inquiry Officer was a retired chief general manager taken from a panel approved by the Central Vigilance

G. SUNDARSANversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1995 INSC 39312 July 1995Dismissed

G. Sundarsan, appointed under the Scheduled Caste quota in the Income Tax Department, rose to the rank of Income Tax Inspector. Three years before his retirement, a departmental enquiry established that he did not belong to any Scheduled Caste and therefore was not entitled to the reserved post. Consequently, under Rul

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search