ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OF ORISSA AND ANR.versusR. RAMAMURTHY AND ANR.
2006 INSC 92229 November 2006Dismissed
The appellants challenged a High Court judgment that interpreted Rule 37A of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 regarding the calculation of restored pension for employees who had commuted a portion of their pension. The High Court had held that the pro‑rata commuted portion must be deducted from the basi…
SATISH CHANDER SHARMA & ORS.versusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS.
2025 INSC 49115 April 2025Dismissed
The petitioners, retired officers of the Himachal Pradesh State Forest Development Corporation, challenged the denial of pension benefits under the 1999 corporate sector pension scheme, arguing that the Supreme Court’s decision in State of H.P. v. Rajesh Chander Sood, which upheld a cut‑off date of 02‑12‑2004, was per …
CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER GUJARAT TELECOM CIRCLE, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. & ORS.versusMANILAL AMBALAL PATEL & ANR.
2019 INSC 3378 March 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a former BSNL employee, was granted provisional pension under Rule 69 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 because a vigilance case was pending at the time of his superannuation. He later applied for commutation of his pension on 1 November 2012, after retirement, under Rule 13(1) of the C…