CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusELMOT ENGINEERING COMPANY AND ORS.
1994 INSC 17627 April 1994
The Central Bank of India (appellant) had two suits in the Subordinate Court of Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh, to enforce an equitable mortgage and recover expenses against Elmot Engineering Company (a limited company) and its directors. While the winding‑up petition against the company was pending, the Bombay High Court,…
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITEDversusCYRUS INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
2021 INSC 21726 March 2021Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the NCLAT order that had declared Tata Sons' affairs oppressive and prejudicial, reinstated Cyrus Pallonji Mistry (CPM) as Executive Chairman and Director, restrained the Tata Trust nominees, and set aside the conversion of Tata Sons from a public to a private company. The Court held that the…
INDERJEET SINGH SIALversusM/S. KARAM CHAND THAPAR
1995 INSC 59625 September 1995Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, heirs of Pishora Singh Sial, sued the assignees of a mining lease for unpaid sums labeled as "royalty" under a 1939 assignment deed. The respondents argued that "royalty" meant the State's share in mineral extraction and could not be claimed by a private party, contending the payments made for twenty ye…
VAZIR SULTAN TOBACCO CO. LTD. ETC. ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD
1981 INSC 17225 September 1981Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether sums appropriated by companies for taxation, retirement gratuity, and proposed dividends could be treated as "other reserves" for capital computation under the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963 and the Companies (Profits) Sur‑tax Act, 1964. It held that amounts set aside for taxation are pr…
NARENDRA BAHADUR TANDONversusSHANKERLAL (SINCE DECEASED) BY LRS. AND ANR.
1980 INSC 1025 January 1980Appeal(s) allowed
The original owners of a plot in Saharanpur granted a permanent, transferable lease to Patel Mills Ltd. The company went into voluntary liquidation and its liquidator sold the lease‑hold interest to Benaras Bank Ltd., after which the company was dissolved under the Companies Act, 1913. The bank later entered liquidatio…
RABINDRA CHAMRIA AND ORS., ETC., ETC.versusREGISTRAR OF COMPANIES WEST BENGAL AND ORS., ETC., ETC.
1991 INSC 29919 November 1991Dismissed
The appellants, former directors of a jute mill company, sought relief under Section 633 of the Companies Act, 1956 to be exempted from liability for delayed and non‑payment of Employees' Provident Fund dues. The Calcutta High Court had allowed a consent order permitting instalment payment and restraining criminal pros…
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KERALAversusALAGAPPA TEXTILE (COCHIN) LTD.
1979 INSC 18919 September 1979Dismissed
Alagappa Textile (Cochin) Ltd. entered into a five‑year financing and management agreement with Kamala Mills Ltd., under which Kamala Mills received remuneration for purchases, sales and management of the mill. The assessee claimed the remuneration as a deductible business expense under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income‑…
RAJRATHA NARANBHAI MILLS. CO. LTD.versusSALES TAX OFFICER, PETLAD
1991 INSC 5219 February 1991Appeal(s) allowed
The company Rajratha Naranbhai Mills Ltd. was ordered to be wound up on 26 June 1967 and the liquidator invited creditors to prove claims for priority under s.530(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956. The Sales Tax Officer claimed priority for sales tax and penalties, arguing that the assessment orders and demand notices w…
RASHTRIYA MILL MAZDOOR SANGH, NAGPURversusTHE MODEL MILLS, NAGPUR AND ANR.
1984 INSC 17118 September 1984Appeal(s) allowed
The Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh filed four references under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act seeking bonus for workmen of Model Mills, Nagpur for the years 1964‑68, alleging the employer was liable under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. The employer contended that a notified order under Section 18A of the Industries…
THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATORversusPARTHASARATHI SINHA & OTHERS
1982 INSC 10417 December 1982Appeal(s) allowed
The Official Liquidator instituted misfeasance proceedings under Section 543 of the Companies Act, 1956 against the directors of a company in liquidation, including Dr. S.N. Sinha. Dr. Sinha died intestate during the pendency of the suit, and his heirs and legal representatives were substituted in his place. The Calcut…
GENERAL RADIO & APPLIANCES CO. LTD. & ORS.versusM.A. KHADER (DEAD) BY LRS.
1986 INSC 8517 April 1986Dismissed
General Radio & Appliances Co. Ltd., the original tenant of a premises in Secunderabad, merged with National Ekco Radio and Engineering Co. Ltd. under a court‑sanctioned scheme of amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The landlord, M.A. Khader, sought eviction on the grounds that the amalg…
CUSTODIAN OF TEXTILES UNDERTAKING, BOMBAYversusHALL & ANDERSON LTD. & ORS.
2011 INSC 5217 January 2011Dismissed
Hall & Anderson Ltd., originally a departmental store in Calcutta, purchased a textile mill in Bombay in 1950 and later operated both businesses separately. The textile mill was nationalised under the Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1983 and the Textile Undertaking Nationalisation Act, 1995. The g…
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,versusVIKRAM COTTON MILLS LTD.
1987 INSC 37715 December 1987Dismissed
Vikram Cotton Mills Ltd., a textile manufacturer, incurred heavy losses and ceased production in 1953. In 1956, under a court‑approved scheme, its plant and machinery were leased to General Fibres Dealers for Rs 2.5 lakh per year for ten years (renewable) to generate income for creditors and enable future reconstructio…
HASMUKHLAL MADHAVLAL PATEL AND ANR.versusAMBIKA FOOD PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
2023 INSC 58215 June 2023Case Partly allowed
The case involved a private limited company with an authorised capital of Rs.1 crore, where the board of directors resolved to issue additional shares on a 1:1 basis and sought to increase the authorised capital to Rs.2 crore following a bank's advice. The V.P. Patel and Sheth groups alleged oppression and mismanagemen…
PREM CHAND JAIN & ANRversusR. K. CHHABRA
1984 INSC 2913 February 1984Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, members of Commercial University Ltd (CUL), were prosecuted under Section 24 of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 for continuing to use the word "University" and for conferring degrees after the Act came into force, despite CUL being incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913. The central issue…
THE CHURCH OF SOUTH INDIA TRUST ASSOCIATIONversusTHE TELUGU CHURCH COUNCIL
1996 INSC 4610 January 1996Dismissed
The Church of South India Trust Association (CSITA) claimed that the Telugu Church Council (TCC) had merged into the Church of South India in 1947 and therefore the properties transferred to CSITA were held in trust. TCC contested the merger and sought declaration of its continued existence. Earlier suits decided by th…
AMMONIA SUPPLIES CORPORATION (P) LTD.versusMODERN PLASTIC CONTAINERS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
1998 INSC 3474 September 1998Case Partly allowed
Ammonia Supplies Corp. (P) Ltd. claimed it had invested in 50% of the shares of Modern Plastic Containers Pvt. Ltd., a claim the respondent denied. The appellant filed a petition under Sections 397, 398 and 155 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking rectification of the register of members. The Delhi High Court dismissed t…
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusRAM KUMAR AGGARWAL AND BROS.
1993 INSC 3542 November 1993
The assessee, a partnership firm dealing in shares, bought all equity shares of a company in 1945 and treated those shares as stock-in-trade for tax purposes. When the company was liquidated, the liquidator distributed a surplus to the shareholders, and the assessee received Rs. 32,25,550. The Income Tax Officer includ…
M/S TRIVENI ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIES LTD.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2025 INSC 10601 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, M/s Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd., a sugar manufacturer, was ordered by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) to pay Rs.18 crore as environmental compensation for alleged illegal discharge of untreated effluents and related violations. The appellant challenged the orders on the ground that it was n…
M.S. MADHUSOODHANAN AND ANR.versusKERALA KAUMUDI PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
2003 INSC 3611 August 2003Disposed off
The case involved a family dispute over the control of Kerala Kaumudi Pvt. Ltd., focusing on the validity of share transfers from Mani and his children to M.S. Madhusoodhanan, the removal of Madhusoodhanan as Managing Director and the deletion of Article 74, the allotment of additional shares to Ravi and Srinivasan, an…