Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Constitution (77th Amendment) Act, 1995

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 30821 March 1997Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the promotions of several engineers in the Uttar Pradesh Public Works Department, arguing that the Supreme Court's decision in Indira Sawhney (Mandal) that reservation in promotion was unconstitutional could not be postponed for five years. The Court examined whether the right to promotion is

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusMADHAV S/0. GAJANAN CHAUBAL AND ANR.

1996 INSC 107018 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Government created a single post of Secretary in the National Savings Scheme Service and applied a 40‑point roster and rule of rotation to reserve vacancies for Scheduled Tribes. When a vacancy at point No. 4 arose, a Scheduled Tribe candidate was to be promoted from the Superintendents, but the Central Administrat

H. P. SCHEDULED TRIBES EMPLOYEES FEDERATION & ANR.versusHIMACHAL PRADESH S. V. K. K. & ORS.

2013 INSC 61813 September 2013Case Allowed

The petitioners, representing Scheduled Tribes employees, sought a direction that Himachal Pradesh implement its own policy of reservation in promotions with consequential seniority under the 85th Constitutional Amendment, relying on data already collected. The State argued that implementation should be deferred pendin

SHIV NATH PRASADversusSARAN PAL JEET SINGH TULSI & ORS.

2008 INSC 3710 January 2008Dismissed

Shiv Nath Prasad, a Scheduled Caste candidate, was appointed Assistant Engineer in Madhya Pradesh and promoted to Executive Engineer in 1980 against a reserved post. General‑category engineers, senior to him in the feeder cadre, were promoted to the same post in 1985. The State Administrative Tribunal and the Madhya Pr

SURAJ BHAN MEENA & ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

2010 INSC 8577 December 2010Disposed off

The Rajasthan High Court quashed two state notifications that granted consequential seniority to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe officers promoted under reservation, on the ground that the state had not complied with the requirements laid down in M. Nagaraj's case. The petitioners, members of the Rajasthan Administ

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search