Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Constitution of India

6832 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

VIJAY NARAYANDAS RIZWANIversusBHASKARRAO BAPURAO PATIL KHATGAONKAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Vijay Narayandas Rizwani, filed a writ petition challenging the trial court's order that impleaded Respondents 3 and 4 (the wife and son of Respondent 2) as parties in his suit for simpliciter injunction against Respondents 1 and 2 over a 40‑R agricultural plot. The petitioner argued …

NITIN MUNJAJIRAO IJATE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, nineteen Class‑III employees of the former Parbhani Municipal Council, challenged an order dated 05‑01‑2022 by the Deputy Commissioner of Parbhani Municipal Corporation that re‑fixed their pay scales and directed recovery of excess salary. They argued that the re‑fixation was …

RAMESHWAR BHARAT KEDARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The petitioner sought quashing of FIR No. 601/2022 and the charge‑sheet under Sections 420, 465, 468 and 471 IPC, alleging that he merely obtained his wife's bank statements and that no dishonest intention or wrongful gain existed. The State argued that the petitioner forged his wife's signature and …

KETAN CHATRABHUJ GHADGEversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, a large group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007‑2012, sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and payment of arrears, arguing that their work is of a perennial nature and that the Maharashtra …

NAMDEO BABURAO MALI AND ANOTHERversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, a large group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007 and 2012, sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and arrears of salary, arguing that their work is continuous and the scheme has been renamed but …

PRATIBHA KALIDAS DARADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The case involved two writ petitions concerning the interchange of appointment approvals between Pratibha Darade (petitioner) and Manjusha Mule (respondent no.7) by the School Management and the Education Officer of Zilla Parishad, Beed. The petitioner was originally appointed to a partially‑aided …

ANANT MADHAVRAO DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a retired lecturer, challenged clauses 3 and 4 of a 1983 Government decision that limited service‑continuity protection to teachers absorbed within the same management, alleging violation of Article 14. He argued that earlier circulars and resolutions (1975, 1976, 1981) entitled him …

KESHARCHAND BHILAJI DUBELEversusSURESH RAGHUNATH KHANDRE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, who are adjacent landholders, filed a civil suit alleging that the defendants had encroached upon their property. After a Court Commissioner’s survey, the plaintiffs sought to amend the plaint to (i) correct the measured area of encroachment, (ii) rectify a typographical error …

CHANDRAKANT KONDIBA KAWLE AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007‑2012 sought regularisation, permanency benefits and creation of super‑numerary posts, arguing that their work is of a perennial nature and that the Maharashtra Rural …

BHUJANG KISHOR BABANRAO AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007‑2012, claimed that they had worked continuously and were entitled to regularisation, creation of permanent posts and arrears of salary. The State of Maharashtra, the Union of …

THOGYA RUPA VALVI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The Valvi family filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 29 January 2021 in which the Tahsildar, acting under Section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code, held the respondents in possession of disputed agricultural land. The petitioners argued that the revision under Section …

GANESH RAKHAMAJI DEVKAR AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007‑2012, claimed that despite continuous service they were denied regularisation and permanency benefits because of artificial technical breaks. The State of Maharashtra, the …

CHANBAS RAMLING KOTE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007 and 2012 sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and arrears of salary, arguing that their work is of a perennial nature and that the Maharashtra Rural Development …

SADHNA PRAMOD KUMAR SANCHETIversusRAMLAL KESHARCHAND LODHA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, three women, filed a regular civil suit (No. 103 of 2013) seeking partition and separate possession of ancestral property against their parents, brothers and sisters‑in‑law. During trial they applied for an adjournment to cross‑examine Defendant 5 and later sought to amend the …

AKSHAY SHARAD GAWANDE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners sought quashment of an FIR and charge‑sheet filed under sections 306, 504, 506 read with 34 of the IPC for the alleged suicide of the informant’s son. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, after a loan dispute, verbally abused and threatened the informant, which the son …

DR PRAKASH KAHNAYALAL KANKRIYAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Dr. Prakash Kahnayalal Kankriya, the owner of Gut No.190/2 in Nimbalak village, challenged an award dated 30‑04‑2010 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 that incorrectly recorded the vendor’s name and the area as 63 R instead of the correct 23 R. After a prior writ petition in 2022 was partially …

SANGEETA NANDLAL PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Sangeeta Nandlal Pawar, a headmistress of a private school, was suspended in June 2024 after an FIR under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. She was reinstated in September 2024 after a preliminary enquiry found the charges baseless, but the Education Officer failed to grant …

GOVIND DEVRAO CHAUREversusDNYANDEV SITARAM MISAL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a civil suit for partition which was ultimately decreed, but the respondents sought to challenge the decree through various appeals and a pending civil review. In parallel, mutation proceedings were initiated, and the Sub Divisional Officer kept the matter on "sane die" due to …

PAPINDER KAURversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Sakina Khan and Papinder Kaur filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking mandamus directing the respondents to deposit salary arrears and pay Employees' Provident Fund contributions with interest. The Court observed that the petitioners had not first …

SAKINA KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Sakina Khan and Papinder Kaur filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking mandamus directing the respondents to deposit salary arrears and pay Employees Provident Fund contributions with interest. The Court observed that the petitioners had not first …

JANARDHAN SIDRAM MISALversusVAN PARIKSHETRA ADHIKARI AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a self‑described forest guard, filed a complaint alleging that he had worked continuously for more than 240 days each year for ten years and therefore was entitled to permanency and related benefits under a 1996 Government Resolution. The respondents contended that no such post …

SAIKH LATIF SHAIKH AHMEDversusTHE CHAIRMAN FAIZ E AZAM TRUST

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, an employee of a hospital run by the Chairman of the Faiz-e-Azam Trust, was orally terminated on 11 September 2006 for alleged misconduct of distributing medicines without prescription and practicing as a doctor without qualifications. The employer relied on testimony from a district …

PRAKASH SINGA GAVITversusTHE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Prakash Singa Gavit, filed a public‑interest litigation seeking a writ directing oil companies to honour the Scheduled Areas (Maharashtra) Order, 1985 by reserving LPG distributorships for Scheduled Tribe dealers in Maharashtra’s scheduled areas and to apply the same reservation …

SHIVAJI GOVIND SHEJULversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, elected Sarpanch of a village Panchayat, was disqualified under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 for allegedly encroaching on Gram Panchayat land. He challenged the disqualification, claiming he was never served with the dispute notice, was denied a …

BABASAHEB TULSHIRAM SARUK AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered two writ petitions challenging Clause 3 of a Government Resolution dated 13‑10‑2016, which denied subject‑teacher pay scale benefits to teachers of classes 6‑8. Relying on the Nagpur Bench decision in Ganesh Mahadeo Asekar v. State of Maharashtra, …

POPTYA ALIAS POPAT SHAHADEV BORUDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, accused in a POCSO case, challenged a Special Judge's order allowing the prosecution to re‑examine a witness (PW4) on the issue of the victim's alleged marriage. The High Court examined whether such re‑examination was permissible and what limits should apply, emphasizing that …

SCARIA MATHEW GEEVARGHESE AND ANOTHERversusVAISHALI VISHAL MUNDALE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in a special civil suit for specific performance of a land purchase agreement dated 22 March 2019, filed a writ petition alleging that the lower court had only made observations, not a proper order, regarding the impounding of the unregistered sale deed. They …

BABA DHONDIBA DALVI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a court order to restart the TB Sanatorium Hospital run by the Indian Red Cross Society in Ahmednagar and to decide service benefit claims of ex‑employees whose services were terminated due to the hospital's closure. The District …

HARSHAL KISHOR SAPKALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Harshal Kishor Sapkale, filed a civil application seeking permission to appear for the summer 2026 MBBS examination and to continue his studies, relying on a prior interim order that allowed his admission pending a caste claim. The High Court noted that the petitioner repeatedly …

VISHAL UTTAM JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court heard four writ petitions challenging the dismissal of applications for compassionate appointment on the ground of substitution of a family member's name on a waiting list. All petitioners sought to replace the name of an elder brother, who had been removed from the waiting …

VIJAY BHAUSAHEB SHINDE AND OTHERSversusFAKIRA CHILLOBA SHINDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petition arose from an order of the Tahsildar, Rahuri, confirming the existence of a 2‑3 foot customary pathway on the boundary of Gats 224 and 225 and directing the removal of an obstruction allegedly caused by the petitioners. The petitioners contended that the panchnama produced under Section …

SONAL RAVINDRA MAHADWARversusNAMDEV AMBADAS RATHOD AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The respondents filed a civil suit for declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction against the petitioner. After a temporary injunction was rejected, the plaintiffs sought to withdraw the suit and were granted liberty by the trial court to file a fresh suit on the same cause of action, with …

REKHA VIJAYSINH SOLANKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, an Assistant Commissioner in the Backward Class Cell, was transferred to the post of Deputy Election Officer in Parbhani, but upon arrival the post was found to be non‑vacant, preventing him from joining. He approached the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal seeking a stay of the …

SONUBAI CHANDRASHEKHAR SHELARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner challenged a Government Resolution dated 30.01.2025 that granted a uniform 10 grace marks to all graduate candidates for Anganwadi Helper appointments, alleging arbitrariness and discrimination. She also contested the appointment of another candidate who, under the new marking system, …

GOVIND DEVRAO CHAUREversusDNYANDEV SITARAM MISAL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Govind Devrao Chaure, filed a partition suit in 2008 which was ultimately decreed after a series of appeals, while the respondents filed a second appeal that was dismissed. The petitioner then sought mutation of the land in his name, but the Sub Divisional Officer kept the revenue …

SUDHEER PRABHAKAR DESAI AND ANRversusANAND PRABHAKAR DESAI AND 2 ORS

Rule made absolute

The petitioners Sudhir and Sanyucta Desai challenged a trial court order that allowed Sudhir to withdraw his counterclaim in Regular Civil Suit No. 26/2023 but denied him leave to pursue the same relief in a separate Special Civil Suit No. 153/2023. The High Court held that Order 23 Rule 3 of the …

NIMESIA FALEIROversusTHE STATE OF GOA THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS.

Disposed of

The Bombay High Court examined five writ petitions challenging the Goa Municipalities (Amendment) Ordinance, 2026, which altered the statutory framework for municipal elections just as the terms of eleven municipal councils expired. Petitioners argued that the ordinance violated Articles 14, 213 and …

SURESH KUMAR AND ANRversusAGNELO MANUEL FERNANDES

Disposed of

The petitioners challenged a February 2025 order of the Civil Judge Junior Division, Pernem, which allowed the respondent to amend the plaint in a suit for recovery of compensation under a leave‑and‑license agreement. The amendment sought to correct the agreement period from 01‑10‑2020 to 31‑08‑2021 …

VAISHALI SANJAY BARDEversusSTATE OF GOA THR CHIEF SECRETARY AND 3 ORS

Disposed of

The Bombay High Court examined five writ petitions challenging the Goa Municipalities (Amendment) Ordinance, 2026, which altered the composition, delimitation and reservation framework for municipal elections. The petitioners argued that the ordinance, promulgated after the terms of eleven municipal …

AMNRE DEEP SING JUDGE THR POA DEVENDRA SINGHversusBONIFACIO FERNANDES AND ANR

Disposed of

The petitioner, a non‑resident Indian, sought condonation of a 5‑year‑5‑month delay in filing his written statement in Civil Suit No. 367/2015. The trial court refused, holding the petitioner negligent. The petitioner argued that his advocate’s death and negligence caused the delay, presenting …

SHITESH MOREversusTHE STATE OF GOA THR CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS

Disposed of

The Bombay High Court examined a group of writ petitions challenging the Goa Municipalities (Amendment) Ordinance, 2026, which altered the composition, delimitation and reservation framework for municipal elections just as the five‑year terms of eleven municipal councils were expiring. The …

TRAJANO DMELLOversusSTATE OF GOA THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS.

Disposed of

The High Court considered eleven writ petitions challenging the Goa Municipalities (Amendment) Ordinance, 2026, which altered the statutory framework for municipal elections just as the terms of the existing Municipal Councils expired. Petitioners argued that the Ordinance, promulgated after …

VALLABH P. PRABHUDESSAIversusSTATE OF GOA THR THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS

Disposed of

The High Court examined five writ petitions challenging the Goa Municipalities (Amendment) Ordinance, 2026, which altered the statutory framework for municipal elections just as the terms of eleven municipal councils expired. Petitioners argued that the ordinance violated Articles 14, 213 and 243U …

SURESH DATTU KAMATversusUNION OF INDIA THR THE SECRETARY AND ANR

Rule made absolute

The petitioner, Suresh Dattu Kamat, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order dated 26‑06‑2025 that reopened his income‑tax assessment for AY 2021‑22 under Section 148A(3). The original notice under Section 148A(1) alleged only escaped interest of Rs 2,51,257, which the petitioner …

DEVENDRA KUNDAIKARversusSTATE OF GOA THR CHIEF SECRETARY AND 3 ORS

Partly allowed

The petitioner, Mr. Devendra Kundaikar, complained to the Corporation of Panaji about illegal repair work by respondent No.3 that violated a repair licence and caused structural damage. The corporation issued a work‑stoppage order and a show‑cause notice on 14 May 2026, which was later revoked on 7 …

Gaurav BidreversusState of Goa Through Public Prosecutor and other

Rejected

Gaurav Bidre, charged under IPC sections 365, 342, 302 and 201, applied for bail for the fourth time before the Bombay High Court, Goa Bench. He has been in custody since 24 June 2022 and argues that the delay in trial violates his Article 21 right to a speedy trial. The prosecution and an …

SHIVAMMA YALLAPPA POTENAVARUversusTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SOLAPUR

Disposed Off

Shivamma Yallappa Potenavaru filed a writ petition seeking to quash a government resolution that declared Anjali Yoginath Bajaramath as President of Maindargi Municipal Council following the 2025 municipal election. The petitioner argued the election was invalid, while the respondent argued that …

RAHUL VASANT BHOI AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 434/2023 and the related criminal proceeding RCC No. 337/2023 for alleged offences under Sections 324, 504 and 34 of the IPC. The complainant, Dhanaji Yashwant Mali, filed an affidavit stating that the dispute with the petitioners had been amicably settled …

PRAVIN DILIP JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Petitioner Pravin Dilip Jadhav filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus to quash an order dated 11 September 2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Revision Application No.28 of 2026. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel …

ARUN MALLAPPA AINAPURAversusSURESH SHANKARRAO PUROHIT AND ANR.

Disposed Off

Petitioner/accused issued cheque No. 131886 dated 25 October 1993 for Rs.1,13,925 in favour of Respondent No.1/complainant. The cheque was dishonoured, and Respondent No.1 filed Summary Case No. 3944 of 1994 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 before the JMFC, Sangli. After the …

MAHADEV RAMCHANDAR JANKARversusSHANKAR EKNATH MALI AND ANR.

Dismissed

The petitioners, legal heirs of the deceased Mahadev Ramchandra Jankar, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the CrPC challenging a Judicial Magistrate’s order that rejected their application to refer a disputed cheque to a handwriting expert. The …

SHEETALKUMAR SUDHAKAR MANEREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The petitioner, Sheetalkumar Manere, challenged a July 2025 order of a Judicial Magistrate that directed further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Cr.P.C. against him and Mahesh Oza, based on an application filed by the complainant, Sanjay Ghodawat. The court examined whether a proposed …

GIRISHKUMAR RAMESHCHANDRA SONIversusHIGH COURT OF GUJARAT THROUGH REGISTRAR GENERAL

35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, an Additional District Judge, sought to quash a departmental inquiry and his suspension, alleging that the inquiry violated Ministry of Law and Justice guidelines requiring a complaint with an affidavit. The High Court examined whether the disciplinary authority could initiate an …

KAMALKISHOR PREMNATH NIMJEversusPRADNYA @ KOMAL KAMALKISHOR NIMJE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The husband challenged an order that increased his interim maintenance liability to Rs 50,000 per month under Section 125 of the CrPC. The revision court had allowed the wife’s revision, disregarding the husband’s claim of lack of service and the wife’s alleged income from bank statements. The High …

VIKRAM BABURAO PAWAR AND ANRversusMARIYAM AMIN MUKHI AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners (Vikram Pawar and his daughter) challenged a civil judge's order appointing the District Superintendent of Land Records as a Court Commissioner to conduct a joint measurement of the suit property and adjoining lands, alleging the order was an improper exercise of discretion in a suit …

ANIL GANESH BHAGATversusAMIT RAMAKANT PATKAR AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Anil Ganesh Bhagat (original Respondent No.13), sought modification of an interim order dated 12 April 2023 that barred him from further construction and prevented the issuance of an occupancy certificate. The original order was based on Section 32‑G of the Bombay Tenancy and …

JATIN @SONU MUKESH MEWATIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Jatin @ Sonu Mukesh Mewati, was arrested in 2018 for serious offences under the IPC, Arms Act and other statutes and has been in custody for over four years without trial. He filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arguing that the …

Akash Kalyan FoundationversusSenior Divisional Commercial Manager

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Akash Kalyan Foundation, challenged the validity of a termination letter dated 29 August 2024 concerning pay and use of toilet facilities. The respondents argued that the dispute is governed by the Indian Railways Standard General Conditions of Contract, which provides for …

PROF. ASHISH WAKHLUversusPROF. M L BHATT VICE CHANCELLOR K.G.M.C. LUCKNOW and ORS.

Dismissed on merits/Rejected

Prof. Ashish Wakhlu filed a contempt application alleging that the Vice‑Chancellor and members of the Executive Council of King George’s Medical University (KGMU) violated interim orders dated 20‑12‑2018 and 05‑12‑2019 by suspending and dismissing him. The High Court examined whether the respondents …

PESHNAWAJ ASARAR KHANversusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner challenged a detention order dated 22‑11‑2025 issued by the Commissioner of Police under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities (MPDA) Act, 1981. The order was based on two criminal cases and two in‑camera witness statements, but the petitioner alleged that …

JAYDEEP SURYAKANT GADKARI AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The petitioners, Jaideep Gadkari and Mangesh Gadkari, sought to quash FIR No.5 of 2020 filed under sections 420, 409, 34 of the IPC and various provisions of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, alleging that the criminal proceedings were …

SEAVIEW RESIDENCY COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.versusSANDEEP S. THAKUR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, a Navi Mumbai resident, filed a PIL under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus to quash development permissions granted by the State of Maharashtra and the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC) to Respondent Nos. 3 to 7 co-operative housing societies, contending that Regulation …

MUNICIPAL CORPN. OF THE CITY OF PUNEversusM/S. PRAVINKUMAR KANTILAL AGARWAL

Allowed

The Municipal Corporation of Pune challenged a lower court order that had set the rateable value (RV) of a godown at Rs 2,600, contrary to the corporation’s assessment of Rs 17,550. The respondent, a lessee of the plot, had not produced any valuation evidence before the assessing officer. The High …

PRATYA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Pratya Singh, who was charged under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly causing firearm injury to the son of an informant. The applicant argued that the FIR did not specifically assign him a role, that the …

SMT SONALI YADAV CORPUS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The High Court heard a habeas corpus petition filed by Smt. Sonali Yadav, an adult woman, who claimed she was being kept in her parents' custody against her wishes after voluntarily marrying Akash Rai in 2020 and having a child in 2024. The petition sought her release to reside with her husband. The …

RUBI PARVEEN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The High Court examined a habeas corpus petition filed by Rubi Parveen, who was produced before the court after a direction to the State. The corpus, a 21‑year‑old woman, testified that she voluntarily married Imran on 18 June 2026 against her parents' wishes and is residing with him in her …

THAKURI DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSHRIRAM AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Azamgarh to dispose of suit No. 733/2021 within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which …

SUKHVINDAR SINGHversusNATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sukhvindar Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District Judge, Kanpur Dehat, to decide Arbitration Case No. 7 of 2023 (NHAI v. Sukhvindar Singh) within a fixed period as mandated by Section 34(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The …

MUKESH KUMAR SAHUversusANTIM KUMAR JAIN AND 9 OTHERS

Mukesh Kumar Sahu filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Lalitpur, to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Civil Suit No. 120 of 2024. The High Court, after examining the petition at the …

AKASH SANTOSH DESHMUKH AND ORSversusBRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR

Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation’s (BMC) advertisement dated 25 November 2024 for Junior Engineer posts, which limited eligibility to engineering diploma holders and excluded engineering degree holders. They argued that the Recruitment Rules 2023 prescribe only a …

RAKESH KUMAR GARGversusUMESH KUMAR MITTAL AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Rakesk Kumar Garg filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging an order in Original Suit No.06 of 2013. The petitioner produced a certified copy of the order, but the underlying suit had been withdrawn by order dated 12 September 2026. The Court held that the withdrawal of the suit …

JAYSHEEL TIWARIversusUNION OF INDIA

The applicants, police personnel including Jaysheel Tiwari, Ramkrit Yadav, Raj Kumar Verma and Angad Prasad Chaudhary, sought bail in connection with the custodial death of Krishna Kumar Yadav @ Pujari in Jaunpur in February 2021. The FIR alleged that the SOG team and police officials took the …

JITENDRA SINGH BAJWA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners, former directors of Godwin Construction Company, challenged a District Magistrate's order and related recovery proceedings initiated under a National Green Tribunal (NGT) order, arguing that personal recovery against erstwhile directors is impermissible per the precedent of Rakesh …

DEEPAK KUMAR DASversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Deepak Kumar Das filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to pay arrears of rent of Rs. 16,45,000 with interest as per a lease deed dated 18-10-2023. The petition alleged that the respondent had failed to make the payment and …

LAND MANAGEMENT COMMITTEEversusSMT HARMAYA DEVI AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners sought to set aside an order dated 04.08.2025 passed by the Gram Nyayalay, Mant, District Mathura in Original Suit No. 42 of 2025 (Harmaya Devi v. Vimlesh). They requested the High Court to direct the lower court to expedite the pending suit. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision …

RANG BAHADURversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Rang Bahadur filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the Executive Officer of Nagar Palika Parishad Mungra Badshahpur, Jaunpur to correct the death date of Shyam Lal from 01‑08‑1984 to 25‑07‑1982 as recorded on 14‑01‑2022. The petitioner …

SAPNA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Sapna Singh, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mirzapur, to dispose of a pending maintenance case (Case No. 128 of 2024) under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner, represented …

SANTOSH KUMAR KESHARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Santosh Kumar Keshari filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to protect his legal title and possession over two land parcels in Prayagraj. The Court examined the nature of the relief and held that it amounted to an …

DILIP UPADHYAY @ DILIP KUAMR UPADHYAYversusSMT CHETALI SHARMA @ CHEWALI

The petitioner, Dilip Upadhyay, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Agra, to decide a pending mutual divorce case (No. 1011/2025) filed under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act. The parties were married under Hindu rites on 7 December 1996 and were …

ARYA SHIKSHA SABHA AND ANOTHERversusSHAMBHU SHARAN SRIVASTAVA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite the pending Original Suit No. 1042 of 2022 (originally filed in 1999). The High Court referred to the precedent of Ali Shad Usmani v. Ali Isteba, which generally disallows such …

ZINAT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Zinat and another adult, are in a live-in relationship across different religions and face threats and intimidation from family members. They filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a protection order directing the respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh …

PRAKASHNATH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Jaunpur to decide a 2006 civil suit (Case No. 830 of 2006) within a stipulated period. The High Court examined whether it could issue a time‑bound directive under Article 227, noting the Supreme Court’s decision in High …

RAM CHANDRA AND ANOTHERversusRAMPHER AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a direction under Article 227 for the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Sant Kabir Nagar to decide case No.514 of 2021 (Rampher v. Ram Chandra) concerning a land dispute. The High Court examined whether it could issue a time‑bound directive for expeditious disposal of a civil …

PHOOL SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSUNEEL KUMAR (DIED) AND 23 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Aligarh, to decide an injunction application filed in Civil Appeal No. 107 of 2026 under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 of the CPC. The High Court observed that keeping the matter …

DR. ZAFAR ALI KHANversusAFTAB AHMAD KHAN AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Azamgarh decide a suit pending since February 2019 within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to a recent Supreme Court decision (High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar …

SMT. KALAWATIversusH.K.S. DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. AND 11 OTHERS

Smt. Kalawati filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of her objection to an ad interim injunction granted in an original suit and her application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC for rejection of that suit. The High Court, noting that keeping the matter pending served no …

KARUNA SHANKAR DIXITversusVIMLA DEVI AND 9 OTHERS

Petitioner Karuna Shankar Dixit filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order for the issue disposal of Succession Case No. 66 of 2003 pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Varanasi, alleging irreparable loss if not expedited. The High Court referred to the …

MOHINI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult individuals in a live-in relationship of different religions, alleged threats and harassment from family members and sought a protection order under Article 226 of the Constitution. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, opposed the relief. The Court noted …

ROSHAN AND 5 OTHERSversusKESHRAJ

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gautam Buddh Nagar to decide Original Suit No. 142 of 2021 expeditiously and without unnecessary adjournments, alleging irreparable loss. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. …

PRADEEP AND ANOTHERversusUMAPATI AND ANOTHER

Petitioners Pradeep and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) in Jaunpur to expedite Suit No.24 of 2026 against the respondents. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …

TRIDEV MANI TRIPATHIversusSURENDRA TRIPATHI AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Tridev Mani Tripathi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226/227 seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of the Fast Track Court‑I, Maharajganj, decide Suit No. 395 of 2015 expeditiously. The High Court examined precedent, notably the Supreme Court’s decision in …

NEERAJversusSHYAM LAL AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Neeraj, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of a pending Miscellaneous Civil Appeal (No. 144 of 2025) that arose from an ex-parte decree against him. The appeal had been filed after an Order IX Rule 13 CPC application was dismissed. The High Court, noting …

INTEJAR AHMAD AND ANOTHERversusMOHD. SALEEM @ SALLAN AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) to decide a 6-C application filed in Original Suit No. 827 of 2022. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending would serve no useful purpose. …

GAYATRI AND ANOTHERversusSHEELA AND ANOTHER

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Mau to decide Suit No. 1030 of 2024 against the respondents on an expedited basis. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which held that …

SHYAM SUNDAR YADAVversusSUNIL KUMAR PALIWAL

The petitioner, Shyam Sundar Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a directive that the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Firozabad decide his pending civil suit (No 100/2019) within a stipulated period. The High Court examined whether a constitutional court can impose a time‑bound …

PYARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried women in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a protection order against interference by family members and to direct police to ensure their safety. They alleged threats and harassment, claiming a violation …

SHANTILAL DAGDULAL NAVLAKHAversusANIL BANDOPANT CHILLAL AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging a July 2005 order of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, which had impounded a 1994 lease deed and directed payment of deficit stamp duty and penalty. The petitioner argued that the trial court had no jurisdiction to …

SACHIN DILIP SONWANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Sachin Dilip Sonwane, accused of murder, attempted murder and abetment of suicide under IPC Sections 302, 307 and 201 read with 34. The prosecution’s case relied on the testimony of the …