Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Consumer Protection Act, 1986

391 judgments · newest first · showing 201–391

DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMYversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2014 INSC 902Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the administration of the Sri Sabhanayagar Temple at Chidambaram, claimed by the Podhu Dikshitars, a Smarthi Brahmin community, as their religious denomination. The High Court had earlier dismissed the State's order appointing an Executive Officer under the Madras Hindu Religious …

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITEDversusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 808Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined whether the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) could entertain challenges to regulations made by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) under Section 36 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997. It held that the power …

DR. BALRAM PRASADversusDR. KUNAL SAHA & ORS.

2013 INSC 717Disposed off

Dr. Kunal Saha filed a consumer complaint after his wife died while being treated for toxic epidermal necrolysis at AMRI Hospital. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission held the hospital and four doctors negligent but reduced the claim, deducted 10% for alleged contributory negligence …

DR. JAGMITTAR SAIN BHAGATversusDIR. HEALTH SERVICES, HARYANA & ORS.

2013 INSC 459Disposed off

Dr. Jagmittar Sain Bhagat, a former medical officer of the Haryana Health Department, claimed that his retiral benefits, including gratuity and penal rent, were not fully paid after his voluntary retirement in 1985. He filed a complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum in 1995, …

U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.versusANIS AHMED

2013 INSC 394Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether industrial/commercial electricity users could file complaints before a Consumer Forum against assessment orders under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003 or actions under Sections 135‑140 of the same Act. The petitioners (U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and …

VIRENDER JAINversusALAKNANDA COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 276Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, members of Alaknanda Cooperative Group Housing Society, had paid instalments for flats but the Society refunded their money and terminated their membership alleging default on payments. The appellants filed complaints under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, seeking …

BHANWAR KANWARversusR.K. GUPTA & ANR.

2013 INSC 216Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant's son suffered convulsions and was treated by respondent No.1, an Ayurvedic practitioner, who advertised a total cure and allegedly prescribed allopathic medicines while claiming they were Ayurvedic. The treatment, conducted between 1994 and 1997, worsened the child's condition, …

EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE CORPN. OF INDIA LTD.versusM/S. GARG SONS INTERNATIONAL

2013 INSC 39Disposed off

The Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. (the insurer) issued an export credit insurance policy to Garg Sons International (the insured) which required the insured to submit a monthly declaration of any overdue payments by the foreign importer under clause 8(b). The foreign buyer …

A. SRIMANNARAYANAversusDASARI SANTAKUMARI & ANR.

2013 INSC 23Dismissed

The wife of a deceased patient filed a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence against two doctors who had performed an operation. The doctors contended that, per the Supreme Court’s decision in Martin F. D'Souza, a complaint could not be entertained without an expert opinion, and they sought …

GURGAON GRAMIN BANKversusSMT. KHAZANI & ANR.

2012 INSC 372Dismissed

Smt. Khazani obtained a loan from Gurgaon Gramin Bank to purchase a buffalo and insured the animal for Rs.15,000 with New India Assurance. After the buffalo died, the bank failed to process her insurance claim, prompting her to file a complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, …

CICILY KALLARACKALversusVEHICLE FACTORY

2012 INSC 321Dismissed

Cicily Kallarackal filed Special Leave Petitions challenging Kerala High Court judgments that entertained writ petitions against orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC). The Supreme Court examined two issues: (1) whether a High Court can entertain writ petitions under …

M/S. NARNE CONSTRUCTION P. LTD. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.

2012 INSC 224Dismissed

Narane Construction Ltd marketed plots for sale, promising development of infrastructure, layout approvals and other amenities, and required purchasers to become members by paying fees. The purchasers alleged deficiencies in the promised services and contended that the company was a service provider …

SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD.versusMUSIC BROADCAST PVT. LTD.

2012 INSC 200Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Copyright Board, under Section 31(1)(b) of the Copyright Act, 1957, could grant an interim compulsory licence while a complaint was pending. The Board had earlier held it lacked such power, but the Delhi High Court reversed that view and directed the Board to …

THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, M.P.versusS.K. DUBEY & ANR.

2012 INSC 122Matter referred to larger bench

The case concerned a former High Court judge who, after retirement, served as President of the Madhya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for nearly five years. He claimed pension for that period based on a 2002 executive order of the State Government, although the Madhya Pradesh …

M/S. NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LTD.versusM. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY AND ANOTHER

2012 INSC 29Dismissed

Farmers who bought foundation seeds from National Seeds Corporation (NSC) alleged crop failure due to defective seeds and sought compensation under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. NSC contended that the Seeds Act, 1966 was a special law that exclusively governed seed quality disputes, that the …

M/S. NAGPUR GOLDEN TRANSPORT COMPANY (REGD.)versusM/S. NATH TRADERS & ORS.

2011 INSC 838Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Nagpur Golden Transport Company, a common carrier, was ordered by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum to pay Rs.3,60,131 to the consignees (Nath Traders & Ors.) for damaged monoblock pumps. The consignees had already paid this amount to the consignor (respondent No.3), who …

CITICORP. MARUTI FINANCE LTD.versusS. VIJAYALAXMI

2011 INSC 793Disposed off

The appellant Citicorp Maruti Finance Ltd. entered into a hire‑purchase agreement with the respondent for a Maruti Omni. After the respondent defaulted on monthly instalments, the bank repossessed the vehicle, informed police, and later auctioned it to a third party. The respondent filed a complaint …

TRANS MEDITERRANEAN AIRWAYSversusM/S UNIVERSAL EXPORTS & ANR.

2011 INSC 689Dismissed

The case concerned a complaint by Universal Exports (the consignor) that Trans Mediterranean Airways, an international cargo carrier, misdelivered a consignment intended for Barclays Bank, Madrid, delivering it instead to M/s Liwe Espanola. The consignor sought compensation under the Consumer …

C. VENKATACHALAMversusAJITKUMAR C. SHAH AND OTHERS

2011 INSC 618Dismissed

Two consumer complaints were filed before the South Mumbai District Consumer Forum, and the opposite parties objected to the appearance of an authorized agent who was not an advocate. The High Court held that the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 permits parties to be represented by authorized agents …

RAJEEV HITENDRA PATHAK & OTHERSversusACHYUT KASHINATH KAREKAR & ANOTHER

2011 INSC 594Disposed off

The case arose from a complaint filed by the wife of the respondent alleging deficiency in service by a nursing home, which was dismissed ex parte by the Maharashtra State Consumer Commission. The Commission later recalled its dismissal order and restored the complaint, prompting the appellants to …

ETHIOPIAN AIRLINESversusGANESH NARAIN SABOO

2011 INSC 556Disposed off

The respondent filed a complaint before the Maharashtra State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission alleging delay and damage to a consignment shipped by Ethiopian Airlines. The State Commission dismissed the complaint; the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission set aside that order and …

MRS. RUBI (CHANDRA) DUTTAversusM/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2011 INSC 224Case Partly allowed

The appellant, owner of a bus insured with the respondent insurer, claimed Rs.5,33,782 for damages after a 2003 accident, asserting that the driver held a valid licence. The insurer contested the claim, alleging the driver lacked a valid licence and that the claim amount was excessive. The District …

BIRLA TECHNOLOGIES LTD.versusNEUTRAL GLASS AND ALLIED INDUSTRIES LTD.

2010 INSC 880Appeal(s) allowed

Birla Technologies developed software modules for Neutral Glass, which later complained of deficiencies. The respondent filed a consumer complaint alleging deficiency in services. The State Consumer Commission dismissed it, holding the respondent was not a consumer. The National Commission reversed …

C.N. ANANTHARAMversusM/S. FIAT INDIA LTD. AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2010 INSC 811Disposed off

The petitioner bought a diesel Fiat Siena Weekender and complained of engine rattling noise, leading the dealer to replace the engine and other parts. Unsatisfied, he demanded a new vehicle or a refund of the purchase price and expenses, filing complaints before the District Forum, State Commission, …

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARDversusAVTAR SINGH AND OTHERS

2010 INSC 636Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined appeals by the Chandigarh Housing Board challenging orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission which directed the Board to refund earnest money and interest to members of co‑operative housing societies. The Court held that the society members are the …

M/S. KRANTI ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. & ANR.versusSH. MASOOD AHMED KHAN & OTHERS

2010 INSC 582Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court heard two separate appeals filed by a builder (Kranti Associates) and Corporation Bank against orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (National Commission) that dismissed their revision petitions without providing adequate reasons. The Court examined whether …

MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITYversusSURJEET KAUR

2010 INSC 408Dismissed

Surjeet Kaur, a student of Maharshi Dayanand University, pursued an M.A. regular course while simultaneously enrolling in a B.Ed. correspondence course, violating the university's Clause 17(b) of its General Rules of Examination. After the university cancelled her B.Ed. results, she appeared for a …

CONTROLLER, VINAYAK MISSION DEN. COL.& ANR.versusGEETIKA KHARE

2010 INSC 401Appeal(s) allowed

The student, Geetika Khare, filed a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against Controller, Vinayak Mission Dental College alleging deficiency in service because the college lacked recognition, forcing her to withdraw and causing loss of an academic year and mental harassment. The …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusM/S. PROTECTION MANUFACTURERS PVT. LTD.

2010 INSC 389Dismissed

The insured's factory suffered a fire and the insurer, New India Assurance Co., appointed a surveyor, joint surveyors, and later an investigator who alleged arson, before seeking the opinion of former Chief Justice Y.V. Chandrachud who concluded the fire was accidental. The National Consumer …

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusKANTIKA COLOUR LAB & ORS.

2010 INSC 282Disposed off

The insured imported two machines and obtained transit insurance. During road transport only the printer machine was damaged; the film processor remained functional. Surveyor reports and the manufacturer’s engineer confirmed that the printer was extensively damaged and could not be repaired in …

M/S. DILAWARI EXPORTERSversusM/S. ALITALIA CARGO & ORS.

2010 INSC 218Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Dilawari Exporters (appellant) exported garments to the USA and handed the consignment to Fourways Movers (respondent No.3), which issued a House Air Waybill and, on behalf of Alitalia Cargo (respondent No.1), a Master Air Waybill. The shipment was delayed, leading the exporter to claim damages …

V. KISHAN RAOversusNIKHIL SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL & ANOTHER.

2010 INSC 129Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant's wife was admitted to Nikhil Super Speciality Hospital with intermittent fever; the hospital failed to diagnose malaria and treated her for typhoid, leading to her death after being transferred to another hospital. The District Consumer Forum held the hospital negligent and awarded …

ECONOMIC TRANSPORT ORGANIZATIONversusM/S. CHARAN SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD. AND ANR

2010 INSC 103Dismissed

The appellant, a carrier, appealed against a complaint filed by the assured (a consignor who was also a consumer) and the insurer under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, seeking compensation for loss of a consignment. The goods were insured, the insurer paid the assured, and the assured executed a …

KUSUM SHARMA & OTHERSversusBATRA HOSPITAL & MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE & OTHERS

2010 INSC 95Dismissed

The appellants filed a complaint under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 alleging deficiency in service and medical negligence after the death of the husband who underwent adrenal surgery at Batra Hospital. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed the complaint, …

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, BIKANERversusMOHAN LAL

2009 INSC 1209Dismissed

The Bikaner Urban Improvement Trust (UIT) allotted plot A‑303 to Mohan Lal in 1991, but in 1998 laid a road through the plot without notice or acquisition proceedings. After the Trust ignored his complaints, Lal filed a consumer complaint in 2005 seeking restoration of the plot or an alternative …

SONIC SURGICALversusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

2009 INSC 1185Dismissed

A fire broke out in the appellant's godown at Ambala in February 1999, and the appellant filed a claim petition before the Consumer Commission of Chandigarh in 2000, which was allowed. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission set aside that order, holding that the Chandigarh commission …

RAMESH CHANDRA AGRAWALversusREGENCY HOSPITAL LTD. AND ORS.

2009 INSC 1131Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, diagnosed with spinal tuberculosis (Pott's disease), underwent three surgeries that left him handicapped and filed a complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) alleging medical negligence. The Commission dismissed the complaint, holding that …

BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARDversusSURESH PRASAD SINHA

2009 INSC 1108Appeal(s) allowed

The father of a student who lost a year of schooling because his son's examination result was not published filed a complaint before the District Consumer Forum alleging deficiency in service by the Bihar School Examination Board and sought compensation. The Forum, State Commission and National …

GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOMversusM. KRISHNAN & ANR.

2009 INSC 1100Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a telecom authority, disconnected a telephone line for non-payment of the bill. The respondent filed a complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, which ordered reconnection and payment of Rs.5,000 compensation with interest. The appellant challenged the forum's …

MADAN KUMAR SINGH (D) THR. LRS.versusDISTT. MAGISTRATE, SULTANPUR & ORS.

2009 INSC 1026Disposed off

Madan Kumar Singh purchased a truck at a public auction to use for his self‑employment. Although he paid the full consideration, the District Magistrate, Sultanpur and other officials delayed handing over the vehicle for six months and, more seriously, withheld the vehicle's registration documents …

MALAY KUMAR GANGULYversusDR. SUKUMAR MUKHERJEE AND OTHERS

2009 INSC 1025Disposed off

The case concerned the death of Anuradha Saha, who was treated for Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) by several doctors in Kolkata and Mumbai. The complainant alleged that the doctors prescribed excessive doses of the steroid Depomedrol and failed to provide essential supportive care, constituting …

E.L.C.M. EXPORTS LIMITEDversusSOUTH INDIAN CORPN. (AGENCIES) LTD. & ANR.

2009 INSC 938Case Allowed

ELCM Exports Ltd., an export house, filed a complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission seeking damages for a delayed shipment that was held in a US customs bonded warehouse, causing the foreign buyer to reject the consignment. The Commission dismissed the complaint as …

MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.versusRAJIV KUMAR LOOMBA & ANR.

2009 INSC 908Dismissed

The consumer purchased a Maruti car in Chandigarh and was charged Rs 7,000 for a catalytic converter that was neither fitted nor required in that city. The consumer sought a refund, and the District Consumer Forum ordered a refund, which was upheld by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal …

KANDIMALLA RAGHAVAIAH & CO.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. & ANR.

2009 INSC 901Dismissed

The appellant, a tobacco business, took a fire insurance policy for stock stored in a godown which was destroyed by fire on 22-23 March 1988. Although the insurer and the bank were notified, the appellant did not lodge a claim until 1992 and only sought claim forms, which the insurer refused, citing …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSURESH CHANDRA AGGARWAL

2009 INSC 902Appeal(s) allowed

The claimant purchased a comprehensive motor insurance policy from New India Assurance Ltd. for his car, which was involved in a fatal accident on 29 February 1992. The insurer denied the claim, alleging that the driver’s driving licence was not valid on the date of the accident because it had …

SIKKA PAPERS LTD.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.

2009 INSC 849Dismissed

Sikka Papers Ltd. insured a diesel generating set for Rs.35,00,000 but the set broke down and the insurer appointed a surveyor who allowed reimbursement only for parts damaged in the accident, rejecting claims for wear‑and‑tear replacements. The company paid Rs.25,00,000 for repairs and claimed the …

NIZAM'S INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCESversusPRASANATH S. DHANANKA & ORS.

2009 INSC 811Disposed off

The case involves a 20‑year‑old engineering student who underwent excision biopsy of a mediastinal neurofibroma at Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences and subsequently suffered acute paraplegia. The complainant alleged negligence before, during and after the operation and claimed compensation of …

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusJ. MAHESHWARAMMA

2009 INSC 772Disposed off

The husband of the complainant had a valid accidental death insurance policy with National Insurance Co. Ltd. and died in a motorcycle accident. The insurer contested the claim, alleging that the deceased's driving licence for a motorcycle was fabricated and that he only possessed a licence for a …

N. KANNADASANversusAJOY KHOSE AND OTHERS

2009 INSC 732Dismissed

The appellant, N. Kannadasan, was an Additional Judge of the Madras High Court who was not confirmed as a permanent judge and later appointed as President of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission under Section 16 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Writ petitions challenged his …

DR. C.P. SREEKUMAR, M.S. (ORTHO)versusS. RAMANUJAM

2009 INSC 657Dismissed

The case arose from a road accident in which the respondent suffered a hairline fracture of the femoral neck. Dr. C.P. Sreekumar, the treating orthopaedic surgeon, initially immobilised the fracture but later performed a hemiarthroplasty after the fracture displaced. The respondent alleged medical …

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR.versusSATISH HANS

2009 INSC 643Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute involved a shop allottee who had paid Rs.82,000 and Rs.207,000 for a plot purchased at auction in 1993, but the developer (HUDA) resumed the plot due to non‑payment of further installments. The allottee filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, before the …

ANIRUDH AGGARWALversusDHARAM BIR BHATIA

2009 INSC 527Disposed off

The respondent filed a claim under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 alleging that the appellant, a dentist, abandoned the treatment of his daughter's teeth, causing pain and suffering. The District Consumer Forum awarded the respondent compensation of Rs.25,000 plus costs, while the …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusPRADEEP KUMAR

2009 INSC 472Dismissed

The appellant, New India Assurance Co., insured a heavy truck owned by the respondent, Pradeep Kumar, which was damaged in an accident. The respondent repaired the vehicle using a bank loan and claimed the repair expenses plus interest from the insurer. The insurer relied on reports of two approved …

MS. INS. MALHOTRAversusDR. A. KRIPLANI & ORS.

2009 INSC 398Dismissed

The appellant, sister of the deceased Priya Malhotra, alleged that doctors and Bombay Hospital were negligent, leading to Priya's death from peritonitis and renal failure. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed the complaint for lack of proof of negligence, a decision the …

STATE BANK OF INDIAversusM/S. B.S. AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES (I)

2009 INSC 377Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant, M/s B.S. Agricultural Industries, filed a consumer complaint against State Bank of India on May 5, 1997 alleging deficiency in service for non‑receipt of a demand draft and related documents. The cause of action arose on June 7, 1994 when the bank failed to deliver the draft, making …

U.T. CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION & ANR.versusAMARJEET SINGH & ORS.

2009 INSC 359Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether lessees who obtained leasehold rights to sites in Chandigarh through public auction could invoke the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, on the ground that payment of lease premium instalments and ground rent was conditional upon the administration providing basic …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSATPAL SINGH MUCHAL

2009 INSC 353Appeal(s) allowed

The insured, Satpal Singh Muchal, had taken a Medi‑claim policy from New India Assurance and disclosed a pre‑existing kidney ailment. The insurer invoked clause 5.9 of the policy to cancel it, refunding a pro‑rata premium, and later refused renewal citing the pre‑existing condition and adverse claim …

BUDDHIST MISSION DENTAL COLLEGE. & HOSPITALversusBHUPESH KHURANA & OTHERS

2009 INSC 183Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Buddhist Mission Dental College & Hospital against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission that held the college liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice. The college had advertised that it was affiliated to Magadh …

KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPN. & ANR.versusASHOK IRON WORKS PVT. LTD.

2009 INSC 131Disposed off

Ashok Iron Works Pvt. Ltd., a private limited manufacturing company, filed a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation (KPTC) for delay in electricity supply. The key issues were whether a private limited company qualifies as a ‘person’ under …

SECRETARY, BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusSUSANTA KUMAR MISHRA

2009 INSC 87Appeal(s) allowed

The Bhubaneswar Development Authority (BDA) allotted a MIG house to Susanta Kumar Mishra under a lease‑cum‑sale agreement dated 6‑May‑1991, which required quarterly instalments to be paid from 1‑Sept‑1989 and stipulated interest of 15% per annum on any defaulted instalment. Mishra began paying …

PUNJ LLOYD LIMITEDversusCORPORATE RISKS INDIA PVT. LTD.

2008 INSC 1416Appeal(s) allowed

Punj Lloyd Limited, an engineering contractor, filed a consumer complaint against Corporate Risks India Pvt. Ltd., an insurance broker, alleging negligence that caused a loss of over Rs. 5.26 crore in securing insurance for a pipeline project. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission …

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusRAJE RAM

2008 INSC 1217Appeal(s) allowed

The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) had originally allotted plots to allottees who later transferred their rights to new buyers (re‑allottees) after price revisions and delays in development. The re‑allottees filed complaints before consumer forums alleging delay in possession and seeking …

M/S KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINESversusDIRECTOR GENERAL OF INVESTIGATION & REGISTRATION

2008 INSC 1129Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines appealed against an order of the MRTP Commission that held it guilty of unfair trade practice for a deficiency in cargo service. The complainant alleged that two parcels were delayed, causing loss, and the Commission treated the delay as an unfair trade practice under …

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusM/S. BOGHARA POLYFAB PVT. LTD.

2008 INSC 1057Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether an insurance dispute could be referred to arbitration after the insured had executed an undated full‑and‑final discharge voucher. The insured claimed the voucher was signed under coercion and that the insurer had conditioned payment on its execution. The Court held …

DHARMENDRA GOELversusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2008 INSC 882Case Allowed

The appellant purchased a Tata Sumo and insured it, renewing the policy on 13 February 2002 for Rs 3,54,000. The vehicle was involved in an accident on 10 September 2002 while the policy was in force. The insurer’s surveyor declared the vehicle a total loss and valued it at Rs 1,80,000, whereas the …

H.U.D.AversusRAJ SINGH RANA

2008 INSC 835Case Allowed

The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) allotted a residential plot to Raj Singh Rana under an allotment letter that stipulated a 7% simple interest rate on instalments of the tentative sale price. After the plot’s acquisition cost was enhanced, HUDA demanded additional payment with interest …

PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusBHUPINDER SINGH

2008 INSC 825Case Partly allowed

In 1989 PUDA invited applications for higher‑income houses, requiring a Rs 4,000 earnest deposit and expressly stating that no interest would be paid on it. Unsuccessful applicants who did not request a refund of their deposit were later included in a second draw of lots in 1996, after which PUDA …

FAQIR CHAND GULATIversusUPPAL AGENCIES PVT. LTD. & ANR.

2008 INSC 803Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a landowner, entered into a "collaboration agreement" with the builder to construct a residential building and share the constructed area. The builder allegedly deviated from the sanctioned plan, failed to obtain a completion certificate and C&D forms, and did not rectify defects, …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTDversusM/S HIRA LAL RAMESH CHAND & ORS.

2008 INSC 751Appeal(s) allowed

The complainants, exporters of rugs, insured multiple consignments shipped from India to the United States under "warehouse‑to‑warehouse" marine policies covering all risks. The buyer failed to pay and the original documents of title were not presented, leading the exporters to claim loss of the …

K. SAGAR, M.D., KIRAN CHIT FUND MUSHEERABADversusA. BAL REDDY & ANR.

2008 INSC 748Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a chit fund, and the respondent, a prized subscriber, were involved in a dispute over unpaid amounts after the subscriber defaulted on payments. The subscriber approached the consumer dispute redressal machinery seeking a direction for the chit fund to pay a sum, leading to …

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERversusBHAVANI

2008 INSC 506Dismissed

Bhavani, a former employee of a Kerala cashew factory, claimed pension under the Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995, asserting she retired on 31‑12‑1995 based on her employer's service records showing her date of birth as 31‑12‑1935. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner relied on its own records, …

GODFREY PHILLIPS INDIA LTD.versusAJAY KUMAR

2008 INSC 438Appeal(s) allowed

In 1999 Godfrey Phillips India Ltd. ran a newspaper and magazine advertisement for its "Red & White" cigarettes featuring actor Akshay Kumar and the slogan "Red & White smokers are one of a kind". Ajay Kumar filed a consumer complaint alleging that the ad constituted an unfair trade practice by …

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusSEHTIA SHOES

2008 INSC 257Case Allowed

The insured, Sehtia Shoes, obtained a shop‑keeper insurance policy from National Insurance Company Ltd. After a fire, the insurer paid Rs 2.72 lakhs as full and final settlement. The insured later filed a consumer complaint alleging that the settlement was signed under coercion and claimed the loss …

ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LIMITEDversusPRITHVI RAJ

2008 INSC 96Case Allowed

Prithvi Raj owned a Mini Bus insured by Oriental Insurance. After an accident, he claimed compensation for damage to his own vehicle, but the insurer denied the claim, alleging that the driver did not possess a valid driving licence. The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission found that no …

M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusRAM PRAKASH RATURI

2008 INSC 75Case Allowed

The appellant, United India Insurance Co., rejected a claim for damages to a vehicle on the ground that the insurance policy was issued in the name of Roopa Sharma and that the vehicle had not been transferred to the claimant, Ram Prakash Raturi, at the time of insurance. The District Consumer Forum …

H.U.D.AversusPREM KUMAR AGARWAL & ANR.

2008 INSC 61Case Partly allowed

The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) appealed against the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's (NCDRC) award of interest at 18% per annum on compensation for an alternative plot allotted after the original plot could not be delivered. The issue was whether a uniform 18% rate …

SAMIRA KOHLIversusDR. PRABHA MANCHANDA & ANR.

2008 INSC 56Case Allowed

The appellant, a 44‑year‑old unmarried woman, was admitted for a diagnostic laparoscopy but, while under general anaesthesia, the respondent doctors performed an abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‑oophorectomy without her informed consent. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusPRABHU LAL

2007 INSC 1210Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant, Prabhu Lal, claimed compensation from New India Assurance Co. Ltd. after his Tata 709 vehicle was damaged in a collision with a Roadways bus. The insurer contended that the vehicle was a "transport vehicle" and was being driven by the complainant's brother, Ram Narain, who held only …

M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusDAVINDER SINGH

2007 INSC 1069Appeal(s) allowed

The owner of a motor vehicle insured with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. suffered an accident while the vehicle was being driven by a driver whose licence was later found to be forged. The owner filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 alleging deficiency in service …

ACCOUNTS OFFICER, JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR.versusANWAR ALI

2007 INSC 1024Case Partly allowed

Anwar Ali filed a complaint before the District Consumer Forum alleging that his electricity supply was disconnected without prior notice. The Forum awarded him Rs 50,000 compensation with interest, an order upheld by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and the National Consumer …

RAJEEV HITENDRA PATHAN AND ORS.versusACHYUT KASHINATH KAREKAR AND ANR.

2007 INSC 931Matter referred to larger bench

The appeal concerned whether a State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission can restore a complaint dismissed for default. The appellant argued that the Supreme Court’s decision in Jyotsana v. Bombay Hospital Trust denied such power to State Commissions, while the National Commission relied on New …

KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARDversusNANDI COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD.

2007 INSC 743Case Partly allowed

The Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board allotted a 2.5‑acre plot to Nandi Cold Storage Pvt Ltd for a cold‑storage project. Subsequent litigation by the original landowners resulted in a High Court stay order, preventing construction, and the company's loan from Karnataka State Financial …

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusJEET S. BISHT AND ANR.

2007 INSC 656Disposed off

The petitioners, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, appealed against a High Court order that directed the State Government to create at least five State Consumer Forums, prescribe salaries and allowances for members, and grant retired High Court judges the same facilities as sitting judges. The …

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusSYNDICATE BANK

2007 INSC 622Appeal(s) allowed

The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) introduced a self‑financing housing scheme and allotted 15 HIG houses to Syndicate Bank, which paid the price for 11 of them by May 15, 1989. Delivery of four houses occurred in 1989‑90, but the remaining 11 were delayed until January‑March 1997 due to …

KISHORELALversusCHAIRMAN, E.S.I. CORPORATION

2007 INSC 527Appeal(s) allowed

Kishore Lal, an employee insured under the Employees' State Insurance (ESI) scheme, complained that his wife received negligent medical treatment at an ESI dispensary, leading to her condition worsening. He filed a complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum seeking compensation …

M/S. TRANSPORT CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.versusM/S. VELJAN HYDRAIR LTD.

2007 INSC 189Dismissed

The Transport Corporation of India Ltd, a common carrier, was entrusted by Veljan Hydra Ltd with a hydraulic cylinder consignment in 1996. The carrier repeatedly assured the consignee that it was locating the goods but never informed them of any loss, and the consignment was never delivered. Veljan …

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusM/S KIRAN COMBERS & SPINNERS

2006 INSC 976Dismissed

M/s Kiran Combers & Spinners held a fire policy with an endorsement for flood covering its building, machinery and stock. In July 1993 heavy floods caused the building to collapse, allegedly due to subsidence of the land. United India Insurance repudiated the claim, relying on a surveyor’s report …

HOTEL & RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION AND ANR.versusSTAR INDIA PVT. LTD. AND ORS

2006 INSC 911Appeal(s) allowed

The Hotel & Restaurant Associations, representing owners of large and small hotels, challenged the rates demanded by broadcasters under TRAI's tariff orders, arguing that they are consumers entitled to TDSAT's jurisdiction under Section 14 of the TRAI Act. TDSAT held that the hotels were not …

SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (P), UHBVNLversusDHARAM PAL

2006 INSC 850Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a consumer of electricity, alleged that the meter installed by the appellant was defective and that the demand of Rs.1,07,326 raised for alleged tampering was illegal. He filed a complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum seeking that the matter be referred to …

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusNIPHA EXPORTS PVT. LTD.

2006 INSC 667

In 1990 National Insurance Company issued transit insurance for a consignment of NIPHA EXPORTS to Sudan. The goods were damaged and a claim was made, but a dispute arose over who was entitled to the proceeds. After investigations, the claim was finally settled by a letter dated 8 April 1994 and the …

M/S. SHOBIKA ATIREversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR.

2006 INSC 621Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a textile showroom owner, insured its stock-in-trade against riots, strikes and terrorist damage. Following bomb blasts in Coimbatore, an armed mob looted and set fire to the showroom, allegedly destroying stock on the ground floor and in two basement levels. The insurer paid for the …

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK LTD.versusDR. B.N. RAMAN

2006 INSC 433Case Partly allowed

Dr. B.N. Raman, a non‑resident Indian, deposited US$5,000 in a Foreign Currency Non‑Resident (FCNR) account with Standard Chartered Bank in August 1979, which was to mature in November 1984 and was later reinvested at higher rates. The bank later claimed the deposit was prematurely withdrawn in …

CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR PUDA AND ANOTHERversusMRS. SHABNAM VIRK

2006 INSC 167Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab Urban Development Authority (PUDA) advertised a housing scheme with a tentative flat price of Rs 6.3 lakh, stating that the price could be revised upward. Applicants, including the respondent, applied, signed a proforma undertaking to abide by all terms and to pay any higher cost due to …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusPARAMJIT SINGH AND ORS.

2006 INSC 134Disposed off

The State of Karnataka and the Union of India appealed against a Karnataka High Court judgment that had struck down the proviso to Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 on the ground that it allowed tribunals to impose imprisonment or fine without prescribing a trial procedure, violating …

INDOCHEM ELECTRONIC AND ANR.versusADDL. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, A.P.

2006 INSC 116Dismissed

Indochem Electronic supplied an EPABX telephone system to the Additional Collector of Customs, Andhra Pradesh, with a one‑year warranty and a promise to open a service centre. The system was defective from the outset, and despite repeated complaints the supplier failed to provide satisfactory …

TARA CHAND JAINversusSIR GANGA RAM HOSPITAL AND ANR.

2005 INSC 620Dismissed

The appellant underwent a prostate operation at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital and subsequently suffered continuous urinary leakage, pain and other ailments. He filed a complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) alleging medical negligence and seeking Rs. 40 lakh as …

UNIT TRUST OF INDIAversusRAVINDER KUMAR SHUKLA, ETC. ETC.

2005 INSC 427Dismissed

The Unit Trust of India (UTI), a statutory corporation, issued account‑payee cheques to its unit holders and sent them by registered post. Approximately 1,600 unit holders claimed non‑receipt of cheques worth about Rs 3.35 crore, alleging interception and fraud. The unit holders filed complaints …

BRIJ PAL SHARMAversusGHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

2005 INSC 364Dismissed

The appellant, Brij Pal Sharma, had paid full consideration for a housing plot under two different schemes of the Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA). In the first case the original Karpoori Puram Scheme was cancelled and a new scheme was launched, leading to a refund claim; in the second case …

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.versusZORA SINGH AND ORS.

2005 INSC 354Dismissed

The Punjab State Electricity Board (the Board) was appealed against for refusing to supply electricity to a group of agriculturists (Zora Singh and others) despite receipt of security deposits and compliance with formalities. The District Consumer Forums, State Commission and National Consumer …

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusMANI RAM

2005 INSC 335Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant filed a consumer complaint alleging that LIC should pay the death claim of his son, who was insured under a policy back‑dated to 28‑April‑1995. The first premium was paid on 21‑August‑1995, making the next premium due on 28‑April‑1996 with a one‑month grace period until 28‑May‑1996. …

NEERAJ MUNJAL AND ORSversusATUL GROVER MINOR AND ANR.

2005 INSC 261Appeal(s) allowed

A complaint was filed before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which the parties agreed to refer to arbitration. An arbitrator was appointed on 19‑May‑1995 and rendered an award on 19‑Aug‑1996, which the Commission accepted. The Supreme Court later held that the NCDRC could …

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.versusNATIONAL CONSUMER AWARENESS GROUP AND ORS.

2005 INSC 255Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the procedure for appointing the President of the Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission under Section 16(1)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, specifically the requirement of consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court. The Court also …

HARYANA SEEDS DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD.versusSADHU AND ANR.

2005 INSC 85Appeal(s) allowed

The farmers, including Sadhu Singh, purchased wheat seeds from Haryana Seeds Development Corporation and a cooperative credit society and alleged poor germination, filing a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The District Consumer Forum, State Commission, and National Commission all …

SHRI ASHOK TANWAR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF H.P. AND ORS.

2004 INSC 721Dismissed

The Himachal Pradesh government sought to fill a vacancy for President of the State Consumer Redressal Commission by appointing a sitting High Court judge, Justice Surinder Swaroop. The government initially sent a proposal to the Chief Justice, but the High Court pointed out that the appointment …

POLYMAT INDIA P. LTD. AND ANR.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ORS.

2004 INSC 685Dismissed

Polymat India Ltd. and an associate insured their factory premises against fire under two policies issued by National Insurance Co. Ltd. The policies described the location as "factory‑cum‑godown" and the insured answered in the negative to a query about goods stored in the open. After a fire …

HUDA AND ANR.versusBABESWAR KANHAR AND ANR.

2004 INSC 666Disposed off

The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) allotted a residential plot to an applicant who deposited earnest money. Clause‑4 of the allotment letter required the applicant to communicate non‑acceptance within 30 days or forfeit the deposit. The applicant mailed a registered notice of …

ANUMATIversusPUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

2004 INSC 616Leave Granted & Allowed

The appellant and her husband held a joint fixed deposit with an "either or survivor" clause. The husband allegedly pledged the deposit as security for a loan taken by his proprietary firm, and the bank adjusted the deposit against that loan without the wife’s consent. The wife filed a complaint …

SAVITA GARGversusTHE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HEART INSTITUTE

2004 INSC 597Appeal(s) allowed

Savita Garg filed a consumer complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) alleging that her husband, A.K. Garg, died due to medical negligence at the National Heart Institute. The Commission dismissed the petition on the ground that the treating doctors and nurses …

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusSOMA DEVI

2004 INSC 554Disposed off

The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) allotted a plot to Soma Devi, who paid a substantial sum but was not given possession due to litigation. She filed a consumer complaint seeking a refund; the District Forum ordered a refund with 18% interest, which was upheld by the National Consumer …

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusM/S. HARCHAND RAI CHANDAN LAL

2004 INSC 547Leave Granted & Allowed

The insured, M/s Harchand Raj Chandan Lal, purchased a burglary insurance policy from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. that defined "burglary" as theft involving forcible and violent entry. During the policy period, bags of grain were stolen from the insured's godown without any force or violence, …

H.N. SHANKARA SHASTRYversusTHE ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, KARNATAKA

2004 INSC 364Appeal(s) allowed

The consumer purchased paddy seeds that failed to germinate, resulting in loss of crop. He sued the seller under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, seeking a refund and compensation. The District Forum ordered both refund and damages; the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission …

SUMATIDEVI M. DHANWATAYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2004 INSC 241Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an elderly woman, was assaulted and had valuables stolen during a mob attack on a railway train. She claimed the Railway administration failed to provide protection, constituting deficiency in service, and filed a complaint before the Maharashtra State Consumer Commission, which …

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusBALBIR SINGH

2004 INSC 182

The Supreme Court examined a batch of appeals arising from orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) that uniformly awarded interest at 18% per annum in cases of deficiency of service by development authorities. The Court held that the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has a …

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusM/S. PUSHPALYA PRINTERS

2004 INSC 128Dismissed

The respondent, a printer, claimed Rs.75,000 for damage to its building and machinery caused by vibration from a bulldozer operating on a nearby road. The insurance policy’s Clause 5 covered "impact by any rail/road vehicle or animal". The insurer argued that the damage was not an "impact" and …

JOSE PHILIP MAMPILLILversusM/S. PREMIER AUTOMOBILES LTD. AND ANR.

2004 INSC 60Disposed off

The appellant purchased a new diesel car from Premier Automobiles Ltd. through its dealer, but upon delivery the vehicle had paint defects and faulty piston rings. Despite repeated repairs, the defects persisted, leading the appellant to file a complaint before the District Consumer Dispute …

CCI CHAMBERS CO-OP. HSG. SOCIETY LTD.versusDEVELOPMENT CREDIT BANK LTD.

2003 INSC 436Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a co‑operative housing society, maintained a savings account with the respondent bank and alleged that the bank dishonestly honored forged cheques, debiting Rs 75,70,352. A complaint was filed before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) under the Consumer …

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.versusANAND PRAKASH SOLANKI

2003 INSC 417Appeal(s) allowed

Anand Prakash Solanki, a former Special Judge, was appointed President of the District Consumer Protection Forum (DCPF) in Pali and later transferred by the Rajasthan Government to Jalore and then Banswara. He challenged the transfer, and the Rajasthan High Court held that the concept of transfer …

ARCHANA M. KAMATHversusCANARA BANK AND ANR.

2003 INSC 71Dismissed

Archana M. Kamath, a current account holder of Canara Bank, challenged the bank's imposition of a Rs. 50 charge for issuing 50 MICR cheque leaves, alleging that the fee was unilateral, without her consent, and contrary to RBI directives. The Bombay Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum ruled in her …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusVISHWABHARATHI HOUSE BUILDING COOPERATIVE SOCIETY AND ORS.

2003 INSC 19Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, particularly the Parliament's power to create a three‑tier consumer dispute redressal system parallel to the regular courts. The petitioners argued that Parliament lacked competence to establish such …

CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 542Appeal(s) allowed

The Cellular Operators Association of India (appellants) challenged the Government's decision to permit Fixed Service Providers to offer Wireless in Local Loop (WLL) with limited mobility, arguing that the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) failed to consider the …

R.D. GOYAL AND ANR.versusRELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD.

2002 INSC 477Dismissed

The appellants R.D. Goyal and others challenged the MRTP Commission’s finding that the issue of equity shares linked with redeemable non‑convertible debentures, before allotment, did not constitute "goods" under Section 2(e) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. They argued …

RABINDRA NATH GHOSALversusUNIVERSITY OF CALCUTTA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 413Dismissed

Rabindra Nath Ghosal appeared for an M.A. examination in 1984 but his result was not declared for several years. He later pursued another course, wrote to the University, and filed a writ petition for mandamus to compel publication of his result, which was eventually declared (he had failed). A …

DR. J.J. MERCHANT AND ORS.versusSHRINATH CHATURVEDI

2002 INSC 330Disposed off

The doctors filed a petition before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) alleging that a complaint of medical negligence against them should be dismissed or stayed, arguing that the case involved complicated questions of law and fact and that a nine‑year delay in disposal …

T. FENN WALTER AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 299Disposed off

The case examined whether a sitting High Court judge appointed as President of a State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission could continue to function as a judge. A group of advocates challenged the appointment, arguing it created a master‑servant relationship and threatened judicial independence, …

TOPLINE SHOES LTD.versusCORPORATION BANK

2002 INSC 287Dismissed

The appellant, Topline Shoes Ltd., challenged a decision of the Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission that it had accepted a reply from the respondent, Corporation Bank, filed after the 45‑day period prescribed under Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The appellant …

SYNCO INDUSTRIESversusSTATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPUR AND ORS.

2002 INSC 24Dismissed

Synco Industries filed a complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) alleging that State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur had frozen its sanctioned working facilities without prior notice, seeking damages of Rs. 15 crore and additional expenses of Rs. 60 lakh. The NCDRC …

SMT. VINITHA ASHOKversusLAKSHMI HOSPITAL AND ORS.

2001 INSC 457Dismissed

The appellant, Vinitha Ashok, filed a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence after losing her uterus during a termination of pregnancy at Lakshmi Hospital. She claimed the doctors performed an unnecessary MTP without ultrasonography, used an improper cervical dilatation device, and failed to …

SAVANI ROADLINESversusSUNDARAM TEXTILES LTD. AND ANR.

2001 INSC 296Appeal(s) allowed

Sundaram Textiles Ltd. (respondent No. 1) entrusted 125 cartons of goods to Sa Vani Roadlines (appellant) for transport, but the goods were not delivered. The consignor insured the goods with New India Assurance Company Ltd. (respondent No. 2), which paid the loss and obtained a Letter of …

M.S. CHAWLA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

2001 INSC 210Dismissed

The appellants, retired District Judges, were appointed as Presidents of District Consumer Forums under Section 10 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Punjab Government issued an order on 25‑January‑1996 directing that the pension they received as retired judges be deducted from the salary …

M/S HANIL ERA TEXTILES LTD.versusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ORS.

2000 INSC 552Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Mis Hani Lera Textiles Ltd., held fire insurance policies with Oriental Insurance Co. for its mill premises, including a blow‑room that was inspected and charged a higher premium in November 1994. A fire in December 1994 destroyed most of the mill but not the blow‑room. After the …

CHARAN SINGHversusHEALING TOUCH HOSPITAL AND ORS.

2000 INSC 453Appeal(s) allowed

Charan Singh underwent surgery at Healing Touch Hospital and alleged medical negligence that left him paralysed on the right side, resulted in the loss of a kidney, loss of employment and substantial expenses. He filed a complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) …

SKYPAK COURIERS LTD. ETC. ETC.versusTATA CHEMICALS LTD. ETC. ETC.

2000 INSC 320

The Supreme Court examined the practice of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) referring consumer disputes to a retired judge for "consensual adjudication" and then treating the award as its own order. It held that the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 does not empower the …

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2000 INSC 331

Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) advertised several schemes for allotment of developed plots, collected deposits from allottees, and then failed to deliver possession within a reasonable time. The aggrieved allottees obtained orders from the MRTP Commission, Consumer Forum and High Court …

VIMAL CHANDRA GROVERversusBANK OF INDIA

2000 INSC 254Appeal(s) allowed

V.C. Grover obtained an overdraft facility from Bank of India by pledging shares and later requested the bank to sell 500 of those shares to clear part of his overdraft. The bank delayed the sale for several months, during which the share price fell dramatically, causing Grover a loss. He filed a …

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusSMT.SANTRA

2000 INSC 234Dismissed

Smt. Santra, a poor labourer with seven children, underwent a sterilisation operation at a government hospital under the family‑planning scheme and was issued a certificate stating the procedure was successful. She later became pregnant and gave birth to a child because only her right fallopian tube …

PATEL ROADWAYS LTD.versusBIRLA YAMAHA LTD.

2000 INSC 163Dismissed

Birla Yamaha Ltd. booked Patel Roadways Ltd. to transport 267 generator sets, which were destroyed in a fire at the carrier's godown. The complainant filed a petition before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission alleging deficiency in service and seeking compensation. The Commission …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusR. SRINIVASAN

2000 INSC 107Dismissed

R. Srinivasan filed a complaint before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission seeking damages for loss to his insured vehicle. The complaint was dismissed for default and his application for restoration was also rejected. He then filed a fresh complaint before the District Consumer …

M/S. MODERN INSULATORS LTD.versusTHE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2000 INSC 93Appeal(s) allowed

Modern Insulators Ltd. purchased an All Risk Insurance Policy from Oriental Insurance Co. for a kiln installation. When the kiln furniture collapsed during trial, the insurer refused to pay, claiming an exclusion clause for second‑hand property that the insured alleged was never disclosed. The State …

OBERAI FORWARDING AGENCYversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR.

2000 INSC 42

The appellant, Oberai Forwarding Agency, was hired to transport a consignment of broken rice, which was lost in transit. The consignee (second respondent) claimed the loss from New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (first respondent), which paid compensation and obtained a "Letter of Subrogation" and a …

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERversusSHIV KUMAR JOSHI

1999 INSC 558Dismissed

Shiv Kumar Joshi, a member of the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, complained before the District Consumer Forum that the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner delayed payment of his provident fund, alleging deficiency in service. The Commissioner appealed, arguing that the scheme was not a …

RAVNEET SINGH BAGGAversusM/S. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES AND ANR.

1999 INSC 511Dismissed

The appellant booked a journey from New Delhi to New York with KLM (respondent No.1) and also secured an earlier connecting flight with TWA (respondent No.2). At Amsterdam, KLM staff, suspecting irregularities in his US visa (photocopy of photograph and dual bookings), delayed his onward travel for …

DELHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY UNDERTAKINGversusBASANTI DEVI AND ANR.

1999 INSC 444Disposed off

The Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) offered a Salary Savings Scheme under which Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking (DESU) deducted insurance premiums from its employees' salaries and remitted them to LIC. DESU failed to remit premiums for two months, after which an employee died and his widow …

UNION BANK OF INDIAversusM/S. SEPPO RALLY OY AND ORS.

1999 INSC 441Appeal(s) allowed

The Union Bank of India issued a bank guarantee for Dany Dairy & Food Engineers Ltd., which was later invoked by Seppo Rally OY, a Finnish company. Payment under the guarantee was delayed because the bank had to obtain permission from the Reserve Bank of India to remit the amount in foreign exchange …

ASHOK GANGADHAR MARATHAversusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

1999 INSC 378Appeal(s) allowed

Ashok Gangadhar Mara Tha owned a Swaraj Mazda truck classified as a light motor vehicle and insured it with Oriental Insurance. The vehicle was totally damaged in an accident, but the insurer denied the claim, alleging that the driver held only a licence for a light motor vehicle and not for a …

MR. FRANCE B. MARTINS AND ANR.versusMRS. MAFAIDA MARIA TERESA RODRIGUES

1999 INSC 353Dismissed

The appellants, promoters of an apartment complex, sold a flat to the respondent’s minor daughter for Rs. 2,10,000 and delivered possession in September 1985 but failed to execute a sale deed. The respondent filed a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 on 19 June 1992 seeking specific …

UNITED INDIA INSURANCEversusAJMER SINGH COTTON AND GENERAL MILLS AND ORS. ETC.

1999 INSC 322Appeal(s) allowed

The insured, having procured multiple fire insurance policies, received claim payments after a fire loss and voluntarily executed discharge vouchers stating full and final settlement. He later filed a complaint before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission seeking interest on the …

LATA CONSTRUCTION AND ORS.versusDR. RAMESHCHANDRA RAMNIKLAL SHAH AND ANR.

1999 INSC 326Dismissed

The respondents entered into a 1987 agreement with Lata Construction for the purchase of a flat, paid substantial sums, but the flat was never delivered and was later occupied by another. In 1991 the parties executed a fresh agreement providing for compensation of Rs.9,51,000 in lieu of the flat, …

SOVINTORG (INDIA) LTD.versusSTATE BANK OF INDIA, NEW DELHI

1999 INSC 319Case Partly allowed

Sovintorg (India) Ltd. deposited a cheque for Rs 1 lakh with State Bank of India in June 1983; although the cheque was cleared, the proceeds were not credited to its account for seven years. The company claimed compensation, damages and 24% interest under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The State …

M/S INDIA PHOTOGRAPHIC CO. LTD.versusH.D. SHOURIE

1999 INSC 300Dismissed

The respondent filed a consumer complaint alleging that India Photographic Co. Ltd., a distributor of Kodak film rolls, sold the rolls without printing the sale price on each package, contrary to Rule 6(1)(t) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977. The District …

M.R.F. LTD.versusJAGDISH LAL AND ANR.

1999 INSC 225Dismissed

The appellant M.R.F. Ltd. challenged a consumer complaint alleging a defect in a tyre and tube that had burst. The complainant had handed the tyre and tube to the dealer, who forwarded them to the appellant, and therefore the complainant no longer possessed the goods. The District Forum was required …

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusSHRL DHARAM VIR ANAND

1998 INSC 391Disposed off

The Life Insurance Corporation of India issued a life insurance policy on 31 March 1990, which the insured back‑dated to 10 May 1989 and paid premiums for that period. The insured’s minor daughter committed suicide on 15 November 1992. Clause 4‑B of the policy limits the insurer’s liability to the …

NEW ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSHRI B.N. SAINANI

1997 INSC 560Appeal(s) allowed

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. issued two marine insurance policies to cover consignment of computer waste from Antward to Bombay. The vessel was diverted to Muscat due to a port strike and the insurer stipulated that the goods must be re‑shipped within 60 days, otherwise liability would cease. The …

TATA ENGINEERING AND LOCOMOTIVE CO. LTD. AND ANR.versusGAJANAN Y. MANDREKAR

1997 INSC 475Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, G. Y. Mandrekar, purchased a commercial tipper truck from Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. and, after running it for about 9,000 km, discovered several defects including worn tyres, improperly fixed front axle pins, and excessive vibration. Despite repeated complaints and …

M/S CHEEMA ENGINEERING SERVICESversusRAJAN SINGH

1996 INSC 1267Appeal(s) allowed

Mis Cheema Engineering Services sold a brick‑making machine ("Brickman") to Rajan Singh. The dispute centered on whether Singh used the machine for self‑employment, i.e., exclusively to earn his livelihood, or for a commercial purpose, which would exclude him from the definition of "consumer" under …

GULZARI LAL AGARWALversusACCOUNTS OFFICER

1996 INSC 1108Case Partly allowed

The appellant filed a complaint before the District Forum, Bankura, alleging inflated telephone bills and obtained an interim order directing the respondent not to disconnect his line on condition of a Rs 4,000 deposit, which he complied with. The respondent appealed to the State Commission, which …

M/S. FAIR AIR ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusN.K. MODI

1996 INSC 910Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. Fair Air Engineers Pvt. Ltd. entered into a contract with N.K. Modi to install a centrally air‑conditioned plant in his house. After alleged breach, the respondent filed a complaint before the State Consumer Commission, which stayed the proceedings and ordered the parties to arbitrate under …

INDIAN BANKversusM/S. SATYAM FIBRES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.

1996 INSC 861Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Indian Bank forwarded Bills of Exchange to a French bank on behalf of the respondent M/s. Satyam Fibres, which later went into liquidation. The respondent claimed the bank was negligent for not securing co‑acceptance of the bills, relying on a covering letter (letter No. 2776) that …

THE STATE OF GUJARATversusRAJESH KUMAR CHIMANLAL BAROT AND ANR.

1996 INSC 820Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Gujarat appealed against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission which had upheld a Gram Panchayat's claim to a subsidised electricity rate. The appellant argued that the question of pricing did not fall within the jurisdiction of the consumer redressal forums. …

POONAM VERMAversusASHWIN PATEL & ORS.

1996 INSC 669Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Poonam Verma, sued Dr. Ashwin Patel (a registered homoeopathic practitioner) and Dr. Rajeev Warty for negligence after her husband died following treatment with allopathic medicines prescribed by Dr. Patel, who was not qualified to practice allopathy. The National Consumer Disputes …

PASCHIM BANGA KHET MAZDOOR SAMIT!versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

1996 INSC 621Disposed off

The petitioners, members of Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samiti, filed a writ petition under Article 32 on behalf of Hakim Seikh, who suffered serious head injuries after falling from a train and was repeatedly denied admission in several government hospitals due to lack of beds and facilities, …

STATE OF ORISSAversusDIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIC AND ANR.

1996 INSC 405Appeal(s) allowed

Haribandhu Setha, a government servant, filed a consumer complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 seeking damages from the State of Orissa. The State Commission and later the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission awarded Rs.1,00,000 against the State. The State appealed to the …

S.P. GOELversusCOLLECTOR OF STAMPS

1995 INSC 863Dismissed

S.P. Goel applied to register a will, but the Sub‑Registrar impounded it, deeming it a deed of conveyance that was not duly stamped. The Collector of Stamps required additional documents and payment of stamp duty before registration could proceed. Goel filed a complaint under the Consumer Protection …

RAJEEV METAL WORKS AND ORS.versusTHE MINERAL METAL TRADING CORPN. OF INDIA LTD.

1995 INSC 822Dismissed

Rajeev Metal Works applied to the District Industry Centre for 300 MT of galvanized steel sheets, which were to be procured by the statutory agency MMTC Ltd. on its behalf. MMTC pooled requirements, placed a consolidated indent with a foreign seller, but could supply only a portion of the quantity; …

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONversusV.P. SHANTHA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 720Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether medical services rendered by doctors, hospitals and nursing homes fall within the definition of "service" under Section 2(1)(o) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and thus attract consumer‑redress. It held that services provided for consideration – even if …

HOUSING BOARD HARYANAversusHOUSING BOARD COLONY WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ORS.

1995 INSC 524Appeal(s) allowed

The Housing Board of Haryana issued additional price demands to allottee families after a land price escalation, which the allottee association contested before the District Consumer Forum. The Forum quashed the Board's demand and the Board appealed to the State Commission, which dismissed the …

LAXMI ENGINEERING WORKSversusP.S.G. INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTE

1995 INSC 248Dismissed

Laxmi Engineering Works, a small‑scale proprietary concern, bought a CNC universal turning machine from P.S.G. Industrial Institute and alleged it was defective, claiming Rs. 4 lakhs. The Maharashtra Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission allowed part of the claim, but the National Consumer …

CHAIRMAN, THIRUVALLUVAR TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusCONSUMER PROTECTION COUNCIL

1995 INSC 107Appeal(s) allowed

Shri K. Kumar died in a bus accident in 1990. The Consumer Protection Council, Tamil Nadu, filed a claim before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) on behalf of his legal representatives, seeking compensation. The NCDRC awarded Rs. 5.10 lakh without addressing the question of …

MORGAN STANLEY MUTUAL FUNDversusKARTICK DAS

1994 INSC 220Disposed off

Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund, a SEBI‑registered domestic mutual fund, sought to issue a public fund scheme after obtaining SEBI approval for its draft scheme and advertising the issue. A prospective investor filed a petition before the Calcutta District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum seeking an …

OM PRAKASHversusASSISTANT ENGINEER, HARYANA AGRO INDUSTRIES CORPORATION AND ORS.

1994 INSC 151Appeal(s) allowed

Om Prakash booked a tractor on 12‑12‑1990, paying an advance and was first on the dealer's booking list. The dealer delayed delivery, supplied tractors to lower‑ranked customers, and when the tractor was finally delivered on 21‑9‑1991 the price had risen, causing a loss of Rs 40,690 to the consumer. …

INDIAN OIL CORPORATIONversusCONSUMER PROTECTION COUNCIL, KERALA AND ANR.

1993 INSC 383

Dr. P. Kamalasanan obtained an LPG connection through Karthika Gas Agency, an authorized distributor of Indian Oil Corporation, but did not receive a subscription voucher. When he sought regularisation of the connection, the corporation refused, prompting a complaint before the Consumer Redressal …

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusM.K. GUPTA

1993 INSC 365

The Lucknow Development Authority (LDA) developed a housing scheme and allotted a flat to M.K. Gupta, who paid the full price but was not given possession because construction was incomplete. Gupta filed a complaint before the District Forum under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, alleging …

COMMON CAUSE REGISTERED SOCIETYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 2Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the sluggish implementation of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, specifically the failure of many States and Union Territories to establish District Forums as mandated by Section 9. The petitioners, a registered society, sought directions under Article 32 to compel the …