ARUP BHUYANversusSTATE OF ASSAM & ANR.
2023 INSC 29224 March 2023Reference answered
The Supreme Court examined whether a person must show "active membership" to be convicted under Section 10(a)(i) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) after an association is declared unlawful. It held that the provision plainly punishes anyone who continues to be a member of a banned association, wi…
SMT. GIAN KAUR ETC. ETC.versusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB ETC. ETC.
1996 INSC 41821 March 1996Disposed off
Gian Kaur and her husband were convicted under Section 306 of the IPC for abetting the suicide of Kulwant Kaur. They appealed, arguing that Section 306 (and Section 309) were unconstitutional because Article 21 of the Constitution includes a "right to die", as held in P. Rathinam. The Supreme Court, sitting as a Consti…
A. MAHARAJAversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
2008 INSC 130014 November 2008Case Partly allowed
The deceased, Alagu Ambalam, was cutting trees when his son (the accused) confronted him over a land dispute. A verbal altercation escalated into a sudden fight during which the accused snatched the deceased’s aruval (machete) and struck him on the neck and shoulder, causing death. The trial court convicted the accused…
SHATRUGHNA PRASAD SINHAversusRAJBHAU SURAJMAL RATHI AND ORS.
1996 INSC 102010 September 1996Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Shatrughna Prasad Sinha, was charged after an interview published in Stardust magazine allegedly outraged the religious feelings of the Marwari community and defamed them as a class. Complaints were filed in the magistrate courts of Pune and Nasik. The High Court held that the Pune complaint did not disc…
SAMSUDDIN RAHMAN AND ORS.versusBIHARI DAS AND ORS.
1996 INSC 7119 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, owners of a parcel of land covered by a patta, claimed that land had gradually accreted to their estate as the Barak river receded over 15‑16 years. They sought a declaration of title over the accreted land, which was also claimed by the respondents under an annual patta granted by the Deputy Commission…
SOU. VIJAYA @ BABYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2003 INSC 4493 September 2003Appeal(s) allowed
Vijaya and her brother were charged for the murder of the brother's wife, who was burnt to death. While the brother was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC, Vijaya was acquitted of that charge but convicted under Section 201 IPC for allegedly causing disappearance of evidence and giving false information. On appe…