Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Criminal Procedure Code

17749 judgments · newest first · showing 1801–2000

MANOJ MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 304 and 308 IPC. The applicant alleged false implication and mala‑fide motives, contending …

KHANJHATI AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 24‑09‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 08‑01‑2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 32 of 2026 (State of U.P. v. Khanjhati & others). The court examined …

SATYA PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Satya Prakash filed an application under Section 529 CrPC seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite Case No. 83 of 2016 (State vs. Daulat Ram) involving offences under Sections 420 and 120‑B IPC, which has been pending since 2016. The State, represented by the Attorney General, …

SHAN AHMAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 18‑02‑2026 issued in State v. Shan et al., which arose from charges under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. During the …

VANSHIKA KATIYAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 11‑Sept‑2025 and the cognizance order of 31‑Jan‑2026 in a criminal case (Case No. 474 of 2026) arising from FIR No. 0288 of 2025. They alleged that the FIR was false, filed to harass them in a …

MOHAMMAD REHAN @ REHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohammad Rehan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and a non‑bailable warrant issued in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 336 IPC and Section 7 of …

OM PRAKASH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 19‑08‑2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑11‑2023, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 4729 of 2023 (State v. Sushil Kumar and others) …

PAPPUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite Sessions Trial No. 810 of 2008 (State vs. Jagga @ Jagdish) concerning offences under Sections 302 and 394 IPC. The applicant argued that the trial, …

RIZWAN KHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑03‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 19‑08‑2025, and the entire proceedings of case No. 72367 of 2025 relating to alleged offences under IPC sections 271, 278, …

RABIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rabiya filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 16‑03‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑05‑2026, and the entire proceedings in case 33831 of 2026 arising from an FIR under IPC sections 406, 504, 419 and 120B. The High Court examined …

X JUVENILEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The juvenile applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 01‑10‑2023, the cognizance/summoning order dated 25‑01‑2024, and the entire proceedings pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Shamli, relating to offences under IPC sections 147, …

SHAMIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shamim applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482 after a charge sheet was filed. The A.G. argued that the alleged offences (IPC s.420, 406, 506) do not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, so there is no risk of arrest. The applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and …

KAMLESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kamlesh Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the charge‑sheet dated 25‑09‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20‑01‑2026 in Case No. 264 of 2026 (State vs. Munni Devi). He relied on a prior application by co‑accused Ram Kumar (Application No. 24122 …

SUSHEEL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Susheel Kumar under Section 482 of the CrPC and the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, where he alleged false implication in a case involving two base cases in a gang chart. The applicant had no prior …

RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rahul was arrested in connection with a case under IPC sections 69, 115(2), 351(3) and 352, alleged to have established a physical relationship with a married woman by falsely promising marriage, administered drugs, and caused a miscarriage. The victim’s statements under CrPC sections 180 and 183 …

MERAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Meraj, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 after a charge sheet was lodged. The learned Additional Government Advocate argued that the alleged offences do not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, so there was no fear of arrest. The applicant’s counsel …

OMENDRA @ OGENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The learned Additional Government Advocate objected that the applicant had not disclosed his complete criminal antecedents as mandated by Chapter XVIII, Rule 18(7) of the Rules of the Court. The applicant's …

RANI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rani Devi, who was accused of misappropriating a family pension of Rs. 20,32,771 and facing charges under various IPC sections, CrPC Section 482, and IT Act Section 66(D). The applicant claimed she was falsely implicated, had …

MOHD. SALEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Mohd. Saleem filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash two orders dated 05.01.2026 and 19.06.2026 issued by the Family Court, Muzaffarnagar, which authorized a recovery warrant for arrears of maintenance in a case arising under Section 128 of the Criminal Procedure Code. …

SABIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sabir under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, in a case involving mutual violence that resulted in injuries to eleven persons. The applicant argued he had no criminal antecedents and that no specific role was assigned to him, citing …

SUDAMA PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sudama Pandey in a 2019 case involving alleged misappropriation of food grains under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A, 120B and 34 of the IPC. Pandey contended that he was a fair‑price shop dealer, the FIR was lodged after a …

AJAY KUMAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ajay Kumar Shukla filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑Nov‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20‑Jan‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in State v. Ajay Kumar Shukla (Case No. 2186 of 2026). The High Court …

HAR VILASH @ PAPPUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application before …

NITIN KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants Nitin Kumar and three others were charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Dowry Prohibition Act in a case pending before the Bijnor court. They filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482, which the Assistant Government Advocate contested on the ground that …

VINAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vinay Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a charge under Section 337 of the B.N.S. The Attorney General objected, arguing that the offence does not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, the charge‑sheet had already been …

CHANDRA PRAKASH GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Chandra Prakash Gupta was arrested in connection with an FIR dated 18‑06‑2026 alleging dowry demands, matrimonial atrocities and assault leading to a miscarriage, filed by his wife. The applicant contended that the FIR was false, filed after a three‑month delay, and that a doctor’s report showed no …

KUNAL @ KUNAL GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Kunal Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside an order dated 31.01.2026 that had issued both a recovery warrant and an arrest warrant for the enforcement of arrears of maintenance. The maintenance was originally granted to his wife under Section 125 of the …

SURAJ PASWANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suraj Paswan, who was arrested in a rape case (CrPC Sec. 64(1), 351(3)) and had been in custody since July 15, 2026. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to material contradictions between the victim’s statements under …

ONKAR SAHAIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Onkar Sahai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC in connection with offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The learned Additional Government Advocate argued that the offences do not attract imprisonment exceeding seven years, a …

SUDHIR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC for Sudhir Yadav, who was not named in the FIR but was later implicated in a case under the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, and certain provisions of the …

ARJUN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Arjun Singh, charged with offences under Sections 147, 148, 427 IPC and Section 4 of the Government Property Damages Act, had been absconding since 2004 and earlier obtained a three‑week interim protection under Section 528 CrPC, which he failed to act upon. He subsequently filed an anticipatory …

ANASversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Anas, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case where a charge sheet had been filed against him for cheating under Section 413 IPC, in addition to earlier charges under Sections 411 and 414 IPC. The applicant claimed false implication and asserted …

ARUN BABUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Arun Babu, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 230 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 331(4) and 109 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. He is the son of the informant, who is …

ABHISHEKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Abhishek, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with Crime No. 373 of 2026. The applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application before the concerned court. The …

ROHIT @ JAIHINDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rohit @ Jaihind under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a FIR alleging his involvement in a gang that promised government jobs for money. The applicant’s name appeared only in the confessional statements …

PARASNATH KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Parasnath Kushwaha, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a case involving alleged offences under IPC Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) relating to a disputed sale deed. The first bail application was rejected because the applicant failed to …

SAMEERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sameer, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, fearing arrest in a case involving mutual assault between two parties where 23 persons were named in the FIR. He argued that he was falsely implicated, had no specific role assigned, and possessed no …

MANOJ AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Manoj and two others under CrPC Section 482 in a criminal case (Crime No.259 of 2026) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections. The applicants claimed false implication, noting a 15‑day delay in filing the …

JUGENDRA @ CHHOTEversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Jugendra @ Chhote, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with Crime No.168 of 2026. After hearing, the applicant’s counsel sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application, …

NADEEM KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Nadeem Khan under CrPC Section 482 in connection with a FIR alleging his participation in a large-scale protest that resulted in public property damage. The FIR named 25 individuals and 1,700 unnamed persons, but the …

RAKESH MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rakesh Mishra under Section 482 CrPC in a case where he was named in the FIR for allegedly threatening an informant, while the principal assault charge was against his brother. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated …

AKASH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akash Chauhan, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He asserted that he was falsely implicated, noting that only a single base case appears against him in the gang …

TASVEER AHMAD ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Tasveer Ahmad Ali applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482, claiming fear of arrest in a criminal case involving IPC offences. The State opposed, arguing the offences do not carry imprisonment exceeding seven years, a charge‑sheet has been filed and there is no apprehension of arrest, …

CHANDRABHAN SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Chandrabhan Singh Yadav, who had been granted anticipatory bail in eight criminal cases, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking a direction that the trial courts accept two common bail bonds for all those cases. The court examined whether the applicant had ever …

INDRAJEET KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Indrajeet Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 299 of 2025) alleging embezzlement of pre‑deposit amounts of two bank customers, filed under Sections 316(5) and 351(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, stating that the FIR was lodged by a bank …

ASHA YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Asha Yadav and two other teachers under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC relating to alleged embezzlement of grant money from a madarsa. The …

PANKAJ GOPALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Pankaj Gopal, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Allahabad High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant’s counsel, Dhruva Dixit, subsequently moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashok Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 324 of 2013) involving offences under Sections 419, 420 and 468 of the IPC. The applicant sought relief to avoid arrest and asked for …

YASH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under CrPC Section 482 on behalf of Yash (applicant No.1) in a case involving alleged violence between two rival groups. The FIR named twelve accused and six to seven unknown persons, but no specific role was assigned to the applicant, …

UMAKANT YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Umakant Yadav, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a criminal case involving alleged forgery and cheating related to a land dispute in Jaunpur. The prosecution alleged that a forged entry dated 26‑10‑1994 was entered in consolidation …

NARESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash criminal proceedings (ST No.21 of 2020) arising from offences under IPC sections 323, 506 and 308. The parties had already reached a compromise, which was verified by the Additional District and Sessions Judge on 26‑05‑2026 and …

RATAN RAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ratan Raj Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC, which was rejected by the Sessions Judge. He then sought permission to appear before the concerned court and apply for regular bail, requesting protection from any coercive action during the interim. The State opposed the request, …

KESHAV RAM @ MANJESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Keshav Ram @ Manjesh applied for bail in a kidnapping case (Crime No. 278 of 2026) while the trial is pending. He was implicated based solely on a co-accused Uttam Bajpai’s statement linking him to other child‑trafficking cases, which are not part of the present charge. The State argued …

GOLDEN @ EHSAN AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Golden @ Ehsan Ahmad, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC after being falsely implicated in an assault case where he was not named in the FIR. The State opposed bail, arguing the applicant's name appeared in injured parties' statements and citing his prior criminal …

AKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Akash was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No. 62 of 2026, alleged to have violated Sections 137(2), 87, 61(2), 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, Section 17 of the POCSO Act and Section 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident …

PUSHPENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Pushpendra Kumar, who feared arrest in a case involving alleged manipulation of electronic weighing machines and misappropriation of sugarcane. The applicant was not named in the FIR, though co‑accused Bittu …

BHIM RAOversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhim Rao, who is accused under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B and 34 in a land‑allotment dispute case. The applicant claimed innocence, stating he merely implemented an order as a consolidation Lekhpal and had no role in the alleged …

USMAN ALIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Usman Ali applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC Section 482 in connection with FIR No. 67/2025 alleging offences under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2). He claimed innocence, asserted that the charges were filed out of personal enmity, and argued that no reliable evidence …

SHAITAN SINGH YADAV AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Shaitan Singh Yadav and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the criminal proceedings initiated against them under the Arms Act and NDPS Act. They argued that no offence was made out and that the prosecution was …

AMAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Aman Singh filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in Crime No.0380 of 2026, fearing arrest. The State objected, arguing that the alleged offences do not attract a punishment exceeding seven years and that safeguards under Section 35(3) of the BNSS and Supreme Court rulings …

JASHODA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Jashoda Devi, who feared arrest in a family‑dispute case involving alleged assault on Padma Verma and Sridevi. The FIR named six persons and alleged offences under …

VIKAS @ MUDDUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Vikas @ Muddu, who feared arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 109, 115, 351, 352, 117 and 3 of the IPC. The applicant claimed false implication, noting …

AMIT AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which had earlier been rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge under the POCSO Act. They prayed for permission to appear before the concerned court and apply for regular bail, …

REHANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Rehana, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside orders dated 18‑06‑2025 and 09‑07‑2026 that seized her vehicle under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. She claimed to be the registered owner of the vehicle and argued that its …

ROHIT SHETTHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Rohit Shetthi applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 57 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 16 and 17 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the CrPC indicated that the applicant had no role in …

KAPIL RASTOGIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kapil Rastogi, who is accused under Sections 418, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC in a case pending since 2022. The applicant claimed innocence, cited a compromise deed resolving the commercial dispute, and noted that a co‑accused's case had …

JAI KISHAN ALIAS JAICOversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jai Kishan Alias Jaico in Criminal Case No. 485 of 2026, where he was charged under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code for allegedly snatching an informant's bag. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication …

RAKESH KUMAR BINDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rakesh Kumar Bind, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside a order dated 25‑11‑2025 passed by a Civil Judge in a case under the Uttar Pradesh Gauvandhan Nivaran Act. The applicant contended that no offence was made out as all eight …

VIKASH PRASHANT LAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in a criminal case where they were charged under Sections 420, 406 and 504 IPC. They argued that, according to the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh …

UBAID ULLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ubaid Ulla, was arrested in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 103 of 2026) involving offences under IPC sections 318(2), 336(3), 338, and 340(2). He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and had no incriminating material recovered from his …

UDAYSHANKAR TRIPATHI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1179 of 2010, which involved offences under Sections 143, 186, 506, 147, 148, 353 and 504 of the IPC. The parties had earlier been directed by this Court to obtain a court‑verified …

SANJEEV @ KARU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Session Case No. 954 of 2022, which stemmed from Crime No. 663 of 2017 involving offences under Sections 452, 307, 323, 325, 504 and 506 of the IPC. Earlier, the High Court had directed the parties …

GARIMA SRIVASTAVA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Garima Srivastava and another filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. 470/2025 and the subsequent civil suit No. 5401/2026. They contended that no offence was made out, the prosecution was malicious, and there was no direct evidence against …

BRIJESH PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Brijesh Pal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking discharge in criminal case No. 557/2026. He argued that he is innocent, that no direct evidence exists against him, and that the lower court's order is illegal. The State opposed the application. The High Court …

HITESH AGRAWAL @ GOLDIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Hitesh Agrawal, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 855 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 318(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, stating he was merely an employee of the alleged company and had no criminal history, and …

AAMIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Aamir filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application, which the State's counsel did not oppose. The court allowed the withdrawal and …

VIJENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vijendra Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside an order dated 24‑07‑2026 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in criminal case 873/2018 (Ganga Saran v. Vijendra Singh). The applicant …

NAJIRA BEGAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 237 of 2014, which involved charges under IPC sections 498, 406 and 506. The State opposed the application and the matter was heard by the Hon'ble Justice …

AZAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Azam, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act, fearing arrest after his name appeared in the confessional statement of a co‑accused who was caught with 211 g of heroin. The applicant’s earlier bail …

ZIAUDDIN @ GUDDU @ MUDDIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered the bail application of Ziauddin @ Guddu @ Muddi, who was in custody for offences under Sections 308(5) and 61(2) of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged a delayed FIR, and pointed to the grant of anticipatory bail to a co‑accused. The State opposed bail but …

SMT AYSHA KHATOONversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Aysha Khatoon filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to order a CBI investigation under Sections 318(4) and 351(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR dated 10-10-2025. The State, through the learned Additional …

SURESHversusSANJAY SHARMA AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Suresh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 3, Mathura, to decide an application filed on 06.03.2024 under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which was registered as Misc. Case No. 155 of 2024 in Suit …

AMIT KUMAR ALIAS PARESHWARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Amit Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order passed by the Family Court, Ghaziabad, which directed him to pay Rs 5,000 per month to his wife and Rs 2,500 to his minor son from 21‑06‑2024. He sought a stay of the arrears and asked the High Court to direct the Family …

JAGDEESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Jagdeesh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel requested that the application be withdrawn. The High Court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. The court dismissed the Section 528 …

NISRAT KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Nisbat Khan in a session case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 304‑B of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that three fact witnesses, whose statements were recorded under Section 319 Cr.P.C., had …

BHUTTU @ INSAFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Bhuttu @ Insaf (revisionist) challenged an ex parte maintenance order dated 18‑09‑2018 passed under Section 125 CrPC, which had already been recalled on 18‑01‑2020 by a Section 126(2) application. He later filed another Section 126(2) application, dismissed on 08‑09‑2025, and now filed a criminal …

SHADABversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained a second anticipatory bail application filed by Shadab under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a matter arising under Sections 3 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR and was only …

CHOTIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a murder case where she was alleged to have thrown brickbats causing fatal head injuries to the deceased. The FIR named six accused, but two were dropped; the applicant contended she was merely present and had no prior criminal …

RISHABH SHNAKAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rishabh Shankar Shukla appealed against a summoning order issued by the Special Judge, SC/ST (PA) Act, Etawah, which had summoned him under several IPC offences and provisions of the SC/ST Act. The appellant argued that the investigating officer’s final report found insufficient evidence, that the …

ROHIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rohit Kumar under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 195 of 2026 alleging false promise of marriage and related offences under the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely …

AMARJEET KUMAR MANOJversusSTATE OF UP

The applicant, a Branch Manager of UP Gramin Bank, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case alleging misappropriation of funds from 51 bank accounts, with charges under Sections 420, 120B and 409 of the IPC. He contended that the co‑accused siphoned the …

BHOJRAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Bhojraj, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC fearing arrest in a FIR alleging firing on an informant, a case with no injury. The applicant argued he was falsely implicated, had no prior conviction, and only one pending case. The informant’s counsel …

RINKU @ RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Rinku @ Rahul was arrested in connection with an FIR dated 21.07.2026 alleging enticement of a 17‑year‑old girl, a charge filed by the victim's father. The victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code were found to be inconsistent, and the …

AMIT @ AMIT SIKARWAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Amit Sikarwar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking bail after an FIR dated 11‑08‑2023 alleged offences under IPC sections 332, 353, 504 and 506 and the Public Property Damage Prevention Act. The Judicial …

YOGENDRA @ YOGENDRA VARSHNEY AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the summoning order dated 06‑06‑2024 and the entire proceedings of a criminal complaint pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasganj. They alleged false implication and argued that the summons were issued without …

VIKAS KUMAR SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking verification of a written compromise dated 27‑08‑2026. The court noted that the parties had already entered into the compromise and that two of the parties, one a cadet in the Merchant Navy and the other …

VIKRAM VIBHUTI SINGH MOURYA AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, a group of ten accused, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the charge‑sheet dated 11‑12‑2024 and a stay of the Special Judge’s proceedings in Special Session Trial No. 918 of 2026. They also prayed that the trial court expedite …

DR. MOHD. UMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dr. Mohd. Umar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 13‑08‑2026 issued in Complaint Case No. 2035 of 2025 (Nazarul v. Dr. Mohd. Umar) under Section 304 IPC. The warrant was issued by the Chief Judicial …

SIMRAN SINGHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Simran Singhal filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash a summoning order dated 25‑01‑2024 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑III, Gautam Budh Nagar, and the pending criminal case (Complaint No.1964 of 2023) under Section 406 IPC. The applicant alleged …

RAM PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ram Prakash filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 7910 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 52 of 2025 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, and also requested liberty to surrender and obtain …

KESHAR PRATAP PATELversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Keshar Pratap Patel, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, his counsel sought to withdraw the application and requested that it be dismissed, with liberty to file a revision if needed. The Court entertained …

VINOD KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order in a criminal complaint (Case No. 304 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 392, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court …

SMT. MANISHA SHANKHWARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Manisha Shankhwar filed a criminal revision challenging the Family Court's order that denied her claim for maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code while granting a modest maintenance to her minor son. She alleged that she was forced out of her matrimonial home due to dowry …

JAGPALversusSTATE OF UP

The applicant, husband of a woman who died by suicide within seven years of marriage, sought bail in a dowry death case (Criminal No. 175 of 2025) under Sections 85, 80(2) of the Bailable Non-suspect provisions and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed false implication and no …

AARISH ROSHAN AND 6 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but their counsel later informed the court that the application should not be pursued due to factual defects in the compromise. The counsel requested that the application be dismissed as not pressed, …

VIPIN ALIAS AMARNATH DHARIKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vipin alias Amarnath Dharikar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences against a minor girl. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, …

GEETA PAL AND 9 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and the entire criminal trial (Special Session Trial No. 853 of 2023) relating to offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) …

SANDHYA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Sandhya Singh filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order that granted maintenance of Rs.10,000 per month to her son but denied maintenance to herself and her daughter. She contended that the trial court failed to consider her allegation that her husband was cohabiting with his …

SHIVJI BAJPAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 27.05.2021 and the cognizance order dated 11.08.2021 in Criminal Case No. 95762 of 2021, alleging that the prosecution was instituted with mala fide intent. The court examined …

SADHANA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Sadhana Devi filed a maintenance application under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Family Court admitted the marriage but held that she was living separately from her husband without sufficient reason and consequently declined to decide the remaining points concerning her inability …

RAEES KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Raees Khan, filed a petition under Article 227 challenging the dismissal of his complaint alleging that the respondent altered the amount on two cheques from Rs.3,000 to Rs.300,000, causing dishonour. The petitioner failed to produce any evidence of such alteration. The Chief …

TANAJI TATYARAM GADEversusGIRIJA TANAJI GADE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The husband (Applicant) appealed the Family Court's dismissal of his request to reduce maintenance under Section 127 of the Cr.P.C., arguing that his post‑retirement pension of about Rs.20,000 and the wife’s ownership of two flats, along with self‑supporting children, made the original Rs.14,000 …

SANDEP SUBHASHRAO DESHMUKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC filed by Sandeep Subhashrao Deshmukh, an insurance agent alleged to have participated in a large-scale fraud involving fake fixed‑deposit receipts that misappropriated approximately Rs 8.75 crore from Union Bank of …

AJIT BHAGWAN KANHURKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, convicted of murder under IPC Section 302, applied for suspension of his life sentence and bail pending appeal. The prosecution relied on the victim’s sister’s eye‑witness testimony, an informant’s account, and forensic evidence showing the applicant’s blood‑stained clothing and knife …

UTTAM BAJIRAO JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Uttam Bajirao Jadhav, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case (CR No. 348/2019) involving offences under IPC Sections 420, 465, 468 and 471 …

DIGAMBAR DNYANDEV PATILversusTHE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD AND ORS

Allowed

The applicant, Digambar Dnyandev Patil, was charged with cheating and forgery for allegedly submitting false documents to obtain a Rs.15 crore loan from South Indian Bank. The bank recovered Rs.1.7 crore before the FIR was filed and later settled the dispute on 31 Oct 2024 by receiving Rs.13.55 …

Usha Kiran Enterprises Pvt LtdversusV N Timber Traders

Disposed Off

The applicant, Usha Kiran Enterprises Pvt Ltd, was the complainant in a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, where the trial court dismissed the complaint, resulting in the acquittal of the respondent. The applicant sought leave to appeal under the proviso to …

XYZ (VICTIM)versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, a victim under Section 2(wa) of the Criminal Procedure Code, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 188‑day delay in filing an appeal against a Special Judge's order acquitting the accused of offences under Sections 376(2)(l), 376(3), 377, 354, 506 of the IPC and …

MOHAN @ PRASAD SIVERAM PILLAIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Mohan @ Prasad Siveram Pillai, was one of twelve accused in a case involving alleged commission of Rs.10 lakh from a Rs.55 lakh transaction, charged under IPC sections 406, 420, 120(B) read with 34 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. The prosecution had only …

SHAHID SULTAN GADHAWALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 439 of the CrPC and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for a 19‑year‑old accused charged with offences under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the …

NAVNATH SURYAKANT @ BALASAHEB VALHEKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Navnath Suryakant Valhekar, arrested on 31‑01‑2019, has been in custody for 7 years and 7 months for offences under the IPC (including murder and attempt to murder), MCOCA and the Arms Act. He filed a bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …

SATISH SALIANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

Satish Salian filed a criminal writ petition alleging that his daughter's death, officially recorded as a suicide, was the result of a conspiracy involving powerful persons and that the police investigation under Section 174 of the CrPC was inadequate. He sought the transfer of the investigation to …

KHUSAL BHANUDAS TAPKIRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants, accused of a Section 302 IPC offence, had a non‑bailable warrant issued in 2022 and were alleged to be absconding. The Sessions Judge issued a proclamation under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. on 7 February 2025 but failed to specify a place and time for appearance and did not provide the …

ADITYA UDDHAV THAKREYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

Satish Salian filed a criminal writ petition alleging that his daughter's death, officially recorded as a suicide, was the result of a conspiracy involving powerful persons and that the police investigation under Section 174 of the CrPC was inadequate. He sought the transfer of the investigation to …

SATISH SALIANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

Satish Salian filed a criminal writ petition alleging that his daughter's death, officially recorded as a suicide, was the result of a conspiracy involving powerful persons and that the police investigation under Section 174 of the CrPC was inadequate. He sought the transfer of the investigation to …

SATISH SALIANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

Satish Salian filed a criminal writ petition alleging that his daughter's death, officially recorded as a suicide, was the result of a conspiracy involving powerful persons and that the police investigation under Section 174 of the CrPC was inadequate. He sought the transfer of the investigation to …

SHIV NARAIN AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant had stood as surety for an accused in Sessions Trial No. 153 of 1981, furnishing a bond of Rs. 3,000. When the accused failed to appear, a criminal miscellaneous case was instituted under Section 446 of the Criminal Procedure Code and recovery warrants were issued against the …

SANTOSH VIJAY PAGAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The accused were convicted for the murder of Kiran Nikam under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148 r/w 149 and 120B of the IPC, receiving life imprisonment and fines. On appeal, they challenged the reliability of eye‑witnesses, the delay in filing the FIR, the admissibility of defence CCTV and photographic …

GANESH ASHOK UGHADE AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Dismissed

The accused were convicted for the murder of Kiran Nikam under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148 r/w 149 and 120B of the IPC, receiving life imprisonment and fines. On appeal, they challenged the reliability of eye‑witnesses, the delay in filing the FIR, the admissibility of defence CCTV and photographic …

MURTAZA HASAN ALI NETTERWALAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashment of FIR No.341 of 2025 filed under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, invoking the inherent power of Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Both parties had reconciled …

BHUPAT RAVJIBHAI LUKHIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Bhupat Ravjibhai Lukhi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashment of FIR No. 442 of 2017, which alleged offences under IPC Section 420 and the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act. Both parties, having settled their civil …

RAM WOLI AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

Ram Woli and another were charged under Sections 118(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for simple hurt and intimidation arising from a public altercation. The parties later reconciled, and the complainant filed a consent term and a no‑objection affidavit seeking to have …

SNEHAL NITIN SHINDE AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought consent quashing of a criminal case (C.R. No. 0123 of 2026) filed for cheating under an agreement for sale of Rs.1.5 crore. The complainant, Respondent No.2, filed an affidavit stating voluntary consent to quash the proceedings and that no coercion was involved. The Court …

YUVRAJ RATAN MOREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Yuvraj Ratan More, sought bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Crime No. 679 of 2024, which alleged kidnapping under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. …

ROSHAN @ MAYUR RAJESH PATHADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Roshan @ Mayur Rajesh Pathade, was arrested as Accused No.2 in a case involving offences under Sections 302, 323, 504, 143, 148 and 149 of the IPC arising from an altercation at a grocery store. The prosecution could not establish his precise participation in the assault, only that he …

SACHIN UTTAM TAWAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Sachin Uttam Taware, an under‑trial accused of murder (IPC 302 r/w 34), offences under the Arms Act and the Maharashtra Police Act, was arrested four and a half years after the alleged crime and has been in custody for the same period without his trial commencing. He filed a bail application under …

JITESH @ BANDU SAMPAT MURTADAKversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The accused were convicted for the murder of Kiran Nikam under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148 r/w 149 and 120B of the IPC, receiving life imprisonment and fines. On appeal, they challenged the reliability of eye‑witnesses, the delay in filing the FIR, the admissibility of defence CCTV and photographic …

DILIP RAVJI SHAH AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No.191/2023 and related criminal proceedings for offences under IPC sections 420, 406 and 506(ii) read with 34, invoking Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Both parties reconciled and the original complainant consented to the quashing, …

HEMANG JADAVJI SHAHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Hemang Jadavji Shah, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No.53 of 2025 for alleged offences under Sections 316(5) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. …

RAMESH K KARANGIAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Ramesh K. Karangia, purchased a white Range Rover from an agent of accused Arjun Raj and is the registered owner as per the RC book. The vehicle was seized by the police in connection with an FIR filed by Respondent No.2 alleging fraud in a separate car transaction. The Metropolitan …

SHAHRUKH YUNUS KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Shahrukh Yunus Khan, was arrested in connection with a serious criminal case (CR No. 252 of 2024) involving murder, attempt to murder, and other offences under the IPC, Motor Vehicles Act, Maharashtra Police Act and MCOC. The prosecution relied on two statements of a witness: an …

PANKAJ NEMANIversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Pankaj Nemani filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 8388 of 2023) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. Notices were issued to the opposite parties, but they failed to take the required steps. The court noted the non‑compliance and dismissed the …

MANOJ JADAVBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants, Manoj Patel and Ashutosh Kumar, sought quashing of criminal proceedings filed under sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 506 read with 34 of the IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, invoking the inherent powers of the High Court …

MUKESH ANIL MAGARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Rejected

Mukesh Anil Magar applied for bail under Section 439 of the CrPC for offences including murder (Section 302 IPC) and drug offences, alleging that a prior bail granted to a co-accused in a similar case should be a guiding factor. The State contended that the applicant had violated an externment order …

MAHESH MANOHAR PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The petitioner, an advocate, filed a writ petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash FIR No.568/2010, which alleged offences under Sections 323, 353, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC and Sections 85(1) & (2) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The incident occurred on 9 October 2010 when the …

ARVIND BHARATBHUSHAN AGARWAL AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (mirroring Section 482 of the CrPC) seeking to quash FIR No. 1613/2024, which arose from a commercial dispute. The parties have since reconciled, filed a consent affidavit, and the complainant urged the …

MOHAMMED KAIF MOHAMMED YUSUF SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court heard two criminal writ petitions filed by a group of young offenders who were accused of causing grievous hurt in a parking dispute that escalated into a fight involving iron rods and bamboo sticks. Both the petitioners and the state agreed that the incident was a private …

SREEJIT RAMESHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner sought quashing of FIR No. CR 395/2025 and a pending chargesheet for criminal intimidation under the Atrocities Act, invoking Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Both parties, who knew each other, had reconciled and filed a consent affidavit indicating a …

ASHUTOSH KUMAR AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants, Manoj Patel and Ashutosh Kumar, sought quashing of criminal proceedings filed under sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 506 read with 34 of the IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, invoking the inherent powers of the High Court …

RAHUL ASHOK KUMAR AJMANIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petition arose from a motor car accident that led to FIR No. 96 of 2026 being lodged under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for offences under sections 281, 125 and 324(4) of the BNSS and sections 184, 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act. Both the petitioner, Rahul Ajmani, and the …

PRASHANT HINDURAO PADALKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Shweta Dilip Bhosale and Prashant Hindurao Padalkar, filed writ petitions under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of FIRs registered against them for offences under the IPC, arising from cross‑complaints of breach of trust and trespass. Both parties …

ASHOK CHAMPALAL PAREKH AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, engaged in a gold exchange business, filed a complaint alleging breach of trust, leading to FIR C.R. No.65 of 2026 under Sections 316(5) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The parties later reconciled and submitted a consent affidavit stating full payment of dues, seeking …

SHWETA DILIP BHOSALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Shweta Dilip Bhosale and Prashant Hindurao Padalkar, filed writ petitions under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of FIRs registered against them for offences under the IPC, arising from cross‑complaints of breach of trust and trespass. Both parties …

SHADAB NAWAB ALI SHAIKH AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners were involved in an altercation on 15‑08‑2023 near Kala Ghoda, Mumbai, after a motorcycle handle brushed the complainant's hand, leading to a fight. An FIR was initially filed for simple hurt but was later upgraded to grievous hurt, charging offences under IPC sections 326, 504, 506 …

FARHAN @ BABLU ABDUL KARIM SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Farhan @ Bablu Abdul Karim Shaikh, was arrested as Accused No.5 in a case alleging that he arranged fake sureties for filing bail bonds, alongside other accused who are advocates. The prosecution alleged that he facilitated sureties on four occasions and seized multiple Aadhaar and …

LAKHAN LALACHAND DHAMWANI AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants, Lakhan Lalchand Dhamwani and another, were charged under Section 85(1) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for allegedly shouting loudly at each other while intoxicated, alleged to breach public peace. The prosecution’s case did not allege any third‑party disturbance or any element of …

SUNIL KUMAR GARGversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Garg, filed a criminal writ petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) and Article 227 of the Constitution, seeking to quash an order dated 28‑04‑2025 of the Special Court at Greater Sessions, Mumbai, which had taken cognizance of a …

MINAL OMKAR SAKPALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by Minal Omkar Sakpal, a 30‑year‑old mother of three minor children, who was arrested in connection with a case alleging the sale of her 40‑day‑old daughter. The prosecution alleged that the applicant and her husband attempted to sell the …

SHUBHAM BALASAHEB TAKALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered the bail application of Shubham Balasaheb Takale, a 25‑year‑old accused charged with multiple offences under the IPC, who had been in custody for five years and three months with only three of thirty‑five witnesses examined. The Court examined the constitutional …

ZULFEEQUAR DAULAT KHAN SARGUROH AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants were charged under IPC sections 406, 420 read with 34 for a commercial mineral supply dispute. The parties later reconciled, returned the disputed amount and filed consent terms seeking to quash the FIR under Section 482 of the CrPC and the corresponding Section 528 of the Bharatiya …

SAPAN KHANNA and ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. and ANR.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The applicants, Sapan Khanna and others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application. The Court observed the absence of prosecution and consequently dismissed the application. The …

M/S D. C. AMBER DEVELOPERS LLP AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, a developer, were charged under IPC sections 409, 420, 464 and 34 following a complaint by a society member regarding a redevelopment project. The parties later settled their private dispute and filed a consent petition under Sections 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and 528 of …

AZGAR TAIYEBALLY DALAL AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, accused in a redevelopment dispute, sought quashing of FIR No. 1036/2024 and a chargesheet under IPC sections 409, 420, 464 and 34, invoking consent settlement dated 07.05.2026. The parties had resolved their differences through a consent affidavit filed on 29.08.2026, and the High …

POONAM VIJAY MATTE AND ANRversusRAM RAMDAS SAMUDRE AND ANR

Disposed Off

Petitioners Poonam Vijay Matte et al. and Ram Ramdas Samudre filed writ petitions under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR/MECR proceedings relating to alleged extortion, forgery and criminal intimidation. The parties had settled their private dispute, …

ASIF ALI AHMED ALI SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petition arose from a civil land dispute that was settled by the parties, who filed an affidavit of consent and executed release and conveyance deeds. The petitioner sought quashing of FIR No. 83 of 2023 (sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 IPC) under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and …

ANIL KUMAR AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No.44/2010 and the accompanying charge‑sheet for offences under the IPC and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. The parties had settled the underlying …

SURESH JEEVRAJ RAWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash FIR No.1114 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, evidenced by a Consent …

M/S WALIA AGNI METAL PVT. LTD.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, M/s Walia Agni Metal Pvt. Ltd., was implicated in FIR No.44 of 2021 for cheating and breach of trust concerning a land transaction. The parties later settled the dispute through a deed of compromise filed in a commercial suit, and the petitioner sought quashing of the FIR under …

BHARATH PRAVEEN CHAND DARAM @ BHARAT RAOversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. 0194/2024 filed for offences under Sections 420 read with 34 of the IPC. The parties had settled the underlying civil dispute, with the complainant receiving Rs.3,61,000, and both sought …

VIPIN SATYAWAN KHANDAGALE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioners, Mathadi workers involved in a violent dispute over loading and unloading contracts, were charged under several IPC sections including 307 and 324. Both parties filed cross‑FIRs but later sought to settle the matter and filed consent affidavits requesting quashing of the FIRs under …

SUNNY KARMVEER DHILOD AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioners, Mathadi workers involved in a violent dispute over loading and unloading contracts, were charged under several IPC sections including 307 and 324. Both parties filed cross‑FIRs but later sought to settle the matter and filed consent affidavits requesting quashing of the FIRs under …

HITESH RAMESH GANDHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed three criminal applications under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No. 812/2025 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The complainant, Pranam Harish Mehta, …

LADULAL HARAKCHAND KANTHER AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered three criminal applications filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIRs registered for offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4) r/w 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The complainant, Pranam Harish Mehta, …

DEEPAK SATYAWAN KUDALKAR AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTR AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants were charged with cheating and criminal breach of trust for taking deposits from 27 investors, all of which were later returned. The complainants filed affidavits confirming full settlement and requested that the criminal proceedings be terminated. The applicants filed an application …

VINOD KUMAR NIHALCHAND PARMAR AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR C.R. No.4 of 2026 that alleged offences under Sections 406, 409, 420, 120B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The complainant had paid the disputed dues and filed a …

ROHAN PRABHAKAR BACHEWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petition arose from a land sale dispute that led to multiple civil suits and an FIR for cheating and criminal breach of trust. The parties later reconciled through a Memorandum of Understanding and a consent affidavit, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings under Section 528 of the Bharatiya …

RUPA GOVIND NEPALI AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The police raided a brothel in Pune on 12‑12‑2003 and found minor girls in the presence of the accused women, Rupa Govind Nepali and Rita Jithbahadu Thapa. The prosecution proved that the accused had obtained possession of the minors with intent to use them for prostitution, relying on police …

VIKAS RANCHOD SHUKLA AND ORSversusMANISHA EKNATH KAVALE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, a practising advocate, a tax consultant and his brother, were accused by a tribal lady in a criminal complaint (CR No.440 of 2022) and in turn filed a cross‑complaint (CR No.441 of 2022) against three other individuals alleging assault and robbery, arising from a rivalry over …

PANDURANG ARJUN VIGHNEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered the bail application of Pandurang Arjun Vighne, accused No.3 in a murder case involving offences under Sections 302, 201, 364, 324 read with 34 of the IPC. The prosecution’s case was based solely on weak circumstantial evidence and a four‑day‑old last‑seen theory, with a …

AMAN MUSTAK SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 439 of the CrPC and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita on behalf of Accused No.3 in a case involving murder, attempted murder, criminal conspiracy and other offences. The applicant was indicted primarily on …

ANIL ATMARAM BHAMBORE AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petition arose from a civil dispute over a Memorandum of Understanding concerning possession of flats, where the developer failed to deliver possession and the aggrieved party filed FIR No.196 of 2018 for trespass and mischief. The petitioners sought quashing of the FIR by consent under Section …

KIRAN PURSHOTTAMDAS GORADIAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Sections 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of FIR No.0321/2023 (IPC §§419, 420) that arose from a tenancy dispute. Both parties had settled the civil dispute and agreed to a consent quashing. The court examined its …

JAYESH RAMESHCHANDRA SAVLAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed

The petitioner, Jayesh Rameshchandra Savla, filed a writ petition under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking consent quashing of FIR No. 0320 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 406 and 420 arising from a tenancy dispute. The High Court examined the applicability of Section 528 (mirroring …

NAVEED AKTAR SAGHEER AHMEDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered multiple anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and school officials accused of forging appointment orders to back‑date their service dates and evade the mandatory Teacher Eligibility Test. The …

SHAFEEQUE AHMAD JAMEEL HASAN AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered multiple anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and school officials accused of forging appointment orders to back‑date their service dates and evade the mandatory Teacher Eligibility Test. The …

RAHUL DINKAR PATIL AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, a practising advocate, a tax consultant and his brother, were accused by a tribal lady in a criminal complaint (CR No.440 of 2022) and in turn filed a cross‑complaint (CR No.441 of 2022) against three other individuals alleging assault and robbery, arising from a rivalry over …

MUDASSIR AHMED MOHAMMED HAROONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The High Court considered multiple anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and school officials accused of forging appointment orders to back‑date their service dates and evade the mandatory Teacher Eligibility Test. The …

MUDASSIR AHMED MOHAMMED HAROONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The High Court considered multiple anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and school officials accused of forging appointment orders to back‑date their service dates and evade the mandatory Teacher Eligibility Test. The …

CHAND ABDUL REHMAN SHAIKH AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioners were accused in an FIR dated 26‑06‑2022 for cheating and forgery relating to a flat and a disputed gift deed. They later filed a civil suit seeking declaratory relief, which was settled by a consent term on 27‑11‑2024 and subsequently disposed of by a National Lok Adalat decree. The …

ANIL KUMAR BHERULAL JAGETIYAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed three criminal applications under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No. 812/2025 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The complainant, Pranam Harish Mehta, …

DR. DINESH RAMESH CHAVAN AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, husband and in‑laws, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashal of criminal proceedings initiated on an FIR relating to offences under Sections 323, 406, 498A, 504, 506, 507 and 34 of the IPC. The …

ABDUL SHAKUR WALESAB NADAFversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for stabbing his wife, resulting in her death. The prosecution relied on the testimony of a child eyewitness, multiple oral dying declarations, an extra‑judicial confession, and forensic evidence showing the appellant's blood on the seized …