Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Criminal Procedure Code

17749 judgments · newest first · showing 1601–1800

RAHUL GANDHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Dismissed

Rahul Gandhi filed a writ petition challenging the issuance of process against him for alleged defamation under Section 500 IPC, based on a complaint by Mahesh H. Shrishrimal, a BJP member. The petitioner argued that the complainant lacked locus standi under Section 199 CrPC and that the BJP, being …

NAVDURGA STEEL TRADERS AND ANR.versusM/S Z V STEELS PVT LTD AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The applicants, Navdurga Steel Traders & Anr., filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, challenging an order dated 9 July 2026 by the Additional Sessions Judge which continued a stay of execution subject to a 20 percent deposit of compensation …

NAVDURGA STEEL TRADERS AND ANR.versusM/S Z V STEELS PVT LTD AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The applicants, Navdurga Steel Traders & Anr., filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, challenging an order dated 9 July 2026 by the Additional Sessions Judge which continued a stay of execution subject to a 20 percent deposit of compensation …

VENKATA BHASKARA RAO MADDALAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants, senior citizens aged 86 and 82, filed criminal applications under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (equivalent to Section 482 CrPC) challenging orders that rejected their exemption from personal appearance, issued non‑bailable warrants and directed them to attend …

VENKATA BHASKARA RAO MADDALAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants, senior citizens aged 86 and 82, filed criminal applications under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (equivalent to Section 482 CrPC) challenging orders that rejected their exemption from personal appearance, issued non‑bailable warrants and directed them to attend …

GAJENDRAN S.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants, senior citizens aged 86 and 82, filed criminal applications under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (equivalent to Section 482 CrPC) challenging orders that rejected their exemption from personal appearance, issued non‑bailable warrants and directed them to attend …

GAJENDRAN S.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants, senior citizens aged 86 and 82, filed criminal applications under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (equivalent to Section 482 CrPC) challenging orders that rejected their exemption from personal appearance, issued non‑bailable warrants and directed them to attend …

ANKIT SAXENA @ SAURABH SAXENA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ankit Saxena and three others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. No counsel appeared for either party on the date of hearing. The sole issue before the court was whether the application should be entertained in the absence …

RAM KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants Ram Kunwar and Ram Kewal were convicted for the murder of Smt. Shanichari and for concealing the offence based on the testimony of the victim's five‑year‑old daughter, Kumari Pramila, and the alleged recovery of a knife. On appeal, the High Court examined the reliability of the …

SMT. BITTAN DEVI @ SUSHMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt. Bittan Devi and three others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application. Counsel for the State and the second opposite party were present. The Court observed the …

SITARAMversusState of UP

The applicant, Sitaram, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the application, stating it should be dismissed as not pressed. The Additional Government Advocate raised no objection …

NAJAMA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 62 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 147, 452, 323 and 506 IPC. The parties had entered into a settlement on 28 July 2025, which was verified and reported to the …

MOHAMAMD RASHIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Mohammad Rashid filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code that required him to pay Rs.3,000 and Rs.1,000 monthly as maintenance to two claimants. He argued that the trial court fixed the amount without properly ascertaining his actual …

DAVESHISH LASKER AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Daveshish Lasker and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings. The matter was listed in the revised court list, but no party appeared to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The …

MUBARAK ALI AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Mubarak Ali and eight others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court …

RAJU AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Raju Yadav and six others were summoned under the SC/ST Act for alleged assault, attempted rape, and caste‑based abuse against a complainant and his minor daughters. The appellant challenged the summoning order, arguing that the complaint did not disclose the essential ingredients of …

RAHUL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rahul and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, presumably to quash a criminal proceeding. The matter was listed in the revised court list, but no party appeared before the court. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The …

KIRAN DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kiran Devi and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, presumably to quash criminal proceedings. The matter was listed in the revised court list, but no party appeared before the court. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. …

MADAN SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The court noted that the case was listed but no party appeared to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court dismissed the application on the ground of …

HARESH YADAV AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER

Haresh Yadav and three others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, but no party pressed the matter when it came up for hearing. The learned …

KALAM AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants Kalam and four others appealed against a summoning order dated 26‑02‑2021 in a complaint (Pappu v. Kalam) that alleged offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 427, 504, 506 and Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST Act. They contended that the matter stemmed from a land dispute, that no …

KALLU BAKSHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 30 September 2019 in case crime No. 533 of 2019, which alleged offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. The …

JASWANT SINGH @ JASWANT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 16‑10‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 17‑04‑2025, and the entire proceedings in case No. 5174 of 2025 (State v. Jaswant Singh et al.) arising from an alleged …

MAHENDRAversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance and summoning order dated 11 July 2023 in Criminal Case No. 48767 (State v. Kundan & Others), which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended that Sections …

BAL KRISHNA DUBEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANR

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but failed to appear before the court. No counsel represented the applicants on the revised list, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate and the second opposite party were present. The …

AVI GUPTA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. Counsel for the applicants informed the court that the dispute between the parties had been settled, rendering the petition moot. The court considered whether the application could proceed in light …

SANJEEV BANSAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties reached an amicable settlement, and a copy of the settlement agreement was placed on record. Both counsel acknowledged the settlement. The court held that, in …

LALCHANDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 6087 of 2019, which involved offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC. The applicant did not press the merits of the quash petition and instead requested the …

SMT. KAILASHI DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Smt. Kailashi Devi and two others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Their counsel, Mool Chandra Maurya, later informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application. The court accepted this request and dismissed the application …

ARVINDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The appellant filed a complaint under Section 156(3) of the CrPC alleging that on 23 November 2023 the accused entered his house, assaulted his family, attempted to molest his wife, and that one accused sustained an injury. The Additional District & Sessions Judge dismissed the complaint, finding no …

DURGA YADAV AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionists Durga Yadav and others filed a criminal revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, challenging the Sessions Judge's order rejecting their discharge application under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code and directing framing of charge …

ABBAS AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 07.08.2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and both the State and the second …

MOHIT ARORA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohit Arora and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 06‑07‑2025 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 10188 of 2026) arising from alleged offences under Sections 406 and 506 IPC. The parties …

RAMCHARAN @ KUDDANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ramcharan @ Kuddan was arrested and subsequently filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 6670 of 2026). The applicant's counsel informed the court that the applicant had already been taken into custody, rendering the anticipatory bail …

KHARPATTU CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Kharpattu Chauhan was arrested in connection with Crime No. 0411 of 2025 under Section 316(5) BNS and filed a bail application claiming innocence and alleging false implication. The applicant offered to pay Rs. 3,46,009.57 to the informant within two months after release. The State opposed the bail …

KUNAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings (S.T.No. 1677 of 2022) relating to offences under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement and a compromise was verified by the trial court on …

ARADHNA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Aradhna Yadav and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was filed under Section 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The respondents argued that the same matter had already …

MANNALAL PANDA @ MUNNA LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 BNSS seeking a direction that the trial court expedite the disposal of Criminal Case No. 471 of 2014, which involves offences under Sections 354, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that the case, pending since 2014, should be decided within a …

RAJ BAHADUR BINDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Raj Bahadur Bind, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the judgment and orders in a criminal revision and a criminal case involving allegations of domestic violence under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant …

DEVESH YADAV AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 4‑April‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 371 of 2026, which arose from an FIR dated 14‑Sept‑2025 alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 3(5) of …

SALMAN HUSSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash a Special Judge's order that affirmed a Judicial Magistrate's dismissal of a Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. application. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw …

JAY PRAKASH SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 10806 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court examined the material and held that, on the …

SHAHRUKHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shahrukh, who was arrested in a rape case (Criminal Case No. 193 of 2026) under Sections 87, 69 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that the victim, a major married woman, had consented and that the medico‑legal …

RAJ KUMAR YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionists challenged the Additional Session Judge’s order rejecting their discharge application under Section 308 of the IPC, arguing that the evidence did not show any intention to cause death and that the injuries were simple. The State contended that the assault caused serious injuries, …

BADALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Badal filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The court noted the counsel's statement and proceeded to dismiss the application as …

FARHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farhan in a criminal case (Crime No. 342 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 61(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal …

SHYAM PRAKASH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 17-11-2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 16-10-2025, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 14265 of 2025 relating to offences under Sections 127(2), 115(2), 352 …

SEEMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Seema filed a criminal revision under Section 125 CrPC seeking maintenance from Mukesh Soni, alleging that she is his lawful wife. The trial court had rejected her claim, holding that her earlier marriage was still subsisting and therefore her subsequent marriage to Mukesh Soni was void. Seema …

RAJKUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite the disposal of State vs. Yogendra Nishad (S.T. No. 1261 of 2024), a case involving offences under IPC sections 376(3) and 328 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4(2). The State's Additional …

GAURI SHANKAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner Gauri Shankar Sharma filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the dismissal of his complaint under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code by a Judicial Magistrate. The High Court noted that revision against a magistrate’s order is concurrently within the …

VEEKESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Veekesh filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The respondents were the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. Counsel for the applicant were Arvind Agrawal and Ritik Kumar Mishra, while G.A. …

SMT SONAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt. Sonam, filed an application under Section 529 CrPC seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a domestic‑violence complaint (Case No. 3090 of 2024) and an interim‑maintenance application filed under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence …

ARCHANA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Archana Devi under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case (Crime No. 177 of 2026) where she was alleged to have threatened an informant. The applicant argued that she was falsely implicated, had no role …

NITESH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a criminal case (No. 420 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC Sections 420 and 406. The State’s Additional Government Advocate argued that anticipatory bail was not maintainable because the alleged offences did not …

JITENDRA KUMAR @ GUDDUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jitendra Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a criminal case pending since 2003. The applicant argued that the matter had remained undecided for an inordinate period and requested a time‑bound schedule …

SHAYAM LOHIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shayam Lohiya filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction that the trial court expedite the pending criminal case (No. 1192 of 2020) involving offences under the IPC, the Public Property Damage Prevention Act and the Criminal Law Amendment …

DHRUVCHAND KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dhruvchand Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a 2015 complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act pending before the Civil Judge, Gorakhpur. The applicant argued that the case had …

HARISHANKAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite a criminal case (Case No. 3404 of 2009) that has been pending for many years. They argued that the matter required a time‑bound disposal. The State opposed, and the court considered …

SHIV SHANKAR CHAUDHARY AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the proceedings in Criminal Case No. 204 of 2026. The High Court examined the material and observed that, at the pleading stage, it could not be said that no offence was made …

RAJESH AGARWAL @ BABLU AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Rajesh Agarwal @ Bablu and two others, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 8656 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Sanjay Srivastava, subsequently informed the court that the …

SMT ANJANA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt Anjana Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite a pending criminal case (Case No. 7448 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 354, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

ASHA AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Asha and nine others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 27‑01‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 01‑04‑2026, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 201 of 2026. The High Court examined the FIR, the …

DHARMENDRA KUMAR SAINIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar Saini, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑10‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 11‑12‑2024 in a case pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar. The …

KISHAN CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P.

Kishan Chaudhary filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite criminal case No. 973 of 2024 (State vs. Virendra Singh) involving offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The State opposed the direction only if the lower …

SANDEEP @ BALLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sandeep (Ballu) in a case involving alleged kidnapping, abduction and rape of a minor under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(3) and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4(2). The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the …

OMPRAKASH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 20‑03‑2023 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 05‑06‑2023 in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 323 and 504 of the IPC. The applicant contended that these …

PRADEEP KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pradeep Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 13‑09‑2021 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …

ABHIJEET GAUTAM @ AMIT GAUTAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 04‑04‑2026 in a criminal case that alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 452, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that Sections 406 …

MD. BABUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Md. Babu, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case (Crime No.259 of 2016) filed under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. He feared arrest and sought interim protection to appear before the trial …

NEERAJ JAISWAL @ SUMANT JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Neeraj Jaiswal, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) after having already been granted regular bail by the trial court. The applicant's counsel argued that the anticipatory bail petition had become redundant and should be …

RAKESH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 21‑06‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 13‑01‑2026 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 117(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 333 of the IPC. The High Court …

AFSARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Afsar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC fearing arrest in a case (Crime No.144 of 2026) involving offences under various sections of the B.N.S. He argued that he was falsely implicated as his name does not appear in the FIR or injured witnesses' …

NAVEEN KUMAR BHATI ALIAS NAVEEN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an application under Section 528 CrPC filed by Naveen Kumar seeking quashing of the cognizance and summoning order dated 30 March 2022 in State v. Naveen Kumar (Case No.1520 of 2022) arising from a crime under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. The applicant contended …

MOHD. FAIZIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Mohd Faizi filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs 7,000 per month dated 30‑07‑2026, issued by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Muzaffarnagar, in a case under Section 144 of the B.N.S.S. and Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He argued …

RAMESHCHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rameshchandra, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed he was falsely implicated and that the only case shown against him in the …

SUBHASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 20‑12‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06‑04‑2026, and the entire proceedings in State v. Subhash (Case No. 3154 of 2026). The High Court examined the FIR, the …

ATIF LARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Atif Lari, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 478 of 2019) instituted under Section 307 IPC. The applicant, being the husband of the informant, asserted that the dispute had been amicably settled and a …

SUAIB KHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Suaib Khan and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 132 and 121(1) of the BNSS, 2023, fearing arrest. The State, represented by the Advocate General, objected, arguing that the alleged …

DEEPIKA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Deepika Singh filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court in Kanpur to dispose of her pending Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance case within a fixed time‑frame. The applicant argued that the case, filed on …

MUJMMILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 8, 21, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act, fearing arrest. He also sought interim protection to appear before the trial court and apply for regular bail. The State did not oppose the prayer. …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Ashok Kumar, who feared arrest in a session case involving alleged offences under several provisions of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 16 and 17 of the Protection of …

SHANI @ AVNEESH RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shani @ Avneesh Rajbhar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 211 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 304 and 126(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed false implication arising from …

AMAN VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Aman Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25-06-2019, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06-07-2019, and the non‑bailable warrant dated 06-02-2023 in a case registered as Crime No. 478 of 2018 under …

KUNAN URF KUNALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kunan Urf Kunal under Section 482 CrPC in a rape case (Crime No. 0171 of 2026). The applicant claimed false implication, citing a five‑day delay in filing the FIR, lack of medical evidence, and evidence of a consensual extra‑marital …

AVDHESH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Avdhesh Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482 in a case where charge‑sheet had already been filed for offences under IPC s.498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act s.3/4. The learned Attorney‑General objected that the offences were not punishable with imprisonment …

DAALCHANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Daalchand, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 20‑07‑2013 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 19‑02‑2014 in Crime No. 666 of 2013, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. …

KHEMAKARAN KUMAR @ NIKTEN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Khemakaran Kumar alias Niketan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 23‑02‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 21‑04‑2026, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 13397 of 2026 relating to …

ASIF AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the applicants submitted that the application had become infructuous and should therefore be dismissed. The opposite party did not object to this …

AKHILESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akhilesh Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 20‑11‑2017 and the accompanying order dated 20‑07‑2026, which were issued after he failed to appear despite having been released on bail in a case …

KRISHAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The revisionist, a government teacher, challenged a Family Court order granting his wife and daughter maintenance of Rs.16,000 per month, arguing that salary deductions reduced his net income and the amount was excessive. The State contended that the trial court correctly applied the Supreme Court's …

BABITA RANIversusSATISH PRAKASH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Babita Rani, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Meerut to decide Miscellaneous Case No. 242 of 2025, which arose from an application under Section 379 of the BNSS 2023 (equivalent to Section 340 of the CrPC). The …

LALTI DEVI AND ANOTHERversusBABU LAL

The petitioners, Lalti Devi and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Family Court, Ghazipur, to dispose of a pending Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance case (Misc. Case No. 193 of 2020) within a fixed time. The petitioner, represented …

AMRIKA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Amrika Devi and her minor son, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court‑III, Jaunpur, to expedite the trial of a pending Section 125 Cr.P.C. case (Amrika v. Sudhakar). The petition argued that the …

SABIHA KAUSHAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sabiha Kaushar and three others, sought a habeas corpus writ to obtain custody of the minor children Jannat Sahab and Muhammad Ashar, alleging that the mother was unfit to care for them. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, contended that the custody dispute arose from a …

SMT. DARAKSHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, an informant, filed an application on 11‑August‑2025 under Section 240 of the Criminal Procedure Code in criminal case No. 2972/2023, which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner sought a direction from …

DURGESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Durgesh filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash a summoning order dated 14‑03‑2024 and the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1800 of 2023 (Gulab Chand v. Smt. Asha) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Ghaziabad. …

ANIL KUMAR SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings initiated by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, in Complaint Case No. 50510 of 2019 (Devendra Kumar Sharma v. Anil Kumar Sharma & others) under Sections 504 …

SHEELENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sheelendra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging an order dated 21‑02‑2024, which the complainant had appealed before the Additional Sessions Judge, Hathras. The applicant contended that he retained the right to contest the …

NARESH BABOOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The applicant later informed the court that he no longer wished to pursue the application and requested its withdrawal, asking for liberty to file a fresh application if needed. The court considered …

NISHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nishar, who was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 333, 351(3), 74, 75(2) of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a delay of more than a month in …

RINKU @ ABHAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Rinku @ Abhay Kumar, was charged under Sections 137(2) of the CrPC, 65(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act in Crime No. 275 of 2025. He filed a second bail application after the first was rejected. The counsel for the applicant failed to present any new ground …

SMT ARTI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 04‑07‑2025 and the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 164/2024, which alleged offences under Sections 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The complaint was lodged …

DURGA PRASAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 20‑09‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 10‑03‑2026, and the entire proceedings of case No. 1145 of 2026 arising from FIR under IPC sections 333, 110, 115(2), …

SMT SANGEETA RANI CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt Sangeeta Rani Chaudhary filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 10‑03‑2008 and related orders dated 24‑11‑2011 and 21‑12‑2011 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicant limited her prayer …

LAXMINARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Laxminarayan applied for bail in a non‑bailable offence (Case Crime No.101 of 2026) under Section 103(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court examined the facts, noting that a co‑accused, Shakuntala Mishra, had already been granted bail in a similar case, and that the applicant had no prior …

RAJEEV KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajeev Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summons issued on 21‑06‑2022 in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court noted that the contentions raised were essentially factual …

AJAY LAKHERAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Ajay Lakhera, filed a criminal revision challenging an ex parte maintenance order dated 1 June 2026 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mahoba, under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. They sought quashing and a stay of the order, arguing that the order was …

ANUJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Anuj Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order dated 06.08.2026 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Aligarh, which directed him to pay Rs.4,500 per month to his wife, Smt. Lata alias Sonam. He contended that the amount was not commensurate with his …

ANURAGversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Anurak, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 237 of 2026 under Sections 318(4), 61(2) of the CrPC and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming he was falsely implicated in a …

AJEEMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction that all criminal cases in which he had been granted bail should be secured by a single personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two common sureties. The court queried whether the applicant had previously …

RAFAQATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 1142 of 2025) pending against him, alleging that no offence was disclosed and that the prosecution was malicious. The court examined whether, at the stage of a …

RAFAQATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 1143 of 2025) pending against him in the Kanpur Sessions Court. He alleged that no offence was disclosed against him and that the prosecution was instituted with …

SHIVAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shivam Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 166 of 2026) under IPC sections 103(1) and 238 BNS. He argued that the FIR was lodged fifty days after the alleged offence, there was no identification parade under Section 7 of the Evidence Act, and eyewitness statements were recorded …

JAMALUDDIN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 2557 of 2008, Anjum Bano v. Dr. Rakesh Pathak & Others) that alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 468, 201, 218 and 120B. They asserted that the parties had reconciled and a written compromise …

SHRIKANT AGRAWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shrikant Agrawal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to set aside the cognizance and quash the charge sheet in a criminal case under the Essential Commodities Act. He contended that no offence was disclosed and that the prosecution was …

SAJID @ ASIFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sajid (also known as Asif), challenged recovery and arrest warrants issued against him for arrears of interim maintenance granted to his wife under Section 125 CrPC. The wife had obtained interim maintenance on 22.01.2019 and later filed an application under Section 147 BNSS for …

ABHISHEK MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but the parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement, which was verified on 11 May 2026. The court, noting the settlement, ordered the trial court to consider any application under Section 320 …

AKASH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash Kumar in Criminal Case No. 313 of 2026, which alleged his involvement in extortion and impersonation of a police inspector under IPC sections 115, 127, 308 and 351. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming false implication and lack of any …

SHIVSHANKAR SAHANIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shivshankar Sahani was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he abused and maltreated his wife and three children, leading them to ingest organophosphorous poison, resulting in the death of two children. The primary informant turned hostile before trial, and the applicant has no prior …

ARVIND AND 5 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.240 of 2017, which involved offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(5) of the SC/ST Act. The parties had reached a full settlement, which was verified by the …

AVINASH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings after the parties settled their dispute amicably and the compromise was verified by the trial court. The trial court confirmed the settlement on 25 June 2025. Both the State and the second opposite …

ANIL KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants were summoned under several IPC offences and Sections 3(1)(Da) and 3(1)(Dha) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act based on a complaint alleging forced removal of a combine, loss of crop, and assault with caste‑based insults. The appellants …

WASI AHMAD AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that they had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 19‑05‑2026. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. The High …

GURJUGDIP SINGH SMAGH S/O JAGROOP SINGHversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Gurjugdip Singh Smagh, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Section 439 of the CrPC for alleged offences under multiple provisions of the NDPS Act relating to the import of licorice roots contaminated with heroin. The prosecution’s case …

AMIT SURESH SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Amit Suresh Shinde under CrPC Sec. 438 and B.N.S. Sec. 482 in connection with charges of causing a miscarriage and related offences. The prosecution alleged that Shinde instructed a doctor to induce a miscarriage without his wife's …

MARKAS YOHAN THORATversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dismissed

The petitioners, Markas Yohan Thorat & Anr., filed a review petition challenging a judgment dated 24 June 2026, alleging that the police had made inconsistent statements and committed fraud on the court. The petitioners argued that this fraud warranted a review of the earlier decision. The Court …

SANDIP SAMBHAJI BORADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by Sandip Sambhaji Borade, who has been in custody for over seven years for alleged kidnapping, rape (IPC §§363, 376(1)) and a POCSO offence (Section 4). The prosecution alleged that the 17‑year‑old niece was taken to a lodge and assaulted, …

SURESH BAJIRAV JAGTAPversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Suresh Bajirav Jagtap, accused No.2 in a case involving alleged sexual offences under IPC Section 376(2)(N) and POCSO Act Sections 4(M), 5(N) and 6. The original FIR and the prosecutrix’s first …

KHELAWAN AND OTHERSversusSTATE

The appellant Ramapati appealed against his conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II read with Section 34 IPC. The prosecution’s case rested on a single eye‑witness who, during cross‑examination, admitted he was not present at the start of the incident and …

SHIV PAL AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appeal concerned the conviction of seven accused under IPC sections 147, 148, 304 and 149 for the fatal assault of Bankey Lal during a land‑dispute. The prosecution proved that the accused, armed with lathis and a sickle, assaulted the deceased, causing multiple injuries corroborated by medical …

RAKESH CHANDversusSTATE

The appellant Rakesh Chandra was convicted by the Sessions Court for attempting murder under Section 307 IPC after allegedly shooting the victim Harnath during a theft of a pea crop. The prosecution relied on the complainant’s written report, eyewitness testimony of the injured and the complainant, …

JITENDRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Jitendra and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Ram Ashish Pandey, subsequently expressed the intention to withdraw the application. The Court, after noting the withdrawal request, dismissed …

YOGESH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Yogesh and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail. Their counsel, Shubham Yadav, informed the court that he did not wish to press the application and requested its dismissal, while seeking liberty to file a fresh application later. …

AJAY PRAKASH TRIPATHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ajay Prakash Tripathi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, while counsel for the State of U.P. was present. The Court dismissed the application in …

TAHIR ABBASI AND 10 ORSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 8189 of 2019) by Tahir Abbasi and ten others against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application had been pending since 2019, and no counsel appeared for either party, although the Attorney General …

RAM SAHAYversusSTATE OF UP AND 6 OTHERS

The High Court considered an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 9633 of 2019) by Ram Sahay against the State of Uttar Pradesh and six others. The application had been pending since 2019, and no counsel for either party appeared before the court, although the …

SMT. ANISA KHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Smt. Anisa Khan and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 11402 of 2019) before the Allahabad High Court. The application remained pending for several years without any appearance by the petitioners, even after a revised call. The court …

MOHD ALIM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 76 of 2025) that involved offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both parties appeared before the civil court, …

SMT. AMRIKANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Smt. Amrikan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The State of U.P., represented by the Additional …

MOHIT KUMAR VASANEY AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Mohit Kumar Vasaney and four relatives seeking to quash a criminal complaint (No. 577 of 2017) filed by Neha Vashaney under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of …

CHANDAN KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chandan Kumar Mishra, who was not named in the FIR but was implicated through a co-accused's confessional statement in a case under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2). The applicant argued innocence, lack of substantive evidence, and …

NEHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, a wife and her father‑in‑law, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (including a charge‑sheet and cognizance order) filed under Sections 392, 504 and 506 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute. They contended that …

MUNSHI RAM AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings against them and to be allowed to appear through counsel before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Moradabad. The court examined the material and found that the …

SUKHRAM AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants Sukhram, Aushan Singh and Jeet Raj were convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the death of Veerpal Singh. The High Court examined the prosecution’s case, which relied mainly on the testimony of two relatives of the deceased and lacked any forensic linkage …

SATNAM SINGH @ SATTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Satnam Singh @ Satta filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 17‑09‑2024 and the ensuing criminal proceedings (Case No. 3529/2025) for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. The High Court examined the material …

DHANANJAY MISHRA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Dhananjay Mishra and others seeking to quash the criminal proceedings, charge sheet and cognizance in State vs Shashi Prakash and others. The court examined the material and concluded that the facts on …

VANSH PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Vansh Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order, and proceedings in a criminal case arising from FIR allegations under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2) and 352. The applicant argued that the FIR was based on false …

NETRALPAL SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal case (State v. Ashish & Others) and the cognizance order dated 02.02.2026. The court examined the record and observed that the dispute revolves around questions of fact and that no …

ANUP @ ANUP PRASAD AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 09.01.2026 and the cognizance order dated 20.02.2026 in Criminal Case No. 491 of 2026, which arose from offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 333 of the Indian Penal …

AAMIR ASRAR @ AKKU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants challenged the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑02‑2023 issued by the Special Judge under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(2)(va) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging that the FIR was lodged 42 days after the incident, the investigation was …

VISHESH GARG AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Sessions Court judgment dated 11‑12‑2025 and a Chief Judicial Magistrate order dated 06‑05‑2025 relating to offences under Sections 307, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The High Court examined the material …

PEERA PRADHAN @ MATLOOB ALI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Peera Pradhan and another seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 18‑04‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 11‑07‑2024 in a criminal case under Sections 504 and 506 IPC. The court examined the material …

HASIM ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Hasim Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 24‑07‑2022 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 3060 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. The High Court examined …

HRIDAY NARAYAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 16‑01‑2023 in Crime No. 578 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. The High Court examined the material and observed that the dispute …

BHAIRAV PRASAD PATHAKversusSTATE OF U.P.

Bhairav Prasad Pathak was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 286 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC. He had been in custody since 23 July 2024, amounting to more than two years of pre‑trial detention. The applicant contended that he was …

DEVENDRA KUMAR SOLANKI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Devendra Kumar Solanki and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 592/2026) instituted by the State of U.P. arising out of Crime No. 123/2025 under Sections 76, 78, 115(2) and 352 of the IPC. …

DEVENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Devendra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 709 of 2026) filed against him under IPC sections 324(4), 352 and 351(2). The High Court examined the record and observed that the material on file …

AADITYA JAIN @ SUNNY JAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Aaditya Jain, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The application was listed before Hon'ble Justice Sanjay Kumar Pachori. No representative of the applicant appeared even after the revised call, while the learned …

GAYA PRASAD VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaya Prasad Vishwakarma in a case involving offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(4), 340(2) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the CrPC. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and only mentioned in a …

LATA DOHAREversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

The appellant, Lata Dohare, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act challenging the Special Judge's order dated 19.01.2026 that rejected her complaint under Section 226 of the BNSS. The complaint alleged that the respondents forcibly entered her …

SHASHANK @ SHASHANK PURI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 7638/2025, which involved offences under Sections 323, 325 and 506 of the IPC arising from a personal dispute. The parties had entered into a …

NIDHI SAXENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nidhi Saxena, sought a first information report (FIR) against her brother Sushant Saxena for allegedly withdrawing Rs. 38.85 lakh from their deceased father's PPF account and refusing to share the proceeds. She filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code …

SURENDRA PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet and entire proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 420 and 409 IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached a full compromise. Both parties, including the …

MAHENDRA AND OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 4567 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 452, 323, 308, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement outside court, and the compromise …

RAJU YADAV AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, a group of farmers, were implicated in an alleged assault at a sugar mill based on a FIR lodged a day after the incident, despite no injuries, no victim complaint, and no direct evidence linking them to the alleged offences. They filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS …

JAMEEL ANSARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Jameel Ansari and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel was Abdul Saleem Ahamad, while the State was represented by G.A. The petitioners failed to appear even after a revised call. The learned …

ISHWARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ishwar, who was arrested in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 82 of 2025) under Sections 316(5) and 61(2). Ishwar claimed innocence and argued that co‑accused had already been released on bail, invoking parity. The State opposed the …

VIRENDRA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 12‑09‑2025. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. The …

BHAGWANDEEN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Bhagwandeen and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Case No. 19290 of 2025) involving offences under sections 191(2), 333, 115(2), 351(2) and 324(2) of the BNS P.S. …

MS KSRISTY ENTERPRISES AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summoning order dated 20‑12‑2022 and the entire proceedings in case No. 260139 of 2022 (Manoj v. Ksristy & another), which arose from a complaint under Section 379 IPC. The complaint had named …

KRIPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kripal Singh filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 5928 of 2021, alleging false implication and lack of evidence. The State opposed, contending that the issues were factual and that at the stage of taking cognizance only a prima facie case is required. The …

SANJAY SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑12‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 05‑07‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 15665 of 2025 (State vs. Sanjay Sharma and others). The court …

MOHD ASLAM KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Mohd Aslam Khan filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 31‑10‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 09‑01‑2026 in a case registered as Crime No.239 of 2025 under Sections 354A, 354C and 509 of the IPC. The opposite party questioned …

MANOJ PANDEY @ MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summons, cognizance order and chargesheet filed against them in a criminal case under Sections 291 and 352 of the BNSS. They contended that the FIR was false, based on a neighbourhood dispute, and that the …

DEEP NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite the disposal of a criminal case (State vs. Ram Bachan, case No. 5085 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur, under Sections 323 …

SHANI YADAV AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quashing of two criminal cases (ST No.22 of 2023 and ST No.114 of 2022) arising from Crime No.64 of 2022, which involved several non‑compoundable offences under the IPC. Both the applicants and the State admitted that they had …

KISHAN VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Kishan Vishwakarma, was arrested in connection with a violent incident that resulted in the death of a relative of the first informant. The FIR alleged that the applicant and his family assaulted the informant's elder brother and that the applicant caused a head injury to the …

ABHISHEK YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek Yadav, who was arrested in a case involving alleged fraud causing a loss of Rs. four crores and charged under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted no specific allegations against him, and highlighted that …

YASHRAJ VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Yashraj Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 04‑12‑2025, the cognizance order dated 12‑02‑2026 and the entire proceedings of State v Yashraj Verma (Case No. 8859 of 2026). The applicant alleged that the …

YOGESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Yogesh applied for bail in a kidnapping case (Criminal No. 278 of 2026) where a child was recovered after his alleged involvement. The prosecution alleged that Yogesh and a co‑accused were apprehended in a police encounter and that police personnel sustained injuries. Yogesh contended that the …

IKRAMUDDINversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ikramuddin, filed an application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant, Ashwini Kumar Srivastava, informed the court that he no longer wished to pursue the application and requested its withdrawal. The court …

GANGA PRASAD SAHU AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 26‑10‑2018 in Criminal Case No. 5057 of 2018, which was instituted under Section 323 of the IPC. They contended that the magistrate had taken …

AMARJEET SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 28‑06‑2024 in a criminal complaint (Case No. 143827 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 420, 406, 506 and 511 of the IPC. The parties were engaged in a financial …

ROHIT CHAURASIYA AND 4 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Rohit Chaurasiya and four others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Shiv Kumar Singh, expressed the intention to withdraw the application. The State's Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no …

SUDHADEVI SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by 64‑year‑old retired employee Sudhadevi Srivastava, who feared arrest in a case alleging misappropriation of Rs. 29,93,943 along with 12 co‑accused. The alleged amount had been deposited and no actual loss was claimed; the receipt of …

JAWAHAR LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Jawahar Lal filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge-sheet and summoning order in a case under Section 354 IPC. He alleged that the prosecution was malicious and intended to harass him. The High Court examined whether any of the Supreme …

VISHALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Vishal, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking the court's direction to accept a single personal bond and surety for six separate bail cases in which he had already been granted bail. During hearing, it was clarified that the applicant had never actually furnished …

AMAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aman Kumar, who was arrested in a POCSO case alleging rape of a minor girl aged about 14 years. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC, …

ASHWANI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 09-04-2026. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. …

AAS MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aas Mohammad in a rape case under Sections 64(2), 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 5N and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the victim’s statement under Section 183 did not incriminate him, the …

KAVITA KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Kavita Kumari, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The court considered the counsel's request and, finding no objection, …

MUNABBARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Munabbar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Attorney General highlighted that the applicant had nine prior criminal cases, contradicting the applicant's affidavit claiming no similar history. Confronted with this discrepancy, …

YASHAPAL @ YASHAPAL CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Yashapal Chaudhary under CrPC provisions in a case involving alleged offences under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3). The FIR alleged that the accused used a country‑made firearm to shoot at two …

ISHTIYAK AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Ishtiyak Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar Nagar Seva Samiti Act seeking to set aside a Gram Nyayalaya order dated 31‑03‑2026 passed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. He contended that the Family Court had earlier …

RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA @ RAJESH JARRAHAversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajesh Kumar Sharma, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings pending against him. The injury report showed no serious injury and the parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the trial court on 06.01.2025. Both …

KAMLESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Kamlesh Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 1130 of 2025, which involves offences under Sections 323, 504 and 342 IPC. The applicant argued that two …