Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Criminal Procedure Code

17749 judgments · newest first · showing 5401–5600

KRISHNA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the chargesheet dated 21‑12‑2021, the cognizance and summoning order dated 14‑01‑2022, and the non‑bailable warrant dated 14‑11‑2022, along with the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 49 of 2022 …

TANUJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Tanuj, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 29‑09‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 11‑02‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 90 of 2025 (State vs. Tanuj) arising from an FIR under Section …

MOHD MOHSIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohd Mohsin and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 30‑06‑2022 and a cognizance order dated 17‑12‑2022 in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 324, 325, 504, 506 and 308 of the Indian Penal …

GAYATRI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Gayatri Devi filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving offences under Sections 384, 506 and 420 of the IPC. While seeking anticipatory bail, she later requested to withdraw the application and instead move a regular bail application …

ANURAG PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 14 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the City Magistrate of Gorakhpur to decide a criminal case (Case No.17471 of 2024) concerning alleged encroachment under Section 133 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 152 of the B.N.S.S. Act. The magistrate had …

VIABHAV MISHRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Viabhav Mishra and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application. The opposing party's counsel …

RAMDEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ramdevi under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a death case (Crime No. 32 of 2026). The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the allegations against her were false, that she had no direct involvement, and …

ANIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Anil Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 13-07-2001, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24-07-2002, and the non‑bailable warrant dated 08-02-2006 in Criminal Case No. 9247 of 2001 (State vs. Anil …

HARISHARAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC for four individuals accused of offences under IPC sections 420, 468, 471, 120B and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The applicants, who were lekhpals, claimed innocence and argued that there was …

RAMAPATI @ RAJPATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ramapati, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 4267 of 2025 (State vs. Ramchandra) arising from FIR No. 145 of 2024. The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order and the chargesheet …

SHIVAM PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shivam Pal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑05‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 01‑01‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 1957 of 2026. The High Court examined the record …

LAVI TYAGI @ AKASH TYAGI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Lavi Tyagi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 06‑03‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 18‑06‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 297 of 2025 arising from Crime No. 36 of 2025. The High …

MANOJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Manoj, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended …

ABHISHEKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Abhishek, who had previously been released on bail, failed to appear before the Special Judge (POCSO) and a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 07‑02‑2026 was issued against him in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 504, 506 and 304 IPC. He filed an application under …

SACHINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The revisionist, Sachin, filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Session Judge's order refusing to recall witness PW‑2 for further cross‑examination under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He argued that certain points remained unaddressed and that the trial court failed to …

ABID AHMAD ALIAS SHAKILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Abid Ahmad (alias Shakil), who had been in custody since September 2017 for an alleged murder under Section 304 IPC. The applicant argued that the trial had been unduly delayed, with only three of ten prosecution witnesses …

MAHAVIR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a stay of the criminal proceedings and bail, alleging that they had not yet been arrested and that the lower court's order of detention was unwarranted. The High Court examined the allegations, noting that they pertained to …

MD RIZWAN KHAN @ RIZWAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Md Rizwan Khan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the chargesheet dated 28‑09‑2019 and the cognizance order dated 18‑11‑2019 in a case pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur. They alleged that they were …

MAHAVEERversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Mahaveer filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 17874 of 2023) filed by Om Prakash under IPC sections 323, 427, 452 and 506. The applicant alleged that the complaint was fabricated, that there was no …

NITISH KUMAR DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the CrPC for Nitish Kumar Dwivedi, who was charged in a cyber‑crime case involving alleged money laundering and offences under Sections 318(4), 308(2), 61(2) of the IPC and Section 66‑D of the IT Act. The applicant argued that …

NIKKY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Nikky Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. Counsel for the applicant, Abhishek Pratap Singh, appeared before Justice Vivek Kumar Singh. During the …

AMIT AHUJAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Amit Ahuja, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking modification of an interim maintenance order dated 27‑05‑2025, which required him to pay Rs 20,000 per month to two claimants under Section 125 of the CrPC. The applicant argued that the order was …

KARANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan, who was named in an FIR under several IPC offences and CrPC bail provisions. The applicant claimed false implication and lack of any overt act, asserting that the injured's statement identified another co-accused, Rahul, as the assailant. …

SATYAPAL @ SANJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Satyapal (also known as Sanjay), filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking modification of an interim maintenance order dated 20‑03‑2025 issued by the Family Court, Handras, under Section 125(3) of the CrPC. The applicant contended that the order …

DIN DAYAL AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Din Dayal and four others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS and Section 482 of the CrPC seeking a stay of the criminal proceedings (Case No. 1693/2025) pending a mediation process. The court heard the petitioner's and the non‑governmental respondent's arguments and …

DHANVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dhanveer Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of his criminal complaint (No. 21 of 2023) involving alleged offences under Sections 420, 504 and 506 of the IPC, pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Sadabad. The …

NARENDRA NATH GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Narendra Nath Gupta, filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash a non-bailable warrant dated 18‑03‑2023 issued in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The warrant arose from Complaint Case No.19737 of 2021 (Vipin Agarwal v. Narendra Nath Gupta …

YOGENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Yogendra Singh filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act, alleging false implication in the recovery of 10 kg of ganja from a motorcycle. He contended that there was no independent witness, the …

BHAGAWANI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Bhagawani Devi, who was implicated in an FIR alleging a cross‑fight that resulted in injuries under Sections 325 and 307 IPC. The applicant claimed false implication, low flight risk, and …

KARTIK SEHGALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Kartik Sehgal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside an interim maintenance order dated 16‑02‑2026 issued by the Family Court, Meerut, which required him to pay Rs 8,000 per month to the respondent. The applicant argued that the order …

VINEETversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vineet, who was arrested on 22 January 2026 in connection with an extortion case (Crime No. 27 of 2026) under Sections 308(5) and 61(2) BNS. The applicant's only evidence was a confessional statement to police and the statement of a co‑accused; …

CHHATRAPALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a Section 482 CrPC application to quash Special Sessions Trial No.148 of 2019, which involved offences under IPC sections 420, 494, 354‑Gha, 366, 376 and 506, on the ground that the parties had reached a written compromise verified by the trial court. The State and the informant …

GOPAL PODDERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Gopal Podder, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered in 2013 under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 120‑B and 471 relating to alleged misappropriation of funds of Ramela Industries. The FIR alleged that the applicant was running the business and had diverted …

AKASH KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Akash Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the pending POCSO trial (Session Trial No. 456 of 2017) arising from alleged offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged …

HASEEN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Haseen Khan was arrested in connection with a rape case under the IPC and the POCSO Act, alleged to have assaulted the informant after the informant objected to his advances toward the informant's daughter. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed with a twenty‑hour delay, no …

INTEZAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Intezam, sought bail in a 2014 case involving alleged forgery and fraud under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. He claimed the FIR was false, that a stay of his arrest was granted in 2014, and that his relocation to Delhi prevented his appearance, not an intention to abscond. …

ANEESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aneesh, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault and multiple IPC offences. The applicant argued that the allegations were false, the injuries were minor, and that co‑accused Mohammad Ashraf and Bilal had already been …

KULDEEP KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Kuldeep Kumar filed an application under Section 173(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the police to register an FIR against two accused for alleged assault and damage to his motorcycle. The trial court dismissed the application, holding that the facts were solely in the …

CHAKRADHARI YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Chakradhari Yadav filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Upper Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Jaunpur to dispose of a pending criminal case (Misc. Case No. 765 of 2020) expeditiously. The applicant argued that the case had been pending for …

RAJ DHAKRE @ HARI OM SINGH DHAKREversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Raj Dhakre, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application before the …

LAXMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Laxman, named in an FIR filed on 26‑02‑2026 for alleged stone‑pelting and firing in a village clash, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and related provisions, fearing arrest while the investigation continued. The State opposed the bail, arguing …

SMT SAVITA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, sister‑in‑law of the informant, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 18‑May‑2018 issued in a criminal case (Crime No.99 of 2014) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …

ABHISHEK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Abhishek Kumar, who was implicated in a FIR alleging he paid money to secure a government job and was charged with offences under Sections 419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, …

RANJEET KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the BNSS filed by Ranjeet Kumar and others seeking to quash criminal proceedings instituted under IPC sections 363, 366, 376, 120‑B and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicants demonstrated that the alleged victim had married …

ABDULLAH ANSARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 9 February 2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 18 September 2025, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 45720 of 2025 arising from a crime under …

SITARAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Sitaram and another in connection with a criminal complaint arising from a property dispute. The FIR alleged offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B, …

VIKAS BABUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Vikas Babu, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Sessions Trial No. 14 of 2025, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 342, 504, 506, 376D and IT Act section 67. He contended that the FIR was lodged …

MOHAMMAD HASEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohammad Haseen, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside an interim maintenance order dated 06‑04‑2026 passed by the Family Court, Amroha, which required him to pay Rs 4,500 per month to the respondent. He contended that the order was …

SRIMATI PREM KALAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Srimati Prem Kala, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 335/11/2021 pending before the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Sant Kabir Nagar. The applicant argued that the matter had been …

SOGRA KHATOON AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Sogra Khatoon and another, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of a pending family suit (Case No. 199 of 2024) before the Principal Judge, Family Court, District Mau. The trial court had been hearing the matter since 2024 …

SALEEM AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 52800 of 2024) arising from alleged offences under IPC sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 325, 354 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute was matrimonial in nature and the parties …

BACHCHA BHARTEEY @ KARAN KUMAR BHARTIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Bachcha Bharteey @ Karan Kumar Bhartiya, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, alleging that the seizure of 106.15 g of Alprazolam was false …

ROHITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Rohit, accused in a case involving alleged dowry demand leading to the death of his wife, charged under Sections 498A, 304B IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution evidence had been closed and the …

NITESH YADAV @ MANTU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitesh Yadav, who was named in an FIR and chargesheet for alleged abduction and assault under IPC sections 140(1), 115(2) and 351(3). The applicant claimed false implication, pointing out that the victim was not recovered from his possession, the …

SMT GEETA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Geeta Devi, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court in Azamgarh to expedite the pending family dispute case (Case No. 12 of 2024). The trial court had been hearing the matter for an …

DEVENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Devendra Singh, who was charged under Sections 302 and 120B of the IPC for a murder that allegedly occurred on 09.04.2023, with the FIR lodged a year later under Section 156(3) of the CrPC. The applicant claimed innocence, lack of …

TITUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The appellant, Titu, appealed under Section 413 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the acquittal of accused Nos. 2‑4 in a case involving alleged abusive language and an altercation with the victim. The trial court had acquitted these accused, while the deceased accused Vikas @ Ulla was alleged …

DEEPU @ SURAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for Deepu @ Suraj Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (CrPC 108 of 2026) under Sections 105 and 115(2) of the IPC. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR was …

KHALEELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Khaleur, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 209 of 2025) charged under Sections 87, 137(2) and 70(1) BNS of the Criminal Procedure Code. He argued that a co‑accused, Ismail, had already been released on bail, and therefore, on the principle of parity and his clean criminal …

SMT. SAVITAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt. Savita, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a direction to the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Court No.3, Aligarh, to expedite the pending domestic violence case (Case No. 1367 of 2025) filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic …

KHALIL KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under the inherent powers of the High Court to quash a charge‑sheet dated 27‑08‑2012 in a criminal case under Section 420 IPC and the cognizance order dated 01‑12‑2012. Both parties had entered into a compromise, which was verified by the trial court on 7‑June‑2024 …

ISRAWATI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Israwati and two others in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 110, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 117(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants argued that there …

ANU RASTOGI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Anu Rastogi and another, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.1, Ghaziabad, to enforce a maintenance order dated 2 March 2012 and a subsequent order dated 17 October 2024. Only …

SATVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of Complaint Case No. 238 of 2022 (Satveer v. Charan Singh), which was pending under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in the Special Court, Gautambudhnagar. The applicant …

AMIT @ BHURAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Amit (also known as Bhura), was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 227 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 304, 64, 352, 351(3) and 351(4) of the IPC, with the FIR lodged more than a month after the alleged incident. The applicant contended that he was falsely …

MADHAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mathura, in a case under Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant contended that he was already on bail when the NBW was …

SMT MAMTA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt. Mamta Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a criminal complaint (Case No. 302 of 2018) pending before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Prayagraj, involving charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. …

SHEETALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sheetal, accused in a dowry‑death case (Criminal Case No. 508 of 2025) alleging that she and the husband of the deceased had an illicit relationship which led the daughter to commit suicide. The prosecution argued that the accused were principal …

VIMLESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant filed an exemption application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief from producing another copy of Annexure No.3, which the State’s Additional Government Advocate did not oppose. The court found the grounds sufficient and granted the exemption. The applicant …

SMT SAKSHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Smt Sakshi and another, filed an application under Section 529 of the Allahabad High Court seeking expeditious disposal of a pending petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Case No. 122 of 2020) before the Family Court, Mathura. The petition had been pending since …

KARUNASHANKAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionist, Karunashankar Gupta, filed a criminal revision under section 227 of the CrPC challenging the Additional District and Sessions Judge's order rejecting his application for discharge in a case arising from FIR No. 504 of 2020. The FIR, lodged by the victim, alleged physical relations …

GUFRAN @ RIHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Gufran @ Rihan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 169 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 64(2)(J), 87 and 351(3) of the IPC and Section 183 of the CrPC. The counsel argued that the FIR was false, delayed by ten days, and lacked medical corroboration, while the …

PRADEEP ARORAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Pradeep Arora, was implicated in an FIR dated 13‑09‑2021 under Sections 63 and 65 of the Copyright Act, 1957 for allegedly possessing 53 pairs of counterfeit footwear. No arrest was made during the investigation and a charge‑sheet has already been filed. Fearing arrest, the applicant …

PREMA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Prema Devi filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending domestic violence case (Case No. 471 of 2018) filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The case had been pending since 2013 before the …

DEVENDR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Devendr and Naresh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 307, 324, 504 and 506 IPC. The FIR originally implicated a co‑accused, Satyapal, but the injured witness later altered his statement to allege …

SMT. PARUL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Parul Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order dated 04.03.2020 that discharged/acquitted the accused. The High Court noted that the applicant has a statutory remedy to contest the discharge by filing an appeal. No …

SANGEETA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Sangeeta Devi and two others in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 109, 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code arising from a …

RAMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Raman under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with alleged offences under IPC sections 318(4), 111(2), 61(2) and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, …

DEEPIKA RAOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Deepika Rao, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending criminal trial (S.T. No. 439 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 376, 328, 504 and 506 IPC. The trial court had been hearing the case since 2025 with …

SMT ROLI SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Roli Shukla, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of a pending Section 125 maintenance case (Case No. 779 of 2022) before the Family Court, Allahabad. The trial court had earlier been directed, via a Section 482 …

AKEEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Akeel and Mohammad Shakil Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair and impartial investigation of case crime No. 0140 of 2026, arising from an FIR dated 1 April 2026. They argued that the investigation was biased and that …

NARESH SONIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 19-04-2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06-07-2024, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 680 of 2024 (State vs. Naresh Soni). The Court examined the FIR, the …

CHANDRAPAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Chandrapal and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑07‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20‑12‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 25924 of 2025 arising from …

SAVITAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for an accused, Savita, who was charged under Section 108 of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act for allegedly abetting the suicide of her husband. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged six months …

SHAVEJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shavej, was implicated in an NDPS case (sections 8, 21 and 29) based solely on the statement of a co‑accused who was caught with 50 g of cannabis. Shavej, who has a criminal record of 13 cases (mostly robbery) but no prior NDPS offence, contended that he was falsely implicated and …

SUBHAN ALIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Subhan Ali under Section 438 of the CrPC in a case arising from alleged violations of Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, where a supply inspector seized 15 empty gas cylinders from his shop. The …

AJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ajit Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.5, Meerut, to conclude the pending trial of Complaint No. 2984 of 2023 (Ajit Singh v. Usha) under Section 138 of the Negotiable …

SOMLATA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

An application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Somlata and three others seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 02‑06‑2019 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 3394 of 2019) involving offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B and 506. The applicants …

ASHISH KUMAR CHATURVEDI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in Case No. 9466 of 2023, where they were charged under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. They contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. State of …

MAHESH CHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mahesh Chandra, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an interim maintenance order dated 11 May 2023 and a subsequent arrest warrant dated 18 February 2026. The maintenance order, issued under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from …

DHIRENDRA PRATAP CHAURASIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dhirendra Pratap Chaurasiya, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expedited decision in a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Case No. 14462 of 2022) before the Civil Judge (Senior Division‑I), Gorakhpur. …

JAGDISH ALIAS SETHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 filed by Jagdish alias Sethi, who alleged false implication in an FIR dated 17‑08‑2001 involving offences under IPC Sections 147, 324, 353, 504, 224, 225 and 307. The applicant had not been served with any summons, …

SHAKEEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal revision challenging an order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat, dated 25 March 2026, which directed the police to lodge an FIR under Section 173(4) read with Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioners argued that the order was illegal and …

POONAM DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Poonam Devi, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.2 to render a final decision in a pending maintenance proceeding (Case No. 148 of 2023) under Section 125 CrPC. The applicant …

PINTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pintu, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant issued against him in a 2004 case (State vs. Sunil & Another) involving offences under IPC Sections 498 and 376 and Section 3(1) of …

ANISversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Anis, was arrested in connection with the murder of the son of the first informant, although his name was not mentioned in the FIR. The prosecution’s case rests on a statement recorded under Section 180 and the recovery of a 'danda' that bore no bloodstains. The applicant argued that …

KARTIKEY RAOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Kartikey Rao applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.12 of 2026) involving charges under Sections 137(2), 65(1)M, 87 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, 2012. The FIR was lodged about one and a half months after the alleged incident. The victim, who had stayed voluntarily at …

ASIF @ ASIVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Asif @ Asiv in a criminal case (Crime No.10 of 2026) involving alleged sexual assault of a 15‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed false implication, citing contradictory victim statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS, with the …

MANORAMA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Manorama Devi, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No. II, Varanasi, to decide a pending Section 125 CrPC case (Case No. 483 of 2023) within a specific time frame. The trial court …

SHAHNAZ FATIMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shahnaz Fatima, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an order directing the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No. 5, Allahabad, to expedite the pending Section 125 case (Shahnaz Fatima v. Akhtar Husain) which had been delayed for a …

RAMPAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in State v. Rampal (Case No. 635 of 2024) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. They contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) cannot …

CHATRAPALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Chatrapal in a case involving alleged robbery and murder offences (Sections 303(2), 317(2), 3(5) IPC). The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated due to enmity with …

PRASHANT SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Prashant Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summoning order and charge sheet in a criminal case where he was charged under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant argued that, based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club …

RIFAQAT ALI KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rifaqat Ali Khan filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the summons dated 24‑02‑2025 and the entire proceedings of a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed by the State. He contended that the dispute was essentially a monetary …

M/S K.G.N. ENTERPRISESversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, M/s K.G.N. Enterprises, filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the summoning order dated 07‑04‑2021 and the entire criminal proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act arising from Complaint No. 39787/2021. The applicant alleged malicious prosecution, …

RAHUL CHHABRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Rahul Chhabra and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 66500 of 2024) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, alleging that the parties had amicably settled the dispute via a compromise …

AIJAZ AHAMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Aijaz Ahamad, filed a transfer application seeking to move a Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance case (Case No.1188 of 2022) from the Family Court in Aligarh to another district court, alleging threat to his safety. He argued that his participation via video conferencing would serve the …

ANKUR SHUKLA @ ANKUSH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ankur Shukla and others, filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge to pass a reasoned order on a stay application pending in Criminal Revision No. 443 of 2025 and to keep the execution of an order dated 13‑08‑2025, issued under Section 133 …

ASHOK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashok Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate, Second, Bhadohi‑Gyanpur to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 6649 of 2021) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint had been …

RAJENDRA MOHAN AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajendra Mohan Agarwal, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending criminal case (Complaint No. 10995 of 2022) involving allegations under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 and 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant is …

MAJIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Majid, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 02‑08‑2011 issued by the Special Judge (Gangsters Act) in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that he was already on …

RITESH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ritesh Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending Session trial (Case No. 646 of 2025) in which he is charged under Section 307 IPC. He argued that the pending case adversely affected his police …

AJAY SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ajay Srivastava, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 90 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 363, 366 and 368 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that the FIR was lodged five days after the alleged incident, that the victim's statements under Sections 161 and 164 …

MOHAMMAD SADDAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Mohammad Saddam filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS and Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 07‑04‑2026, a subsequent order dismissing his recall application, and the entire criminal proceeding arising from a 2019 case under IPC sections 363, …

RITESH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ritesh Yadav, the applicant, is facing a pending criminal trial (Session Case No. 643 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 392, 411, 414 and 120‑B IPC. He was selected for a post in the Indian Army and later for a clerkship in the Chandigarh High Court, but adverse police verification …

SMT SANTOSH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Santosh Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to conclude a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (case no. 17288 of 2021). The matter had been pending for a long period …

SANTOSH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Santosh Singh filed a criminal revision under Section 319 Cr.P.C. challenging the Additional Sessions Judge’s order that summoned him as an accused in a murder case (Sections 302, 504, 436 IPC). The revisionist argued that the trial court relied on eye‑witness statements claiming a licensed gun was …

ARVIND CHAUDHARY ALIAS KALUAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Arvind Chaudhary (Kalua) filed a criminal revision under Section 203 of the Cr.P.C. challenging a Judicial Magistrate’s order dismissing his complaint. He alleged that the Magistrate ignored material evidence, including his exoneration from an FIR containing serious IPC offences, and that the order …

BAJRANG LAL DUBEY AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Bajrang Lal Dubey and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicants argued that the application had become infructuous. The court considered the submission that the relief sought was …

SACHIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Sachin Kumar appealed to the Allahabad High Court by filing a criminal revision against the Family Court’s order rejecting his application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. His wife had obtained a maintenance decree under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. after the husband failed to appear, leading to …

NAUSHAADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 15‑11‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 29‑01‑2024 in a murder case (Sections 302 and 120‑B IPC) pending before the Additional District and Session Judge, Meerut. The applicant alleged that the …

RAHUL GARG AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Rahul Garg and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 18‑06‑2025 and the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 1026 of 2023 (Venkatesh v. Rahul Garg & Ors.) filed under IPC sections 406, 468 and 471. Both parties, …

ANAS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants sought quashing of criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 674 of 2025) that arose from a matrimonial dispute which had been converted into offences under Sections 87, 351(2), 64(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The parties, including the son‑in‑law of the opposing party, had reached a …

UDAIVIR SINGH BAGHEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Udaivir Singh Baghel and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants expressed a desire to withdraw the application, stating an intention to possibly file a fresh one …

SHAHRUKHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Shahrukh, charged under the POCSO Act for offences alleged in case crime No. 980 of 2024, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and cognizance order. He asserted that he had married the victim on 04‑10‑2024, that they were living together …

RAKESH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Rakesh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The applicant sought dismissal of the application on the ground that it was not pressed. The learned …

SHRI RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Shriram, was alleged in a FIR of 28 June 2021 to have participated in an attempt to outrage a woman's modesty and a shooting incident, but the investigating officer exonerated him and did not include him in the charge-sheet. During trial, the Special Judge summoned Shriram under …

RAJESHWAR PRASAD TIWARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionist challenged the Additional Sessions Judge's order rejecting a discharge application and refusing to omit charge under Section 308 IPC, alleging that the medical report supporting the charge was forged. The High Court examined the medical evidence, noting that the CT scan was performed …

SANJAY SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 12‑01‑2023 in a case that also involved offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and 354A. Both parties submitted …

NITIN SHANKHDHAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashal of criminal proceedings (Case No. 774 of 2019) arising from offences under Sections 377, 376, 504, 323 and 313 IPC. The dispute stemmed from a matrimonial relationship that ended in a mutual divorce and a compromise …

ANWARversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 1 July 2018 and the cognizance order dated 8 January 2019 in Criminal Case No. 103 of 2019 (State vs. Anwar), which involved offences under Sections 354 and 452 of the IPC. The …

MUKESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the proceedings in State v. Mukesh Kumar (Case No. 2978 of 2023) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑III, Ghaziabad. They contended that the cognizance order dated 09‑11‑2023 was …

ASHOK KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners challenged a revisional order dated 22 September 2025 that had set aside a trial court’s dismissal of a Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. application and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The trial court had held the allegations to be civil in nature and directed the complainant to …

TEJPAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants Tejpal and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summons and the entire criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 378 of 2024) arising from Crime No. 175 of 2022, which involved offences under IPC sections 308, 325, 323, 504 and 506. The applicants …

IMRAN ALI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants, Imran Ali and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 02‑09‑2025 issued by the Special Judge, POCSO Act, Bareilly, in a case involving offences under the IPC, POCSO Act, SC/ST Act and the Uttar …

JAGDISH SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionists Jagdish Singh and others filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Gram Court Magistrate dated 5 September 2024, which rejected their application under Section 245(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) on the ground that the evidentiary stage under Section 244 CrPC …

ABRARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abrar, a 19‑year‑old accused in a criminal case (Crime No.212 of 2025) involving alleged sexual offences under the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the relationship with the 16‑year‑old victim was consensual and that the …

SANTOSH KAMALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Santosh Kamal, sought bail in a rape case (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 39639 of 2025) where he is alleged to be the biological father of a child born to the victim, as established by DNA testing. He argued that his co‑accused had already been granted bail and that he had no …

JAVAHARLAL GAUDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Javaharlal Gaud, filed a criminal complaint alleging assault by the respondents, but the trial court dismissed the complaint on the basis that the allegations were exaggerated and no medical injury report was produced. Gaud contended that the police refused to facilitate a medical …

RAJENDRA SINGH ASWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Rajendra Singh Aswal and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. Counsel for the applicants was Hemant Shukla, while the respondent was represented by G.A. The matter was listed …

SONI KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, Soni Kumari, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 44796 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The opposite parties raised a preliminary objection that an appeal under Section 14-A had already been filed against the impugned order. The …

DHARMVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Dharmveer Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the dismissal of his criminal complaint by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, which held that the dispute was essentially a property matter and the allegations against the respondent were false. The complaint …

SHIVAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Shivam and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 26042 of 2022, which stemmed from a FIR alleging offences under Sections 498A, 323, 377, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached a mutual settlement on 14 …

VIPIN ALIAS SHIVAM CHAUHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Vipin Chauhan and another, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to set aside a September 2025 order of the Additional Sessions Judge that had rejected their request, under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to recall and re‑examine three witnesses. The High …

PRADEEP KUMAR NAIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Pradeep Kumar Nai was arrested on 4 January 2024 after a large seizure of 620 kg of ganja, of which 50.8 kg was found in his possession. He filed three bail applications under several IPC offences and Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act, alleging non‑compliance of Section 50 and Section 52A and …

NAEEM AKHTARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash an order dated 11 September 2025 that dismissed his request to recall witness PW‑4 for cross‑examination. The trial court had allowed the examination‑in‑chief of PW‑4 on 25 July 2024, deferred cross‑examination, …

ANJUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Anju was arrested in a murder case (Criminal No. 440 of 2023) under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC for allegedly beating a cyclist with a lathi, leading to his death. The defence argued that the post‑mortem report showed only simple injuries that could not have caused death and suggested the victim …

VIKAS AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summons order dated 14.08.2025 and the entire criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 2958 of 2025, which arose from a matrimonial dispute involving alleged offences under Sections 85 and 115(2) of the BNS and …

SABHAJEETversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The applicant failed to appear before the court even after a revised call on 6 January 2025. The State's brief holder, Shri B.N. Upadhyay, was present, but no representation was made for the …

ABDUL KAREEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Abdul Kareem, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. Both parties failed to appear for the hearing, and even the revised call saw no representation from the applicant, though a brief holder for the State was present. The court noted the …

ABDUL SALMAN KHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners were summoned under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 474 IPC on the allegation that a sale deed dated 23 March 1957, executed in favour of the petitioner's father, was forged. The State alleged that the petitioners were merely tenants who fabricated the deed to claim ownership, and …

ATIF SHAMSHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 1574 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 323, 324, 325, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants and the second opposite party had reached a compromise, which was verified by the trial …

MOHAMMAD SALMAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 1575 of 2024) arising from an alleged offence under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. The applicants and the second opposite party had entered into a compromise, which was verified by the trial …

ABHISHEK PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by 19‑year‑old Abhishek Pal, who was arrested on charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the CrPC, Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act for an alleged sexual offence involving a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended …

Shivanand YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, four Yadav youths, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault and caste-based abuse of an informant on 26 March 2024. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing they have clean antecedents, that …

Munna PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Munna Paswan was originally charged with offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 504 and 506 of the IPC and was released on regular bail. During investigation a charge‑sheet was filed adding the more serious offence of attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC. He filed an anticipatory bail …

Abhijeet Kumar SinghversusThe Union of India

ALLOWED

The petitioner, a director and guarantor of a defaulting company, challenged a Look Out Circular (LOC) and a passport endorsement marking his passport as “cancelled without prejudice” that barred his travel abroad. He argued that the LOC was issued mechanically at the request of Canara Bank without …

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Ray @ Vikash SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appeal concerned two juveniles, aged between 16 and 18, charged with murder under Sections 302, 440 and 34 of the IPC. Their regular bail applications were rejected by the Children Court on the ground that the alleged offence was heinous. The Patna High Court examined the mandatory provisions of …

Rajendra MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajendra Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 102.240 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not …

XXXversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, a 16‑year‑old juvenile, was charged under IPC 302 read with 34 and the Arms Act for the murder of an informant’s son. The Juvenile Justice Board found him mentally competent and ordered trial as an adult in a Children Court, which denied bail citing the prosecution’s inquest and …

Sandeep kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 273.15 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …

Vijay RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Rai was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 680 litres of spirit from a vehicle, charged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, did not own the vehicle, and was implicated solely on secret information, …

Deepak SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Singh, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 760 litres of spirit from a Bolero vehicle. He argued that he was not the vehicle's owner, was not arrested on the spot, and was implicated solely …

RAJU RAY @ RAJU KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Raju Ray, accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 872 litres of liquor from government land, applied for anticipatory bail. He claims he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession, and that the complaint originated …

Mukesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar Singh was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the recovery of 889.56 litres of liquor from two vehicles, including 34.56 litres from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, that he …

Virajan Kumar @ ViranjanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Virajan Kumar, a resident of Muzaffarpur, was implicated in a case under Sections 414 and 34 of the IPC read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 136.8 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He claimed he had a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and was …

Arjun RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arjun Rai applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 600 litres of liquor in a Scorpio vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, did not own the vehicle, …

XXXversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, a 16‑year‑old juvenile, was charged with gang‑rape under Section 376(D) of the IPC and related offences under the POCSO Act. After preliminary assessment he was found physically and mentally mature and was tried as an adult, but his regular bail petition was rejected by the Children …

Madhurendra MadhukarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Madhurendra Madhukar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 2,356.720 litres of liquor from vehicles he owned. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his vehicle was …

Vidhan Rai @ Vidhan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vidhan Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 94 litres of liquor from a public area near the Ganga River. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and …

Md. Ansarul Nadaf @ Ansarul NadafversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Ansarul Nadaf, was implicated in a case under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 585 litres of liquor from four motorcycles and a sack. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time …

Chandan Kumar Jha and OrsversusState Of Bihar and Anr

DISPOSED

The petitioners, four individuals, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 31.07.2018 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Benipur, which had rejected their discharge petition in a criminal case arising from Bahera Police Station. The petition …

Arjun PanditversusState Of Bihar and Anr

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Arjun Pandit, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an interim maintenance order dated 06-07-2018 passed by the Family Court, Vaishali, which required him to pay Rs.4,000 per month to his wife. The petitioner …

Punam Kumari @ Punam and OrsversusState Of Bihar and Anr

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of residents of Begusarai, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 04 July 2017 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal …

KRISHNA MUKHIYAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellants, three Mukhiya brothers, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for rape, grievous hurt and related offences under Sections 376(D), 326, 324, 201/511 read with Section 34 of the IPC, based largely on the victim's testimony, a confessional statement of a co‑accused and …

Bipin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, was implicated in a complaint under Section 498‑A of the IPC alleging that he abducted a 21‑year‑old woman, solemnised a marriage, and later demanded Rs 5,00,000, subsequently ousting her from the matrimonial home. The petitioner contended that the allegations were …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, nine individuals from Gaya district, appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act against a refusal of anticipatory bail in a case alleging caste‑based assault and vandalism on 25‑9‑2024 and 26‑9‑2024. The informant claimed that a large group, including the appellants, attacked …

RAMAWATAR MUKHIYAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellants, Krishna Mukhiya and Ramawatar Mukhiya, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge‑VII‑cum‑Special Judge, POCSO, Madhubani, for rape and related offences under Sections 376(D), 326, 324, 201/511 read with Section 34 of the IPC, receiving a 20‑year rigorous imprisonment term. They …

Aman Kumar @ Aman SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Aman Kumar, was charged under several IPC sections and Section 3(i)(r) of the SC/ST Act in connection with a violent incident alleged to have occurred on 09.08.2021. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Saran. The appellant …

HARENDRA RAI @ HARINDRA RAYversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

The appellants Harendra Rai, Suchindra Rai, Abhishek Kumar and Ajit Kumar appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against a Special Judge's order refusing anticipatory bail in a case alleging caste‑based assault and other offences under the Bihar Negotiable …

Bullu Yadav @ Bullu PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, a group of villagers, were charged under Sections 191(2), 115(2) and 126(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly demolishing a temple wall and assaulting …

Mantu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner Mantu Kumar filed a criminal complaint alleging that the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) forged a valuation report to misclassify his residential land as agricultural, resulting in inadequate compensation. The trial magistrate dismissed the complaint under Section 203 of …

Pukar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners sought pre‑arrest bail in a case (PS 305/2025) involving offences under several IPC sections for alleged assault and robbery. The FIR alleged that the accused assaulted the informant, his family members, and stole a gold chain. The court noted that no specific allegation was made …

Roshan KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Roshan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 69 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, alleged to have engaged in a sexual relationship with the informant on a false promise of marriage and subsequently refusing to marry. The petitioner sought pre‑arrest bail, arguing that both …

CHANDAN DEVI @ CHANDA DEVI @ NUNU DEVI @ NUNUversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Chandan Devi, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and attempted grievous hurt under Section 328 IPC for allegedly poisoning a seven‑year‑old boy with sugar. The prosecution’s case rested on the child’s alleged oral dying declaration and the testimonies of several village …

Deepak Kumar @ Dipak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was charged with kidnapping, alleged forced marriage, and sexual offences under sections 363, 366A, 504, 376, 34 of the IPC and sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that he, along with others, abducted the minor daughter of an informant and forced …

Suryajeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suryajeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Gaurichak PS Case No. 503 of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 34 IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner demanded Rs 5 …

Ravindra RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravindra Ram, was implicated in a case alleging theft of Rs.50,000 and jewellery and the alleged sexual offence under the POCSO Act involving a 17‑year‑old girl. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the girl was his consensual partner and that they had …

VISHAL PREMNARAYAN CHATURVEDIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, Vishal Premnarayan Chaturvedi, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh …

DHARMESHBHAI HASMUKHBHAI MEHTAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, Dharmeshbhai Hasmukhbhai Mehta, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS challenging the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referring to its earlier decision in Shivsinh …

GOPALBHAI JUMROMAL JAMATANIversusUSHA ELECTRICS THRO VISHWANATH KHAGENCHANDADE

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant Gopalbhai Jamatani filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the precedent set in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh …

RAVAL PANKAJKUMAR CHINUBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, originally imposed by a magistrate and affirmed by a Sessions Court. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the …

CHANDRAKANTBHAI R. PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita against a trial court's acquittal. The High Court examined the precedent set in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. …