Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Criminal Procedure Code

17749 judgments · newest first · showing 5601–5800

KARSAN LALJI JIVANIversusCHIRAG ARVINDKUMAR SHAH

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS challenging the trial court's acquittal of the respondents in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. …

JAVEDKHAN JITENDRABHAI VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant filed a criminal revision against a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the appellate court. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the complainant gave consent to compound the offence …

HAKIMSINGH CHURASINGH RAJPUTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, Hakim Singh Churasinh Rajput, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita challenging the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the recent …

SIVAPRASAD KANUKUNTLAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE

Sivaprasad Kanukuntla was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and a non‑bailable warrant was issued for his surrender. He filed a revision application under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking conversion of the non‑bailable warrant …

SUBHASH TEKCHAND DHOBIversusRAJUBHAI KARSHANBHAI VAGHELA

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, originally imposed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate on 23.11.2022 and affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge on 13.04.2026. During the pendency …

SUBHASH TEKCHAND DHOBIversusRAJUBHAI KARSHANBHAI VAGHELA

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the complainant …

LAKHABHAI D. KANARA PROPRIETOR OF INDIA SALES AGENCYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

Lakhabhai D. Kanara, convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act for a cheque bounce, filed multiple criminal revision and miscellaneous applications seeking to set aside the conviction and to compound the offence. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement, with the complainant …

VAKHATSINH AAITABHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

Vakhatsinh Aaitabhai Parmar, the original complainant, filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the Principal Sessions Judge’s order dated 23‑11‑2015 that dismissed his application for further investigation under Section 173(8). The …

HARENDRABHAI BHOGILAL SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, challenged the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The High Court examined whether a complainant who is also a victim may file an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 BNSS or must use the …

SOLANKI NARESHBHAI MADHABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, challenged the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 of the BNSS. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State …

JIGAR JITENDRA SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, held …

AMIT PRAKASH MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Amit Prakash Mishra filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The matter was listed on 21 April 2026, where the court noted that no one appeared on behalf of the applicant and only the State's counsel was present. The court vacated any …

HANEEF AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The case arose from a night-time assault and shooting on 10‑11 June 1977 in Azamgarh, for which seven accused were convicted under IPC sections 147, 307/149 and 323/149 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. During the pendency of the appeal, six of the accused died, leaving only appellant Sarda …

AKHTAR ALI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 478 of 2021) filed against them under IPC sections 406, 323 and 506. They alleged that the case was false, motivated by malafides and that proceeding would …

SUBHAM SHARMA38versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Subham Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The matter was listed for hearing on 21 April 2026, but the applicant failed to appear. On the revised list, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. Consequently, the High Court …

RAMESH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants were convicted in 1986 for offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 324/149 and 436/149 and sentenced to up to three years' rigorous imprisonment. They appealed, not on the merits, but seeking the benefit of probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, with the State's …

VEDRAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants Vedram and two others appealed to quash the summoning order dated 4 October 2023 in Complaint Case No.02 of 2022 (Kumari Sarina Vs. Vedram & Others), alleging that the complaint under IPC sections 452, 354, 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was fabricated. The …

SANJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sanjay Kumar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction. No opposition was filed against the application, and the respondent side was represented only by a government lawyer. The Court noted the absence of any …

DURGAversusIV A.S.J. BANDA AND OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioner, Durga, was ordered by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate to remove an alleged encroachment on a public way under Section 133 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Durga challenged this order through a criminal revision, which was dismissed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge. She then filed a …

RAJPAL SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 31‑12‑2014 and the related proceedings in a case under Section 308 IPC, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled by compromise. The trial court had verified the …

VISHAL VERMA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 100076 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 342, 354, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

MUKESH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants sought to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3005 of 2022) filed under several IPC offences arising from a land‑related dispute, invoking Section 528 of the CrPC. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that no offence was made out against them. The State opposed, contending …

RAJPAL SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and related proceedings arising from offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 504 and 506 of the IPC. During hearing, the applicants’ counsel withdrew all prayers except to surrender before the …

AMAN FAUJI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal case, charge sheet dated 20.08.2022 and summons order dated 13.02.2024 in State vs. Aman Fauji and others, alleging false implication. The State opposed, contending that the FIR, …

MONU PALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC for Monu Pal, who was arrested in connection with a case under IPC Sections 305, 331(4) and 317(2). The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the alleged recovery of weapons and money lacked independent …

TRINETRA FILLING STATION AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Trinetra Filling Station and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the applicant or the opposite party to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want …

SATYAM SHANKHVAR AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHER

Satyam Shankhvar and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The application was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Deepak Verma. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, while the learned Additional …

BEER BAHADUR PASWAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a prior order. The court had earlier referred the matter to mediation on the condition that the petitioners deposit Rs.55,000 before the mediation centre. The petitioners failed to make the …

SMT. GUDDI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Guddi Devi alleged that a toilet constructed by respondents encroached upon a five‑foot public passage in front of her house, reducing the width to two feet. The Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) initially held that no encroachment existed, but the Additional Sessions Judge, in Criminal …

RAJ KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant sought quashing of the Special Judge's cognizance and summoning order in Complaint Case No.57 of 2025, alleging that the order was passed without granting the accused an opportunity of hearing as mandated by Section 223(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and violated …

HANSRAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a criminal matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The Court also vacated any …

SANTOSH KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Santosh Kumar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The learned counsel for the applicants argued that the passage of time had rendered the …

MOHD HASHIMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohd Hashim, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a criminal case (Crime No.209/2025) alleging false accusations under IPC Sections 87, 137(2) and 70(1). He claimed innocence, highlighted contradictory statements of the victim’s sister, and pointed to bail …

ABDUL AZIZversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a recovery warrant issued under Section 128 by the Family Court, which was based on a maintenance order of Rs.3,500 per month granted to his wife and two minor children under Section 125. The applicant …

SANJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash an ex‑parte maintenance order dated 20‑10‑2014 and a subsequent order dated 06‑11‑2023 that rejected his request to recall the ex‑parte order. He alleged that he was falsely implicated and that his legally wedded wife, the …

RAKESH GUPTA AND 4 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 Others

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, and only the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court observed that the application was not prosecuted and …

MIRZA SALEEM BEG AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Mirza Saleem Beg and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel or parties appeared before the court to argue the application. Consequently, the court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the application. The …

RAHUL YADAV AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and all proceedings in Criminal Case No. 659 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was …

MUNNA PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad heard an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Munna Pandey and others. No counsel or parties appeared to prosecute the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been …

RAVI ALIAS RAVINDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ravi alias Ravindra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued on 18‑Oct‑2024 in a trial for offences under Sections 307 and 504 IPC. The High Court examined the procedural …

ABID HUSSSAIN AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in the High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order previously …

RITESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Ritesh Kumar Srivastav challenged a summoning order dated 5 June 2025 issued by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Varanasi, which had proceeded against him under Sections 504 and 506 IPC and Sections 3(1)(da) and 3(1)(dha) of the SC/ST Act. The complaint alleged caste‑based abuse linked …

GOPAL PRASAD GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash charge‑sheet No. 1019 of 2018 in State v. Gopal Prasad Goswami and others, which alleged offences under various IPC and IT Act provisions. The High Court examined the material and held that, at the …

RAJESH MISHRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

On 21 April 2026 the Allahabad High Court listed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Rajesh Mishra and two others against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The court issued an interim order and directed the matter to be listed in ordinary course. When the case was …

MOHAMMAD NAZIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Mohammad Nazim, who was implicated in a case under the Cow Slaughter and Prevention Act, 1955 (sections 3, 5Ka, 5Kha, 8) and IPC sections 427 and 307. The FIR dated …

RIYAJUDDIN ALIAS RAJUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Riyajuddin Alias Raju, filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order dated 24 April 2023 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Deoria, in a Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance proceeding. The impugned order had unilaterally accepted …

SHAFIQ ALAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 341, 354, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was verified by the …

JITENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but no counsel appeared to prosecute the application. The court noted the absence of any party to press the matter and consequently dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order …

JAFRUDDIN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a criminal matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order …

HARISHCHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant sought to quash the order dated 01‑07‑2025 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh, which had rejected his earlier application under Section 319 CrPC to summon a third accused, Harikesh, who had not been charge‑sheeted. The matter arose from an NCR filed in 2009 involving offences …

ANJU TIWARI (CORPUS) AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that Anju Tiwari, a friend of petitioner Jitendra Rai, was being held in illegal custody by Ajay Tiwari, a respondent. Respondent Ajay Tiwari countered that Anju Tiwari is his legally wedded wife and resides with him voluntarily, supporting …

AMAR CHANDANIversusSTATE OF U.P AND ANOTHER

The applicant Amar Chandani and co‑applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (case No. 347/2021) instituted under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 377 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. They asserted that a …

HEERA LAL CHANDRA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Heera Lal Chandra and four co‑applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The court was asked to entertain the application and pass appropriate orders. The primary …

UDAY BHAN DIXIT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under the inherent powers of the High Court to quash Criminal Case No. 17162 of 2007, which involved charges under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably reconciled, executed a verified compromise deed, and the trial court had confirmed the …

AMIT KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 19279 of 2024) that involved offences under the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, arising from a matrimonial dispute. The parties had earlier settled the dispute through mediation at the …

AJAY CHAHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, Ajay Chahar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a recovery warrant issued by the Family Court, Mathura, under Section 144(3) BNSS for non‑payment of maintenance ordered in a Section 125 Cr.P.C. case. He contended that the maintenance amount of …

RAJVEER AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of Session Trial No. 88 of 2023, which involved offences under IPC sections 323, 324, 504, 506, 308 and 325. Earlier, the High Court had directed the parties to obtain a court‑verified compromise, which they did, and the …

BACHCHU SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, including Bachchu Singh, challenged the denial of their promotion to Head Constable on the ground that their promotion files were kept in sealed cover due to pending criminal proceedings for cheating and forgery. They relied on a prior order (Writ A No.15474 of 2024) and the …

VIJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vijay Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a stay of the order dated 02.07.2025 of the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act concerning a dishonoured cheque. The applicant contended …

JAI KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jai Kumar, who was charged with gang‑rape, video‑recording of the act, and offences under the IPC, POCSO Act and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused and a co‑accused raped the victim, recorded the act …

ANKIT @ SHASHIKANT TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ankit @ Shashikant Tiwari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case where he was alleged to have opened fire on an informant, though no injury was reported. The applicant argued that the allegation was false, the investigation was pending, and his …

KISHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Kishan Singh, who was accused of offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 351(3) of the IPC. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, that the alleged …

CHANDAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Chandan Singh, who was implicated in a case (Crime No. 931 of 2018) involving alleged offences under Sections 409, 417, 120‑B IPC and 66‑C of the IT Act, arising from a complaint under the …

SMT SHAYDA HASHMI AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, led by Smt. Shayda Hashmi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to stay the execution of a decree and the continuation of criminal proceedings in case No. 9641/2021, which involved charges under Sections 406, 504, …

SADANANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Sadanand filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking modification of an interim maintenance order dated 07‑01‑2026, which required him to pay Rs.800 per month to the respondent (Defendant No. 2). He contended that the order was unjust because his …

SUSHIL KUMAR KATIYARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sushil Kumar Katiyar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No.11258/2025, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 324 and 506, and also sought bail. The High Court examined the material and held that the allegations disclose …

HARENDRA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Harendra Sharma filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 17‑07‑2025 and a Family Court order dated 31‑05‑2025 that directed him to pay maintenance arrears to his estranged wife and her minor son. He contended that the …

SANJAY BOBBY DESHWALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sanjay Bobby Deshwal under Section 482 of the CrPC in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 19 of 2024). The FIR alleged that the applicant, a landlord, was linked to a fraudulent transaction involving Rs. 57,89,776 transferred to …

VIVEK ALIAS KAMAL SINGH SHYORANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionist, Vivek alias Kamal Singh Shyoran, challenged the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate refusing his discharge in a case arising from an FIR lodged by Block Pramukh Santosh Devi, alleging blackmail and threats. He contended that the FIR was false, that the informant’s …

RAHUL SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rahul Singh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order and the charge‑sheet in State v. Jyoti Yadav (Case No. 6164 of 2025) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant …

VIJAY AND 2 ORSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 23372 of 2018) filed under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506. They asserted that the parties had amicably settled the dispute by a compromise dated 2 …

SAKET GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Saket Gupta, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a stay of the criminal proceedings (Criminal Revision No. 5294/2021 and Criminal Re‑examination No. 270/2024) pending a possible settlement between the parties. The …

SAHIL VERMA @ MOHIT VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil Verma (also known as Mohit Verma) in a criminal case (Crime No.210 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the …

SARIFUNNISHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a stay of the criminal proceedings and bail, challenging a cognizance order and a non‑bailable warrant dated 29‑05‑2018 and a non‑bailable warrant dated 13‑02‑2026. The court examined the allegations, noting …

ABHISHEK SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Abhishek Sharma, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of a pending criminal case (Case No. 87503 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 323, 406 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic Violence Protection …

HIMANSHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Himanshu, who claimed false implication in an FIR alleging assault with lathi‑danda and iron rod. The applicant, who has three prior criminal cases (two pending, one resulting in conviction), sought …

DILSHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilshad in a case under Sections 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and 87 of the B.N.S., alleging abduction of a 15‑year‑old girl. The applicant’s counsel argued that the victim, a major, had been mischaracterised as a minor and that her …

SUNEELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Suneel filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside an order dated 23‑02‑2024 of the Special Judge (Essential Commodities Act) that allowed Criminal Revision No. 252/2022 (Shaukeen v. Suneel & others), and also to set aside an order dated 21‑10‑2022 of the Sub‑Divisional …

AKSHAT SINGHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akshat Singlar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑framing order dated 24‑02‑2024 and the summoning order dated 17‑01‑2024 in a Session Trial under Section 307 IPC. The applicant argued that a discharge application he had …

CHANDRAKESHAV PRASAD MISHRAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Chandrakeshav Prasad Mishra filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) Mirzapur to expedite the pending complaint case No. 659/2023 filed under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner argued that the complaint, filed …

MOINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Moin, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 1877 of 2019) initiated by the State against Dinesh and others under Sections 419, 420, 406 and 411 IPC. The sole ground was that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …

TILAKRAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionists, Tilakram and two others, filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 11 March 2026, which dismissed their application for discharge in a case involving alleged fraud under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. They contended that the …

SUNDARAM PANDEY AND 19 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Sundaram Pandey and 19 others, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 30‑09‑2023 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 09‑11‑2023 in State v. Sundaram Pandey (Case No. 1875 of 2023) which involved offences under several IPC …

SANJAY JAISWAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Sanjay Jaiswal and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 1‑3‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 3‑11‑2025, and the entire proceedings of State v. Sanjay Jaiswal (Case No. 1054 of 2025) …

MOHAN LAL AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 7‑8‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20‑2‑2026, and the entire proceedings of State v. Mohan Lal and others (Case No. 864 of 2026). The court examined the FIR, …

SITAMBAR @ DEENDAYAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the quashing of a summoning order dated 09.03.2026 and the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 1627 of 2024 (Raghav v. Sitampbar @ Deendayal). The High Court examined the complaint and found that the …

BIRBAL RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Birbal Ram filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 7 July 2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 21 October 2023, and a non‑bailable warrant dated 26 February 2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ballia, as well …

ASHISH KESARWANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashish Kesarwani, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non-bailable warrant (NBW) issued on 9 October 2025 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mirzapur, in a case under Section 379 IPC. The High Court examined the record and found no …

SHIVKUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shivkumar filed a criminal revision under Section 226 of the CrPC challenging the order of a Judicial Magistrate who had dismissed his complaint alleging abuse and threats by parties 2 and 3. The complaint stemmed from a civil dispute over a conditional sale deed and repayment of money, where the …

SMT. MONIKAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Monika, filed a criminal revision petition challenging an order dated 05.09.2022 of the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Varanasi, which had granted her maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code and directed the opposite party to pay Rs. 15,000 per month. …

SHAILESH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shailesh Kumar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the proceedings of case no. 29226 of 2023, which involved charges under Sections 420, 406 and 120B IPC. The applicant argued that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) cannot be invoked …

SMT RAJBALA @ RAJMALA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Smt Rajbala and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 27‑08‑2021 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahar, in a criminal case (State v. Dinesh Kumar). They explained that …

ANIL GAUR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Anil Gaur and two others who were named in an FIR for a stone‑pelting clash in Hathras. The applicants disclosed modest criminal histories but asserted they had no role in the incident and were …

SUMIT KUMAR PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 12‑11‑2019 and the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 40 of 2019, as well as a later order dated 11‑11‑2025 passed in Criminal Revision No. 12 of 2020. The court examined the record and …

VIGUL AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 10‑04‑2021 and the cognizance order dated 01‑07‑2022 in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 and 325 IPC. They alleged false implication, …

MOHD AMAN @ CHANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 5 January 2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 23 July 2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 790 of 2025 arising from offences under Sections 147, 283, 341, …

RAFUDDEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rafuddeen filed an application under the High Court's inherent jurisdiction seeking to quash the order dated 25‑02‑2026 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge (Special Judge, POCSO) which had rejected his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application for further cross‑examination of prosecution witnesses …

SHANI KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shani Kumar Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge‑sheet dated 25‑08‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 06‑02‑2026 in a criminal case (Case No. 31 of 2026) arising from FIR under Sections 106(1) and 281 of the …

ANSAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 181 of 2024) arising from matrimonial disputes involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 354 IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. …

RAJA BHAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of Criminal Case No. 9518 of 2022, which involved offences under Sections 147, 325, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and had been pending before the Judicial Magistrate‑I, …

SUJEET VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The appellant challenged the acquittal of the husband and in‑laws of Sanju Verma in a dowry‑death case. The prosecution alleged that the accused harassed the deceased for dowry and caused her death by poisoning, invoking Sections 302/34, 304B, 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

RAJESH SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Rajesh Sharma and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 4‑8‑2025 and the charge‑sheet dated 18‑5‑2025 in State v. Rajesh Sharma (case 24124/2025). They contended that the charge‑sheet …

CHHOTELAL GAUTAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Chhotelal Gautam, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and the order rejecting his discharge application in a case pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420 and 406 IPC. The applicant …

RADHEY SHYAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Radhey Shyam Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in a narcotics case (NDPS Act, §§8,21) where he was already on bail. He contended that the NBW was issued without first …

VIRI SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners (Viri Singh and others) filed a criminal revision challenging the Special Judge’s order dated 09‑02‑2026 that dismissed their application for discharge and framed charges under IPC sections 147, 323, 354, 504 and POCSO Act sections 7 and 8. They contended that the victim’s statements …

CHANDRA CHURN PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Chandra Churn Pandey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a non‑bailable warrant issued in Criminal Case No. 1650 of 2003, relating to offences under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court examined the …

SABIR HUSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sabir Husain, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a complaint case involving alleged offences under Sections 323, 506 and 406 of the IPC. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and …

ALIYAR RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Aliyar Ram, a former Assistant Development Officer, who was alleged to have been involved in the illegal sale of food‑grains under the fair‑price shop system. The offences alleged against him included sections 409, 420, …

SHESH NARAYAN TIWARI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Shesh Narayan Tiwari and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 04‑02‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 30‑07‑2024, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 223 of 2024) relating to …

DEEPAKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 05‑07‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 07‑08‑2023 in Criminal Case No. 19149/2023, which alleged offences under Sections 380, 447, 448, 504 and 506 IPC. The sole ground raised was that the …

SHILA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Shila Devi and two minor children, sought an expeditious disposal of a pending maintenance enforcement case (Misc. Case No. 63 of 2025) before the Family Court, Chandauli, under Section 147 of the B.N.S.S. Act. The maintenance order, originally passed under Section 125 of the …

SHIVAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivam Yadav, accused in a dowry‑related death case (Crime No. 0125 of 2025) under Sections 80(2), 85 B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant contended that his wife died by suicide, supported by an autopsy …

SANJAY YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants, Sanjay Yadav and Yadraam Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act concerning alleged adulteration of biodiesel. They claimed false implication by the …

LALLAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Lallan Kumar, who was arrested in a complaint case involving IPC sections 323, 498-A, 377, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely …

SMT ARTI ANANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Arti Anand, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to dispose of a pending complaint under Section 125 Cr.P.C. (case No. 139 of 2024) concerning maintenance. The trial court had not concluded the matter for more …

ANKUR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Ankur Shukla, accused in Crime No.151 of 2025 for the death of his wife. The applicant contended that the death was a suicide, citing a post‑mortem report showing hanging, an intact hyoid bone, and the hostile, non‑supportive testimony of …

MAUSEEM ALIAS MOHSINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mauseem alias Mohsin, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC after a summons dated 26.05.2022 in a case alleging offences under Sections 302 and 506 IPC. He claimed innocence, asserted that the allegations were false and that he had been exonerated during …

AFSAR AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 31‑03‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 23‑05‑2024 in Case No. 21861, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 323, 506, 452 and 448 IPC. Their sole contention was that the charge‑sheet under …

JADAWATI VISHVAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jadawati Vishvakarma, who was alleged to have participated in the assault leading to the death of an informant’s wife. The FIR named her among six accused, but the post‑mortem report indicated injuries that were old and the cause of death was …

SUMAN MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant Suman Mishra filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to decide a criminal case (State Vs. Dilip Kumar Mishra) pending since 2011, involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 406, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC and Sections …

NOOR MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Noor Mohammad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail. The counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the application, relying on the precedent set in Dinesh Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another (2017 AIR All 29). The High Court …

KANCHAN BHARTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Kanchan Bharti filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending criminal complaint (Case No. 2432 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 323, 504, 506 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The matter was before …

MAHESHWAR PRATAP SHAHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 08.02.2023 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) under Section 145(1) CrPC, which directed both parties to maintain status quo over a disputed property. The applicant argued …

MOHD. SHIFAT @ SIFATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside an order dated 25-02-2026 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Banda, in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 409/XI/2023, and to stay the recovery proceedings in that case. The petition also sought liberty to file a …

DIVYANSH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 10‑02‑2026 that directed the consolidation of two separate offences arising from different case‑crime numbers for joint trial. The applicant argued that the offences were distinct and could not be tried …

DHARMENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of Criminal Case No. 9444 of 2021 (State of U.P. v. Harendra) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ghaziabad. The case, involving offences under Sections 323, …

ANKIT DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ankit Dubey under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging fraud in medical college admissions. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, and was …

AMILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash a summoning order dated 08‑07‑2019 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal, in a case under Sections 4, 5, 6 and 23 of the PC‑PNDT Act, 1994. The applicant alleged that the complaint’s allegations were false, baseless and …

ATIULLAH KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Atiullah Khan, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Case No. 5311 of 2024) before the Judicial Magistrate, Farendra, District Maharajganj. The …

NOOR JAHAANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Noor Jahaan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a Sessions Court order that rejected his Section 311 CrPC application to recall a material witness, Dr. Nitin Sharma, who performed the post‑mortem in a 498A, 304‑B and Dowry Prohibition Act case. The …

AMARPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Amarpal Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summons issued in a cheque‑bounce case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Siddhu Enterprises. The applicant argued that the dispute was essentially a money …

TARIFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The accused filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster Act. During the hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application …

MUSKAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an order for the speedy disposal of a pending maintenance case (Case No. 1090 of 2024) filed under Section 125 Cr.P.C. before the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No. 2, Kanpur Nagar. The trial court …

KM UPMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The applicant, Km Upma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order. The opposing party's counsel raised a preliminary objection, contending that the applicant had an alternative remedy of filing a revision and that the application was not maintainable. …

GULAM SABERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Gulam Saber under Section 482 CrPC in connection with a case under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated based on statements of co‑accused who had been arrested with …

BHOLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Bhola filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash a Judicial Magistrate's order that rejected his request for an expert opinion on a Rs.5 lakh cheque alleged to be fabricated. The Magistrate had dismissed the request on the ground that the applicant's evidence under …

YUNUS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Yunus and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashment of a non‑bailable warrant dated 21‑04‑2025 issued by the Additional Sessions Judge‑II, Jaunpur, in a case arising from offences under various IPC sections. The applicants …

DINESH KUMAR MITTALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Dinesh Kumar Mittal, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an order for the expeditious disposal of a pending Session trial (Case No. 645 of 2025) involving charges under Sections 302 and 120‑B IPC. The trial had been pending for a long period …

JITENDRA SINGH @ JITENDRA KUMAR BAGHELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jitendra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for the applicant, Ms. Swati Singh, informed the court that she no longer wished to pursue the application and requested …

CHINTU @ BRAJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Chintu @ Brajesh Kumar, who was charged under IPC sections 87, 61(2), 137(2), 64(1) and POCSO Act sections 5(j)(2) and 6 for allegedly enticing the informant’s 17‑year‑old niece, resulting in pregnancy. The applicant argued that he was …

DEVESH @ MONUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Devesh @ Monu, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in BNSS No. 4280 of 2026 against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The victim's statement was recorded under Section 183, after which the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the bail …

VIMLA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vimla Devi filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 16‑12‑2024 in State vs. Vimla Devi, wherein she was charged under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …

ANMOL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of the chargesheet dated 10‑02‑2026, the cognizance order dated 27‑02‑2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 358 of 2026 arising from FIR charges under IPC sections 126(2), 131, 118(1), …

SMT NIL KAMALversusASHOK KUMAR

The petitioner, a wife, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Firozabad, to decide a pending application under Section 125(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Misc. Case No. 1765 of 2023). The application had been pending since 2023, and …

REENA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Reena Devi filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge-sheet and summoning order in a case under various sections of the B.N.S. and the SC/ST Act. During hearing, counsel for the applicant withdrew the request to …

AMAAN HUSSAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Amaan Hussain, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the applicant’s counsel sought to withdraw the application. The court considered whether a pending anticipatory bail application could …

MAHENDRA KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Mahendra Kumar Gupta was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 18 of 2026) where the deceased was allegedly struck with a wheel spanner by co‑accused Ravi Kiran Nishad. The applicant contended that he merely brought his son to the Primary Health Centre and that no incriminating …

DEEPUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Deepu filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order, a non‑bailable warrant dated 20‑01‑2026, and criminal proceedings under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. and a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. During the hearing, …

SACHIN @ BHANU PRATAPversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sachin @ Bhanu Pratap, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.130 of 2026) alleging that he had entered a consensual relationship with a 24‑year‑old woman under a false promise of marriage and later refused to marry her. The prosecution alleged deception, while the defence argued …

RAMNAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of Criminal Miscellaneous Appeal No. 41 of 2025, which had remained pending since 2024. The appeal involved offences under Sections 34, 302, 307, 504, 506, 201 and 120B of the IPC …

SHYAMPALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shyampal, filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 19‑03‑2025 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasganj, in a criminal case (Cr. No. 252 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 363 and 376 IPC. The applicant contended …

BHUAL GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhual Gupta in a murder case (Crime No. 36 of 2026) where the applicant was not named in the FIR and was allegedly implicated only on the basis of three witness statements that he was seen leaving the scene. The applicant argued that there was no …

GAURAV SAXENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Gaurav Saxena, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to decide a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (Complaint No. 4773 of 2021) within a stipulated period. The trial court in Aligarh had not yet …

PAWAN KUMAR GAUTAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Pawan Kumar Gautam filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court’s direction to expedite two pending applications dated 04.01.2025 and 25.08.2025 in Sessions Trial No. 714 of 2024 (State v. Hamid Ali & Another), which involve offences under IPC sections …

RAMCHANDRA RAI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ramchandra Rai and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summons order dated 07‑01‑2019 and a subsequent order dated 30‑03‑2026 in State v. Ramchandar case, which arose from an FIR under IPC sections …

ANCHAL VISHWAKRMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Anchal Vishwakrma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 17‑04‑2026 registered under several IPC provisions and sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The State argued that the FIR was prima facie established based on statements …

RAMLAL SINGH KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ramlal Singh Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of a pending criminal case (Criminal Case No. 43179 of 2023) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was pending before the Judicial …

NEERAJ KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Neeraj Kumar Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 29‑07‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 10‑06‑2025 in State v. Vijay Kumar Maurya (Case No. 2125 of 2025). The chargesheet alleged offences under Sections 419, …

RAM CHANDAR MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ram Chandar Maurya, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 18‑03‑2026 issued in Criminal Case No.6568 of 2007 (State vs. Radhey Shyam) involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The …

SHRI NATH GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Shri Nath Gupta sought a direction under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code to register an FIR alleging that the respondents had forged signatures on a compromise deed filed in a civil suit. The Special Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissed the application, holding that the …

YOGENDRA SINGH ALIAS HANDRE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the CrPC and Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a Special Session Trial (No. 55 of 2023) arising from a complaint under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and the SC/ST Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably …

FARUKH ALIAS NARGIS KINNARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a transgender individual, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside orders of the Sessions Judge and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate that dismissed his application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, alleging extortion over a demanded 'badhai' …

RAJENDRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Rajendra and Aslam filed an application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. and Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 96 of 2024 (Ram Prasad v. Rajendra) filed under Sections 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(VA) of the SC/ST Act. The application also …

ANIL KUMAR BARANWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a summoning order dated 07.03.2025 in a complaint case arising from an FIR lodged on 07.07.2022 under IPC sections 323, 427, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act section 3(1)(da). They alleged that the prosecution case was …

AMIT KUMAR PASWANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, Amit Kumar Paswan, was charged in a Session Trial for offences under Section 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. He married the victim on 17 June 2025, and the victim’s statements under Sections 161 and 164 CrPC indicated no allegation against him and expressed love for …

LAKHAMI SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Lakhami Singh and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 58212 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 325 IPC. While initially seeking quash, the applicants later …

SUNDARAM GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The husband (revisionist) appealed a Family Court order that granted his wife maintenance of Rs 10,000 per month under Section 125 of the CrPC, directing payment from February 2020. He argued that the wife was capable of earning, that the marriage involved dowry disputes, and that she was mentally …

NITIN KUMAR DIVYANTversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitin Kumar Divyant, who is charged under IPC sections 409, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B for allegedly withdrawing post‑retirement benefits of a State Bank of India employee via an ATM card. The applicant contended that he was never named in the FIR, …

NEERAJ DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Neeraj Devi, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside the dismissal of her complaint alleging dowry harassment, domestic violence, and related offences by the Judicial Magistrate and the Additional Sessions Judge. She claimed that her husband and in‑laws had demanded …

MOHIT SAINI ALIAS ANUBHAV KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohit Saini, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323, 324 and 504 IPC. He later indicated that he was not pressing any substantive relief and only …

SMT. SHUBHAVATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shubhavati Devi filed a petition under Article 227 challenging an attachment order passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate under Section 146(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The order was based on an application under Section 145 CrPC alleging illegal possession of agricultural land, but the …

RAMESH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quash of Criminal Case No. 196 of 2016 (State v. Ramesh & Ors.) relating to offences under Sections 420, 406, 467 and 468 IPC. The High Court had earlier referred the matter to its Mediation and …

JITENDRA KUSHWAHAversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jitendra Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 7 February 2024 issued by the Civil Judge (Offence Against Women) in a criminal case involving allegations under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3 …

RAVINDRA PAL ALIAS RAVINDRA PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ravindra Pal Singh in a 2013 case involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant pleaded innocence, contended that the allegations were fabricated, and highlighted that the co‑accused had …

IKRAAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 458 of 2025) arising from offences under sections 70(1), 127(2) and 351(3) of the BNSS, on the ground that a verified compromise had been reached with the victim. The trial court had …

SAURABH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Saurabh Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order dated 30 September 2024 and 19 December 2024 respectively, which alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. …

MOHD SAMEERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohd Sameer, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Allahabad High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the absence of representation and considered the application …

VIJAY SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 8 February 2023 and the related criminal proceedings (Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act) pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Mainpuri. The …

JAHID AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Jahid and eight others, were charged in Criminal Case No.25855 of 2022 for offences including rioting, assault and criminal intimidation. They filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quash of the charge sheet dated 28‑08‑2022 and the …

ABHAY MISHRA AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 36208 of 2024) arising from a dowry-related complaint under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Court’s …

MUKESH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summons order dated 04‑12‑2024 and the charge‑sheet dated 19‑10‑2024 in a POCSO case (Sections 363, 366, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 POCSO Act). They claimed they were …

RAJNISH SINGH @ SAHIL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rajnish Singh @ Sahil Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 277/2025) under IPC sections 109(1), 303(2), 317(2) and 317(4). He contended that he was falsely implicated and argued that co‑accused who faced the same charges had already been granted bail, invoking the …

DINESH ALIAS VINOD KUMAR AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 427 of 2022) filed under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Court’s Mediation Centre, where the parties amicably settled the dispute …

MANISHA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Manisha Singh filed a complaint under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code against Surya Prakash and others. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Ballia dismissed the complaint under Section 203, finding no prima facie case. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed a criminal revision before …

BHULLAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Bhullan Singh, the accused, filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the order dated 13-10-2025 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahr, which dismissed his discharge application under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petition sought to overturn the …

NAGEENA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Nageena Yadav filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the dismissal of her criminal complaint by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner failed to appear at the last two hearings, and no counsel was present …

SUJAL VISHWAS ATTAVAR & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2026 INSC 442Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant company alleged that the appellants forged documents to obtain a property measurement and sought registration of a FIR. After filing complaints with the Deputy Superintendent of Land Records, the authority declined coercive action and referred the matter to the police, which returned …

SHAILESH KUMARversusSMT. SANJU AND ANOTHER

The husband, Shailesh Kumar Raina, challenged an order dated 8 December 2016 of the Family Court, Gorakhpur, which had partially allowed a Section 125 Cr.P.C. application by his wife and minor daughter, fixing monthly maintenance of Rs 8,000 and Rs 5,000 respectively. Subsequently, a separate …

RAJ BAHADURversusSTATE OF U.P.

In Criminal Appeal No. 849 of 2001 (Raj Bahadur v. State of U.P.), the appellant and the State agreed to settle the dispute out of court and filed a joint affidavit evidencing a compromise between the appellant, the informant Punjab Singh, and the injured witness Rampati. The High Court, after …

SUNITA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Sunita Singh and another appealed against a Special Court order that partially rejected their discharge application under Section 227 Cr.P.C., leaving them charged under Sections 417, 420 IPC and Section 3(2)(5a) of the SC/ST Act. They contended that Section 3(2)(5a) could not apply because the …

RUPESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 13-10-2024 and the cognizance order dated 30-01-2025 in State v. Rupesh, which involved offences under Sections 110 and 352 of the IPC. The parties had already reached a …

SONU MALIKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Sonu Malik alleged that six accused entered her house on 17 April 2024 and raped her while she was pregnant, and she applied under Section 173(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code for registration of an FIR. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissed the application, relying on the …

BHARTI SINGH AND ANOTHERversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court heard a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC challenging a Family Court order dated 5 March 2024 that granted modest maintenance of Rs.3,000 to the wife and Rs.2,500 to her minor son under Section 125 of the CrPC. The wife alleged dowry harassment, forced abortion, …

Vijendra Ram @ Vijendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijendra Ram, the petitioner, has been in custody since 15 January 2021 in connection with a case involving alleged arson of a victim's daughter over a dowry dispute, with charges under Sections 341, 323, 498(A), 307, 34 and 304(B) of the IPC. The petitioner contends that he was not present at the …

Munarik Turiya @ Mundrik TuriyaversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Munarik Turiya, was arrested on 8 April 2023 in connection with a 2021 case alleging that he, along with others, attempted to rape a minor girl under Sections 376(A), 376(B), 376(D) of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement was recorded under Section 164 of …

SANJAY SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault and theft related to a loan dispute with the informant, who is his sister-in-law. The informant claimed the petitioner had taken a loan of Rs. 4,50,000 and …